Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

PENYELESAIAN HUKUM KEADILAN RESTORATIF TERHADAP PELAKU PENGANIAYAAN Nofarizal, Dedi; Yusuf, Yusuf; Pardede, Rudi
Collegium Studiosum Journal Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024): Collegium Studiosum Journal
Publisher : LPPM STIH Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/csj.v7i2.1350

The issues above are rooted in the focus on a criminal act and the justice achieved through resolving a criminal case. The perspective on the meaning of a crime and punishment adopted in the current traditional criminal justice system is that “a crime is a violation of the state, defined by lawbreaking and guilt,” which is rigid and does not allow freedom for victims and perpetrators to resolve their cases. Based on research findings, it is known that the implementation of restorative justice for perpetrators of assault in the jurisdiction of Dumai Police, based on the Regulation of the Indonesian National Police Number 8 of 2021 concerning the Handling of Criminal Acts Based on Restorative Justice, has not been running effectively. Many cases between victims and perpetrators have not reached an agreement, making the process only viable if both parties, the victim and the perpetrator, agree to resolve the issue through restorative justice. The obstacles include the influence of third parties from the victim's family on the victim, the involvement of interested parties in the matter, the lack of understanding of restorative justice among the community, and communication barriers between the perpetrator and the victim. Efforts to overcome these obstacles involve providing input to victims and perpetrators regarding the issue, preventing interference from uninterested parties, increasing public understanding of restorative justice, and improving communication between the perpetrator and the victim.

PELAKSANAAN PENYIDIKAN TINDAK PIDANA PERBANKAN DALAM WILAYAH HUKUM POLDA RIAU Simamora, Bona Adrian; Fahmi; Pardede, Rudi
Collegium Studiosum Journal Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024): Collegium Studiosum Journal
Publisher : LPPM STIH Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/csj.v7i2.1391

Tindak pidana perbankan merupakan salah satu bentuk kejahatan ekonomi yang memiliki dampak luas bagi masyarakat, perekonomian, serta stabilitas sistem perbankan itu sendiri. Di wilayah hukum Polda Riau, kasus-kasus tindak pidana perbankan membutuhkan penanganan yang serius mengingat kompleksitasnya yang sering kali melibatkan teknologi, keterampilan keuangan, serta jaringan yang melibatkan pelaku dari berbagai kalangan. Penyidik dalam hal ini memiliki peran sentral dalam mengungkap dan menindak kejahatan di sektor perbankan. Penyidik yang bertugas di Polda Riau memiliki kewenangan dan tanggung jawab berdasarkan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana (KUHAP) serta undang-undang terkait lainnya seperti Undang-Undang Nomor 10 Tahun 1998 tentang Perbankan dan Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 2010 tentang Pencegahan dan Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang. Fungsi utama penyidik adalah melakukan proses penyidikan untuk mengungkap fakta hukum terkait tindak pidana yang terjadi, mengumpulkan bukti-bukti, serta mengidentifikasi pelaku untuk diajukan ke proses peradilan. Metode yang dipergunakan adalah penelitian hukum sosiologis. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian diketahui bahwa Pelaksanaan penyidikan dalam mengungkap tindak pidana perbankan di wilayah hukum Polda Riau adalah belum berjalan sebagaimana mestinya, karena masih adanya terjadinya tindak pidana dalam perbankan. Penyidik kepolisian bertanggung jawab untuk memverifikasi adanya tindakan pidana yang dilakukan oleh pihak yang terlibat, baik itu individu, kelompok, maupun institusi perbankan. Proses penyidikan dimulai dengan laporan atau pengaduan yang diterima oleh aparat kepolisian, diikuti dengan pemeriksaan terhadap dokumen terkait, saksi, serta tersangka yang diduga terlibat dalam tindak pidana perbankan. Penyidik harus memastikan bahwa prosedur penyidikan yang dilaksanakan sesuai dengan ketentuan hukum yang berlaku. Modus operandi tindak pidana perbankan di wilayah hukum Polda Riau adalah mulai dari penipuan, penggelapan, hingga pemalsuan dokumen perbankan dengan tujuan memperoleh keuntungan secara ilegal. Pelaku sering kali memanfaatkan kelemahan dalam sistem pengawasan dan kontrol internal di lembaga perbankan untuk melakukan tindakan yang merugikan nasabah atau pihak lain. Salah satu modus yang sering terjadi adalah pemalsuan dokumen yang berkaitan dengan pinjaman atau transaksi keuangan, di mana pelaku membuat dokumen palsu untuk mendapatkan dana secara tidak sah. Selain itu, penyalahgunaan akses oleh oknum perbankan untuk melakukan transfer dana tanpa izin juga sering dijumpai sebagai modus operandi dalam tindak pidana perbankan. Modus lainnya termasuk penggunaan teknologi informasi untuk melakukan penipuan atau pembobolan rekening nasabah melalui serangan cyber. Penyidikan terhadap modus operandi ini memerlukan analisis yang mendalam terkait pola-pola tindak pidana yang ada, dengan melibatkan berbagai pihak terkait, termasuk pengawasan dari Bank Indonesia dan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK) untuk mendalami lebih jauh jaringan dan praktek ilegal yang terjadi di sektor perbankan.

