Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 33 Documents
Search

The Application Of System Based Models Victim Offender Mediation Towards Recovery Of State Financial Losses Due To Corruption In Indonesia Sidabutar, Victor Antonius Saragih; Febrian, Febrian; Nashriana, Nashriana; Achmad, Ruben
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 23 No. 1 (2024): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v23i3.5192

Abstract

In some cases, corruption has the potential to develop into money laundering, which will complicate the performance of law enforcement officers to track suspicious financial transactions and save assets suspected of belonging to the state. In response to this problem, the replacement money payment system is carried out by law enforcement officers. However, based on the results of the investigation, the implementation of replacement money payments for the recovery of state financial losses is considered ineffective and inefficient at the application and execution stages. Therefore, a legal breakthrough is needed in the form of the use of penal mediation as an effort to maximize state financial recovery. The purpose of this study is to identify the problems of recovering state financial losses due to corruption in Indonesia and the application of the victim offender mediation system based models to recovering state financial losses due to corruption in Indonesia. The results of this study indicate that the alternative nature contained in the construction of Article 18 of Law. No. 31 of 1999 has the potential to result in efforts to recover state financial losses being less than optimal and effective, this is due to the tendency of perpetrators to avoid responsibility for paying replacement money. The application of SBM VOM to recovering state financial losses can be done by accommodating the concept of PB in positive law in Indonesia. This research is a normative legal research using 3 approaches, namely the statutory approach (Statute Approach), the conceptual approach (Conceptual Approach) and the comparative approach (Comparative Approach).
Pertanggungjawaban Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pengerdaran sediaan Farmasi Tanpa Izin Edar Kamila, Rifda; Achmad, Ruben
Lex LATA Vol. 7 No. 3 (2025): NOVEMBER 2025
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sriwijaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28946/lexl.v7i3.3075

Abstract

Sediaan farmasi ialah obat-obatan yang memenuhi standar & mutu harus mempunyai izin resmi yang diedarkan secara sah oleh Badan Pengawasan Obat & Makanan, Dinas Kesehatan, serta lembaga yang berwenang terhadap Kesehatan, khususnya obat Narkotika & Psikotropika, yang tidak boleh dijual secara bebas melaikan harus dengan resep dokter serta memiliki izin edar. Tujuan oleh jurnal ilmiah untuk mengetahui pertanggungjawaban tindak pidana pengedaran persediaan tanpa izin farmasi tergadap pelaku. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian Normatif. Penelitian ini didasarkan oleh kajian Pustaka hukum & Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. Berdasarkan penelitian ini diperoleh bahwa Pertanggungjawaban pidana yang dilakukan oleh orang atau manusia maupun badan hukum untuk melakukan tindak pidana yang melawan hukum berdasarkan kesalahan ialah kesengajaan (opzet) & kelalaian (culpa). Tindak pidana yang dilakukan berdasarkan Studi Kasus Putusan Mahkamah Agung RI berdasarkan Pokok Perkara, Dakwaan Jaksa Penuntut Umum, Tuntutan Pidana, Pertimbangan Hakim, Amar Putusan, serta Analisis Dasar Pertimbangan Hakim didalam Menjatuhkan Sanksi Pidana.
Overcoming Criminal Acts of Corruption Outside the Court by Penal Means Based on Justice Based on the Principle of Efficiency Jeffry, Mochamad; Febrian; Nashriana; Achmad, Ruben
Jurnal Sipakatau: Inovasi Pengabdian Masyarakat Vol. 3 No. 3 (2026): Jurnal Sipakatau
Publisher : PT. Global Research Collaboration

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.66314/sipakatau.v3i3.712

Abstract

Corruption remains a chronic problem in Indonesia, causing substantial state financial losses and hindering national development. Law No. 31 of 1999 as amended by Law No. 20 of 2001 prioritizes criminal sanctions, reflecting a retributive purpose of punishment where imprisonment is imposed regardless of the magnitude of state losses. This approach often proves inefficient, as handling costs may exceed recovered losses. This research examines three issues: (1) the regulation of corruption crimes using penal means based on the purpose of punishment; (2) the countermeasures of corruption using penal means based on the purpose of punishment; and (3) the countermeasures of fair corruption out of court using penal means based on the efficiency principle. Using normative legal research with statutory, conceptual, comparative, philosophical, and futuristic approaches, this study finds that the current retributive orientation contradicts the Corruption Law's goal of recovering state losses to achieve a just and prosperous society. In practice, law enforcement continues to prioritize imprisonment even in small-loss cases. This research proposes reformulating Article 4 of the Corruption Law to allow the return of state losses to eliminate punishment when loss values fall below enforcement budget thresholds, accompanied by a fine of one times the loss amount. This efficiency-based approach aligns with utilitarian theory and the fifth principle of Pancasila (social justice for all Indonesian people), ensuring that small-scale corruptors need not undergo imprisonment while prioritizing state financial recovery.