Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
9.826
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Lentera Hukum Arena Hukum Veritas et Justitia Perspektif : Kajian Masalah Hukum dan Pembangunan Asy-Syir'ah: Jurnal Ilmu Syari'ah dan Hukum Inklusi Journal of Disability Studies Widya Yuridika Jurnal Hukum Samudra Keadilan Jurnal Pro Hukum : Jurnal Penelitian Bidang Hukum Universitas Gresik Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Unes Law Review JURNAL ILMIAH ADVOKASI Jurnal Al-Dustur JURNAL HUKUM MEDIA JUSTITIA NUSANTARA UNTAG Law Review Jurnal Darma Agung Legal Spirit Jurnal Supremasi Risalah Hukum Nusantara Science and Technology Proceedings Journal Presumption of Law Jurnal Kompilasi Hukum Keadilan Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan KADARKUM: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat UNES Journal of Swara Justisia Veteran Justice Journal Yustisia Tirtayasa: Jurnal Tugas Akhir KARYA: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Veteran Society : Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance Jurnal Hukum Legalita Private Law Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik (JIHHP) Lex Publica JOSAR (Journal of Students Academic Research) Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan Keadilan Fundamentum: Jurnal Pengabdian Multidisiplin Lex Stricta : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kertha Semaya : Journal Ilmu Hukum Jurnal Kajian Pembaruan Hukum
ADHITYA WIDYA KARTIKA
Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jawa Timur
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Engineering Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Medicine & Pharmacology Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 83 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 83 Documents
Search

 5   6   7   8   9 
ANALISIS YURIDIS TERHADAP PENYELESAIAN PERKARA PELANGGARAN KODE ETIK PENYELENGGARA PEMILIHAN UMUM (STUDI PUTUSAN DKPP NOMOR 317-PKE-DKPP/X/2019): LEGAL ANALYSIS OF THE SETTLEMENT OF CASES OF VIOLATIONS OF THE CODE OF ETHICS OF GENERAL ELECTION ORGANIZERS (STUDY OF DKPP DECISION NUMBER 317-PKE-DKPP/X/2019) Imron Rosadi; Adhitya Widya Kartika
Journal Presumption of Law Vol 6 No 2 (2024): Volume 6 Nomor 2 Tahun 2024
Publisher : Universitas Majalengka

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31949/jpl.v6i2.9131

Abstract

Etika memiliki peran penting bagi penyelenggara Pemilu untuk terciptanya Pemilu yang sesuai dengan prinsip demokrasi. Dewan Kehormatan Penyelenggara Pemilihan Umum (DKPP) merupakan lembaga etik Pemilu yang berwenang untuk memeriksa dan mengadili aduan perkara pelanggaran kode etik. DKPP dalam menjalankan kewenangan harus berpedoman pada hukum acara yang telah diatur dalam peraturan perundang-undangan. Tujuan dari penelitian ini untuk menganalisis Putusan DKPP Nomor 317-PKE-DKPP/X/2019 berdasarkan peraturan perundang-undangan dan menjelaskan upaya hukum yang dapat ditempuh para pihak akibat adanya Putusan DKPP. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian normatif. Data penelitian terdiri dari data primer dan data sekunder yang diperoleh dari studi pustaka dan analisis peraturan. Hasil penelitian ditemukan ketidaksesuaian penerapan aspek prosedural dan subtansial seperti objek sengketa dalam perkara tersebut bukan ranah pelanggaran etik sehingga DKPP dianggap melampaui kewenangannya, Pengadu telah mencabut aduannya dan pelaksanaan rapat pleno anggota DKPP yang tidak sesuai dengan hukum acara DKPP. Adapun upaya hukum yang dapat ditempuh para pihak apabila merasa dirugikan dapat menggugat Keputusan Tata Usaha Negara (KTUN) yang merupakan tindakan lanjut dari Putusan DKPP ke Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara.
Analisis Yuridis Kewenangan Absolut Pengadilan Negeri Dalam Memutus Sengketa Gugatan Perbuatan Melanggar Hukum Terhadap Lembaga Pemerintah (Studi Putusan Nomor: 771/PDT.G/2022/PN JKT.PST) Averoezy, Fauzul; Kartika, Adhitya Widya
Lex Stricta : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026)
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Sumpah Pemuda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46839/lexstricta.v4i3.1501