IMPLEMENTASI PENGELOLAAN BARANG BUKTI TINDAK PIDANA DI WILAYAH HUKUM POLRESTA PEKANBARU Muhardi, Dekky; Harahap, Irawan; Pardede, Rudi
Collegium Studiosum Journal Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025): Collegium Studiosum Journal
Publisher : LPPM STIH Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/csj.v8i1.1680

In the jurisdiction of the Pekanbaru City Police Resort, as part of the Indonesian National Police tasked with maintaining public security and order, the management of criminal evidence should be carried out professionally, transparently, and in accordance with applicable legal provisions, as stipulated in the Indonesian Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP), the Indonesian Criminal Code (KUHP), and internal police regulations. The purpose of this research is to analyze the implementation of criminal evidence management within the jurisdiction of the Pekanbaru City Police Resort, to examine the obstacles in its implementation, and to explore efforts to overcome these obstacles. The research method used is sociological legal research. Based on the research findings, it is known that the implementation of criminal evidence management in the jurisdiction of the Pekanbaru City Police Resort has not been running as it should. Although the formal procedures for managing evidence have been regulated through procedural law and internal police regulations, in practice, some pieces of evidence are still being stored within individual units rather than in centralized, standardized facilities. The obstacles in implementing evidence management include lack of coordination between investigators and other relevant units involved in the criminal justice process, inadequate infrastructure and storage facilities, and the absence of an optimal internal supervision system over evidence management processes. Efforts to overcome these challenges include strengthening inter-departmental coordination, encouraging the digitization of evidence administration systems, improving physical storage facilities, and pushing for adequate budget allocation from the police institution as well as support from local governments to ensure that evidence storage facilities meet ideal standards. Additionally, enhancing the integrity and professionalism of personnel involved in the management of criminal evidence is also a crucial measure.

PELAKSANAAN PENEGAKAN HUKUM TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA PENCURIAN PEMBERATAN Meinecky, Ryan; Kadaryanto, Bagio; Pardede, Rudi
Collegium Studiosum Journal Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025): Collegium Studiosum Journal
Publisher : LPPM STIH Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/csj.v8i1.1705

