Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

THIRD PARTY LEGAL PROTECTION AS A GOOD-INTENTION BUYER OF LAND WHICH IS INDICATED ABANDONED Saputro, Agus Haryono; Fuad, Fokky; Suartini, Suartini
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.709

Abstract

The problem studied in this final assignment islegal protection for third parties as buyers with good intentions for indicated abandoned land, so that it is known how the procedures for possession of abandoned indicated land are known, what are the legal consequences for land indicated as abandoned if it is sold by the right holder to a third party, and what is the legal protection for third parties as a willing buyer either on land indicated as abandoned. Based on this research, it was found that the government's authority regarding state rights in carrying out control of abandoned land is the duty and function of the Ministry of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning/Head of the National Land Agency. Land becomes an object of abandoned land tenure if it is deliberately not cultivated, used and utilized in accordance with the purpose of granting the rights obtained. The process of controlling abandoned land is carried out in several stages, including: evaluation of abandoned land, notification, warning of abandoned land, proposal for designation of abandoned land if after the expiration of the third warning period the land remains abandoned, and determination of abandoned land which includes abolition of land rights, termination of law between land rights holders and their land, and affirmation that the land is directly controlled by the state. The legal consequences for third parties who acquire land through buying and selling plots of land that are indicated as abandoned are because there is no prohibition in the implementation of land registration, where the prohibition on legal action only applies to objects that have been proposed to be designated as abandoned land.
EFEKTIVITAS AKTA DADING SEBAGAI INSTRUMEN PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA PERDATA MELALUI MEDIASI DI PENGADILAN Suartini, Suartini; Sani, Rijal Ibnu
Lex Jurnalica Vol 22, No 3 (2025): LEX JURNALICA
Publisher : Lex Jurnalica

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47007/lj.v22i3.10312

Abstract

AbstractMediation is a dispute resolution mechanism emphasizing deliberation and good faith between parties. In the Indonesian legal system, the mediation outcome embodied in a peace deed (akta dading) holds a significant position as a legally binding agreement once ratified by the court. This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of the peace deed as an instrument for civil dispute resolution in court, particularly within the framework of Supreme Court Regulation (PERMA) No. 1 of 2016 concerning Court-Annexed Mediation Procedures. This research employs a normative juridical approach with descriptive-analytical methods using primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The findings indicate that the peace deed possesses the same legal force as a final court judgment (res judicata pro veritate habetur), yet its implementation is often hindered by the parties’ non-compliance and insufficient judicial oversight. Therefore, strengthening supervisory mechanisms and enhancing the capacity of court mediators are essential to ensure the peace deed’s effectiveness as a fair and efficient dispute resolution instrument. Keywords: Effectiveness, Peace Deed, Mediation, Dispute Resolution, Legal Certainty AbstrakMediasi merupakan salah satu mekanisme penyelesaian sengketa yang mengedepankan prinsip musyawarah mufakat dan itikad baik antar pihak. Dalam sistem hukum Indonesia, hasil mediasi yang dituangkan dalam akta dading memiliki kedudukan penting sebagai perjanjian yang berkekuatan hukum tetap setelah memperoleh pengesahan hakim. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis efektivitas akta dading sebagai instrumen penyelesaian sengketa perdata di pengadilan, khususnya dalam konteks penerapan Peraturan Mahkamah Agung (PERMA) Nomor 1 Tahun 2016 tentang Prosedur Mediasi di Pengadilan. Metode yang digunakan adalah pendekatan yuridis normatif dengan analisis deskriptif-analitis terhadap bahan hukum primer, sekunder, dan tersier. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa akta dading memiliki kekuatan hukum yang sama dengan putusan pengadilan berkekuatan tetap (res judicata pro veritate habetur), namun implementasinya sering terkendala oleh faktor kepatuhan para pihak dan lemahnya pengawasan pelaksanaan oleh lembaga peradilan. Oleh karena itu, penguatan mekanisme pengawasan dan peningkatan kapasitas hakim mediator diperlukan untuk memastikan efektivitas akta dading sebagai instrumen penyelesaian sengketa yang adil dan efisien. Kata kunci: Efektivitas, Akta Dading, Mediasi, Penyelesaian Sengketa, Kepastian Hukum
Disparitas putusan hakim terhadap kasus perselisihan hubungan industrial di wilayah hukum Pengadilan Negeri Medan dan Padang Nurfadilah, Nurfadilah; Suartini, Suartini; Lutfi, Anas
Cessie : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol. 4 No. 3 (2025): Cessie: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum
Publisher : ARKA INSTITUTE

