Articles
<![CDATA[Dual Mediation : Penyelesaian Perkara Lingkungan Hidup yang Melibatkan Korporasi Sebagai Pelaku Melalui Pendekatan Restorative Justice ]]>
<![CDATA[Ach. Faisol Triwijaya]]>;
<![CDATA[Yaris Adhial Fajrin]]>;
<![CDATA[Chintya Meilany Nurrahma]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 9 No 2 (2020) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[University of Udayana ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2020.v09.i02.p14
<![CDATA[The use of the environment today is very important in order to provide benefits to the community. Utilization must also be balanced with good management and avoid damage. Anomaly in the use of the environment that causes widespread damage occurs where there is a role of the corporation as the main actor. The presence of the PPLH Law has not been able to be a solution amid the chaotic environment utilization that is in line with the damage because the existing legal instruments are not able to overcome the problem. This paper has a purpose to analyze the weakness in the resolution of criminal acts of the environment and the extent to which restorative justice is able to overcome the conflict due to environmental criminal act between the corporation and the community. This research method uses normative legal research methods with a conceptual approach. This study obtained the first result, the legal instrument in the PPLH Law has not shown success where there is still widespread environmental destruction today. Second, through the restorative justice approach it is expected to be able to reduce the number of environmental criminal acts by corporations using the dual mediation pattern, namely the merging of the concepts of civil case mediation and penal mediation so as to create a balance pattern that is in line with the direction of the renewal of national criminal law. Pemanfaatan lingkungan hidup dewasa ini amat penting dilakukan guna memberikan manfaat terhadap masyarakat. Pemanfaatan harus pula diimbangi dengan pengelolaan yang baik dan menghindari kerusakan. Anomali pemanfaatan lingkungan hidup yang menyebabkan kerusakan marak terjadi, di mana terdapat peran korporasi sebagai aktor utama. Kehadiran UU PPLH masih belum mampu menjadi solusi di tengah carut marutnya pemanfaatan lingkungan yang sejalan dengan kerusakan karena instrumen hukum yang ada tidak mampu mengatasi masalah tersebut. Tulisan ini memiliki tujuan untuk menganalisa kelemahan dalam penyelesaian tindak pidana lingkungan hidup dan sejauh mana restorative justice mampu mengatasi konflik akibat tindak pidana lingkungan hidup antara korporasi dan masyarakat. Metode penelitian yang digunakan yaitu penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan konseptual. Penelitian ini memperoleh hasil pertama, instrumen hukum di UU PPLH belum menunjukkan keberhasilan di mana masih maraknya kejadian pengrusakan lingkungan hidup hingga saat ini. Kedua, melalui pendekatan restorative justice diharapkan dapat menekan angka tindak pidana lingkungan hidup oleh korporasi menggunakan pola dual mediasi yaitu penggabungan konsep mediasi perkara perdata dan mediasi penal sehingga dapat menciptakan pola keseimbangan yang selaras dengan arah pembaruan hukum pidana Nasional.]]>
<![CDATA[The Reverse Burden of Proof in Indonesia's Money Laundering: A Review ]]>
<![CDATA[Adinda Putri Jade]]>;
<![CDATA[Yaris Adhial Fajrin]]>;
<![CDATA[Diah Nadia Putri]]>;
<![CDATA[Aisya Sanghra Devi Nugraha]]>
<![CDATA[ Lentera Hukum Vol 7 No 3 (2020): LENTERA HUKUM ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[University of Jember ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.19184/ejlh.v7i3.18680
<![CDATA[Money laundering has become one of Indonesia's serious criminal offenses. Then, cases related to it should proceed under the specific regulation and procedure. In Indonesia, money laundering is a further crime preceded by predicate offenses. In practice, there are two main problems to apply in money laundering: first, the principles' difference between national and international criminal laws, and second, their norm contradiction. Although the money laundering crime is claimed to be a further crime, it is separated from the preceded crime in prosecution, investigation, and evidence. This study aims to review the juridical contention of the reverse burden of proof in money laundering by considering the existing challenges to apply the norms. This study confirms that there is a juridical problem in the reversal of proof mechanism