Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

ANALYSIS OF THE LAJNAH BAHTSUL MASAIL NU FATWA METHOD ON DIVORCE JOKES Musthafa, Halum; Firdaus, Firdaus; Azwar, Zainal
El-Ahli : Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam Vol 6 No 1 (2025): EL-AHLI : Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam
Publisher : Program Studi Hukum Keluarga Islam Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Negeri Mandailing Natal

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56874/el-ahli.v6i1.2032

Abstract

The Lajnah Bahtsul Masail issued a fatwa regarding jokes about divorce through NU Online. In this case, someone asked whether someone who jokes about divorce has incurred thalak, and NU Online provided an answer to this question. Lajnah Bahtsul Masa'il is an NU discussion forum that explores legal issues arising from the community. Bahtsul Masail. 'Bahtsul' refers to research, discussion, and exploration. Masail, on the other hand, refers to questions, issues, problems, cases and events. Thus, linguistically, 'bahtsul masail' can be interpreted as 'discussion of a problem'. This study aims to understand the Lajnah Bahtsul Masail method of issuing a law from a problem, particularly with regard to the issue of divorce jokes. The research method employed was a literature study involving data collection through the analysis of various scientific sources, such as journals and books. The results of the study show that Bahtsul Masail uses several methods to explore a law, including the Qauli, Ilhaqi, and Manhaji methods. When answering questions about the law of divorce jokes, Bahtsul Masail uses the Manhaji method, applying the rules of Imam As-Suyuti in the book Al-Asybah Wan Nazhair, although initially the answerer refers to the book Fathul Muin
THE ISTINBAT METHOD OF MUHAMMAD BIN SHAHIH AL-UTSAIMIN: THE PROHIBITION OF REFUSING A MARRIAGE PROPOSAL BECAUSE OF STUDYING Nurul Izzati, Nurul; Azwar, Zainal
Zawiyah: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam Vol 10 No 1 (2024): Juli 2024
Publisher : IAIN Kendari

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31332/zjpi.v10i1.8405

Abstract

Marriage is "half of the religion" which plays a central role in the lives of individual Muslims. On the other hand, education is an important principle in Islamic teachings, as explained in the Qur'an and Hadith. In today's modern society, the phenomenon of Muslim women finding it important to pursue higher education and build a career before marriage. However, a controversy arises; is it permissible in Islam to reject a marriage proposal in favour of education or career? One of the muftis of Saudi Arabia, Shaykh Muhammad bin Shalih Al-Uthaimin, forbids it. This type of research is conceptual using a library research approach. Primary data is obtained from the opinion of Shaykh Muhammad bin Shalih Al-Uthaimin, secondary data is obtained from books, articles, and other scientific works relevant to the discussion. The results showed that Al-Uthaimin used the istinbath method based on the text of the Qur'an, the hadith of the prophet about marriage, and qaul shahabi. The results of the analysis also highlight the importance of pre-marriage agreements, especially with respect to education and career, to build a harmonious marriage. Al-Uthaymeen's statement on higher education being "not needed by the ummah" is quite controversial in the dynamic life of society. Al-Uthaymeen's opinion considers maslahah and Islamic principles in decision-making, while still respecting individual rights. This shows that within Islam, there are diverse views that can serve as a basis for modern society to make decisions in line with their religious values and goals.
The Role of the Malay Customary Institution in Off-Court Divorce Mediation: A Case Study in Rantau Pandan, Jambi Azwar, Zainal; Firdaus, Firdaus; Nafis, Muhammad
Al-Risalah Vol 20 No 1 (2020): June 2020
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah UIN Sulthan Thaha Saifuddin Jambi, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30631/alrisalah.v20i1.561

