Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
4.744
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal SALAM: Jurnal Sosial dan Budaya Syar-i Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum POLITICA: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara dan Politik Islam Journal Evidence Of Law POLICY, LAW, NOTARY AND REGULATORY ISSUES (POLRI) SENTRI: Jurnal Riset Ilmiah SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum ARMADA : Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin Kultura: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora Blantika : Multidisciplinary Journal Jurnal Global Ilmiah Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia Jurnal Riset Ilmiah Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengkajian Ilmiah SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum Themis: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Ismed, Mohamad
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Aerospace Engineering Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Astronomy Automotive Engineering Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Chemistry Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Control & Systems Engineering Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Dentistry Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Energy Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Immunology & microbiology Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Mechanical Engineering Medicine & Pharmacology Neuroscience Nursing Physics Public Health Social Sciences Transportation Veterinary Other

Published : 32 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 32 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4 
Pertanggung Jawaban Pidana Terhadap Perantara dalam Tindak Pidana Narkotika Muhamad, Fadel; Kristiawanto, Kristiawanto; Ismed, Mohamad
Blantika: Multidisciplinary Journal Vol. 1 No. 3 (2023): Reguler Issue
Publisher : PT. Publikasiku Academic Solution

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57096/blantika.v1i3.35

Abstract

Pembahasan mengenai Pertanggung Jawaban Pidana Terhadap Perantara Dalam Tindak Pidana Narkotika. Metode yang digunakan adalah jenis penelitian yuridis normatif dengan merinci pada norma-norma, analisa pasal-pasal dalam peraturan perundang-undangan yang mengatur tentang pertanggungjawaban pidana terhadap perantara dalam tindak pidana narkotika. Pertanggungjawaban pidana terhadap perantara yang diatur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2009 tentang Narkotika sudah tepat untuk menjerat para perantara narkotika.
KEPASTIAN HUKUM PENERAPAN JUSTICE COLLABORATOR TERHADAP PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA NARKOTIKA. Pratama, Dimas Satriawan Syah; Chandra, Tofik Yanuar; Ismed, Mohamad
SENTRI: Jurnal Riset Ilmiah Vol. 3 No. 6 (2024): SENTRI : Jurnal Riset Ilmiah, Juni 2024
Publisher : LPPM Institut Pendidikan Nusantara Global

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55681/sentri.v3i6.2885

Abstract

The idea of a Justice Collaborator is based on Article 37 paragraph (2) of the 2003 United Nations Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC) which states that the state is obliged to consider reducing the sentence of perpetrators who provide substantial cooperation in the investigation and prosecution of a specified crime. As of 2023, UNCAC has 190 member countries which have proven that the article regarding Justice Collaborator is an effective way to eradicate organized crime such as narcotics. The Research method is a normative juridical research, to obtain the necessary data in connection to the period issue. The data used is secondary data in consisting of primary legal materials. Besides, it used primary data to support secondary data legal materials. Data analysis was done by qualitative juridical analysis. The result of research is obtained that From the research results, it can be seen that Justice Collaborator is a form of symbiotic mutualism or mutually beneficial cooperation between Witnesses and Perpetrators of law enforcement officers where each of them gets benefits related to the disclosure of narcotics crime cases. The legal basis for Justice Collaborator began with the publication of SEMA No. 4 of 2011, Joint Regulations, to Law no. 31 of 2014. In the PSK Law, the position of Justice Collaborator is regulated as equal to Witness, Victim and Whistleblower and their rights are guaranteed by law, but in practice there are still many perpetrator witnesses who do not get leniency because in the trial the judge does not consider the testimony of the perpetrator witness to meet the requirements. as Justice Collaborator. Even though the legal basis already exists, because in the Indonesian judicial system the decision maker is the judge, the recommendation of the prosecutor or LPSK does not necessarily lighten the sentence of the perpetrator witness
Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Penyalahgunaan Gas LPG Bersubsidi di DKI Jakarta Siahaan, Pangihutan; Chandra, Tofik Yanuar; Ismed, Mohamad
Jurnal Global Ilmiah Vol. 1 No. 2 (2023): Jurnal Global Ilmiah
Publisher : International Journal Labs

