Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
5.182
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal SUPREMASI: Jurnal Pemikiran, Penelitian Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial, Hukum dan Pengajarannya JURNAL PENDIDIKAN TAMBUSAI Jurnal Pro Hukum : Jurnal Penelitian Bidang Hukum Universitas Gresik Unes Law Review LEGAL BRIEF Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan Jurnal hukum IUS PUBLICUM RIO LAW JURNAL COURT REVIEW: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Batara Wisnu : Indonesian Journal of Community Services Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research Law and Economics SASI Jurnal Ragam Pengabdian Ipso Jure
Sidarta, Dudik Djaja
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 41 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 41 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4   5 
The Duty Of Doctors To Provide Visum Et Repertum To Law Enforcement In The Perspective Of Medical Confidentiality Melissa, Hilda; Hartoyo, Hartoyo; Damayanti, Sri Sukmana; Sidarta, Dudik Djaja
Jurnal Ragam Pengabdian Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): Mei-Agustus, Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): Multidisciplinary Perspectiv
Publisher : Lembaga Teewan Journal Solutions

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62710/rj3gmb94

Abstract

Visum et Repertum is a written piece of evidence that plays an important role in the judicial process, especially in uncovering the factual truth in cases related to a person's body and health, issued by a doctor. Doctors, as professionals in the medical field, have a legal obligation to create and provide Visum et Repertum at the request of law enforcement for court purposes. However, this obligation can raise legal issues because, on one hand, doctors are bound to maintain patient medical confidentiality, while on the other hand, they are expected to assist in law enforcement. It also becomes controversial when the victim objects to the issuance of a Visum et Repertum. This study aims to address the doctor's obligation to provide a Visum et Repertum at the request of investigators according to Indonesian laws and regulations, and to clarify the legal certainty regarding the doctor's duty to provide a Visum et Repertum if the victim or the victim's family refuses to undergo a medical examination for judicial purposes. The research method used is normative legal research with statutory, literature, and conceptual approaches. The legal materials used include primary legal materials in the form of legislation in the fields of criminal law, health, and police regulations; secondary legal materials such as legal literature, scientific journals, and opinions from health law experts; and tertiary legal materials as additional supporting materials. The legal materials are analyzed qualitatively to gain a comprehensive understanding of the doctor's obligation to provide Visum et Repertum to law enforcement from the perspective of medical confidentiality, addressing the two matters above. The conclusion of this study is that doctors are legally protected when providing Visum et Repertum or acting as expert witnesses in court, considering patient medical confidentiality, as long as the request comes from law enforcement in accordance with the law (Law No. 17 of 2023 on Health, Law No. 1 of 2023 on the Criminal Code, Law No. 20 of 2025 on the Criminal Procedure Code, and the Regulation of the Chief of the Indonesian National Police Number 12 of 2011 on Police Medicine) with a clear written request. However, if doctors reveal medical confidentiality outside of these laws, they risk facing criminal sanctions. Doctors are also legally protected when providing Visum et Repertum to investigators, even if the victim objects, because the interest of law enforcement is considered a broader public interest
Co-Authors Al Khasyi', Muchammad Akmal Alfathoni, Ahmad Habib Aliyansyah, Alif Wildan Aranggraei, Renda Aranggraeni, Renda Arifin, Choirul Ayu Chyntia, Desak Nyoman Ayuningtyas, Fitri Azzam, Fakhriyadi Yazid Baruno, Agustiawan Djoko Borman, M. Syahrul Cahyaningsurya, Nabila Sahara Chrysdianto, Dimas Cornelis, Vieta Imelda Damayanti, Sri Sukmana Daniek Suryaningdiah, Daniek Ernu Widodo, Ernu Fitria Ayuningtyas Grahita, Agasta Ardhya Hafidu, Akbar Al Hamdani, Fathul Handayati, Nur Hartoyo Hartoyo Hidayat, Toriqul Ilman Ismail, Nazli bin Ismalia, Rudy Kayla Natasha, Amanda Kurniawan, Yohan Dwi Linta Alfatih, Hafifah Laila M. Firmansyah Manampiring, Herdi Yerison Melissa, Hilda Milky, Faris Jamal Mulyosudarmo, Suviana Suwoto Nasoetion, Deddi Wardana Ngadimin Paramitha, Vallencia Nandya Parengkuan, Estherlina Florence Prasetyo, Rizky Agung Rahayu, Edi Bagus Waluyo Yuda Teguh Rahmah, Nabila Aliya Renol Gansalangi, Jefri Rohman Bulu, Akbar Taufiqur Ruslan, Herlina Sebtamuda, Wima Dwi Siti Marwiyah Soekorini, Noenik Soenyoto, Rochim Soerodjo, Irawan Solichah, Dewi Subekti Subekti . Subekti Subekti Subroto, Edwin Sulasdjono Sucipto Sucipto Sulistyani Eka Lestari Suyanto Suyanto Suyono, Yoyok Ucuk Syamsul Arifin Tambahani, Hance Brian Triyono, Sulasa Agus Ucuk, Yoyok Wahyu Prawesthi, Wahyu Walujo, Christianto Rici Widodo, Erno Wiranata, Ganda Arisandi Wisanggeni, Dimas Wulandari, Shindy Tri Zahra, Meita Fadhilah Zakaria, Riana