Abstract

Jurisdiction is one of the most common defenses raised in civil disputes, as it determines whether a case falls within the jurisdiction of the court hearing it. This study is motivated by the discrepancy between legal theory and the practice of law enforcement. The methodology employed is a normative legal approach, utilizing statutory analysis, case law analysis through comparable rulings, and a conceptual analysis regarding jurisdiction, unlawful acts, lawsuits, and government agencies. This study aims to outline the elements of the case, particularly regarding the liability of government agencies for alleged PMH, and to analyze the application of positive law in Indonesia. The results of the study indicate that: (1) the government agency cannot be held liable for PMH because the elements of the alleged provision have not been met; and (2) the panel of judges at the Central Jakarta District Court should have declared that it lacked jurisdiction to hear the case, as jurisdiction lies with the Jakarta Administrative Court.
ANALISIS IMPLEMENTASI DISIPLIN PNS SEBAGAI INSTRUMEN MANAJEMEN PNS DI PTUN SURABAYA Nadia Faizah Putri Devina; Adhitya Widya Kartika
Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi Vol 14, No 1 (2026): Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi
Publisher : Universitas Labuhanbatu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36987/jiad.v14i1.8087

Abstract

Civil servants (PNS) are state apparatuses who play a strategic role in the implementation of public services, including supporting judicial functions at the Surabaya Administrative Court (PTUN Surabaya). In this context, the enforcement of civil servant discipline serves as a crucial instrument in realizing effective, professional, and accountable human resource management. This study aims to analyze the implementation of civil servant discipline in supporting personnel management at PTUN Surabaya, as well as to identify the supporting and inhibiting factors. This research employs an empirical juridical method with a qualitative approach, where data are collected through observation and interviews and analyzed using a descriptive-analytical framework. The findings indicate that the implementation of civil servant discipline at PTUN Surabaya has been relatively effective, as reflected in internal policies and work programs developed by the Subdivision of Personnel, Organization, and Governance. These programs include attendance monitoring, performance supervision, and the strengthening of a discipline-based work culture. However, this study also identifies several challenges in implementation, such as the lack of continuous supervision and variations in compliance levels among employees. The main contribution of this research lies in identifying an effective discipline implementation model based on internal work programs that enhance the quality of personnel management, while also emphasizing the importance of strengthening supervision and consistent capacity-building measures. Therefore, civil servant discipline functions not only as a control mechanism but also as a fundamental pillar in building professional and integrity-based personnel management within PTUN Surabaya.Keywords: Civil Service, Civil Servants, Discipline, Personnel Management, Administrative Court
Perlindungan Hukum Modifikasi Game Pihak Ketiga Studi Kasus GTA San Andreas Indonesia Hak Cipta Kristoforus Pedro Naibaho; Adhitya Widya Kartika
Journal Kompilasi Hukum Vol. 11 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal Kompilasi Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/jkh.v11i1.357

Abstract

The proliferation of user-generated game modifications in Indonesia, exemplified by the GTA San Andreas Indonesia project, has created significant legal tension between grassroots digital creativity and the exclusive rights of copyright holders. This local modification transforms the original Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas by injecting Indonesian socio-cultural elements, yet it operates without formal authorisation from the rights holder, Rockstar Games, thereby raising fundamental questions about the boundaries of derivative works under Indonesian law. This study aims to analyse the legal status of third-party game modifications within the framework of Law No. 28 of 2014 on Copyright and to examine the forms of legal liability arising from potential violations of the original creator’s moral and economic rights, as well as the contradictions inherent in End User License Agreements (EULA). Employing a normative juridical method, this research utilises statutory and conceptual approaches to critically evaluate the applicable legal norms against the realities of digital innovation. The findings reveal that, from a positivist legal standpoint, the GTA San Andreas Indonesia modification constitutes an unlawful derivative work due to the absence of written consent from the copyright owner, as mandated by Article 9 of the Copyright Law. Furthermore, the circumvention of technological protection measures through reverse engineering techniques explicitly violates Article 52 of the same law. The analysis further indicates that while such modifications formally infringe upon the creator’s moral and economic rights, the selective tolerance exhibited by developers operates merely as a strategy of “tolerated infringement”, thereby creating profound legal uncertainty. The study concludes that the current legal framework fails to accommodate the transformative socio-cultural value of non-commercial modding, underscoring an urgent need for regulatory reform to establish fair use parameters and balance exclusive rights with public innovation.
IMPLEMENTASI PEMBENTUKAN RANCANGAN PERATURAN WALI KOTA SURABAYA TENTANG POSYANDU BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG PEMBENTUKAN PERATURAN PERUNDANG-UNDANGAN Moch. Rafli Wahyu Dwi Saputra; Adhitya Widya Kartika
Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 10 No. 1 (2026): Legal Standing
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24269/ls.v10i1.12903