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55904/cessie.v4i3.1779

Abstract

Disparitas putusan hakim dalam perkara perselisihan hubungan industrial merupakan isu krusial dalam penegakan keadilan bagi pekerja dan pengusaha. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis faktor-faktor penyebab terjadinya disparitas putusan hakim dalam perkara hubungan industrial di Pengadilan Negeri Medan dan Padang. Dengan menggunakan pendekatan yuridis normatif dan metode perbandingan hukum, penelitian ini mengkaji perbedaan pertimbangan yuridis dalam dua putusan yang memiliki substansi serupa namun menghasilkan amar putusan yang berbeda dengan menggunakan teknik analisis berupa content analysis. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan disparitas disebabkan oleh perbedaan interpretasi Pasal 139 vs 142 UU Ketenagakerjaan, serta pengaruh faktor non-hukum seperti tingkat unionisasi dan peran dinas tenaga kerja. Selain itu, subjektivitas hakim dalam menafsirkan norma hukum turut memengaruhi hasil akhir putusan. Implikasi praktis dari temuan ini menunjukkan diperlukan pedoman teknis dari Mahkamah Agung dalam penanganan perkara hubungan industrial serta peningkatan kapasitas dan pelatihan bagi hakim, guna menjamin konsistensi dan kepastian hukum dalam sistem peradilan ketenagakerjaan di Indonesia. Dengan demikian, diperlukan regulasi yang lebih ketat dan terstruktur dalam penyelesaian perselisihan hubungan industrial untuk mewujudkan putusan yang adil, seragam, dan dapat diprediksi.
The Position of BPN in Resolving Land Cases in Depok: A Restorative Justice Approach Nur Hidayati, Maslihati; Suartini, Suartini; Sadino, Sadino; Widarahesty, Yusy; Mumin, Anita
Asian Journal of Social and Humanities Vol. 4 No. 3 (2025): Asian Journal of Social and Humanities
Publisher : Pelopor Publikasi Akademika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59888/n82mj555

Abstract

Non-penal policies should ideally be regulated as the legal basis for implementing the Land Mafia Prevention and Eradication Task Force Team. Legal certainty refers to the application of laws that are clear, permanent, and consistent. The restorative justice approach will serve as the basis for formulating non-penal policies to resolve land dispute cases in Indonesia. The purpose is to determine the position, role, and responsibilities of BPN in land settlement in Depok City. This research is normative juridical research with the character of prescriptive analysis. The novelty in this research is that the object of the dispute in the BPN Depok area has not involved resolution based on the principles of restorative justice. This study reveals that BPN Depok has achieved significant accomplishments in land case resolution, with a 99.66% dispute resolution rate exceeding national targets. The research demonstrates that BPN's integration of restorative justice principles through mediation, asset certification programs, and technological innovations (BERMATA application) has enhanced both the effectiveness and efficiency of dispute resolution. The findings indicate that BPN's dual role as both mediator and government authority requires careful navigation to maintain stakeholder trust. This study concludes that while restorative justice approaches show promise in land dispute resolution, comprehensive strategies addressing resource constraints, mediator capacity development, and multi-stakeholder collaboration are essential for sustainable implementation. The research contributes theoretically to conflict management literature and practically provides evidence-based recommendations for enhancing BPN's dispute resolution mechanisms in rapidly urbanizing contexts.
Kesesuaian undang-undang pembentuk peraturan perundang-undangan dengan kehendak konstitusi Arbain, Arbain; Firmantoro, Zuhad Aji; Suartini, Suartini
Cessie : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol. 4 No. 5 (2026): Cessie: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum (In press)
Publisher : ARKA INSTITUTE

