Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
5.283
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Sriwijaya Law Review DE LEGA LATA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Varia Justicia JURNAL PENDIDIKAN TAMBUSAI Yurispruden: Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Malang Jurnal Hukum Volkgeist Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Indonesian Comparative Law Review Community Empowerment Fundamental : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Borobudur Law and Society Journal Borobudur Journal on Legal Services Jurnal Hukum dan HAM Wara Sains Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora (JURRISH) RechtIdee Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum Neraca Manajemen, Akuntansi, dan Ekonomi Causa: Jurnal Hukum dan Kewarganegaraan Law and Justice Jembatan Hukum: Kajian Ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara Journal of Transcendental Law Journal of Community Services and Engagement: Voice of Community (VOC) Konstitusi: Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Publik, dan Ilmu Komunikasi Legal Advice Jurnal Hukum Fundamental : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Jurnal Jurisprudence Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa & Penelitian Keperawatan
Diana Setiawati
Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
Religion Arts Humanities Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Medicine & Pharmacology Nursing Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 37 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 37 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4 
Hambatan dan Peluang Efektivitas Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis di Indonesia Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 1999 Frensiska Ardhiyaningrum; Diana Setiawati
Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara Vol. 1 No. 4 (2024): Desember : Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/jembatan.v1i4.1132

Abstract

Business disputes are increasing in Indonesia along with the growth of economic relationships. Litigation is often perceived as time-consuming and costly, making Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) a more efficient and relationship-friendly alternative. This study aims to analyze the obstacles and opportunities in implementing ADR for business dispute resolution in Indonesia, based on the legal framework provided by Law Number 30 of 1999. The research employs a normative legal approach with descriptive analysis. Data were collected through literature reviews of legal regulations, academic literature, and journal articles. The findings reveal that although ADR holds significant potential for resolving business disputes efficiently and cost-effectively, its implementation faces several challenges. The primary obstacles include the lack of awareness among business actors about ADR's benefits, the perception that ADR lacks the legal authority compared to litigation, and the limited quality of mediators and arbitrators. The study also highlights the importance of enhancing the capacity of ADR practitioners through continuous training and educating business actors to build trust in this method. By addressing these challenges, ADR is expected to become the primary choice for resolving business disputes, fostering a conducive business environment, and supporting long-term economic growth in Indonesia.
Perbandingan Metode Penyelesaian Sengketa Tradisional dan Digital : Sebuah Pendekatan terhadap Optimalisasi ADR Nabila Ikbal; Diana Setiawati
Konstitusi : Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Publik, dan Ilmu Komunikasi Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): Konstitusi : Jurnal Hukum, Administrasi Publik, dan Ilmu Komunikasi
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/konstitusi.v2i1.427

Abstract

Disputes usually occur due to differences in ideas, beliefs, values, needs, and goals, until finally people with different backgrounds cannot work together and cannot avoid disputes. Litigation is the most traditional dispute resolution which is a process in court using applicable law. Alternative Dispute Resolution is a concept of dispute resolution outside the court that prioritizes a win-win solution which is now integrated into the adjudication process as part of CDR or CADR. With a normative research method, which is sourced from secondary legal data, with primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials, using qualitative data analysis methods by interpreting and describing questions contained in documents and laws and regulations. The results of this study indicate that the traditional dispute resolution method is a slow, protracted, and relatively expensive dispute resolution process, while the digital dispute resolution method in an approach to optimizing ADR has advantages in economic factors, scope factors and good relationship building factors.
PERAN ARBITRASE DAN ALTERNATIF PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA (ADR) DALAM MENCIPTAKAN PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA YANG CEPAT, EFISIEN, DAN DAMAI, TERUTAMA DALAM SENGKETA LINTAS NEGARA Ariffudin Nur Fadly Rosyid; Diana Setiawati
Causa: Jurnal Hukum dan Kewarganegaraan Vol. 10 No. 8 (2025): Causa: Jurnal Hukum dan Kewarganegaraan
Publisher : Cahaya Ilmu Bangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.3783/causa.v10i8.10832