Abstract

This research addresses the low level of public understanding regarding the procedure for drafting the Surabaya Mayor Regulation (Raperwali) on Posyandu, despite the mechanism being regulated in Law No. 12 of 2011 on the Formation of Laws and Regulations and its implementing provisions. The limited knowledge of the stages of planning, drafting, deliberation, ratification, and promulgation creates a gap between the normative process conducted by the local government and community involvement as stakeholders. This study employs a descriptive qualitative approach through field research and document analysis. Primary data were obtained from in-depth interviews with officials involved in the drafting process, while secondary data were collected from legal and administrative documents. The findings indicate that the drafting of the Surabaya Mayor Regulation on Posyandu generally complies with applicable statutory provisions; however, several obstacles remain, including limited human resources, the lack of legal drafting experts, and lengthy bureaucratic procedures. Therefore, although the regulation has a valid legal and procedural basis, strengthening transparency, cross-sectoral coordination, and institutional capacity is necessary to enhance its effectiveness and legitimacy. Ultimately, the Mayor Regulation on Posyandu serves not only as an administrative legal instrument but also as a means of community empowerment in supporting the achievement of Minimum Service Standards (SPM) in public services.
PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA KREDIT MACET PROGRAM NASIONAL PEMBERDAYAAN MASYARAKAT SIMPAN PINJAM PEREMPUAN DI KABUPATEN KEDIRI Randita Putri Nugraini; Adhitya Widya Kartika
Jurnal Hukum Samudra Keadilan Vol 20 No 2 (2025): Jurnal Hukum Samudra Keadilan
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Samudra

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33059/jhsk.v20i2.11729

Abstract

PNPM Kelompok SPP yang ada di Kecamatan Kayen Kidul Kabupaten Kediri beroperasi sejak tahun 2009, dimana dalam pelaksanaanya menemui hambatan terjadi kredit macet angsuran setiap bulannya dari pemanfaat dana SPP. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis hubungan hukum dari para pihak pada pelaksanaannya serta untuk menganalisis bentuk penyelesaian sengketa kredit macet pada PNPM Kelompok SPP di Kecamatan Kayen Kidul Kabupaten Kediri. Metode penelitian yang digunakan yaitu metode penelitian hukum empiris yang mana dalam memperoleh data menggunakan dua cara yakni wawancara bersama pihak Badan Usaha Milik Desa (Bumdesma) Kayen Kidul Sehati LKD dan menggunakan sumber lain yang memiliki relevansi pada penelitian berupa daftar peraturan-peraturan, buku, dan jurnal yang ada. Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah penyelesaian sengketa yang dilakukan sudah sesuai dengan prosedur yang ada, akan tetapi kurangnya pegawai menghambat jalannya prosedur yang ada. Kesimpulan dari penelitian ini adalah hambatan yang ada dalam prosedur penyelesaian sengketa seharusnya segera di atasi dengan membuka program magang sebagai tambahan bantuan di kantor.
Analisis Hukum Perlindungan Data Pribadi Warga Negara Terkait Identitas Kependudukan Dalam Permendagri Nomor 72 Tahun 2022 Tentang Standar dan Spesifikasi Perangkat Keras, Perangkat Lunak, dan Blangko Kartu Tanda Penduduk Elektronik Serta Penyelenggaraan Identitas Kependudukan Digital Legal Analysis Of Citizens Personal Data Protection Related to Population Identity in the Minister Of Home Affairs Regulation Number 72 Of 2022 Concerning Standards And Specifications For Hardware, Software, And El Nadia Nadia Asyroful Aulia; Adhitya Widya Kartika
Jurnal Supremasi Vol 16 No 1 (2026): Volume 16 Nomor 1 Tahun 2026
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Balitar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35457/supremasi.v16i1.5511