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55324/jgi.v1i2.18

Abstract

Pembahasan mengenai penegakan hukum terhadap pelaku tindak pidana penyalahgunaan gas LPG (Liquefied Petroleum Gas) bersubsidi di DKI Jakarta. Metode pendekatan yang dipergunakan dalam penelitian hukum ini adalah metode pendekatan yuridis normatif yang didukung dengan yuridis empiris dengan merinci uraian yaitu suatu penelitian yang secara deduktif dimulai analisa terhadap pasal-pasal dalam peraturan perundang-undangan yang mengatur terhadap permasalahan Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Penyalahgunaan Gas LPG (Liquefied Petroleum Gas) Bersubsidi di DKI Jakarta.Penegakan hukum terhadap pelaku tindak pidana penyalahgunaan Gas LPG bersubsidi di DKI Jakarta bahwa Perbuatan pelaku pengoplos tersebut berdampak negatif untuk masyarakat dimana gas elpiji 3 kilogram merupakan barang bersubsidi yang diperutukkan bagi kalangan yang kurang mampu dan usaha kecil, akibatnya dapat mengurangi jatah masyarakat yang berhak mendapatkannya. Penggunaan hukum pidana sebagai suatu upaya untuk mengatasi masalah sosial (kejahatan) termasuk dalam bidang penegakan hukum dalam penyalahgunaan Gas LPG dimana tersangka telah melanggar pada Pasal 40 angka 9 Undang-Undang No. 11 Tahun 2020 Tentang Cipta Kerja Atas Perubahan Ketentuan Pasal 55 Undang-Undang No. 22 Tahun 2001 Tentang Minyak dan Gas Bumi.
PENERAPAN TINDAK PIDANA PENIPUAN DAN PENGGELAPAN DALAM PELAKSANAAN PERJANJIAN PENGELOLAAN LIMBAH INDUSTRI Santoso, Budi; Maryano, Maryano; Ismed, Mohamad
SINERGI : Jurnal Riset Ilmiah Vol. 2 No. 8 (2025): SINERGI : Jurnal Riset Ilmiah, Agustus 2025
Publisher : Lembaga Pendidikan dan Penelitian Manggala Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62335/sinergi.v2i8.1666

Abstract

  This phenomenon frequently occurs in cooperative practices between industrial companies and waste management operators, where business actors fail to fulfill their contractual obligations, such as not processing waste in accordance with established procedures, concealing essential facts, or abusing trust for personal gain. Such actions may be classified as the criminal offense of fraud as stipulated in Article 378 of the Indonesian Criminal Code (KUHP) and embezzlement under Article 372 of the KUHP.The research problems in this study are: (1) How is the application of the criminal offenses of fraud and embezzlement in the implementation of industrial waste management agreements? and (2) How are legal protection measures provided to the aggrieved party in the execution of such agreements?The research method employed is normative juridical, using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. The results of the study indicate that although an agreement constitutes a civil legal relationship, if there is malicious intent (mens rea) from the outset, such conduct may be brought into the realm of criminal law. Furthermore, law enforcement against perpetrators may be pursued through criminal proceedings by law enforcement authorities, while victims may seek remedies through both criminal and civil legal channels as forms of legal protection.This study contributes to strengthening legal certainty and legal protection for parties involved in non-B3 waste management agreements, as well as serving as a preventive measure against crimes detrimental to the environment and society. The core analysis of this study focuses on material losses, the object of the agreement (non-B3 waste), and the ownership of waste materials in accordance with the contractual terms.
PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA PENGGELAPAN DALAM JABATAN DARIPERSPEKTIF HUKUM PIDANA INDONESIA Akbar, Muhammad Syarif Hidayatullah; Chandra, Tofik Yanuar; Ismed, Mohamad
SINERGI : Jurnal Riset Ilmiah Vol. 2 No. 8 (2025): SINERGI : Jurnal Riset Ilmiah, Agustus 2025
Publisher : Lembaga Pendidikan dan Penelitian Manggala Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62335/sinergi.v2i8.1738