Abstract

Arbitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa (ADR) merupakan mekanisme penting dalam menyelesaikan konflik hukum di luar pengadilan. Artikel ini membahas peran, kelebihan, kelemahan, dan efektivitas implementasi arbitrase dan ADR dalam menciptakan penyelesaian sengketa yang cepat, efisien, dan damai, terutama dalam konteks sengketa lintas negara. Arbitrase menawarkan kepastian hukum melalui keputusan yang bersifat final dan mengikat, dengan proses yang lebih cepat dan fleksibel dibandingkan litigasi. Selain itu, sifat privat arbitrase menjaga kerahasiaan informasi para pihak. Di sisi lain, ADR seperti mediasi, negosiasi, dan konsiliasi berfokus pada dialog dan kerja sama untuk mencapai kesepakatan bersama, menciptakan penyelesaian yang saling menguntungkan. Kelebihan arbitrase dan ADR mencakup efisiensi waktu, penghematan biaya, dan fleksibilitas prosedural, yang sangat bermanfaat dalam sengketa bisnis dan lintas negara. Namun, keduanya juga memiliki kelemahan, seperti biaya arbitrase yang tinggi, keterbatasan banding, dan tantangan dalam menegakkan keputusan arbitrase di yurisdiksi berbeda. Efektivitas ADR dalam sengketa lintas negara ditingkatkan dengan penggunaan mediator yang netral dan berpengalaman, meski tantangan seperti ketimpangan kekuasaan atau perbedaan budaya dapat menjadi hambatan. Kesimpulannya, arbitrase dan ADR adalah solusi alternatif yang relevan untuk menyelesaikan sengketa secara cepat, efisien, dan damai, dengan potensi besar untuk mengurangi beban pengadilan serta menciptakan keadilan yang lebih adaptif. Implementasi yang optimal membutuhkan kolaborasi semua pihak untuk memaksimalkan manfaatnya dalam sistem hukum nasional maupun internasional.
Regional Heads’ Legitimacy in Implementing the Regional Government Based on Democratic Principles Enggarani, Nuria Siswi; Spaltan, Bita Gadsia; Setiawati, Diana; Zuhdi, Syaifuddin; Farid, Achmad Miftah; Budiono, Arief
Jurnal Hukum Volkgeist Vol. 9 No. 1 (2024): DECEMBER
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35326/volkgeist.v9i1.7086

Abstract

The concept of regional autonomy is explicitly regulated in Article 18 of the 1945 Constitution and several related laws and regulations which essentially provide authority and flexibility for provincial, district and city governments to regulate and manage their own government affairs according to the principles of autonomy and assignment tasks including the implementation of regional head elections carried out democratically. In the implementation of regional government, elected regional heads must also be able to realize the principles of democracy and must be able to run effective and responsive regional government to the needs of the community, must not deviate from moral norms and deviate from democratic principles. The problem in this study is How is the Legitimacy of Regional Heads in the Implementation of Regional Government in Accordance with the Principles of Democracy. This study uses an empirical legal method, namely in addition to reviewing data through literature, it also reviews data on events that actually occur through observation activities and so on. The purpose of this study is to analyze legislation and examine cases that have occurred in Indonesia regarding the legitimacy of regional heads in the implementation of regional government in accordance with democratic principles. The conclusion of this study is that based on the analysis of several laws regarding regional heads in the implementation of regional government and based on the analysis of cases of regional heads in leading regional government, they are not yet legitimate and are not in accordance with the principles of democracy
Comparison of Indonesian and Hungarian Laws Regarding Errors in Persona in Land Buying and Selling Transactions Diana Setiawati; Widya Ayu Khairunnisa; Rofi Aulia Rahman
Jurnal Jurisprudence Vol. 14, No. 1, June 2024
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23917/jurisprudence.v14i1.3875