in money laundering. Therefore, the government should harmonize the existing laws relating to the reverse of the burden of proof in money laundering. It is essential to reform the existing regulations by harmonizing laws related to this case. It considers the existing fragmented criminal provisions set out in the Criminal Code and special laws to indicate serious crimes. This harmonization contributes to restoring the return of the state's losses resulted from this crime. Regulatory reform is inevitable. The government then needs to strengthen diplomatic relations with other countries, especially to enforce national laws through Mutual Legal Assistance (MLA) and extradition of money laundering perpetrators. KEYWORDS: Indonesian Money Laundering, Money Laundering Act, Reverse Burden of Proof.]]>
<![CDATA[Principle of Strict Liability in Narcotics Crimes and Efforts to Protect The Rights of Perpetrators ]]>
<![CDATA[Cony Dehas Ratna Devi]]>;
<![CDATA[Yaris Adhial Fajrin]]>;
<![CDATA[Syariful Alam]]>;
<![CDATA[Yohana Puspitasari Wardoyo]]>
<![CDATA[ SALAM: Jurnal Sosial dan Budaya Syar-i Vol 8, No 6 (2021) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Sharia and Law UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.15408/sjsbs.v8i6.23026
<![CDATA[Narcotics abuse cases in Indonesia have been at an alarming level, which causes all levels of society to become targets of victims of narcotics abuse. Efforts to overcome this use two approaches in the narcotics law that regulate it, namely the penal approach and the non-penal approach, which are commonly referred to as the double-track system. As a form of transnational organized crime, narcotics crimes need special efforts to overcome them. Among the many substances of criminal legislation, one of the special measures that can be used is applying the benefits of the existence of the principle of strict liability. The discussion regarding the existence of the principle of strict liability will be the object of study in this paper, namely by using the normative legal research method which prioritizes the study of positive legal provisions and general legal principles. So, it can be found what the strict liability principle is in the teachings of criminal law and the use of the strict liability principle in enforcing criminal law in the field of narcotics in Indonesia. The principle of strict liability can be an option for a new breakthrough in the effectiveness and efficiency of combating narcotics crimes in Indonesia. Although the existence of the principle of strict liability in its implementation provides convenience and practicality for law enforcement officials in carrying out their duties, it also provides an opportunity for injustice. So that the focus of the application of the principle of strict liability is not only used as a means of making it easier but is more used to overcome injustice for the victim or the perpetrator in cases of narcotics abuse so that it will no longer cause an injustice that can injure the basic human rights contained in the paragraph 1 Article 28D of the Indonesia Constitution.Keywords: Narcotics, strict liability, transnational organized crime. Abstrak:Kasus penyalahgunaan narkotika di Indonesia sudah berada pada level yang mengkhawatirkan, yang menyebabkan semua lapisan masyarakat menjadi sasaran korban penyalahgunaan narkotika. Upaya penanggulangannya menggunakan dua pendekatan dalam undang-undang narkotika yang mengaturnya, yaitu pendekatan penal dan pendekatan non penal yang biasa disebut dengan sistem jalur ganda. Sebagai salah satu bentuk kejahatan transnasional terorganisir, kejahatan narkotika memerlukan upaya khusus untuk menanggulanginya. Di antara sekian banyak substansi peraturan perundang-undangan pidana, salah satu upaya khusus yang dapat digunakan adalah dengan menerapkan manfaat dari adanya prinsip pertanggungjawaban yang tegas. Pembahasan mengenai adanya asas strict liability akan menjadi objek kajian dalam tulisan ini, yaitu dengan menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif yang mengutamakan kajian ketentuan hukum positif dan asas hukum umum. Sehingga dapat diketahui apa prinsip strict liability dalam ajaran hukum pidana dan penggunaan prinsip strict liability dalam penegakan hukum pidana di bidang narkotika di Indonesia. Prinsip strict liability dapat menjadi pilihan terobosan baru dalam efektivitas dan efisiensi pemberantasan tindak pidana narkotika di Indonesia. Meskipun adanya prinsip strict liability dalam pelaksanaannya memberikan kemudahan dan kepraktisan bagi aparat penegak hukum dalam menjalankan tugasnya, namun juga memberikan peluang terjadinya ketidakadilan. Sehingga fokus penerapan prinsip strict liability tidak hanya digunakan sebagai sarana untuk mempermudah tetapi lebih banyak digunakan untuk mengatasi ketidakadilan bagi korban atau pelaku dalam kasus penyalahgunaan narkotika sehingga tidak lagi menimbulkan kerugian. ketidakadilan yang dapat mencederai hak asasi manusia yang terkandung dalam ayat 1 Pasal 28D Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia.Kata Kunci: Narkotika; Strict Liability; Kejahatan Terorganisir Transnasional.]]>