Qualified Theft refers to theft committed under certain circumstances or using specific methods that make the crime more severe, and therefore subject to harsher penalties than ordinary theft. This involves two or more individuals collaborating in the act of theft, such as jointly taking possessions. The purpose of this research is to analyze the Implementation of Law Enforcement Against the Crime of Qualified Theft in the Jurisdiction of Pekanbaru, to examine the obstacles in its enforcement, and to explore efforts to overcome those obstacles. The method used is sociological legal research. Based on the findings, law enforcement against the crime of qualified theft in Pekanbaru has not been optimally implemented. This is evident from the continued prevalence of aggravated theft cases, such as motorcycle theft, house and business burglaries, and theft from public facilities—often occurring repeatedly and in close timeframes. The high frequency of such crimes reflects a gap between legal enforcement efforts and the reality of criminal activity in the field. Obstacles to effective law enforcement include: Limited human resources compared to the volume of incoming reports each day, The socio-economic background of offenders—typically from lower-income groups with limited education, A lack of strong evidence and minimal technological support in the evidence-gathering process, Social interference from the perpetrator’s environment, including familial pressure on victims to withdraw their reports. Efforts to overcome these challenges involve: Improving the quality of investigations by strengthening human resources and applying digital technology, Enhancing police-community partnerships through initiatives like neighborhood-based police officers, legal education, and community empowerment via communication and coordination forums (FKPM), Optimizing cross-functional coordination and expediting case handling based on the principles of professionalism and proportionality, Reinforcing scientific investigation techniques such as detailed crime scene processing, forensic evidence collection, and utilizing CCTV footage and digital forensics as supporting evidence.

PENERAPAN HUKUM TERHADAP PELAKU PENYEBARAN KONTEN PORNOGRAFI Rizki, Muhammad; Harahap, Irawan; Pardede, Rudi
Collegium Studiosum Journal Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025): Collegium Studiosum Journal
Publisher : LPPM STIH Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/csj.v8i1.1710

Pornography in Indonesia is a serious concern for the government, as the Associated Press once stated that Indonesia could become the next haven for pornography. This is due to the ease with which erotic or sensual images and information can now be downloaded and accessed simply for viewing or enjoyment. Certain individuals have taken advantage of this situation by developing and commercializing pornographic materials. Such content can now be found almost anywhere, with virtually no restrictions on accessing pornographic videos or images. The spread of pornographic content through the internet has become increasingly easy and fast, necessitating firm actions to prevent it. The objective of this study is to analyze the enforcement of the law against individuals who distribute pornographic content under Law No. 44 of 2008 on Pornography (Case Study at the Criminal Investigation Unit of Pekanbaru City Police). Specifically, it aims to examine the obstacles in the implementation of criminal law against the distribution of pornographic content, and to analyze the efforts and solutions to overcome these obstacles under the same law. The research method used is a sociological legal approach. The findings reveal that the enforcement of the law against perpetrators of pornographic content distribution has been carried out by the Criminal Investigation Unit of the Pekanbaru City Police in accordance with the provisions of the Pornography Law and the Law on Electronic Information and Transactions (ITE Law). Legal enforcement involves stages of investigation, inquiry, and case transfer to the prosecution, guided by relevant criminal provisions. However, the enforcement is not yet fully effective, as many cases remain undisclosed or do not proceed to prosecution—particularly those involving distribution through social media and digital applications. The obstacles identified include: difficulties in digital evidence collection due to the use of anonymous accounts and VPNs by perpetrators; limited forensic digital capabilities among law enforcement officers; ambiguous legal norms within the Pornography Law that lead to varied interpretations; and low public awareness regarding the dangers of distributing obscene content. Additional challenges include cultural and psychological barriers that deter victims from reporting, and weak coordination among institutions and digital platform providers in addressing pornographic content. Proposed solutions include: enhancing law enforcement capacity through digital forensic training; harmonizing legal norms to make them clearer and more operational; increasing digital literacy and legal education among the public; and optimizing cooperation between the government and internet service providers. A restorative justice approach can also be considered in certain cases, especially those involving children or adolescents, to ensure that law enforcement remains humane. Furthermore, the establishment of a dedicated cybercrime unit to professionally and sustainably handle digital pornography cases is essential.

PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP KORBAN KEKERASAN SEKSUAL Sistha, Windy Widya; Harahap, Irawan; Pardede, Rudi
Collegium Studiosum Journal Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025): Collegium Studiosum Journal
Publisher : LPPM STIH Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/csj.v8i1.1715

Sexual harassment is regulated under Law Number 12 of 2022 concerning the Crime of Sexual Violence. Article 4 paragraph 2 of the law stipulates that anyone who commits non-physical actions such as gestures, writings, and/or words related to another person's body parts or sexual desires can be subject to criminal sanctions for non-physical sexual harassment. Offenders proven to have violated this law may face imprisonment of up to nine months and/or a maximum fine of IDR 10 million. The purpose of this research is to analyze the legal protection for victims of sexual violence based on the perspective of Law Number 12 of 2022 concerning the Crime of Sexual Violence, and to analyze the legal consequences of such protection. The method used is normative legal research. Based on the findings, the legal protection for victims of sexual violence under this law represents a significant milestone in Indonesia’s legal framework. The law progressively places the victim at the center of the legal process and broadens the definition of sexual violence beyond what was previously outlined in the Criminal Code (KUHP). Through this law, victims are granted broader rights, including legal assistance, rehabilitation, protection from intimidation, and recovery services. On the other hand, law enforcement officers have greater legal obligations to carry out investigations and trials with a victim-centered approach. The legal consequences of this protection not only affect the perpetrators in the form of criminal sanctions and additional penalties, but also impose institutional responsibilities on the state, including the provision of recovery services and reforming legal approaches. However, implementation challenges such as limited understanding among law enforcement, lack of support facilities, and low public legal literacy remain significant obstacles that must be addressed.

PENEGAKAN HUKUM TERHADAP PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA PERJUDIAN Afriansyah, Ricky; Fahmi; Pardede, Rudi
Collegium Studiosum Journal Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025): Collegium Studiosum Journal
Publisher : LPPM STIH Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/csj.v8i1.1717

The purpose of this research is to analyze the Law Enforcement Against Perpetrators of Gambling Crimes in the Jurisdiction of the Pekanbaru City Police, identify the obstacles in enforcing the law, and explore efforts to overcome these obstacles. The method used is sociological legal research. Based on the results, it is found that law enforcement against gambling offenders in the Pekanbaru City Police jurisdiction is not yet fully optimal, as gambling practices remain prevalent in the community—both in conventional forms such as lottery and card games, and in online forms such as slot games and chip-based games like Higgs Domino. Although the police routinely conduct raids and uncover cases, gambling persists due to various social and structural factors that sustain it. The obstacles in enforcing the law against gambling offenders in the jurisdiction of the Pekanbaru City Police are: First, the limited availability of digital forensic technology at the level of the criminal investigation unit, especially to uncover and act on online gambling involving foreign platforms and fictitious bank accounts. Second, the low level of community participation in providing valid reports or information to the police. It was observed that some community members still perceive gambling as normal, even as a form of entertainment or supplementary income. Third, the presence of legal loopholes in dealing with gambling through game-based applications such as Higgs Domino and similar platforms, as there are no clear regulations defining such games as gambling tools.

PENYELESAIAN HUKUM KEADILAN RESTORATIF TERHADAP PELAKU PENGANIAYAAN Nofarizal, Dedi; Yusuf, Yusuf; Pardede, Rudi
Collegium Studiosum Journal Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024): Collegium Studiosum Journal
Publisher : LPPM STIH Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/csj.v7i2.1350

The issues above are rooted in the focus on a criminal act and the justice achieved through resolving a criminal case. The perspective on the meaning of a crime and punishment adopted in the current traditional criminal justice system is that “a crime is a violation of the state, defined by lawbreaking and guilt,” which is rigid and does not allow freedom for victims and perpetrators to resolve their cases. Based on research findings, it is known that the implementation of restorative justice for perpetrators of assault in the jurisdiction of Dumai Police, based on the Regulation of the Indonesian National Police Number 8 of 2021 concerning the Handling of Criminal Acts Based on Restorative Justice, has not been running effectively. Many cases between victims and perpetrators have not reached an agreement, making the process only viable if both parties, the victim and the perpetrator, agree to resolve the issue through restorative justice. The obstacles include the influence of third parties from the victim's family on the victim, the involvement of interested parties in the matter, the lack of understanding of restorative justice among the community, and communication barriers between the perpetrator and the victim. Efforts to overcome these obstacles involve providing input to victims and perpetrators regarding the issue, preventing interference from uninterested parties, increasing public understanding of restorative justice, and improving communication between the perpetrator and the victim.

