Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 23 Documents
Search

PERTANGGUNG JAWABAN PIDANA NAKHODA KAPAL YANG BERLAYAR TANPA MEMILIKI SURAT IZIN BERLAYAR YANG MENGAKIBATKAN KEMATIAN (STUDI PUTUSANNOMOR 228/PID.SUS/2022/PN.TTE) Sembiring, Windi Syahfitri Br.; Yunara, Edi; Nasution, Mirza
JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND SOCIAL RESEARCH Vol 8, No 4 (2025): November 2025
Publisher : Smart Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54314/jssr.v8i4.4657

Abstract

Abstract: Criminal liability is the existence of an unlawful act, there is no word of forgiveness, capable of being competent in law, there is an error, there is no justification. An unlawful act is an act carried out by a person or group that is contrary to applicable regulations, an error is an act carried out either intentionally or unintentionally, a violation is an act that violates legal provisions (administrative in nature). In this study aims to answer the problem of How is the legal regulation for ship captains who sail without having a sailing license in Indonesia, How is the criminal liability for ship captains who sail without having a sailing license and result in death, How is the judge's consideration in applying criminal sanctions to the defendant in decision number: 228 / Pid.Sus / 2022 / PN.TTE. The regulation of shipping crimes is regulated in the Criminal Code and Law Number 17 of 2008 concerning Shipping which confirms the criminal liability of the captain as the party with full authority over the ship. In Decision Number 228/Pid.Sus/2022/PN.TTE regarding the sinking of the KM Cahaya Arafah, the judge sentenced the passenger to 4 years and 8 months in prison and a fine of Rp 500,000,000, a lighter sentence than the legal penalty due to consideration of extreme weather as a force majeure factor and the defendant's efforts to rescue passengers. This decision reflects the application of Gustav Radbruch's theory, namely balancing legal certainty, justice, and expediency, thus demonstrating the judge's role not merely as a mouthpiece for the law but also as an assessment of the humanitarian aspects and the law's benefits to society.Keyword: Criminal Liability, Ship Captain, Ship AccidentAbstrak: Pertanggung jawaban pidana itu adalah adanya perbuatan melawan hukum, tidak ada kata pemaaf, mampu cakap dalam hukum, adanya kesalahan, tidak ada alasan pembenar. perbuatan melawan hukum adalah tindakan yang dilakukans eseorang atau kelompok yang bertentangan dengan peraturan yang berlaku kesalahan adalah tindakan yang dilakukan baik sengaja maupun tidak sengaja pelanggaran adalah tindakan yang melanggar ketentua hukum (bersifat administratif). Dalam penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menjawab permasalahan Bagaimana pengaturan hukum terhadap nakhoda kapal yang berlayar tanpa memiliki surat ijin berlayar di Indonesia, Bagaimana pertanggung jawaban pidana terhadap nakhodah kapal yang berlayar tanpa memiliki surat ijin berlayar dan mengakibatkan kematian,Bagaimana pertimbangan hakim dalam menerapkan sanksi pidana terhadap terdakwa dalam putusan nomor: 228/Pid.Sus/2022/PN.TTE. Pengaturan tindak pidana pelayaran diatur dalam KUHP dan Undang-Undang Nomor 17 Tahun 2008 tentang Pelayaran yang menegaskan pertanggungjawaban pidana nakhoda sebagai pihak yang berwenang penuh atas kapal. Dalam Putusan Nomor 228/Pid.Sus/2022/PN.TTE terkait tenggelamnya KM Cahaya Arafah, hakim menjatuhkan pidana 4 tahun 8 bulan penjara dan denda Rp500.000.000, lebih ringan dari ancaman undang-undang karena mempertimbangkan faktor cuaca ekstrem sebagai force majeure serta adanya upaya terdakwa menyelamatkan penumpang. Putusan ini mencerminkan penerapan teori Gustav Radbruch, yakni menyeimbangkan kepastian hukum, keadilan, dan kemanfaatan, sehingga menunjukkan peran hakim tidak sekadar menjadi corong undang-undang tetapi juga menilai aspek kemanusiaan dan kemanfaatan hukum bagi masyarakat.Kata Kunci: PertanggungJawaban Pidana, Nakhoda Kapal, Kecelakaan Kapal
RENEWAL OF THE AUTHORITY OF THE OMBUDSMAN INSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA IN SUPERVISING PUBLIC SERVICES IN INDONESIA Lubis, Junaidi Usman; Nasution, Mirza; Afnila, Afnila
NOMOI Law Review Vol 6, No 2 (2025): November Edition
Publisher : NOMOI Law Review

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30596/nomoi.v6i2.26952

Abstract

Public services in Indonesia still face various challenges, both at the implementation level and regulatory aspects. One key issue is the weak effectiveness of oversight by the Indonesian Ombudsman regarding maladministration violations. Although Law Number 25 of 2009 concerning Public Services stipulates the Ombudsman's authority to carry out special adjudication as stipulated in Article 50, this provision has not been optimally implemented. As a result, the resolution of maladministration reports still relies on non-binding recommendations , thus creating legal uncertainty and legal disharmony within the public service system. This research uses a normative legal research method with a statutory and comparative legal approach. The study's findings indicate that regulatory weaknesses and the absence of a firm sanction mechanism for public agencies' non-compliance with the Ombudsman's recommendations have hampered the achievement of accountable and equitable public services. Therefore, regulatory reforms are needed to strengthen the Ombudsman's authority, including the implementation of special adjudication, administrative sanctions, social sanctions, and even criminal sanctions to provide legal binding force to recommendations, in order to ensure legal certainty and improve the quality of public service governance in Indonesia.
LARANGAN TENTANG POLITIK UANG DAN BIAYA (COST) POLITIK OLEH PASANGAN CALON/PARTAI POLITIK DALAM MASA KAMPANYE PEMILIHAN KEPALA DAERAH DI KABUPATEN SAMOSIR Situmorang, Arta Uli LCP; Nasution, Mirza; Sihombing, Eka N.A.M
SIBATIK JOURNAL: Jurnal Ilmiah Bidang Sosial, Ekonomi, Budaya, Teknologi, Dan Pendidikan Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026)
Publisher : Penerbit Lafadz Jaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/sibatik.v5i2.4287

Abstract

In the context of the 2024 regional electrions, the practice of money politics is expected to remain a key strategy used by various political actors to influence election results. The political reality in Indonesia shows that regional elections are often marred by various challenges, one of which is the phenomenon of money politics. Money politics poses a serious threat to election integrity because it has the potential to undermine democratic values and reduce the quality of public political participation. Voter behaviour in determining political choices generally tends to be influenced by material factors, such as the gift or money or goods in the lead-up to the election, rather than by rational consideration of the vision, mission, and policy programs offered by the candidates. In the process of organizing regional elections in Indonesia, there are election management bodies, namely the General Elections Commission (GEC), the Election Supervisory Agency, and the Election Organizer Honorary Council (EOHC). The GEC has the duty and authority as an election management body to prepare for all stages of the election process.