Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search
Journal : JHCLS

The Effectiveness of Administrative Efforts in Reducing State Administration Disputes Ahmad Siboy; Sholahuddin Al-Fatih; Virga Dwi Efendi; Nur Putri Hidayah
Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System Vol 2, No 1 (2022): Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System
Publisher : Lembaga Contrarius Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (583.683 KB) | DOI: 10.53955/jhcls.v2i1.23

Abstract

Regulating administrative efforts as the mandatory procedure is expected to be able to filter and reduce the number of disputes that must be tried by the State Administrative Court. However, the position of administrative efforts is only interpreted as a formality. This study aims to analiyz the position of administrative efforts in the settlement of state administration disputes and to find out how effective the administration efforts in reducing the number of state administration disputes in the State Administrative Courts in East Java. The results indicated that administrative efforts were the embodiment of the state law of Pancasila, but the effectiveness of administrative efforts in East Java was still very low or ineffective in reducing the number of state administrative disputes in the State Administrative Court.
Legal Status of Interfaith Marriage in Indonesia and Its Implications for Registration Bayu Dwi Widdy Jatmiko; Nur Putri Hidayah; Samira Echaib
Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System Vol 2, No 3 (2022): Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System
Publisher : Lembaga Contrarius Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (419.51 KB) | DOI: 10.53955/jhcls.v2i3.43

Abstract

Indonesia's marriage law prohibits interfaith unions. However, this provision has not yet taken effect. This study aims to find out how the legal status of marriage is different religions and how the recording provisions are valid in the eyes of the law. This research uses normative legal research methods, with a regulatory approach and data presentation in the form of descriptive analysis. The results of the research show that, first, regarding legal status, interfaith marriage is invalid in the eyes of the law, because it is contrary to the provisions of Law on marriage. However, based on the Supreme Court's decision couples of different faiths can request a court determination, henceforth to continue to carry out the marriage according to the beliefs held by each bride and groom.  Second, regarding the registration of marriages for interfaith marriages, the bride and groom record them with the civil registry office and will be recorded as non-Islamic marriages.
Artificial Intelligence and Quality of Composition Verdicts in Indonesia: Lessons from New Zealand Hidayah, Nur Putri; Wicaksono, Galih Wasis; Aditya, Christian Sri Kusuma; Munarko, Yuda
Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System Vol. 4 No. 1 (2024): Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System
Publisher : Lembaga Contrarius Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53955/jhcls.v4i1.175

Abstract

The quality of the decision is not only related to the judge's considerations but also its suitability to the composition of the decision so that the resulting decision is not easily overturned at the level of legal action and increases public confidence in the judicial institution. This research aims to analyze the quality of judges' decisions in Indonesia in terms of the composition of the decision texts that have been made. This research uses normative legal research methods, a statutory approach, and a comparative approach. The study results show that decisions are not based on the structure of decisions determined by the Supreme Court. One of the reasons is the minimal use of AI, even though AI can help judges identify which parts of the decision structure are not yet in the decision prepared by the judge and improve them so that it is hoped that it will produce uniformity and decisions that are certain and not easily overturned. Indonesia needs to learn from New Zealand guidelines for using AI at the court and tribunal level. Judges can apply AI, some related to summarizing information and administration.