Abstract

Indonesia, as a state based on the rule of law as stipulated in Article 1 paragraph (3) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, obliges every citizen to uphold the law without exception. In the context of criminal law, the principle of legality as stated in Article 1 paragraph (1) of the Indonesian Criminal Code (KUHP) establishes that an act can only be punished if it is regulated by law. One of the most common criminal offenses is embezzlement in office as regulated in Article 374 of the KUHP, which constitutes an aggravated form of ordinary embezzlement under Article 372 of the KUHP. This offense is often committed by individuals holding positions or employment relations, both in the private and public sectors, who abuse their authority to unlawfully control goods or money. This research aims to analyze the criminal act of embezzlement in office and the criminal liability of its perpetrators from the perspective of Indonesian criminal law. The study employs a normative juridical research method with statutory, case, conceptual, and analytical approaches. Data were obtained through library research consisting of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials, and analyzed using grammatical and systematic interpretation techniques. The findings show that the application of Article 374 of the KUHP in practice often encounters sentencing disparities, where court verdicts tend to be lighter than the prosecutors’ demands. This disparity is evident in several court decisions examined, in which sentence reductions were based on subjective considerations such as the defendant’s cooperative attitude, restitution of losses, and social background. Normatively, the criminal liability of perpetrators of embezzlement in office must be based on the principle of legality, conformity with statutory elements, and evidentiary processes in court. However, in practice, there is a gap between the theoretical framework of criminal law and its implementation, indicating the need for consistent law enforcement to ensure legal certainty and justice
Kepastian Hukum Status Barang Bukti yang Diduga Hasil Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang dari Tindak Pidana Asal Narkotika terhadap Terdakwa yang Meninggal Dunia Trapsilo, Lier Budhi; Maryano, Maryano; Ismed, Mohamad
CENDEKIA : Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengkajian Ilmiah Vol. 2 No. 8 (2025): CENDEKIA : Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengkajian Ilmiah, Agustus 2025
Publisher : Lembaga Pendidikan dan Penelitian Manggala Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62335/cendekia.v2i8.1744

Abstract

The problematic confiscation of assets of money laundering defendants whose convictions were finalized and subsequently dismissed by the court due to the defendant's death is the focus of this thesis research, which examines the duties of law enforcement agencies—the prosecutor's office and the police—to recover state assets owned by heirs who received assets from money launderers, through mechanisms in accordance with the principle of the presumption of innocence. The research questions are formulated as follows: 1) What are the provisions in the Money Laundering Law related to narcotics crimes? 2) What is the legal certainty regarding the status of evidence suspected of being the proceeds of money laundering from narcotics-based crimes against deceased defendants? The research method used in this dissertation is a normative juridical research method, conducted in an effort to obtain the necessary data related to the problem. The data used are secondary data and tertiary legal materials. In addition, primary data is also used to support the secondary legal materials. Data analysis is carried out using a qualitative juridical analysis method. Using a theoretical framework, namely the theory of evidence and the theory of legal certainty, to examine this problem. The research results indicate that the law does not regulate a mechanism for the restitution of state losses for deceased convicts, as this contradicts Article 83 of the Criminal Code. Consequently, there is no legal certainty regarding the status of evidence suspected of being the proceeds of money laundering from narcotics-based crimes against deceased defendants. Proven state losses that must be returned cannot be carried out by prosecutors acting as executors for deceased convicts. State attorneys can file civil lawsuits against the convict's heirs to repatriate assets obtained from money laundering to the state or state treasury as state revenue. The author's recommendation to legislators is to add articles that clearly relate to the mechanism for executing compensation or procedures for the restitution of state losses in the form of compensation to the provisions of the law, as well as to enable heirs of convicts convicted of money laundering to fulfill their legal responsibility, namely to return assets used by the heirs of convicts convicted of money laundering.
Kepastian Hukum Jual Beli Saham pada Perseroan Terbatas Tanpa Persetujuan Pasangan Hidup Dihubungkan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Wahyu; Widjaja, Dhody AR.; Ismed, Mohamad
CENDEKIA : Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengkajian Ilmiah Vol. 2 No. 9 (2025): CENDEKIA : Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengkajian Ilmiah, September 2025
Publisher : Lembaga Pendidikan dan Penelitian Manggala Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62335/cendekia.v2i9.1830

