Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
5.047
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Masalah-Masalah Hukum Jurnal Mahasiswa Bimbingan Konseling Lentera Hukum Jurnal Dinamika Hukum Rechtsidee Perspektif : Kajian Masalah Hukum dan Pembangunan Unes Law Review Jurnal Simbur Cahaya JURNAL RECHTENS Syntax Idea Jurnal Ilmu Hukum KYADIREN Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Ilmu Sosial (JHPIS) Eduvest - Journal of Universal Studies Eksekusi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Negara Jurnal Anti Korupsi Referendum Konsensus: Jurnal Ilmu Pertahanan, Hukum dan Ilmu Komunikasi Jurnal Cendekia Ilmiah PESHUM Rechtenstudent Journal ALADALAH: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora Jurnal Kajian Pembaruan Hukum INLAW
Ainul Azizah
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Jember
Aerospace Engineering Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Automotive Engineering Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Computer Science & IT Education Health Professions Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Neuroscience Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 39 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 39 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4 
Regulating Doxing and Personal Data Dissemination in Indonesia Halif Halif; Ainul Azizah; Prisma Diyah Ratrini
Jurnal Kajian Pembaruan Hukum Vol. 3 No. 1 (2023): January-June 2023
Publisher : University of Jember, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19184/jkph.v3i1.33938

Abstract

The development of information technology have an impact on cyber crimes such as identity theft, fraud, and misuse of personal data. One of the crimes, abuse of personal data is doxing. It was an illegal act to spreading action people's personal information or data without permission and creates dangerous situations, humiliation, harassment, or other adverse which can lead to spoilage of the victims. The act of doxing or disseminating personal data has recently increased, especially among journalists. Doxing is a transmission system of personal data conducted by journalists legally. The freedom of journalists who compose and develop news to encourage misuse of personal data. In this case, we are interested in studying the legal basis of doxing and personal data dissemination in Indonesia, with the objectives: first, does the regulation of distributing personal data (doxing) in the Electronic Information and Transaction Law encounter the doxing typology? second How is the reformulation of the criminal law policy on the act of spreading personal data (doxing) in fulfilling the doxing typology? This research adopted normative legal research and used a statutory approach, conceptual approach, and comparative approach. The results showed that the act of doxing in the ITE Law does not regulate it according to the doxing typology. Therefore, there is a need to reform criminal law policies in the ITE. It can also be through the Bill of Personal Data Protection. The government must compose a regulation on disseminating personal data or doxing in the Law concerning Electronic Information and transactions.
A Maqasid al-Shariah Evaluation of the Death Penalty for Child Sexual Crimes Alon Maemanah; Ainul Azizah; Moh. Ali
Rechtenstudent Vol. 7 No. 2 (2026): Rechtenstudent August 2026 (In Progress)
Publisher : Sharia Faculty, Kiai Haji Achmad Siddiq State Islamic University of Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35719/rch.v7i2.425

Abstract

Sexual violence, particularly sexual intercourse with children, is a serious crime that causes deep trauma, material and immaterial losses, and threatens the victim’s future. In 2024, Indonesia recorded 8,674 cases. Children, as the weaker party, often become targets, so perpetrators are frequently given severe punishments, including the death penalty. In Islamic law, sexual intercourse with children is equated with the crime of hirabah because it forcibly violates a child’s honor; therefore, harsh punishment, including death, is considered consistent with maqashid shariah in protecting religion, life, intellect, lineage, and property. This study examines the urgency of the death penalty for perpetrators of sexual intercourse with children, the characteristics of this crime, and the future concept of capital punishment within the framework of maqashid shariah. Using a normative juridical method with statutory, conceptual, case, and comparative approaches, the study finds that such acts violate the protection of life, intellect, and lineage, and therefore the death penalty is considered legitimate as protection, prevention, and public benefit, in line with Indonesian law and as a deterrent to this extraordinary crime.
Legal Characteristics of Patents as Collateral Assets in Banking Transactions Habibah Rizqo; Dyah Ochtorina Susanti; Ainul Azizah
Rechtenstudent Vol. 7 No. 2 (2026): Rechtenstudent August 2026 (In Progress)
Publisher : Sharia Faculty, Kiai Haji Achmad Siddiq State Islamic University of Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35719/rch.v7i2.426

Abstract

Patents as part of intellectual property possess economic value that can potentially be utilized as collateral in banking financing. The development of Indonesian positive law has normatively recognized patents as fiduciary collateral, particularly following amendments to patent legislation and the enactment of creative economy regulations. Nevertheless, in banking practice, patents have not yet been fully accepted as loan collateral due to various juridical and technical constraints. This article aims to analyze the legal characteristics of patents as objects of fiduciary security, examine their regulation based on the principle of legal certainty, and propose future regulatory directions to enable the effective operationalization of patents as loan collateral. This research employs normative legal research methods using statutory and conceptual approaches. The findings indicate that although patents normatively qualify as fiduciary collateral, the absence of valuation standards, execution mechanisms, and integrated registration systems results in insufficient legal certainty. Therefore, comprehensive implementing regulations and an integrated legal framework are required to optimize patents as banking collateral instruments.
Position of Perma No. 1 of 2013 in the Indonesian Criminal Justice System Danang Tri Hartono; Ainul Azizah; Nurul Ghufron
Eduvest - Journal of Universal Studies Vol. 5 No. 5 (2025): Eduvest - Journal of Universal Studies
Publisher : Green Publisher Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59188/eduvest.v5i5.51281