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55904/yx7mxp58

Abstract

Keberadaan undang-undang sebagai dasar penyelenggaraan pemerintahan merupakan salah satu ciri dari negara hukum. Konsep ini diadopsi Indonesia melalui Pasal 1 ayat (3) UUD NKRI Tahun 1945. Di tengah perkembangan teori dan praktik negara hukum, Indonesia justru menghadapi anomali dalam legislasi. Kondisi tersebut tercermin dari jumlah peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlebihan (hyper-regulation), tumpang tindih, inkonsisten, multitafsir, dan disharmonis. Secara teoritis, sumber tertinggi harmonisasi sistem hukum nasional terletak pada konstitusi (UUD NKRI Tahun 1945) sebagai norma dasar tertulis. Berdasarkan kerangka tersebut, penelitian ini bertujuan mengidentifikasi kehendak konstitusi dalam pembentukan undang-undang dan menganalisis sejauh mana hal tersebut diakomodasi oleh UU tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-undangan. Melalui metode yuridis normatif, penelitian ini menemukan bahwa kehendak konstitusi belum diatur secara memadai, baik yang terkait aspek struktural (kewajiban dan kewenangan kelembagaan DPR), substansial (tata cara pembentukan undang-undang), maupun jenis dan cakupan pengaturannya. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan penataan secara menyeluruh terhadap ketiga aspek tersebut guna menegaskan kembali prinsip konstitusionalisme dalam negara hukum.
The Utilization of Artificial Intelligence as a Contract Review Tool for Government Procurement of Goods and Services to Mitigate Legal Risks Siswahyudi, Siswahyudi; Suartini, Suartini; Rifai, Anis
Business Economic, Communication, and Social Sciences Journal (BECOSS) Vol. 7 No. 3 (2025): BECOSS
Publisher : Bina Nusantara University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21512/becossjournal.v7i3.13647

Abstract

This study examines the application of Artificial Intelligence (AI), specifically Natural Language Processing (NLP), as a strategic tool in reviewing government procurement contracts to mitigate legal risks. Manual contract review processes are often inefficient, prone to human error, and unable to keep up with the volume and complexity of government contracts. Using a normative-judicial legal research method, the study analyzes how AI integration can enhance legal certainty, efficiency, and accountability in public procurement. Through document digitization, standardized contract formats, and audit trail systems, AI can identify ambiguous or risky clauses, verify compliance with regulations, and provide recommendations supported by legal data and precedents. The study also investigates the current legal framework in Indonesia, identifying gaps that hinder AI implementation in administrative practices. While the ITE Law and Presidential Regulations offer a foundation for digital systems in governance, there is still no specific regulation governing AI use in legal decision support. Comparative insights from the UK, US, EU, and Morocco show that AI has improved review accuracy, reduced processing time, and strengthened public sector integrity, although concerns over transparency and algorithmic accountability persist. The study concludes that the integration of AI into procurement contract management offers significant potential for bureaucratic reform and risk mitigation, but requires robust legal frameworks, clear boundaries of responsibility, and institutional readiness. With adaptive policy support, ethical oversight, and inter-agency collaboration, AI can serve as a transformative instrument for enhancing good governance, preventing legal disputes, and protecting public officials in the execution of procurement responsibilities.
Analysis of The Benefits of Collective Labor Agreements (CLA) in Establishing Harmonious Industrial Relations Between Employers, Workers, and The Government Singalodra, Nurita; Suartini, Suartini; Rifai, Anis
Business Economic, Communication, and Social Sciences Journal (BECOSS) Vol. 7 No. 3 (2025): BECOSS
Publisher : Bina Nusantara University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21512/becossjournal.v7i3.13629