Abstract

In general, the concept of mediation in fiqh literature concerns merely with pre-divorce conflicts. In contrast, the Malay Customary Institution in Rantau Pandan, Jambi also concerns with restoring household integrity after divorce. This paper aims at describing and analyzing the role of the Malay Customary Institution in restoring post-divorce households in Rantau Pandan. The field research was conducted where the data taken from in-depth interviews and documentation. This paper concludes that there are two forms of mediation process practiced by the Malay Customary Institution in Rantau Pandan: the mediation that is prompted by the initial request of the involving parties and that is without the precondition of reconciliation. The success of the Customary Institution in mediating familial conflicts is supported by several factors, such as; the competence of the mediators, kinship relations, and the goodwill of the respective parties. The mediation practiced of the Customary Institution works in line with the guidance of the Qur’ān and the principle of mediation in Islam. Additionally, this institution has developed the concept of mediation outside the court, both in terms of form and task.
Criticizing the Verdict of 916/Pdt.P/2022/PN.Sby Surabaya District Court Against Interfaith Marriage from the Perspective of Marriage Law in Indonesia Fernanda, Ahmad; Azwar, Zainal; Ismail, Dailani
Al-Qadha : Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Perundang-Undangan Vol 10 No 2 (2023): Al-Qadha: Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Perundang-Undangan
Publisher : Hukum Keluarga Islam IAIN LANGSA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32505/qadha.v10i2.6150

Abstract

This article is based on a critical review of the verdict of 916/Pdt.P/2022/PN.Sby, which recognizes the validity of interfaith marriages in Indonesia. This decision is different from the provisions of the marriage law in force in Indonesia. Indonesia has regulated that marriages can be carried out according to their respective religions. This article aims to critically analyze the verdict of 916/Pdt.P/2022/PN.Sby. This research is a normative juridical study with a case approach. The main data sources are obtained from court decisions and marriage laws. This article also uses several important articles and research resulting from empirical studies. Based on the data findings and analysis that have been carried out, this paper argues that: Firstly, interfaith marriages are prohibited in Islamic law because they contain more harm than good; this prohibition merely closes the opportunity for bad impacts to occur after the marriage; and second, the decision issued by the Surabaya District Court Judge was inappropriate because it conflicted with positive law and Islamic law. Legally, the judge may refuse to grant permission based on Article 2 paragraph (1) of the Law on Marriage and the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI). In this decision, the judge has a different interpretation of the marriage regulations that apply in Indonesia.
Analisis Ijtihad Syekh Yusuf Al-Qaradhawi Tentang Haramnya Talak Mu’allaq Perspektif Saddu Al-Dzari’ah Bumulo, Zulkifli; Azwar, Zainal
El-Faqih : Jurnal Pemikiran dan Hukum Islam Vol. 11 No. 1 (2025): EL FAQIH
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam (IAI) Faqih Asy'ari Kediri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58401/faqih.v11i1.1777

Abstract

Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradhawi is a contemporary scholar who is famous for his broad scientific insight, jurisprudence, and many works. He is among several scholars who are often asked for fatwas, one of his fatwas is regarding the prohibition of mu’allaq divorce (divorce that is dependent on certain conditions). This study analyzes the views of Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradhawi regarding the law of mu’allaq divorce (conditional divorce) from the perspective of saddu al-Dzari'ah. With a normative qualitative approach based on literature study, it is found that he forbids and considers mu’allaq divorce invalid because it is not in accordance with Sharia. Al-Qaradhawi emphasizes that divorce must be done firmly and clearly, not in the form of conditions or oaths, because it can cause legal uncertainty and harm to the wife. This ijtihad analysis is based on the principle of saddu al-dzari'ah (closing the path to damage). With the perspective of saddu al-Dzari'ah, it can be concluded that mu’allaq divorce and swearing by divorce is forbidden and invalid, as a preventive measure against potential damage that will occur.
The Law of Maninggian Janjang against Perpetrators of Adultery from Saddu al-dzari’ah's Perspective Sudarman, Revoranda; Azwar, Zainal
Syarah: Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Ekonomi Vol. 13 No. 1 (2024): SYARAH : Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Ekonomi
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah Institut Agama Islam Negeri Lhokseumawe