Abstract

Penelitian ini mengkaji perlindungan data pribadi warga negara dalam penyelenggaraan IKD sebagai elemen strategis dalam transformasi digital penyelenggaraan layanan publik. Latar belakang penelitian berangkat dari meningkatnya integrasi data kependudukan yang menimbulkan risiko hukum terhadap hak privasi warga negara. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah menganalisis kesesuaian pengaturan Identitas Kependudukan Digital dengan prinsip perlindungan data pribadi serta merumuskan kebutuhan penguatan norma hukum. Kajian ini berlandaskan pada metode kajian hukum normatif yang mengakomodasi pendekatan terhadap peraturan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan komparatif. Temuan studi mengungkapkan terdapat pengaturan yang telah menerapkan prinsip dasar perlindungan data pribadi, namun masih menyisakan kelemahan pada aspek pengawasan, persetujuan subjek data, dan mekanisme pertanggungjawaban. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa penguatan dan harmonisasi norma hukum diperlukan agar digitalisasi administrasi kependudukan berjalan efektif sekaligus melindungi hak konstitusional warga negara. This study focuses on the examination of legal protections afforded to citizens in relation to their personal data within the implementation of Digital Population identity as part of public service digital transformation. The research is grounded in concerns over increasing data integration that generates legal risks to individual privacy rights. This investigation seeks to evaluate whether regulatory frameworks governing digital population identity are consistent with personal data protection standards and to analyze the imperative for normative refinement. The study is based on normative legal research incorporating approaches to regulation, conceptual analysis, and comparison. The study's outcomes reveal that existing regulations have incorporated fundamental data protection principles, yet weaknesses remain in supervisory mechanisms, data subject consent, and state accountability. The study concludes that normative strengthening and regulatory harmonization are essential to ensure that digital population identity not only enhances administrative efficiency but also guarantees substantive protection of citizens' constitutional rights,
Regulatory Harmonization of Academic Freedom Provisions in the National Education System Brian Bottor Lubis; Adhitya Widya Kartika
Lex Publica Vol. 11 No. 1 (2024)
Publisher : APPTHI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58829/lp.11.1.2024.266

Abstract

This research examines the inconsistencies in the provisions of Article 24 of Law Number 20 of 2003 on the National Education System and the implementation of Government Regulation Number 57 of 2021 concerning academic freedom and higher education autonomy. Despite the legal framework’s intent to promote academic freedom and autonomy, the absence of references to Article 24 in the preamble of the regulation creates disharmony, leading to legal uncertainty and confusion. The research aims to assess the legal impact of these inconsistencies on Indonesia’s national education policies and practices. Using a normative legal methodology, the study employs a legislative approach and analyzes the legal hierarchy to evaluate the alignment of laws and regulations. The analysis reveals that the failure to include Article 24 in the considerations of Government Regulation Number 57/2021 violates the principle of legal hierarchy and undermines the effectiveness of the law. This disharmony results in legal confusion, inconsistent law enforcement, inefficiency in policy implementation, and a potential decline in the quality of education. The study suggests several solutions, including judicial review, revision of laws, and improved harmonization strategies.
Efektivitas Implementasi Prinsip Kenyamanan Penumpang Bus di Terminal Purabaya dalam Perspektif Undang-Undang Nomor 22 Tahun 2009 Deyna Keysha Savira; Adhitya Widya Kartika
Private Law Vol 6 No 1 (2026): Private Law Universitas Mataram
Publisher : Faculty of Law, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/jf1pcr52

Abstract

Hukum pengangkutan mengatur kewajiban penyelenggara angkutan umum untuk memberikan pelayanan yang aman dan nyaman kepada penumpang sebagaimana diatur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 22 Tahun 2009 tentang Lalu Lintas dan Angkutan Jalan. Namun, dalam praktik penyelenggaraan pengangkutan bus di Terminal Purabaya masih ditemukan pelanggaran terhadap prinsip kenyamanan penumpang, seperti kelebihan kapasitas, penumpang yang telah membeli tiket namun tidak memperoleh tempat duduk, serta keterbatasan sarana dan prasarana pendukung. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis tingkat efektivitas penerapan prinsip kenyamanan penumpang bus dalam perspektif hukum pengangkutan serta hambatan pengawasannya. Metode yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum empiris dengan pendekatan yuridis-empiris melalui observasi dan wawancara dengan penumpang, pengelola terminal, serta perusahaan otobus. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penerapan prinsip kenyamanan penumpang di Terminal Purabaya belum efektif, yang ditunjukkan oleh masih ditemukannya praktik overkapasitas pada jam-jam tertentu, ketidaksesuaian antara jumlah tiket terjual dan kapasitas tempat duduk, serta minimnya penegakan sanksi administratif terhadap pelanggaran. Kondisi tersebut disebabkan oleh lemahnya pengawasan, rendahnya kepatuhan perusahaan otobus, serta belum optimalnya koordinasi antarinstansi terkait. Secara ilmiah, penelitian ini berkontribusi dalam mempertegas indikator efektivitas hukum pengangkutan berbasis pemenuhan hak kenyamanan penumpang sebagai bagian dari perlindungan konsumen jasa transportasi. Implikasi hukumnya menunjukkan perlunya penguatan mekanisme pengawasan dan penerapan sanksi yang konsisten guna menjamin kepastian hukum dan perlindungan hak penumpang.  
Pelaksanaan Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Dengan Dakwaan Pasal 372 KUHP Dan/Atau Pasal 378 KUHP Di Kejaksaan Negeri Jombang Azzahra Aisyah Ayurveda; Adhitya Widya Kartika
Lex Stricta : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026)
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Sumpah Pemuda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46839/lexstricta.v4i3.1523

