cover
Article Per Year (5 Year)
All
Home Page
OAI Link
Editorial Team
Contact
Reviewer
Google Scholar
Contact Name
Mochammad Fahlevi
Contact Email
admin@privietlab.org
Phone
+6281211598747
Journal Mail Official
admin@privietlab.org
Editorial Address
Menara Prima Lantai 29 Jl. DR. Ide Anak Agung Gde Agung, RT.5/RW.2, Kuningan, Kuningan Tim., Kecamatan Setiabudi, Kota Jakarta Selatan, Daerah Khusus Ibukota Jakarta 12950
Location
Unknown,
Unknown
INDONESIA
Priviet Social Sciences Journal
Published by PRIVIETLAB
ISSN : 2798866X     EISSN : 27986314     DOI : 10.55942/pssj
Core Subject : Economy, Education, Social,
Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences
PSSJ: Priviet Social Sciences Journal is an open access, monthly peer-reviewed international journal published by PRIVIETLAB. It provides an avenue to academicians, researchers, managers and others to publish their research work that contributes to the knowledge and theory of Social Sciences. PSSJ is published twelve a year. Publisher of Open Access Journals & Books designed to make it easy for worldwide researchers to discover leading-edge scientific research. Working closely with the global scientific community has been at the heart of our book and journal publishing activity. With a portfolio including journals, books, conference proceedings, we focus on Social Sciences and many more. PRIVIETLAB also publishes on behalf of other scientific organizations and represents their needs and those of their members. With worldwide impact, we support researchers, librarians and societies in their endeavours. PRIVIETLAB is an international center for supporting distinguished researchers, teachers, scholars and students who are researching various areas of Business, Science, and Technology. PRIVIETLAB wishes to provide good chances for academic and industry professionals to discuss recent progress in various areas of Business, Science, and Technology. PRIVIETLAB organizes many international conferences, symposia and workshops every year, and provides sponsor or technical support to researchers who wish to organize their own conferences and workshops.
Arjuna Subject : Ilmu Sosial - Ilmu Sosial (Lain-Lain)
Articles 1,067 Documents
 100   101   102   103   104 
GIS-based overlay analysis of flood hazard and settlement exposure in Bandar Lampung City Amjad Malik Perdano; Ahmad Rowatul Irham
Priviet Social Sciences Journal Vol. 6 No. 6 (2026): June 2026
Publisher : Privietlab

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55942/pssj.v6i6.1876

Abstract

Flooding is one of the most frequent hydrometeorological disasters in Indonesia, with increasing intensity due to climate change, rapid urbanization, and inadequate drainage systems. Bandar Lampung City has experienced a significant rise in flood events, affecting thousands of households and expanding into densely populated residential areas. This study aims to analyze the spatial distribution of flood hazards and their relationship with settlement areas using a Geographic Information System (GIS)-based overlay method. Flood hazard data were obtained from InaRISK (2025), while settlement data were derived from Ina-Geoportal (2022). The overlay analysis was combined with a scoring method to classify hazard levels into low, medium, and high categories. The results indicate that flood-prone areas cover 3,225.69 ha, dominated by the medium hazard class. Settlement areas affected by flood hazards reach 1,539.14 ha, with the majority falling into the medium hazard category. Sub-districts such as Sukarame, Tanjung Senang, and Kedamaian show the highest exposure of settlements to flood hazards. These findings highlight that urban development patterns and land-use changes significantly influence flood vulnerability. Therefore, integrating flood risk considerations into spatial planning and improving drainage systems are essential to reduce potential impacts and support sustainable urban development.
The effect of workload on burnout mediated by work-family conflict among employees Nurul Huda; Herning Indriastuti
Priviet Social Sciences Journal Vol. 6 No. 6 (2026): June 2026
Publisher : Privietlab