Abstract

Perseroan Terbatas merupakan bentuk badan hukum yang paling dikenal, diatur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2007, pengalihan saham perseroan kepada pihak lain diatur dalam Pasal 56, terdapat perbedaan penafsiran mengenai syarat jual beli saham diantara para investor, praktisi hukum. Ada notaris yang memerlukan persetujuan pasangannya untuk membeli dan menjual saham milik pribadi, namun notaris lainnya tidak memerlukan persetujuan suami atau istri. Perbedaan penafsiran ini tentu menimbulkan ketidakjelasan skenario penyelesaian transaksi jual beli saham.
Tanggung Jawab Hukum PPAT atas Dana BPHTB yang Tidak Disetorkan ke Kas Negara: Suatu Kajian Yuridis Ayulina, Jennitri; Ismed, Mohamad; Sri Marniati, Felicitas
Politica: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara dan Politik Islam Vol 12 No 1 (2025): POLITICA: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara dan Politik Islam
Publisher : Prodi Tata Negara (Siyasah) IAIN Langsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32505/politica.v12i1.12497

Abstract

This study examines the legal consequences and responsibilities of Land Deed Officials (PPAT) regarding entrusted Land and Building Rights Acquisition Fee (BPHTB) payments that are not deposited into the state treasury. Article 25 paragraph (2) of the Regulation of the Minister of ATR/BPN No. 3 of 2023 requires proof of BPHTB payment in every transfer of land or building rights. However, in practice, clients often entrust BPHTB payments to PPAT, and some officials fail to forward the funds, creating legal problems. Using a normative juridical method with statutory, conceptual, analytical, and case approaches, this research analyzes legal materials from primary, secondary, and tertiary sources. The results show that PPAT who fails to deposit entrusted BPHTB funds may face criminal sanctions under Articles 372–376 of the Criminal Code, particularly Article 374 on embezzlement, since Government Regulation No. 24 of 2016 does not explicitly regulate such sanctions. The implication is the need for strict legal accountability of PPAT to ensure legal certainty, protect the public, and safeguard state revenue.
The Anomaly of Law Enforcement Against the Spread of Fake News in Indonesia Ismed, Mohamad
Journal Evidence Of Law Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): Journal Evidence Of Law (Agustus)
Publisher : CV. Era Digital Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59066/jel.v4i2.1575

Abstract

Abstract The spread of fake news or hoaxes in Indonesia has become an increasingly pressing social issue, impacting both social and political stability. Although the Electronic Information and Transactions Law (UU ITE) provides a legal basis for addressing this issue, its implementation faces significant challenges. This study aims to analyze the anomalies in law enforcement against the spread of hoaxes in Indonesia, focusing on the misalignment between regulations, law enforcement practices, and their impact on freedom of expression. The research employs a normative legal approach using three primary approaches: legislative, conceptual, and case-based. The findings indicate that while the UU ITE provides clear legal grounds, there is ambiguity in the definition of hoaxes, which may lead to misuse of the law. The study also reveals that law enforcement against hoaxes is often influenced by political factors, affecting fairness and transparency in the legal process. Therefore, reform in both regulations and law enforcement practices is necessary to establish a more just and effective legal system.
Tanggung Jawab PPAT dalam Akta Jual Beli Tanah Terkait Adanya Utang Piutang Sarapi, Virgin Venlin; Hutomo, Putra; Ismed, Mohamad
Themis : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 2 No. 1 (2024)
Publisher : LPPI Yayasan Almahmudi bin Dahlan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70437/themis.v2i1.864