<![CDATA[Pencegahan Korupsi Pasca Putusan MK Nomor 71/PUU/XIV/2016 Melalui Pendekatan Kebijakan ]]>
<![CDATA[Yaris Adhial Fajrin]]>;
<![CDATA[Ach. Faisol Triwiwijaya]]>
<![CDATA[ Humani (Hukum dan Masyarakat Madani) Vol 9, No 1 (2019): Mei ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Semarang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (665.297 KB)
|
DOI: 10.26623/humani.v9i1.1443
<![CDATA[Korupsi sebagai extra ordinary crime dalam upaya memberantasnya tidak cukup hanya mengandalkan penegakan hukum pidana yang sifatnya represif namun juga harus menggunakan instrument pencegahan. Namun pasca putusan MK Nomor 71/PUU/XIV/2016 aspek pencegahan dalam rangka tindak pidana korupsi mengalami kemunduran dalam tataran regulasi karena putusan tersebut menyatakan tidak memiliki kekuatan hukum mengikat pasal 7 ayat (2) huruf g Undang-undang Nomor 10 Tahun 2016 yang merupakan salah satu regulasi yag bersifat pencegahan tindak pidana korupsi. Aspek pencegahan dalam upaya pemberantasan korupsi memiliki peran strategis karena tidak cukup apabila hanya menggunakan penegakan yang sifatnya represif. Dipandang dari sisi keadilan Pancasila serta politik kriminal putusan MK Nomor 71/PUU/XIV/2016 merupakan anomali ditengah gencarnya agitasi pemberantasan korupsi di Indonesia dan menyebabkan kerugian bagi masyarakat karena dalam tindak pidana korupsi masyarakat adalah korban.Corruption as an extraordinary crime in an attempt to eradicate it is not enough just to rely on criminal law enforcement that are repressive but also must use the instrument of prevention. But after the Constitutional Court decision No. 71 / PUU / XIV / 2016 aspects of prevention in the context of corruption suffered a setback in the level of regulation because the decision states do not have binding legal force of Article 7 paragraph (2) letter g of Law No. 10 of 2016 which is one regulation meant to be the prevention of corruption. Prevention aspects of the eradication of corruption has a strategic role because it is not enough if it only uses that are repressive enforcement. Viewed from the side of Pancasila justice and criminal politics, the Constitutional Court's decision No. 71 / PUU / XIV / 2016 was an anomaly in the midst of the incessant agitation to eradicate corruption in Indonesia and caused losses to the community because in the corruption act the community was a victim.]]>
<![CDATA[Perempuan dalam Prostitusi: Konstruksi Pelindungan Hukum Terhadap Perempuan Indonesia dari Perspektif Yuridis dan Viktimologi (Women in prostitution: Construction of Legal Protection Towards Indonesian Women from a Juridical and Victimitarian Perspective) ]]>
<![CDATA[Yaris Adhial Fajrin]]>;
<![CDATA[ach faisol triwijaya]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Negara Hukum: Membangun Hukum Untuk Keadilan Vol 10, No 1 (2019): JNH VOL 10 NO. 1 Juni 2019 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Pusat Penelitian Badan Keahlian Setjen DPR RI ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (1199.423 KB)
|
DOI: 10.22212/jnh.v10i1.1203
<![CDATA[The practice of prostitution involving women as the main perpetrator creates a negative stigma that sees women as guilty persons. Even though there are also women who are involved in the practice of prostitution due tocoercion. This condition creates a bias towards the position of the victim in the practice of prostitution. This paper is to examine the involvement of women in the practice of prostitution while also recognizing the position of women that are involved in the practice of prostitution. This research uses the normative juridical research method. Women in the prostitution network can be identified as victims due to both internal and external pressure.Women are perpetrators if involved without any pressure from other parties. Women are victims if they act as service