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55942/pssj.v6i6.1877

Abstract

This study analyzes the effect of workload on burnout, with Work-Family Conflict (WFC) as a mediating variable, among employees of Bank Rakyat Indonesia (BRI) Branch Office Samarinda 1. The study is grounded in the growing pressure faced by banking employees, including high service demands, extended working hours, strict accuracy requirements, and performance targets that may intensify psychological strain. A quantitative research design was applied using a saturated sampling technique, involving all 84 employees as respondents. Data were collected through questionnaires and analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) with SmartPLS 4.1. The findings reveal that workload has a positive and significant effect on burnout and WFC. WFC also has a positive and significant effect on burnout. Furthermore, WFC partially mediates the relationship between workload and burnout, indicating that excessive workload increases burnout both directly and indirectly by disrupting employees’ balance between work and family roles. These results highlight the importance of workload management, adequate staffing, realistic performance targets, and family-supportive policies to reduce burnout risk. The study contributes to human resource management literature by providing empirical evidence from an Indonesian banking branch context. It also offers practical guidance for managers seeking to sustain employee well-being and service quality.
Addressing biopiracy through the BBNJ agreement's marine genetic resources framework: Reflections from the clarion-clipperton zone for Indonesia’s future Nasywa Intan Ramadhanty
Priviet Social Sciences Journal Vol. 6 No. 6 (2026): June 2026
Publisher : Privietlab

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55942/pssj.v6i6.1882

Abstract

Marine Genetic Resources (MGRs) located in Areas Beyond National Jurisdiction (ABNJ) have long been subject to asymmetric appropriation, with a single corporation controlling 47% of patented marine genetic sequences and entities from just ten countries holding 98% of such patents (Blasiak et al., 2018). This article examines how the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) 1982 facilitates this appropriation through structural legal gaps, how the BBNJ Agreement (2023) addresses them, and the implications for Indonesia. Employing a normative juridical methodology with statutory and conceptual approaches, the study finds that the UNCLOS definition of "resources" excludes MGRs from the Common Heritage of Mankind regime, while Parts XIII–XIV provide no binding benefit-sharing mechanism. These conditions are empirically observable in the Clarion-Clipperton Zone (Rabone et al., 2023). Part II of the BBNJ Agreement (2023) introduces a dedicated MGR framework comprising notification obligations, a Standardized Batch Identifier, and two-phase benefit-sharing; however, four structural limitations persist: retroactivity opt-out, deferred monetary benefit-sharing, derivatives ambiguity, and an unresolved ISA interface (Bodansky, 2024; Humphries, 2025). For Indonesia, capturing the Agreement's opportunities in data access, Special Fund support, and COP participation requires regulatory consolidation across fragmented domestic instruments, a designated national focal point, and strategic investment in deep-sea research capacity.
Enhancing Bawaslu’s investigative authority in electoral crime enforcement Herman Balla; Wiwin Wiwin; Muh. Akbar Fhad Syahril; Phireri Phireri; Sunardi Purwanda; Yuspita Syawaliah
Priviet Social Sciences Journal Vol. 6 No. 6 (2026): June 2026
Publisher : Privietlab

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55942/pssj.v6i6.1896

Abstract

This study examines the urgency of expanding the investigative authority over electoral crimes to the Election Supervisory Body or Badan Pengawas Pemilu (Bawaslu) in response to the persistent ineffectiveness of the Integrated Law Enforcement Center (Sentra Gakkumdu). This ineffectiveness is reflected in the high rate of case dismissals due to insufficient evidence and institutional discrepancies in legal interpretation, ultimately undermining the realization of electoral justice. This study adopts a normative (doctrinal) legal approach, employing statutory, conceptual, and case-based analyses. The data were analyzed qualitatively using descriptive, evaluative, and prescriptive methods. The findings demonstrate that expanding Bawaslu’s investigative authority is a philosophical, sociological, and juridical imperative. From a philosophical and sociological perspective, strengthening Bawaslu’s role is essential to ensure electoral justice and enhance public accountability, supported by the institution’s substantive expertise in electoral matters and a relatively high degree of public trust. Juridically, the Indonesian legal system provides a basis for granting investigative powers to Bawaslu’s Civil Servant Investigators or Penyidik Pegawai Negeri Sipil (PPNS) through an integrated law enforcement framework and the application of meritocratic principles, in line with existing practices in handling special criminal offences. This study recommends that such authority be explicitly regulated (expressis verbis) within electoral legislation through an omnibus law. Furthermore, it proposes a distribution of powers model in which the National Bawaslu is granted authority over national elections, while the Provincial and Regency/City Bawaslu oversee local elections under the coordination of the Indonesian National Police. This framework is expected to provide a legal policy solution for achieving a more effective and efficient system of electoral law enforcement in Indonesia.
Legal Certainty of Marital Property in Mixed Marriages within the Mandalika Special Economic Zone: Marital Property in Mixed Marriages Ayang Afira Anugerahayu; Muhammad Rifaldi Setiawan; Hera Alvina Satriawan; Nathania Permata S; Rosyia Wardani; Muh. Rifki Fitriadi
Priviet Social Sciences Journal Vol. 6 No. 6 (2026): June 2026
Publisher : Privietlab