Abstract

Pembuat Akta Tanah (PPAT) merupakan Pejabat Umum yang bertugas untuk membuat Akta Autentik sebagai bukti telah dilakukannya perbuatan hukum tertentu mengenai Hak Atas Tanah atau Hak Milik Satuan Rumah Susun, salah satunya adalah Akta Jual Beli (AJB). Ketika pembuatan Akta Jual Beli tidak memenuhi prosedur dan persyaratan yang diatur dalam peraturan perundang-undangan, maka Akta tersebut menjadi cacat hukum, sehingga harus dibatalkan/batal demi hukum. Adapun rumusan masalah dalam penelitian ini yaitu bagaimana akibat hukum Akta Jual Beli Tanah yang dibuat di hadapan PPAT terkait adanya utang piutang? Serta bagaimana tanggung jawab PPAT yang membuat Akta Jual Beli Tanah terkait adanya utang piutang? Teori yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini yaitu Teori Akibat Hukum menurut Soeroso dan Teori Tanggung Jawab Hukum menurut Hans Kelsen. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini dengan jenis penelitian Yuridis Normatif, yaitu penelitian hukum kepustakaan atau data sekunder dengan sumber bahan-bahan hukum primer, sekunder dan tersier. Adapun pendekatan penelitian yang dipergunakan Pendekatan Perundang-Undangan, Pendekatan Konseptual, Pendekatan Analitis, Pendekatan Kasus dan teknik pengumpulan bahan hukum dilakukan dengan cara mengidentifikasi dan menginventarisasi aturan hukum positif, literatur buku, jurnal dan sumber bahan hukum lainnya. Untuk teknik Analisa bahan hukum dilakukan dengan penafsiran gramatikal, penafsiran sistematis, dan metode konstruksi hukum. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa akibat hukum dari pembuatan AJB dihadapan PPAT terkait adanya utang piutang yaitu mengandung cacat hukum dan tidak dapat dibenarkan karena melanggar syarat materil (sebab yang halal) yang merupakan batal demi hukum. Serta PPAT dapat bertangung jawab secara etik atas sanksi Administratif, atas sanksi Perdata, dan atas sanksi Pidana.
Co-Authors Abdullah, Zulfirman Akbar, Muhammad Syarif Hidayatullah Akkapin, Supaphorn Akkapin, Suphaporn Ali Imron Ardiyansah Ayulina, Jennitri Azhry, Izmi Latifah Basuki , Basuki , Basuki Candra, Tofik Yanuar Chandra, Tofik Yanuar Dwi Budi Santoso Erwinda Emran, Nevertiti Firman, Zul Franciska, Wira Hedwig Heri Susanto Hutomo, Putra Karinda, Frans Jomar Kencanawati, Erny Kristiawanto, Kristiawanto Lina, Ramlani Luter, Albertus Marbun, Lukas Pardamean E. Marniati, Felicitas Sri Maryano, Maryano Megawaty, Octavia Rouli Meilando, Ari Muhamad, Fadel Munzir, Marinov Nainggolan, Marsudin Nasseri, Jelly Paparang, Santrawan Pratama, Dimas Satriawan Syah Putra, Sapta Adi Sanjaya, Titus Adhi Saputra, Adji Sarapi, Virgin Venlin Shodiq, MD Siahaan, Pangihutan Siahaan, Ricardho Sinaulan, Ramlani Lina Sri Marniati, Felicitas Surya Wahyudi, Surya Sutanto, Audrey Lucretia Tarigan, Diego Pratana Trapsilo, Lier Budhi Wahyu Wibowo, Agus Ari Widjaja, Dhody AR. Windira, Ayu Yolanda, Moch Andre