Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
3.984
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Masalah-Masalah Hukum Jurnal Mahasiswa Bimbingan Konseling Lentera Hukum Jurnal Dinamika Hukum Rechtsidee Perspektif : Kajian Masalah Hukum dan Pembangunan Mimbar Yustitia : Jurnal Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Unes Law Review Jurnal Simbur Cahaya JURNAL RECHTENS Syntax Idea Jurnal Ilmu Hukum KYADIREN Jurnal Kajian Pembaruan Hukum Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Ilmu Sosial (JHPIS) Eduvest - Journal of Universal Studies Eksekusi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Negara Aladalah: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora IIJSE Jurnal Anti Korupsi Referendum Konsensus: Jurnal Ilmu Pertahanan, Hukum dan Ilmu Komunikasi J-CEKI PESHUM
Ainul Azizah
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Jember
Aerospace Engineering Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Automotive Engineering Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Health Professions Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Neuroscience Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 32 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 32 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4 
Pengintegrasian Mediasi Penal Sebagai Penyelesaian Perkara Pidana Ditinjau Dari Perspektif Pembaharuan Hukum Di Indonesia Yanuarto, Totok; Sari, Pika; Widihiana Suarda, I Gede; Azizah, Ainul
JURNAL RECHTENS Vol. 13 No. 1 (2024): Juni
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56013/rechtens.v13i1.2845

Abstract

Tujuan artikel ini untuk menelaah dan mengevaluasi tentang pengintegrasian mediasi penal sebagai penyelesaian perkara pidana di tinjau dari perspektif pembaharuan hukum di indonesia. Jenis penelitian ini termasuk kedalam kategori yuridis-normatif, yaitu penelitian yang dilakukan dengan cara menelaah teori-teori, konsep-konsep, asas hukum serta peraturan perundang-undangan yang sesuai dan berkaitan dengan objek penelitian. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa dalam rangka menegakkan keadilan restorative dan pelaksanaannnya dilakukan dengan kesepakatan antara pelaku dan korban. Dikarenakan mediasi penal sebelumnya tidaklah pernah dilakukan di Indonesia maka sejatinya mediasi penal harus di integrasikan kedalam system peradilan pidana di Indonesia dan pengintegrasian tersebut sendiri dapat dilakukan dengan bentuk non penal policy yang dalam hal ini berarti dilakukan tanpa legislasi dan dapat pula dilakukan dengan lebih proper yaitu dengan penal policy yang pelaksanaannya dilaksanakan dengan penyusunan aturan mengenai mediasi penal mulai dari pengertian, asas, dan juga bentuk pelaksanaan integrasi penal di Indonesia. Kata Kunci:Mediasi, Penal, Perkara Pidana  Abstract The purpose of this article is to examine and evaluate the integration of penal mediation as a resolution of criminal cases from the perspective of legal reform in Indonesia. This type of research is included in the juridical-normative category, namely research carried out by examining theories, concepts, legal principles and statutory regulations that are appropriate and related to the object of research. The results of this research show that in order to uphold restorative justice and its implementation, it is carried out with an agreement between the perpetrator and the victim. Because penal mediation has never previously been carried out in Indonesia, penal mediation must actually be integrated into the criminal justice system in Indonesia and this integration itself can be carried out in the form of a non-penal policy, which in this case means it is carried out without legislation and can also be carried out more appropriately, namely by penal policy, the implementation of which is carried out by preparing rules regarding penal mediation starting from the meaning, principles and also the form of implementation of penal integration in Indonesia Keywords: Mediation, Penal, Criminal Case REFERENCES Andi Hamzah. 2009 Hukum Acara Pidana Edisi Kedua. Jakarta : Sinar Grafika. Braithwaite. 2006. Handbook of Restorative Justice “Shame. Shaming and Restorative Justice : A Critical appraisal”. New York : Routledge. Luhut Pangaribuan. 2006.  Hukum Acara Pidana Surat-Surat Resmi Di Pengadilan Oleh Advokat : Praperadilan. Eksepsi. Pledoi. Duplik. Memori Banding Kasasi. Peninjauan Kembali Edisi Revisi.  Jakarta : Djambatan. M Yahya Harahap. 2006. Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP Penyidikan dan Penuntutan Edisi Revisi. Jakartta : Sinar Grafika. Mark S Umbreit. 2001. Obstacles And Oppurtunities For Developing Victim Offender Mediation For Juveniles : The Experience Of Six Oregon. San Fransisco : CA : Joessey-Bass. Bani. Ferdinand Donu. and Frans Simangunsong. "Mediasi Penal Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Perkara Tindak Pidana Lingkungan Hidup." Journal Evidence Of Law 2. no. 3 (2023). Garcia. Virginia. Hari Sutra Disemadi. and Barda Nawawi Arief. "The enforcement of restorative justice in Indonesia criminal law." Legality: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum 28. no. 1 (2020). Lesmana. CSA Teddy. "Implementasi Mediasi Penal Dalam Penanganan Perkara Pidana (Studi Kasus Pada Satreskrim Polres Sukabumi Kota)." Jurnal Rechten: Riset Hukum Dan Hak Asasi Manusia 2. no. 2 (2020). Maknun. Luil. and Febrina Hertika Rani. "Perbandingan Konsep Penerapan Mediasi Penal Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Pidana Di Indonesia Dan Negara Lain." Lex Librum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 6. no. 2 (2020). Oktobrian. Dwiki. Rani Hendriana. Dwi Hapsari Retnaningrum. and Muhammad Lukman Nurhuda. "Pengawasan Pelaksanaan Kesepakatan Mediasi Penal Dalam Penerapan Restorative Justice Pada Tahapan Penyidikan." Litigasi 24. no. 1 (2023). Purnomo. Beja Suryo Hadi. "Kedudukan Mediasi Penal Dalam Sistem Peradilan Di Indonesia." Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Sosial 4. no. 2 (2018). Rizal. Moch Choirul. "Mediasi Penal Perspektif Hukum Pidana Islam." Ulul Albab 18. no. 1 (2017). Septiyo. Tendy. Joko Setiyono. and Muchlas Rastra Samara. "Optimalisasi Penerapan Mediasi Penal Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Perkara Tindak Pidana." Jurnal Yuridis 7. no. 2 (2020). Sudarsono. Cacuk. "Pelaksanaan Mediasi Penal Dalam Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan." Unnes Law Journal 4. no. 1 (2015). Vasilenko. Aleksandra S.. Sergey A. Bukalerov. Natal’ya S. Gaintseva. and Anton V. Serous. "General Provisions of the Mediation Institution in Criminal Proceedings of European States." In Current Problems and Ways of Industry Development: Equipment and Technologies. pp. 906-913. Cham: Springer International Publishing. 2021. Wangga. Maria Silvya E.. Pujiyono Pujiyono. and Barda Nawawi Arief. "Revocation of Political Rights of The Perpetrators of Criminal Acts of Corruption." JILS 4 (2019).
Legal Certainty of Grondkaart as Proof of Control of PT. Kereta Api Indonesia (PERSERO) in the Implementation of Land Registration Mahardika, Anugrah Ganda; Efendi, Aan; Azizah, Ainul
Indonesian Interdisciplinary Journal of Sharia Economics (IIJSE) Vol 9 No 1: Sharia Economics
Publisher : Universitas KH. Abdul Chalim Mojokerto