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55942/pssj.v6i6.1898

Abstract

Mixed marriages between Indonesian citizens and foreign nationals in international tourism areas, such as the Mandalika Special Economic Zone, give rise to various legal consequences, particularly concerning the regulation of marital property and asset ownership. The increasing cross-border socio-economic interaction within the Mandalika Special Economic Zone has contributed to the growing prevalence of mixed marriages. This condition has generated legal issues relating to the certainty of property rights, land tenure, prenuptial and postnuptial agreements, as well as legal protection for Indonesian citizens. This study aims to analyze the legal regulation of marital property in mixed marriages under Indonesian law and to examine the effectiveness of legal protection afforded to Indonesian citizens in the Mandalika Special Economic Zone. The research employs a normative-empirical method with a socio-legal approach. The normative approach examines the Marriage Law, the Indonesian Civil Code, the Basic Agrarian Law, and the Constitutional Court Decision Number 69/PUU-XIII/2015 concerning marital agreements. Meanwhile, the empirical approach explores social and administrative practices relating to asset ownership within the area. The findings demonstrate that the regulation of marital agreements and the separation of property have undergone progressive legal development. Nevertheless, its implementation remains hindered by the low level of public legal awareness, the practice of nominee agreements, limited understanding of the legal consequences of mixed marriages, and the lack of optimal harmonization between family law and agrarian law. Therefore, this study recommends strengthening legal education, optimizing the role of notaries, and reformulating regulations that are more adaptive to the dynamics of international tourism zones. These measures are expected to provide greater legal certainty and more effective legal protection for Indonesian citizens involved in mixed marriages.
The Police negligence in crime enforcement efforts: Ethical sanctions or criminal punishment Anizar Ayu Pratiwi; Fadli Rahman Wahidi
Priviet Social Sciences Journal Vol. 6 No. 6 (2026): June 2026
Publisher : Privietlab

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55942/pssj.v6i6.1900

Abstract

Polri is an institution that participates in its duties and responsibilities to provide service, care and protection to the community. Police attitudes and ethics are regulated in the Code of Ethics and Guidelines for the Conduct of the Polri to limit and avoid arbitrariness and abuse of power, including police negligence in carrying out their duties and responsibilities. The purpose of this study is to determine the ethical and criminal sanctions for Polri’s member and the limitations of ethical and criminal sanctions for police negligence in carrying out their duties. The research method used in this writing is theoretical research based on primary, secondary, and tertiary data sources. Polri as one of the professions, upholds ethics and behavior in carrying out their duties. Any member of the police who violates ethical and disciplinary provisions may be subject to ethical sanctions in accordance with the applicable code of ethics. Meanwhile, legal violations and criminal acts committed by the police can be subject to criminal penalties just like the general public, and thru the applicable criminal justice process and criminal procedure law. Ethical and disciplinary sanctions do not negate criminal penalties, nor do criminal penalties negate ethical sanctions; these sanctions can be applied concurrently
The potential of mangroves as blue carbon in the perspective of maritime law in Indonesia Nathania Permata Satriawan; Hera Alvina Satriawan
Priviet Social Sciences Journal Vol. 6 No. 6 (2026): June 2026
Publisher : Privietlab

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55942/pssj.v6i6.1901

Abstract

Climate change has increased the urgency of coastal ecosystem management as a part of global carbon emission mitigation strategies. Mangrove forests are one of the most significant coastal ecosystems because of their capacity to absorb and store large amounts of blue carbon. This study aims to analyze the potential of mangroves as blue carbon from the perspective of maritime law in Indonesia and to examine the strengthening of legal regulations through Government Regulation or Peraturan Pemerintah (PP) No. 27 of 2025 concerning the Protection and Management of Mangrove Ecosystems. This study utilizes a normative legal research methodology based on statutory and conceptual frameworks. Legal materials were obtained from legislation, scientific journals, and relevant literature on mangrove protection and climate change policies. The results indicate that mangroves serve important functions as coastal ecosystem protectors, natural carbon sinks, and climate change mitigation instruments in the framework of sustainable development. The enactment of PP No. 27 of 2025 strengthens the legal basis for mangrove management through integrated measures involving the protection, rehabilitation, conservation, and damage control of mangrove ecosystems. Nevertheless, the implementation of such regulations still encounters challenges, including weak supervision, overlapping institutional authority, and increasing pressure from coastal development activities. Therefore, policy synergy and strengthened governance are required to ensure the sustainability of Indonesia’s mangrove ecosystems.
Game Based Learning (GBL) as an innovative approach in social system learning: An experimental study at SMP Negeri 1 Balocci Hudayah Sulaiman; Indriani Indriani; Ramdani Sidik; A Hardiyanti; Alwi Usra Usman
Priviet Social Sciences Journal Vol. 6 No. 6 (2026): June 2026
Publisher : Privietlab