providers, suffered, because of force by power from others, besides the relative requirements of women as victims of prostitution when involved in the practice of prostitution because they have been victims of sexual violence and make prostitution as livelihoods. Thus, it is hoped that legislators will soon be able to formulate limits on victims in the context of legal reform and just law enforcement. AbstrakPraktik prostitusi yang melibatkan perempuan sebagai aktor utama menimbulkan stigma negatif yang memandang perempuan sebagai insan yang bersalah. Padahal adapula perempuan yang terlibat dalam praktik prostitusi diakibatkan keterpaksaaan. Kondisi ini menimbulkan bias terhadap kedudukan korban dalam praktik prostitusi. Tulisan ini untuk mengkaji keterlibatan perempuan dalam praktik prostitusi sekaligus mengetahui kedudukan perempuan yang terlibat dalam praktik prostitusi. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif. Perempuan dalam jaringan prostitusi dapat teridentifikasi sebagai korban akibat tekanan internal maupun eksternalnya. Perempuan sebagai pelaku apabila terlibat tanpa tekanan dari pihak di luar dirinya. Perempuan sebagai korban apabila bertindak sebagai pemberi jasa, menderita, karena dan daya paksa dari orang lain, selain itu syarat relatif perempuan sebagai korban dalam prostitusi manakala terlibat dalam praktik prostitusi karena pernah menjadi korban kekerasan seksual dan prostitusi sebagai mata pencaharian. Diharapkan pembentuk undang-undang segera mungkin untuk merumuskan mengenai batasan korban dalam rangka pembaharuan hukum dan penegakan hukum yang berkeadilan.]]>
<![CDATA[Double Track System bagi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Berlatar Belakang Homoseksualitas (Gagasan dalam Pembaruan Hukum Pidana) ]]>
<![CDATA[Yaris Adhial Fajrin]]>;
<![CDATA[Ach Faisol Triwijaya]]>;
<![CDATA[Moh Aziz Ma’ruf]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Negara Hukum: Membangun Hukum Untuk Keadilan Vol 11, No 2 (2020): JNH Vol 11 No 2 November 2020 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Pusat Penelitian Badan Keahlian Setjen DPR RI ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.22212/jnh.v11i2.1608
<![CDATA[Homosexuality is seen as deviant behavior and often becomes the background of a crime. Punishing a criminal offender who has a homosexual background does not automatically solve a crime. Crime punishment actually has a negative impact on criminal offenders, such as stigmatization and obstruction of any efforts to restore the criminal’s sexual orientation. The purpose of punishment in criminal law reform is to improve criminal offenders into better individuals. Based on this background, the “double track system” becomes a relevant idea to be developed, especially now that Indonesia is in the era of reforming the national criminal law. The issues raised were the position of homosexuality in criminal law and the idea of a double track system against the criminal with a homosexual background. The legal research method used is normative research method. The results show that homosexuality is not a criminal offense under Indonesia’s positive criminal law; it is just that homosexuality can be the cause of a crime. The criminal offenders can be given a sanction of action, given that psychology recognizes that there are various therapies to restore sexual orientation. The idea of a double track system is a reflection of the reform of national criminal law which is oriented towards balance values. These values can be used as a basis for immediate implementation of a double track system legislative policy for criminal offenders with a homosexual background in Indonesia’s criminal system. AbstrakHomoseksualitas dipandang sebagai penyimpangan perilaku, tidak sedikit homoseksual menjadi latar belakang terjadinya suatu tindak pidana. Menjatuhkan pidana terhadap pelaku tindak pidana yang memiliki latar belakang homoseksualitas, tidak serta merta menjadi solusi penyelesaian suatu kejahatan. Pidana justru memberikan dampak negatif terhadap pelaku, seperti stigmatisasi dan terhambatnya upaya mengembalikan orientasi seksual pelaku. Tujuan pemidanaan dalam pembaruan hukum pidana adalah memperbaiki pelaku menjadi individu yang lebih baik. Berdasarkan latar belakang tersebut, “double track system” menjadi gagasan yang relevan untuk diupayakan, terlebih saat ini Indonesia sedang berada pada periode pembaruan hukum pidana nasional. Permasalahan yang diangkat yakni kedudukan homoseksualitas dalam hukum pidana dan