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Grondkaart is administrative evidence that records the ownership of railway land in the past. However, the unclear legal status of Grondkaart has given rise to various conflicts that often end up in court. There is legal uncertainty regarding land rights in the form of overlapping other rights issued above Grondkaart or land rights that are only based on Grondkaart itself. Critical evaluation of existing regulations and identification of problems from previous case studies will provide a strong foundation for formulating recommendations for improvement and refinement of the concept in order to ensure legal certainty. The research method used is normative legal research, namely, research on legislation, court decisions, and legal doctrines to understand positive law and resolve legal issues. The results of this study indicate that the Grondkaart has a strategic function as initial evidence of land ownership by PT. KAI (Persero), but its legal certainty will only be realized if the registration or conversion process of rights has been carried out in accordance with the provisions of laws and regulations. The Grondkaart cannot be used as the only legitimate basis for proving ownership in the land registration system in Indonesia. In order to maximize the transitional function of the Grondkaart as a basis for temporary recognition, the government needs to issue a policy that clearly explains its legal status within the framework of rights conversion. This can be done through the technical guidelines of the Ministry of ATR/BPN, which regulate the procedure for integrating historical documents into the national land registration system. Efforts are also needed to increase factual verification of physical control in the field, including the involvement of the community and interested parties. Thus, proof based on the Grondkaart becomes more objective, transparent, and in accordance with the precautionary principle in the national land registration system.
Co-Authors Aan Efendi Afifah, Rinda Nur Afrihasa, Balqis Nurdiniasari Ahmad Fahrudin Ahmad Mukhlasul Abidin Alex Prasetyo Amelia Nur Ramadhani Angga Wardana Anwar, Iryana Balqis Nurdiniasari Afrihasa Dominikus Rato Echwan Iriyanto Efendi, Aan Fadhilla, Dhia Savira Farah Nizrinia Aulia Fina Fakhriyah Firda Yunita Dewi Ghufron, Nurul Habi Burrohim Halif Halif, Halif Hartono, Danang Tri I Gede Widhiana Suarda Jadmiko, Widhi Kahar, Muhammad Paeway Ebiem Khoidin, Muhammad Laely Wulandari M. Arief Amrullah M. Khoidin Mahardika, Anugrah Ganda Mardiyono Mardiyono Moh. Ali Mohammad Arief Amrullah Multazaam Muntahaa Nur Fajrie Pintami Nanda Prihatmini, Sapti Putri, Dinda Fefty Miranda Rahmatullah, Khoirul Lukman Ratrini, Prisma Diyah Sari, Pika Sieldy Aprilia Utami Silaban, Rendy Tridolok Siti Khodijah Tajus Subki Tannuwijaya, Fanny Y A Triana Ohoiwutun Y.A Triana Ohoiwutun Y.A. Triana Ohoiwutun, Y.A. Triana Yanuarto, Totok Yougha Aulia Mahardi Yuris, Faza