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55942/pssj.v6i6.1910

Abstract

This study examined the effectiveness of Game-Based Learning (GBL) as an innovative instructional approach for improving students’ understanding of social system concepts in Social Studies education. A quasi-experimental design employing a Non-Equivalent Control Group Design was used. The participants consisted of 30 eighth-grade students at SMP Negeri 1 Balocci, divided into an experimental group (n = 15) and a control group (n = 15). Data were collected through pretests, posttests, and classroom observations. The experimental group received instruction through Game-Based Learning activities, while the control group received conventional instruction. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Shapiro–Wilk normality tests, Levene’s homogeneity test, Independent Samples t-test, and N-Gain analysis. The results revealed a significant difference between the two groups, with the experimental group achieving a higher posttest mean score (M = 90.75) than the control group (M = 72.20). The N-Gain score also indicated a higher level of learning improvement in the experimental group (0.78) compared with the control group (0.58). These findings suggest that Game-Based Learning effectively enhances students’ learning outcomes, engagement, and conceptual understanding of social systems. The study concludes that GBL is a promising pedagogical strategy for transforming abstract social studies concepts into meaningful and engaging learning experiences.
The disparity of legal certainty in fiduciary guarantee execution following the Constitutional Court Decision Number 18/PUU-XVII/2019 based on a comparative study with Mortgage Jamie Armadi Jaya; Henry Anderson Parapat; Faizal Achmad; Ananda Pradhitya Tenggara; Muhammad Viegri
Priviet Social Sciences Journal Vol. 6 No. 6 (2026): June 2026
Publisher : Privietlab

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55942/pssj.v6i6.1913

Abstract

In rem security institutions are fundamentally established as mechanisms to safeguard investments by providing an Executorial Title to ensure the certainty of debt recovery. However, this landscape has undergone a paradigm shift following the Constitutional Court Decision Number 18/PUU-XVII/2019, which degrades creditors' rights and generates legal dualism between Fiduciary Guarantees and Mortgage Rights. Utilizing a normative legal research method with statutory and conceptual approaches, this article demonstrates that the Constitutional Court decision explicitly weakens fiduciary creditors tied to the doctrine of constitutum possessorium by transforming an independent parate execution process that once represented summary justice into a conditional execution mechanism that requires a written consensus on default and the voluntary surrender of the asset by the debtor. This alteration creates a strategic loophole for bad faith debtors, downgrades the status of the fiduciary certificate to a mere piece of ordinary civil evidence, and forces creditors into a prolonged and costly district court bureaucracy while exposing them to heightened moral hazards, such as the concealment or transfer of movable collateral. Furthermore, the comparative normative analysis identifies a sharp disparity that violates the principle of equality before the law and Aristotelian distributive justice, as fiduciary execution is paralyzed by procedural barriers while the Mortgage Law maintains its absolute and direct executorial title without judicial intervention. This imbalance completely disregards the economic characteristics of the collateral, in which movable fiduciary assets undergo rapid annual value depreciation compared to stable or appreciating mortgage objects, such as land and buildings. This means that execution delays caused by litigation cycles risk rendering the creditor's legal protection financially hollow.
Alternative Dispute Resolution and State Legitimacy in Sudan: A Socio-Legal Analysis of Informal Justice and Governance Fragmentation Fatima Abdelnasir Hammad Ahmed
Priviet Social Sciences Journal Vol. 6 No. 6 (2026): June 2026
Publisher : Privietlab