Abstract

ABSTRACT  Purpose: This research aims to determine the comparison of legal implementation between 2 (two) countries that adhere to a civil law legal system in viewing the issue of error in person. With the main aim of providing insight and potential solutions to overcome the problem of default and error in person, this research contributes to solving the challenges encountered in this domain. Methodology: This research employed normative research methods through a case approach and a comparative approach, both for Indonesia and Hungary. Results: The results of this research demonstrated that the 2 (two) legal perspectives of Indonesia and Hungary both have quite significant similarities in viewing a default or error in person. The decision made by the judge in the decision above can actually still be prosecuted if the person concerned wishes to do so. However, it could be considered inaccurate and could be even more detrimental to the defendant. Hence, the legal considerations applied are deemed appropriate. Applications of this study: This research’s findings can be used to analyze legal comparisons between 2 (two) countries and the judge's considerations regarding error in persona in breach of contract disputes with Decision Number 59/PDT/2021/PT SMR. Novelty/Originality of this study: Undoubtedly, each country has a different view on issues that harm certain parties in the agreement or default; likewise, with formal defects in the form of errors in persona. Therefore, more in-depth research is needed on legal comparisons in 2 (two) countries and judges' considerations regarding errors in persona. Such research contributes to a comprehensive understanding of how legal systems address these issues, facilitating better decisions and potentially encouraging harmonization or convergence of legal practice across jurisdictions.  Keywords: Agreement, Default, Error in persona   ABSTRAK  Purpose : Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui komparasi pelaksanaan hukum diantara 2 (dua) negara yang menganut sistem hukum civil law dalam memandang persoalan error in persona. Dengan tujuan utama memberikan wawasan dan solusi potensial guna mengatasi masalah wanprestasi maupun error in persona. Penelitian ini sebagai kontribusi pada penyelesaian tantangan yang dihadapi dalam domain ini. Methodology : Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian normatif melalui pendekatan kasus dan pendekatan komparatif, baik terhadap negara Indonesia ataupun Hungaria. Results : Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa 2 (dua) perspektif hukum antara Indonesia dan Hungaria, keduanya memiliki kesamaan yang cukup signifikan dalam memandang suatu wanprestasi maupun error in persona. Pengambilan keputusan oleh hakim dalam putusan diatas sebenarnya masih bisa dituntut jika yang bersangkutan menghendakinya, akan tetapi dapat terbilang kurang tepat dan bisa saja semakin merugikan bagi pihak tergugat. Oleh karena itu, pertimbangan hukum yang diterapkan terbilang sudah tepat. Applications of this study : Hasil penelitian ini dapat digunakan untuk menganalisis terkait komparasi hukum diantara 2 (dua) negara dan pertimbangan hakim terkait error in persona pada sengketa wanprestasi dengan Putusan Nomor 59/PDT/2021/PT SMR. Novelty/ Orginalty of this study : Permasalahan yang merugikan pihak tertentu dalam perjanjian atau wanprestasi, tentunya dalam hal itu setiap negara memiliki pandangan yang berbeda. Begitu juga dengan cacat formil berupa error in persona. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan penelitian lebih mendalam terhadap komparasi hukum dalam 2 (dua) negara dan pertimbangan hakim terkait error in persona. Penelitian semacam itu guna berkontribusi pada pemahaman yang komprehensif tentang bagaimana sistem hukum menangani masalah ini, memfasilitasi keputusan yang lebih baik dan berpotensi mendorong harmonisasi atau konvergensi praktik hukum di seluruh yurisdiksi.  Keywords: Perjanjian, Wanprestasi, error in persona
Implementasi Teknologi dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa: Penggunaan Platform Online Dispute Resolution di Indonesia Assadath, Frido Davi; Setiawati, Diana
Borobudur Law and Society Journal Vol 4 No 1 (2025): Vol 4 No 1 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Magelang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31603/12766