Abstract

Collective Labor Agreements (CLA) are a crucial instrument for fostering harmonious industrial relations between employers, workers, and the government. CLAs provide legal certainty, ensure fair management of rights and obligations, and support the creation of a conducive working environment. This study aims to identify the benefits gained by each party employers, workers, and the government through the implementation of CLAs. Using a normative research method, the study analyzes applicable labor regulations and examines the role of CLAs in reducing potential conflicts, increasing productivity, and enhancing cost efficiency. The findings reveal that CLAs offer numerous benefits, including conflict reduction, productivity improvement, more efficient cost management, and the development of a positive image for both companies and the government. The study also highlights the importance of social dialogue in the CLA drafting process and the need for regular evaluation of its implementation. In conclusion, CLAs are a strategic tool for establishing stable, equitable, and sustainable industrial relations. Therefore, it is essential for all parties to strengthen the implementation and oversight of CLAs to ensure the creation of harmonious and productive working relationships.
Akuntabilitas Penyidik dan Prinsip Keadilan: Menimbang Nilai Maqāṣid al-Sharīʿah pada Penetapan Tersangka Septiawan, Aris; Rifai, Anis; Suartini, Suartini
Tasyri' : Journal of Islamic Law Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): Tasyri'
Publisher : STAINI Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53038/tsyr.v4i1.418

Abstract

Fair law enforcement requires accountability of investigators in every process of determining suspects. In practice, there are still procedural irregularities that cause legal uncertainty and violations of the human rights of suspects. This research aims to examine the principle of accountability of National Police investigators in determining suspects based on the Criminal Code and police regulations, and to weigh them from the perspective of maqāṣid al-sharīʿah, especially the value of justice ('adl) and the protection of rights (ḥifẓ al-nafs wa al-'ird). This study uses a juridical-normative approach with a descriptive qualitative analysis method, through the study of laws and regulations, pretrial decisions, and Islamic legal literature. The data were analyzed using the framework of maqāṣid al-sharīʿah as an ethical and normative knife. The results of the study show that the determination of suspects without sufficient preliminary evidence violates the principle of due process of law and harms the maqāṣid of justice. Investigator accountability should be realized through internal control mechanisms, ethical sanctions, and judicial supervision through pretrial. The discussion emphasized that the integration of maqāṣid al-sharīʿah values can strengthen the national legal accountability system, as it places justice and the protection of individual rights as the main goals of law enforcement. Therefore, a reconstruction of the maqāṣid-based investigation paradigm is needed to realize humane, ethical, and substantive law enforcement.
IMPLEMENTATION OF ONLINE DISPUTE RESOLUTION AND MARKETPLACE LIABILITY BASED ON THE PRINCIPLE OF INTERMEDIARY LIABILITY Hidayati, Maslihati Nur; Suartini, Suartini
International Journal Multidisciplinary Science Vol. 3 No. 3 (2024): October: International Journal Multidisciplinary Science
Publisher : Asosiasi Dosen Muda Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56127/ijml.v3i3.1618

Abstract

The rapid growth of online transactions aligns with the increasing potential for disputes between consumers and businesses. The problem is the need for national regulations governing ODR, although some marketplaces have implemented internal dispute resolution systems. This research uses John Rawls' theory of distributive justice to analyze marketplace liability in online dispute resolution, focusing on the principle of intermediary liability. The research method involves a literature review and case analysis on several platforms such as Tokopedia, Shopee, AliExpress, and eBay. The results show that although some marketplaces have developed efficient ODR systems, there are still challenges related to transparency, security, and fairness. Marketplaces are expected to create a more comprehensive and equitable system, considering equal access for consumers.