gagasan double track system terhadap pelaku tindak pidana berlatarbelakang homoseksualitas. Metode penelitian hukum yang digunakan adalah metode penelitian normatif. Hasil yang didapat bahwa homoseksualitas bukan merupakan tindak pidana menurut hukum pidana positif Indonesia, hanya saja homoseksualitas dapat menjadi penyebab terjadinya tindak pidana. Pelaku tindak pidana tersebut dapat diberikan sanksi tindakan, mengingat dalam ilmu kejiwaan mengenal adanya berbagai terapi pengembalian orientasi seksual. Ide double track system merupakan cerminan pembaruan hukum pidana nasional yang berorientasi kepada nilai-nilai keseimbangan. Manfaat tersebut dapat dijadikan pijakan untuk segera melakukan kebijakan legislasi double track system bagi pelaku tindak pidana yang berlatarbelakang homoseksual dalam sistem pemidanaan di Indonesia.]]>
<![CDATA[QUO VADIS: PANCASILA SEBAGAI JIWA HUKUM INDONESIA ]]>
<![CDATA[Ach Faisol Triwijaya]]>;
<![CDATA[Yaris Adhial Fajrin]]>;
<![CDATA[Arif Prasetyo Wibowo]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Pendidikan PKN (Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan) Vol 1, No 2 (2020): November 2020 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Tanjungpura ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.26418/jppkn.v1i2.41083
<![CDATA[Hukum sebagai pedoman perilaku harus benar-benar bisa menciptakan masyarakat yang tertib, cara yang bisa dilakukan dengan pembentukan hukum yang baik. Mencipta hukum yang baik bisa dilakukan dengan menggunakan Pancasila sebagai pedoman pembentukan. Namun saat ini yang terjadi beberapa undang-undang tidak mencerminkan hal tersebut, sehingga tercipta hukum yang tidak adil. Indonesia sebagai negara penganut positivisme hukum seharusnya taat dengan hirarki peraturan perundang-undangan dengan mencipta hukum yang sesuai dengan Pancasila. Hukum yang demikian akan mampu melewati berbagai rintangan karena Pancasila yang sifatnya terbuka mampu beradaptasi dengan perkembangan zaman.]]>
<![CDATA[Sosialisasi Pengurusan Sertifikat Tanah Wakaf Yang Dikelola oleh Pimpinan Daerah Muhammadiyah Kabupaten Malang ]]>
<![CDATA[Muhammad Luthfi]]>;
<![CDATA[Yaris Adhial Fajrin]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Dedikasi Hukum Vol. 1 No. 1 (2021): April 2021 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (562.584 KB)
|
DOI: 10.22219/jdh.v1i1.16317
<![CDATA[Pendaftaran tanah wakaf merupakan bagian penting dalam perbuatan hukum wakaf dengan tujuan memperkuat aspek legalitas dan kepastian hukum perbuatan hukum wakaf. PDM Kabupaten Malang sebagai pihak yang sering menerima tanah wakaf mempunyai kewajiban untuk melakukan pendaftaran tanah wakaf. Berkenaan dengan hal ini diperlukan sosialisasi pengurusan sertifikasi tanah wakaf. Tujuan dari kegiatan pengabdian ini adalah terciptanya pemahaman tentang pentingnya pendaftaran tanah wakaf dilingkungan PDM Kabupaten Malang. Metode yang digunakan meliputi pertama, koordinasi dengan mitra pengabdi, kedua, sosialisasi pengurusan tanah wakaf secara langsung, dan ketiga, sosialisasi pengurusan tanah wakaf melalui media elektronik. Hasil kegiatan ini bahwa kegiatan sosialisasi ini dilakukan secara umum di wilayah PDM Kabupaten Malang dan secara khusus dilakukan di PCM Tirtoyudo, PCM Ngajum, Dan PCM DAU. Pasca dilakukannya sosialisasi peserta sosialisasi merasa kegiatan ini sangat bermanfaat dalam melakukan proses perwakafan dan pendaftaran tanah wakaf. Sosialisasi pengurusan tanah wakaf melalui media elektronik dilakukan melalui media radio. Socialization of the Management of Waqf Land Certificates Managed by the Regional Leaders of Muhammadiyah Malang Regency. Waqf land registration is an important part of waqf legal action to strengthen the legal aspects and legal certainty of waqf legal acts. PDM Kabupaten Malang as a party that often receives waqf land should register waqf land. Concerning this, it is necessary to socialize the management of waqf land certification. The purpose of this devotional activity is the creation of an understanding of the importance of waqf land registration in the PDM Kabupaten Malang environment. The methods used include first, coordination with service partners, second, socialization of waqf land management directly, and third, socialization of waqf land management through electronic media. The result of this activity is that this socialization activity is conducted in general in PDM Kabupaten Malang area and specifically conducted in PCM Tirtoyudo, PCM Ngajum, And PCM DAU. After the socialization of socialization participants felt that this activity was very useful in conducting the process of waqf land registration and waqf. Socialization of waqf land management through electronic media is conducted through radio media.]]>