Abstract

Internet merupakan teknologi yang memiliki dampak paling besar dalam kehidupan manusia. Teknologi juga mengubah bagaimana cara kita dalam berinteraksi antara satu sama lain. Sehingga mengubah cara kita dalam menyelesaiakn konflik infrastruktur telekomunikasi bagi kehidupan masyarakat. Penyelesaian sengketa yang dilakukan melalui internet disebut dengan penyelesaian sengketa online atau ODR. Online Dispute Resolution adalah inovasi hukum dengan memanfaatkan kemajuan teknologi dalam metode penyelesaian sengketa secara alternatif dimana melalui ODR pihak yang bersegketa tidak perlu bertemu secar langsung (tatap muka) guna menyelesaikan sengketanya. Dengan metode penelitian normatif, yang bersumber dari data hukum sekunder, dengan bahan hukum primer dan bahan hukum sekunder, menggunakan metode analisis data kualitatif yaitu pengumpulan data dengan cara pengelompokkan dalam data-data dari hasil penelitan. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa implementasi teknologi dalam penyelesaian sengketa studi kasus penggunaan platform Online Dispute Resolution di Indonesia terdapat kendala-kendala seperti masih terdapat penduduk yang belum mengenal penggunaan internet seperti WhatsApp, Telegram, Line, WeChat, dan masyarakat Indonesia kurang percaya dengan keberhasilan sistem ODR.
Transparency and Accountability in Corporate Social Responsibility Programs: Local Government Oversight through a Business Law Perspective Setiawati, Diana; Soepatini; Hanifah Febriani; Chintya Anggraeni
Law and Justice Vol. 9 No. 1 (2024): Law and Justice
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23917/laj.v9i1.10313

Abstract

Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is increasingly recognized as more than just a corporate obligation—it is a strategic approach to achieving sustainable development goals. In Indonesia, where regional autonomy gives local governments significant authority, their role in supervising CSR becomes particularly important, especially in ensuring transparency and accountability. Despite this, many CSR programs still suffer from a lack of clear oversight, limited regulatory support, and varying levels of corporate commitment. This study explores how local governments carry out their supervisory role in CSR programs from the perspective of business law. Using a qualitative juridical-normative approach complemented by field data, this research focuses on Klaten, Central Java, as a case study. Data were obtained through interviews with local officials, CSR practitioners, and community members, as well as analysis of regional regulations and corporate CSR reports. The findings reveal that while some local governments have made efforts to regulate CSR through regional policies, the lack of binding legal instruments and standardized monitoring systems poses significant challenges. In many cases, accountability still depends more on voluntary compliance than enforceable obligations. Moreover, transparency in CSR reporting is often limited, making it difficult for stakeholders to evaluate the actual impact. The study concludes that strengthening the legal basis of CSR at the local level—through clearer regulations, transparent reporting standards, and inclusive supervision involving civil society—could lead to more effective CSR governance. This would not only improve corporate accountability but also ensure that CSR efforts align more closely with community needs and sustainable development goals. Keywords: CSR, business law, local government, accountability
Analisis Yuridis terhadap Upaya Pengembalian Kerugian bagi Korban Investasi Fiktif di Indonesia Ramadhani, Ichinoty; Putri, Aulia Aninda Ektya; Fadhila, Dhea Salsa; Ristiani, Najwa Alya; Putri, Thaasafina Sitasari; Saptafasya, Viola Puti; Setiawati, Diana
Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai Vol. 9 No. 2 (2025): Agustus
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai, Riau, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Investasi fiktif merupakan bentuk kejahatan ekonomi yang marak terjadi di era digital dan menimbulkan kerugian besar bagi masyarakat. Meskipun aparat penegak hukum telah berupaya menindak pelaku melalui jalur pidana, kenyataannya sistem peradilan pidana di Indonesia masih berfokus pada penghukuman pelaku dan belum sepenuhnya menjamin pemulihan kerugian korban. Akibatnya, korban sering kali tidak memperoleh ganti rugi yang sepadan. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan konseptual. Kebaruan dalam penelitian ini terletak pada penekanan pentingnya peran lembaga seperti Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK) dan Satgas Waspada Investasi dalam menyediakan perlindungan hukum tambahan di luar sistem peradilan melalui mekanisme yang lebih cepat dan responsif. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaturan hukum yang mengatur pengembalian kerugian bagi korban investasi fiktif serta mengidentifikasi bentuk upaya perlindungan hukum yang dapat diperkuat. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa mekanisme pemulihan kerugian sebenarnya telah diatur dalam Pasal 98–101 KUHAP melalui penggabungan gugatan perdata dalam perkara pidana, Pasal 7A ayat (1) UU No. 31 Tahun 2014 tentang hak restitusi korban, serta POJK No. 6/POJK.07/2022 tentang kewajiban ganti rugi oleh pelaku usaha jasa keuangan. Sementara itu, Pasal 378 KUHP menjadi dasar pemidanaan terhadap pelaku penipuan investasi. Namun dalam praktiknya, perlindungan korban belum optimal. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan langkah konkret seperti pembentukan dana perlindungan investor, penyederhanaan mekanisme restitusi, serta putusan pengadilan yang lebih berpihak pada korban demi mewujudkan keadilan yang berimbang antara pelaku dan korban.
Peran Badan Koordinasi Penanaman Modal (BKPM) dalam Meningkatkan Investasi Berkelanjutan Zainab Diva Amanda; Ghalib Rizki Luthfianto; Kevin Kurnia Yuli Ardikha; Qusay Alya Difatta; Alsyad Dedin Ryan Syahputra; Sabrina Diyang Awandi Putri; Diana Setiawati
Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Hukum & Politik Vol 3 No 3 (2025): 2025
Publisher : Yayasan pendidikan dzurriyatul Quran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61104/alz.v3i3.1681