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47766/syarah.v13i1.2928

Abstract

The practice of "maninggian janjang" against members of the adulterous community in the Baso District, Agam Regency, West Sumatra has its own peculiarities. This maninggian janjang punishment only applies there and the most interesting thing is that they punish a community if a member of the community commits adultery.  The concept of punishment like this is not applied in Islamic law, even though Baso sub-district people are Minangkabau people who have a philosophy of life "adat basandi syarak, syarak basandi kitabullah". This research will examine how the saddu al-dzari'at ijtihad method looks at the collective imposition of punishment on adultery offenders. This ijtihad method is used not only because it has similar principles with the punishment of maninggian janjang but also for the consideration of Imam Syafi'I who did not totally reject the concept of saddu al-dzari'ah. This type of research is empirical research using a qualitative approach. Data is obtained by conducting face-to-face interviews which are analyzed through coding techniques. The validity and reliability of the data were tested through peer debriefing techniques followed by review by the reviewer. This study found that maninggian janjang is in accordance with the saddu al-dzari'at method in which the way of ignoring adultery in a community is closed by threatening punishment collectively if there are members of the community who commit adultery. Meanwhile, the abolition of punishment through fines should be adjusted to the economy of the punished people so that the purpose of this maninggian janjang punishment is achieved, namely to provide fear and deterrent effect.
FENOMENA BERDUAAN DENGAN TUNANGAN (ANALISIS FATWA SYEKH YUSUF AL-QARADHAWI) Nurfazila; Azwar, Zainal
An Natiq Vol 4 No 2 (2024)
Publisher : University of Islam Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33474/an-natiq.v4i2.21701

Abstract

Traveling alone without being accompanied by a mahram between two people who are engaged is considered normal for some people in Indonesia, and it is not uncommon for people to fall into adultery. In fact, this is prohibited in Islam. This article aims to analyze the ijtihad method used by Yusuf al-Qaradawi regarding the prohibition of being alone with his fiancee. This research is library research with a fiqh proposal approach. Data was collected from books and other scientific works that are relevant to this study. The collected data is analyzed using content analysis, namely research that is an in-depth discussion of the content of written or printed information and then concludes based on the data collected and analyzed. The result of this research is that Yususf al-Qaradawi issued a fatwa regarding the prohibition of being alone with a fiancé using the ijtihad Qiyas method, where he stated that having seclusion between a man and a woman who is engaged is the same as bringing yourself closer to the act of adultery. For the reason that even though various ceremonies are carried out to celebrate the engagement, this is nothing more than just to strengthen and solidify it. And the Khitbah, no matter what the circumstances, will not be able to give any rights to the suitor but can only prevent other men from proposing to her.
Metode Penyelesaian Ta’arudh Al-Adillah dalam Masalah Hukum Keluarga Menurut Ulama Syafi’iyyah dan Hanafiyyah Hidayat, Firman; Bahar, Muchlis; Azwar, Zainal
Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research Vol. 4 No. 2 (2024): Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research
Publisher : Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/innovative.v4i2.10173

Abstract

Kajian ini mengangkat tema ta’arudh al-adillah yang terdapat di dalam permasalahan hukum keluarga. Dalam hal ini, ulama Syafi’iyyah dan Hanafiyyah memiliki metode yang berbeda dalam menyelesaikan ta’arudh al-adillah. Tujuan penelitian adalah mengetahui bentuk perbedaan metode ulama Syafi’iyyah dan Hanafiyyah dalam menyelesaikan ta’arudh al-adillah pada permasalahan hukum keluarga. Penelitian ini menggunakan sumber data sekunder seperti buku-buku dan karya ilmiyah yang relevan dengan pembahasan ini.  Data yang terkumpul dianalisis dengan metode analisis deduktif. Hasil utama kajian ini adalah bahwa ulama Syafi’iyyah dan Hanafiyyah berbeda pendapat dalam menerapkan urutan metode penyelesaian  ta’arudh al-adillah,  perbedaan dalam menerapkan urutan metode ini terkadang menghasilkan hukum yang berbeda dan terkadang menghasilkan hukum yang sama. Namun urutan metode yang digunakan oleh ulama Syafi’iyyah lebih kuat dibanding urutan metode ulama Hanafiyyah dalam menyelesaikan ta’arudh al-adillah. Hal ini terlihat di dalam penyelesaian ta’arudh al-adillah pada permasalahan hukum keluarga.  
The Tradition of Maantaan Sala in Nagari Guguak Malalo: An Analysis of ‘Urf as a Method of Derivation in Islamic Law Ulfa, Rusda; Azwar, Zainal
Ulul Albab: Jurnal Studi dan Penelitian Hukum Islam Vol 9, No 1 (2025): Vol. 9, No. 1, October 2025
Publisher : Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/jua.v9i1.46536