Abstract

The Study of Law enforcement concerning the criminal act of embezzlement as regulated in Article 372 of the Indonesian Criminal Code (KUHP) and the criminal act of fraud as regulated in Article 378 of the KUHP highlights the importance of analyzing the prosecutor’s considerations in drafting an indictment. This research aims to understand how prosecutors determine the appropriate legal basis, whether by applying Article 372, Article 378, or both in an alternative construction, and how such legal considerations affect the criminal justice process. The findings indicate that in formulating an indictment, prosecutors take into account the elements of the criminal act, witness testimonies, documentary evidence, and facts obtained during investigation. The use of combined charges under Article 372 and/or Article 378 KUHP is intended to ensure legal certainty while providing flexibility for judges in evaluating evidence during trial. Obstacles encountered include difficulties in proving criminal intent, divergent interpretations of legal elements, and the unavailability of key witnesses. Prosecutors overcome these challenges through strengthened coordination with investigators, sharpening juridical analysis, and selecting the most suitable indictment strategy. This study affirms that prosecutorial considerations in choosing the applicable articles of indictment play a central role in ensuring the effectiveness of law enforcement.
Co-Authors Abdullah Fikri, Abdullah Aditya Mahendra Adrian, Sesilia Firsty Ahmad Luthfi Ainun Nisa, Miskha Aldira Mara Ditta Caesar Purwanto Angelina, Ajeng Julia Aprillia, Aisyah Ariyanto, Muhamad Rizky Averoezy, Fauzul Ayu Ramadhani, Binanda Aziyah, Vivi Nur Azzahra Aisyah Ayurveda Baharudin, Achmad Khozin Brian Bottor Lubis Camellia, Lintang Zandra Della Nanda Iswanto Deyna Keysha Savira Diniroja, Syahda Aneira Edghar Abdullah Albab Elmi, Arini Aghniya Fernanda, Fadila Firensya, Nickita Michaela Hani Diaz Valentian Harun Al Rasyid Prasetyo Imron Rosadi Indawati, Yana Isna Veviati Iswanto, Della Nanda Jannah, Yunita Roudhotul Karin Andhita Putri Kristoforus Pedro Naibaho Lia Antasiyah Marcelda, Ardicha Caterine Masrur, Mohammad Abdullah Maulani, Zihan Mira Diva Prasyanti Miskha Ainun Nisa Moch. Rafli Wahyu Dwi Saputra Muhammad Juniar Prabowo Nadia Faizah Putri Devina Nadia Faizah Putri Devina Nadia Nadia Asyroful Aulia Nanda Tribramantya Purnama Nikita, Tinara Aisyah Novia Ayu Permatasari Nunung Puji Rahayu Nur Rais Madjid Nur Rais Madjid Prabowo, Muhammad Juniar Prasantyo, Rafi Danendra Prasyanti, Mira Diva Pratiani, Olivia Putri, Karin Andhita Radya Dzuhrizha Rahmana Radya Dzuhrizha Rahmana Rafi Danendra Prasantyo Randita Putri Nugraini Rofiq, Achmad Rosawati, Nirda Nanda Salsabila Salsabila Salsabila, Salsabila Suryana, Eka Pala SUTRISNO SUTRISNO Sutrisno, Sutrisno Sutrisno, Sutrisno Trisnaningrum, Roshita Anggun Tsania Manzil Assolich Valentian, Hani Diaz Wahyuda, Muhammad Riyan Widyanto Dwi Jatmiko WIWIN YULIANINGSIH Wiwin Yulianingsih Yana Indawati Yehezkiel Cristofer Tambunan Zahro, Ulum Fatimatus Zaidan Nabil Al Farizi