PELAKSANAAN PENYIDIKAN TINDAK PIDANA PERBANKAN DALAM WILAYAH HUKUM POLDA RIAU Simamora, Bona Adrian; Fahmi; Pardede, Rudi
Collegium Studiosum Journal Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024): Collegium Studiosum Journal
Publisher : LPPM STIH Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/csj.v7i2.1391

Tindak pidana perbankan merupakan salah satu bentuk kejahatan ekonomi yang memiliki dampak luas bagi masyarakat, perekonomian, serta stabilitas sistem perbankan itu sendiri. Di wilayah hukum Polda Riau, kasus-kasus tindak pidana perbankan membutuhkan penanganan yang serius mengingat kompleksitasnya yang sering kali melibatkan teknologi, keterampilan keuangan, serta jaringan yang melibatkan pelaku dari berbagai kalangan. Penyidik dalam hal ini memiliki peran sentral dalam mengungkap dan menindak kejahatan di sektor perbankan. Penyidik yang bertugas di Polda Riau memiliki kewenangan dan tanggung jawab berdasarkan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana (KUHAP) serta undang-undang terkait lainnya seperti Undang-Undang Nomor 10 Tahun 1998 tentang Perbankan dan Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 2010 tentang Pencegahan dan Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang. Fungsi utama penyidik adalah melakukan proses penyidikan untuk mengungkap fakta hukum terkait tindak pidana yang terjadi, mengumpulkan bukti-bukti, serta mengidentifikasi pelaku untuk diajukan ke proses peradilan. Metode yang dipergunakan adalah penelitian hukum sosiologis. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian diketahui bahwa Pelaksanaan penyidikan dalam mengungkap tindak pidana perbankan di wilayah hukum Polda Riau adalah belum berjalan sebagaimana mestinya, karena masih adanya terjadinya tindak pidana dalam perbankan. Penyidik kepolisian bertanggung jawab untuk memverifikasi adanya tindakan pidana yang dilakukan oleh pihak yang terlibat, baik itu individu, kelompok, maupun institusi perbankan. Proses penyidikan dimulai dengan laporan atau pengaduan yang diterima oleh aparat kepolisian, diikuti dengan pemeriksaan terhadap dokumen terkait, saksi, serta tersangka yang diduga terlibat dalam tindak pidana perbankan. Penyidik harus memastikan bahwa prosedur penyidikan yang dilaksanakan sesuai dengan ketentuan hukum yang berlaku. Modus operandi tindak pidana perbankan di wilayah hukum Polda Riau adalah mulai dari penipuan, penggelapan, hingga pemalsuan dokumen perbankan dengan tujuan memperoleh keuntungan secara ilegal. Pelaku sering kali memanfaatkan kelemahan dalam sistem pengawasan dan kontrol internal di lembaga perbankan untuk melakukan tindakan yang merugikan nasabah atau pihak lain. Salah satu modus yang sering terjadi adalah pemalsuan dokumen yang berkaitan dengan pinjaman atau transaksi keuangan, di mana pelaku membuat dokumen palsu untuk mendapatkan dana secara tidak sah. Selain itu, penyalahgunaan akses oleh oknum perbankan untuk melakukan transfer dana tanpa izin juga sering dijumpai sebagai modus operandi dalam tindak pidana perbankan. Modus lainnya termasuk penggunaan teknologi informasi untuk melakukan penipuan atau pembobolan rekening nasabah melalui serangan cyber. Penyidikan terhadap modus operandi ini memerlukan analisis yang mendalam terkait pola-pola tindak pidana yang ada, dengan melibatkan berbagai pihak terkait, termasuk pengawasan dari Bank Indonesia dan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK) untuk mendalami lebih jauh jaringan dan praktek ilegal yang terjadi di sektor perbankan.

Title

Found 9 Documents
Search
Journal : Collegium Studiosum Journal

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 9 Documents Search Journal : Collegium Studiosum Journal

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 9 Documents
Search
Journal : Collegium Studiosum Journal