<![CDATA[THE CONCEPT OF PENAL MEDIATION FOR DEFAMATION DELICT IN THE INDONESIA ITE LAW AS A MANIFESTATION OF RESTORATIVE JUSTICE ]]>
<![CDATA[Yaris Adhial Fajrin]]>;
<![CDATA[Ach. Faisol Triwijaya]]>
<![CDATA[ Yustisia Jurnal Hukum Vol 9, No 3: December 2020 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20961/yustisia.v9i3.36167
<![CDATA[The paper aimed to analyze the position of defamation as a complaint delict in the ITE Law and the chances of applying penal mediation in the settlement of criminal defamation charges in the ITE Law. This research uses a normative legal research with qualitative analysis techniques. The research result shows that defamation in the field of ITE is a complaint delict that the settlement of the case can be done through the Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) outside the court through penal mediation mechanism. The settlement of criminal cases through penal mediation has been in line with the direction of the renewal of Indonesian criminal law which is moving towards improving the impact of a criminal act as part of the purpose of criminalization. Penal mediation that promotes the values of consensus deliberation is also in line with the basic values of Pancasila, to encourage peace between the conflicting parties and improve the reputation, self-esteem, and dignity of victims damaged by defamation committed by the perpetrators. The advantages of penal mediation have not been followed by the rule of law of the event that regulates specifically the procedure of penal mediation so that not a few cases of defamation are ultimately decided by criminal sanctions to the perpetrators. Therefore, the mechanism of penal mediation needs to be regulated in the Indonesian Criminal Code in the future, to provide guarantees of a fair and beneficial criminal settlement for all parties, as well as a guarantee of the right to free responsible speech.]]>
<![CDATA[Penerapan Asas Praduga Tidak Bersalah (Presumption of Innocent) Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pencurian di Tingkat Penyidikan: Studi di Kepolisian Resort Pamekasan ]]>
<![CDATA[Ahmad Faiz Alamsyah]]>;
<![CDATA[Sidik Sunaryo]]>;
<![CDATA[Yaris Adhial Fajrin]]>
<![CDATA[ Indonesia Law Reform Journal Vol. 2 No. 3 (2022): November, 2022 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (274.796 KB)
|
DOI: 10.22219/ilrej.v2i3.22395
<![CDATA[The principle of the presumption of innocence is one of the principles regulated in the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP). The application of the principle of the presumption of innocence is closely related to the application of rights to individuals, for example to suspects in the crime of theft who are in the process of being investigated. The regulation of these rights is regulated concretely in the Criminal Procedure Code. However, despite this, the application of the principle of the presumption of innocence in this case the application of the rights of the suspect during the arrest and detention process is still not given much attention by police investigators. Therefore, the researcher raised two problem formulations. First, how is the application of every person arrested for committing the crime of theft to be considered innocent until there is an Inkracht Decision at the Pamekasan Police Resort. Second, how is the application of every person who is detained for the crime of theft must be considered innocent until the Inckracht Decision is made by the Pamekasan Resort Police. The research method used is a sociological juridical approach. It can be concluded that in the application of rights in the arrest process, two rights have not been implemented by the Pamekasan Police investigators, namely the suspect's right to ask the investigator to show an arrest warrant (Article 18 paragraph (1) KUHAP) and regarding the right for the family of the arrested suspect to receive a copy of the letter. an immediate arrest order (article 18 paragraph (3) KUHAP). While in the detention process, two rights have not been implemented, namely those related to the suspect's right to give information freely (article 52 KUHAP) and the suspect's right to obtain legal assistance and law enforcers are required to appoint legal counsel (article 54 KUHAP)]]>
