Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
4.567
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Masalah-Masalah Hukum Jurnal Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Undiksha Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM International Journal of Law Reconstruction INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF CRIMINAL LAW STUDIES JURNAL CENDEKIA HUKUM SOL JUSTICIA Musamus Law Review Jurnal Restorative Justice Al-Adalah: Jurnal Hukum dan Politik Islam Hermeneutika : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Abdimas Galuh: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Musamus Devotion Journal Jurnal Komunitas Yustisia MAQASIDI Parta: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review (JILPR) KREATIF: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Nusantara Safari : Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Indonesia AHKAM : Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Humaniora SASI AKSELERASI: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Indonesia Bergerak: Jurnal Hasil Kegiatan Pengabdian Masyarakat Animha Law Journal Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Studies KREATIF: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Nusantara Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Indonesia
Rudini Hasyim Rado
Faculty Of Law, Musamus University
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Nursing Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 37 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Musamus Law Review

 1 
Customary Institutions in the Kei Indigenous Community Against Criminal Case Resolution Rudini Hasyim Rado
Musamus Law Review Vol 3 No 1 (2020): MuLaRev
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Musamus University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35724/mularev.v3i1.3495

Abstract

This research is focused on exploring the values of Kei customary law on the settlement of criminal cases that are resolved through customary institutions, by proposing 2 (two) problems, First, how is the existence of the law customary criminal Kei? Second, what is the role of customary institutions in the settlement of criminal cases? This research uses non-doctrinal legal research methods with interviews and observations as primary data. Meanwhile, data analysis is inductive and qualitative. It can be concluded that (1) the formal customary law of Kei is the values that live in the community that are agreed upon and are binding on the community, where the settlement of customary Kei crimes is taken in stages starting from the family level, customary institutions (Soa, Orang Kai and the last tier of Rat). (2) the role of traditional institutions in the settlement of criminal cases is starting to strengthen in society, this is indicated by the level of compliance with decisions and sanctions that are stipulated. People believe that customary cases are resolved by “insiders” (customary institutions) through deliberation (dok Tasdov) with a local wisdom approach to create social justice.
Customary Institutions in the Kei Indigenous Community Against Criminal Case Resolution Rudini Hasyim Rado
Musamus Law Review Vol 3 No 1 (2020): MuLaRev
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Musamus University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35724/mularev.v3i1.3495

Abstract

This research is focused on exploring the values of Kei customary law on the settlement of criminal cases that are resolved through customary institutions, by proposing 2 (two) problems, First, how is the existence of the law customary criminal Kei? Second, what is the role of customary institutions in the settlement of criminal cases? This research uses non-doctrinal legal research methods with interviews and observations as primary data. Meanwhile, data analysis is inductive and qualitative. It can be concluded that (1) the formal customary law of Kei is the values that live in the community that are agreed upon and are binding on the community, where the settlement of customary Kei crimes is taken in stages starting from the family level, customary institutions (Soa, Orang Kai and the last tier of Rat). (2) the role of traditional institutions in the settlement of criminal cases is starting to strengthen in society, this is indicated by the level of compliance with decisions and sanctions that are stipulated. People believe that customary cases are resolved by “insiders” (customary institutions) through deliberation (dok Tasdov) with a local wisdom approach to create social justice.
Co-Authors Aldisa Arifudin Aljebra Aliksan Rauf, Muhamad Andi Baso Kumala Andi Ervin Novara Jaya Asriadi Zainuddin Badilla, Nurul Widhanita Y. Betaubun, Restu Monika Nia Binti Abdul Jabar, Nurul Asyikeen Diana Sri Susanti Eki Tolanda Erni Dwita Silambi Erni Dwita Silambi, Erni Dwita Handika Dwi Ardiansyah Pelu Heldiaman Nduru Hermansyah, Agus Kichi Jaya Setiawan Sinaga Julianto Jover Jotam Kalalo M. Saiful Fahmi Marlyn Jane Alputila Muddin, Ahmad Ali Muh. Akbar Fhad Syahril Muhamad Aljebra Aliksan Rauf Muhamad Aljebra Aliksan Rauf Muhammad Saiful Fahmi Muhammad Saiful Fahmi Mulyadi Alrianto Tajuddin Nasri Wijaya Nurul Asyikeen Binti Abdul Jabar Nurul Badillah Nurul Miqat Nurul Widhanita Y Badilla Nurul Widhanita Y. Badilla Parera, Zegovia A Ricardo Goncalves Klau Ricky William Kocop Rulfino Rupang Saleky, Dewa Daniel Andreas Salvadoris Pieter Silubun, Yosman Leonard Solly Aryza Sumarsono, Adi Sumarsono, Adi Sunardi Purwanda Sunarni Sunarni Widyastuti, Rosmala Y. Badilla, Nurul Widhanita Yusril Arba Saputra