Abstract

Investasi berkelanjutan menjadi isu penting dalam mendorong pertumbuhan ekonomi yang inklusif dan ramah lingkungan di tengah tantangan global. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis peran Badan Koordinasi Penanaman Modal (BKPM) dalam meningkatkan investasi berkelanjutan di Indonesia serta mengidentifikasi hambatan dan strategi yang digunakan dalam proses tersebut. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan hukum normatif dengan metode kualitatif berbasis studi pustaka yang berfokus pada data sekunder dari regulasi, literatur akademik, dan publikasi relevan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa BKPM memiliki peran strategis dalam membentuk iklim investasi yang kondusif melalui koordinasi lintas sektor, penerapan sistem OSS, penyusunan panduan investasi lestari, serta promosi investasi hijau yang responsif terhadap prinsip keberlanjutan. Implikasi dari temuan ini menggarisbawahi pentingnya penguatan kelembagaan dan harmonisasi regulasi sebagai prasyarat utama untuk menjadikan Indonesia sebagai destinasi investasi berdaya saing di tingkat global
Dinamika Regulasi Hukum Investasi dan Dampaknya terhadap Kepastian Bisnis Nike Cahyaningrum; Mira Eka Erlina; Rahma Rini Khalisa Firdausi; Chammellia Annastasya Melati4; Rahma Syifa Az Zahra; Irma Salvia Nisrina; Diana Setiawati
Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora Vol. 4 No. 3 (2025): JURRISH: Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora
Publisher : Pusat Riset dan Inovasi Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/jurrish.v4i3.5798