Abstract

The Maantaan Sala tradition in Nagari Guguak Malalo, West Sumatra, represents a customary engagement ceremony in which the bride’s family presents special dishes to the groom’s family. This study seeks to examine the Maantaan Sala tradition through the lens of ‘urf (custom) as a source of Islamic law, with the aim of assessing its conformity with the principles of sharia and the values of public benefit (mashlahah). This research adopts a qualitative field approach, utilising primary data collected through semi-structured interviews with traditional leaders (Ninik Mamak) and the Head of the Customary Council (KAN). Secondary data includes customary documents (Adaik Salingka Nagari Guguak Malalo), books, and academic journals. The data were analysed descriptively through three stages: interview transcription, data coding, and interpretation based on ‘urf theory in Islamic law. The findings indicate that Maantaan Sala functions as a formal public declaration of engagement that embodies social and religious values, including the upholding of honour, the strengthening of kinship ties, the demonstration of filial respect, and the prevention of “a proposal over another proposal,” which is prohibited in Islam. Philosophically, the offering of traditional dishes such as talam samba, which contains rendang, bubua kuniang (yellow sticky rice), and sirih pinang (betel quid), symbolizes honour, prudence, and respect for parental values—principles that align with Islamic moral teachings. According to ‘urf theory, this tradition qualifies as ‘urf shahih (valid custom) due to its widespread acceptance, continuous practice, social benefits, and lack of contradiction with sharia texts. Academically, this study contributes to the enrichment of socio-cultural fiqh scholarship and opens avenues for further research on the living values of Islamic law within local customary traditions.
Consistency of the Indonesian Ulama Council in Using Istiṣlāḥ as a Method for Legal Istinbath Azwar, Zainal; Rinaldi, Farid Afif
AL-ISTINBATH : Jurnal Hukum Islam Vol 9 No 1 (2024)
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri Curup

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29240/jhi.v9i1.7680

Abstract

This article aimed to analyze the consistency of the Indonesian Ulama Council (MUI) in using Istiṣlāḥ (public interest) as a method for legal determination when issuing fatwas. There were fatwas where the use of Istiṣlāḥ was very evident with the goal of safeguarding human lives, while in other fatwas, the opposite seemed to be the case. The objective of this study was to analyze the background of the emergence of fatwas and the consistency of MUI in using Istiṣlāḥ. This article is a normative legal study with an usul al-fiqh (principles of Islamic jurisprudence) approach. The data used represented secondary data in the form of Fatwa No. 14 of 2020 and Circular No.: Kep-1702/DP MUI/IX/2020 as the primary legal materials. Other legal materials, such as books and scholarly articles, were also used. The data obtained were analyzed descriptively using the techniques of reduction, display, and verification. The research results indicated the following: first, the emergence of both ijtihad products was caused by two conflicting government objectives; the desire to prohibit gatherings during worship and the desire to allow gatherings during regional elections. Second, these fatwas and circulars demonstrated inconsistency in the use of Istiṣlāḥ. In Fatwa No. 14 of 2020, MUI showed consistency in using Istiṣlāḥ. On the other hand, MUI appeared inconsistent in using the same method even though the primary goals of both ijtihad products were the same, preventing the spread of Covid-19 through mass gatherings.