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55942/pssj.v6i6.1915

Abstract

State legitimacy in fragile political environments is increasingly shaped by the interaction between formal legal institutions and informal systems of dispute resolution, yet existing scholarship often treats alternative dispute resolution (ADR) either as a technical access-to-justice mechanism or as a culturally bounded expression of legal pluralism. This framing insufficiently explains how informal justice systems participate in the redistribution of governance authority under conditions of institutional fragmentation. This article examines how ADR mechanisms in Sudan function as politically embedded structures of legitimacy production within a fragmented governance order characterized by conflict, contested sovereignty, and weakened state institutions. Drawing upon a qualitative socio-legal and interpretive governance research design grounded in legal pluralism and postcolonial institutional analysis, the study analyzes constitutional frameworks, institutional reports, governance materials, and socio-legal scholarship relating to Sudan’s informal justice landscape between 2005 and 2025. The findings demonstrate that ADR mechanisms operate not merely as supplementary legal forums, but as parallel governance infrastructures that simultaneously stabilize localized order and deepen fragmented sovereignty. The article advances scholarship by reconceptualizing informal dispute resolution as a legitimacy-producing governance structure rather than a peripheral procedural alternative, thereby refining prevailing understandings of legal pluralism, fragile statehood, and institutional authority in conflict-affected societies.

Page 102 of 107 | Total Record : 1067

 100   101   102   103   104 

Filter by Year

2021 2026


Reset
Filter By Issues
All Issue Vol. 6 No. 7 (2026): July 2026 Vol. 6 No. 6 (2026): June 2026 Vol. 6 No. 5 (2026): May 2026 Vol. 6 No. 4 (2026): April 2026 Vol. 6 No. 3 (2026): March 2026 Vol. 6 No. 2 (2026): February 2026 Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): January 2026 Vol. 5 No. 12 (2025): December 2025 Vol. 5 No. 11 (2025): November 2025 Vol. 5 No. 10 (2025): October 2025 Vol. 5 No. 9 (2025): September 2025 Vol. 5 No. 8 (2025): August 2025 Vol. 5 No. 7 (2025): July 2025 Vol. 5 No. 6 (2025): June 2025 Vol. 5 No. 5 (2025): May 2025 Vol. 5 No. 4 (2025): April 2025 Vol. 5 No. 3 (2025): March 2025 Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): February 2025 Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025): January 2025 Vol. 4 No. 12 (2024): December 2024 Vol. 4 No. 11 (2024): November 2024 Vol. 4 No. 10 (2024): October 2024 Vol. 4 No. 9 (2024): September 2024 Vol. 4 No. 8 (2024): August 2024 Vol. 4 No. 7 (2024): July 2024 Vol. 4 No. 6 (2024): June 2024 Vol. 4 No. 5 (2024): May 2024 Vol. 4 No. 4 (2024): April 2024 Vol. 4 No. 3 (2024): March 2024 Vol. 4 No. 2 (2024): February 2024 Vol. 4 No. 1 (2024): January 2024 Vol. 3 No. 12 (2023): December 2023 Vol. 3 No. 11 (2023): November 2023 Vol. 3 No. 10 (2023): October 2023 Vol. 3 No. 9 (2023): September 2023 Vol. 3 No. 8 (2023): August 2023 Vol. 3 No. 7 (2023): July 2023 Vol. 3 No. 6 (2023): June 2023 Vol. 3 No. 5 (2023): May 2023 Vol. 3 No. 4 (2023): April 2023 Vol. 3 No. 3 (2023): March 2023 Vol. 3 No. 2 (2023): February 2023 Vol. 3 No. 1 (2023): January 2023 Vol. 2 No. 12 (2022): December 2022 Vol. 2 No. 11 (2022): November 2022 Vol. 2 No. 10 (2022): October 2022 Vol. 2 No. 9 (2022): September 2022 Vol. 2 No. 8 (2022): August 2022 Vol. 2 No. 7 (2022): July 2022 Vol. 2 No. 6 (2022): June 2022 Vol. 2 No. 5 (2022): May 2022 Vol. 2 No. 4 (2022): April 2022 Vol. 2 No. 4 (2022): December 2022 Vol. 2 No. 3 (2022): November 2022 Vol. 2 No. 3 (2022): March 2022 Vol. 2 No. 2 (2022): September 2022 Vol. 2 No. 2 (2022): February 2022 Vol. 2 No. 1 (2022): January Vol. 1 No. 6 (2021): December Vol. 1 No. 5 (2021): November Vol. 1 No. 4 (2021): October Vol. 1 No. 3 (2021): September Vol. 1 No. 2 (2021): August Vol. 1 No. 1 (2021): July More Issue