Abstract

Investment plays a strategic role in driving economic growth and job creation. However, the dynamics of investment law regulation in Indonesia still face various challenges that impact business certainty for investors. This study aims to: (1) analyze the dynamics of investment law regulations in Indonesia over time until the enactment of the Job Creation Law; (2) identify the forms of investment law regulations and the challenges of their implementation; and (3) formulate legal solutions to improve business certainty for investors. The research method used is normative legal research with a legislative and conceptual approach. Data was obtained from relevant regulations, scientific journals, and academic literature, then analyzed using descriptive-qualitative methods. The results of the study show that although regulations such as Law No. 25 of 2007 and the Job Creation Law have strengthened the legal framework for investment, their implementation is still hampered by bureaucracy, inconsistencies between central and regional policies, and weak oversight in digital investment. The conclusion of this study is that regulatory harmonization, strengthening arbitration institutions, and improving legal literacy are important steps to enhance legal certainty and investment attractiveness in Indonesia.
Co-Authors a Widya Margaretha, Karelina Adriansyah Pradipta, Rifanov Afifah Hapsari Afdah Aflit Nuryulia Praswati Ahmad Agung Febrianto Ahmad Agung Febrianto Ahmad Fausi Ahmad Fauzan Ainanur Faizah, Fatimah Al Fairuz, Muhammad Ranadhif Al Jawi Putri, Prisitina Alaysia, Amaylia Noor Alsyad Dedin Ryan Syahputra Althea Rinanda, Rima Anisahaq, Nabila Arief Budiono Ariffudin Nur Fadly Rosyid Assadath, Frido Davi Ayu Astutik, Zulfiana Benanda Bunga Natasha Carisa Maharani Chammellia Annastasya Melati4 Chintya Anggraeni Chrisna Bagus Edhita Praja Cindy Laksintya, Amelinda Dian Novitasari Dian Novitasari Anggraeni Dick Tjandra, Billie Dwi, Cindy Eka Saputri, Nurani Endah, Qori Enno Haya Gladya Naranta Fadhila, Dhea Salsa Fajriansi, Andi Farid, Achmad Miftah Frensiska Ardhiyaningrum Frontieka Ayu Rahmanto Ghalib Rizki Luthfianto Hakim, Hary Abdul Hanifah Fauziyah Hanifah Febriani Harjuna Nurfattah Hary Abdul Hakim Hasby Yoga, Fahmi Adam Haszmi Alfateh Hisanah Putri Ariyanto, Amelia Ibrahim Sholahudin Indah Maulani Irma Salvia Nisrina Junaidi, M. Karisma Cakraningrat Kevin Kurnia Yuli Ardikha Kinanthi Mukti, Berliana Latifah Kurniasih Mahendra Jaya Gumilang Marsheila Audrey Nuralisha Maulana Putra, Rafie Mira Eka Erlina Mukti Fajar ND Mur Febianti, Selvi Mutimatun Ni'ami Mutimatun Ni’ami Nabila Ikbal Narusweta, Arasyel Noor Vinki Nike Cahyaningrum Nilam Arum Sari Nirwa Rizkyana, Elsa Nirwago Danar P Noviana Pramesti Nur Andriyani Nur Fadilah Syahraya, Muhammad Nur Hidayah Nur Isa Herda A Nuria Siswi Enggarani Panji Nagaro Panji Nagaro Permata Dewi, Tyas Perwithosuci, Winny Presetiyo, Wibowo Heru Putri Dwi Arianti Putri Dwi Arianti Putri, Aulia Aninda Ektya Putri, Erna Putri, Thaasafina Sitasari Qusay Alya Difatta Rahma Rini Khalisa Firdausi Rahma Syifa Az Zahra Rahman, Rofi Aulia Raihanita Raihanita Rakhmat Dian Hidayat Rakhmat Dian Hidayat Ramadhani, Ichinoty ramadhani, zulfa Rika Septiani Rima Mila Wati Ristiana, Lisa Ristiani, Najwa Alya Riyandi Riyandi Rizki Andriyanto, Aditya S Soepatini Sabrina Diyang A.P Sabrina Diyang Awandi Putri Sandy, Fadillah Saptafasya, Viola Puti Shabrina, Kania Putri Soepatini Spaltan, Bita Gadsia Suarnianti, Suarnianti Suharso Suharso Syahputra, Adam Syakira Maghfirani Taufiq Taufiq Tiara Vergita Mahanani Triyono Triyono Tsalsabila Anadila, Kharisma Tyas, Erni Wardani, Lusyka Widya Widya Ayu Khairunnisa Yanita, Salma Yati Nurhayati Yuliana, Khozin Zahra Difa Setyawan, Charlintang Zainab Diva Amanda Zuhdi, Syaifuddin Zulfiani Ayu Astutik