Abstract

This study examines the position of Perma No. 1 of 2013 within the Indonesian criminal justice system, focusing on its role in asset forfeiture for crimes where suspects remain at large. The research highlights the conflict between Article 79 Paragraph (1) of Law No. 8 of 2010 (Money Laundering Law), which permits in absentia trials, and the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP), which mandates defendant presence. Utilizing a normative juridical approach, the study analyzes legal frameworks, including the Anti-Corruption Law and Perma No. 1 of 2013, to evaluate mechanisms for confiscating assets from fugitive suspects. Findings reveal that while Perma No. 1 of 2013 provides a procedural basis for in rem forfeiture, its implementation faces challenges, particularly regarding assets outside formal accounts. The study concludes that harmonizing legal provisions and enhancing law enforcement awareness are critical to optimizing asset recovery and upholding legal certainty in Indonesia’s criminal justice system.
Model Ganti Kerugian Bagi Korban Penipuan Pasar Modal Ainul Azizah
Simbur Cahaya VOLUME 26 NOMOR 2, DESEMBER 2019
Publisher : Universitas Sriwijaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28946/sc.v26i2.541

Abstract

Abstrak : Ganti kerugian adalah tindakan lain dari pengadilan yang memerintahkan untuk melakukan tindakan lain kepada orang yang menyebabkan kerugian. Ganti kerugian merupakan konsep yang awalnya  dianut oleh hukum perdata, yang diberikan kepada pihak lain  apabila terjadi wanprestasi dalam perjanjian  maupun adanya perbuatan melawan hukum. Dalam perkembangannya  konsep ganti kerugian dari hukum perdata ini  diadopsi   dalam  hukum pidana dan  hukum administrasi.  Pada akhirnya  konsep   ganti kerugian dijadikan salah satu sanksi pidana tambahan  bagi pelaku kejahatan di beberapa undang undang  yang berlaku di Indonesia salah satunya undang undang pasar modal.  Mekanisme pemberian ganti kerugian kepada korban  berdasarkan Hukum  Acara Pidana yang tercantum dalam  KUHAP. Tetapi model pemberian ganti kerugian dalam KUHAP jika diterapkan dalam penyelesaian ganti kerugian korban kejahatan ekonomi khususnya penipuan pasar modal dipandang  kurang sesuai. Oleh karena itu perlu kebijakan baru berkaitan dengan model ganti kerugian bagi korban   penipuan pasar modal. Isu hukum yang akan dibahas dalam  tulisan ini  adalah bagaimana model ganti kerugian terhadap korban penipuan pasar modal di Indonesia? Penelitian ini menggunakan  metode  yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan konsep, pendekatan perbandingan dan pendekatan undang undang. Isu hukum yang dibahas dalam penelitian ini  adalah model ganti kerugian bagi korban penipuan pasar modal  untuk masa yang akan datang. Hasilnya : terdapat perubahan model ganti kerugian bagi korban penipuan di pasar modal meliputi perubahan caranya atau mekanisme ganti kerugian,  lembaga ganti kerugian terhadap korban penipuan pasar modal   maupun jumlah  ganti kerugiannya kepada korban penipuan pasar modal. 
Prinsip Keadilan Terhadap Pengecualian Bagi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Yang Diancam Pidana Di Bawah 5 Tahun M. Arief Amrullah; Ainul Azizah; Yougha Aulia Mahardi
ALADALAH: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora Vol. 2 No. 4 (2024): Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora
Publisher : LP3M INSTITUT KH YAZID KARIMULLAH

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59246/aladalah.v2i4.923

Abstract

The existence of limitations on criminal penalties of more than 5 years and incapacity in Article 56 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Procedure Code means that those who commit crimes with a penalty of less than 5 years are no longer required to be provided with legal advice. The objectives of this research are limiting the defense of assistance to perpetrators of criminal acts under 5 years in accordance with the criminal justice system, providing assistance to perpetrators who are under 5 years under the principle of justice, reformulating the provision of legal assistance for perpetrators under 5 years. in the future. This research uses doctrinal legal research methods. The method used is to study and analyze legal materials and legal issues related to legal developments and problems. Legal aid is everyone's human right, which is not only provided by the state and not as a mercy from the state, but is the state's responsibility in realizing equality before the law, access to justice, and fair trials. The provision of legal assistance only looks at the criteria that the person is an incapacitated person who has met the requirements. limitations or limitations but it is an obligation for the state which must provide legal assistance to all Indonesian people without exception.
State Financial Losses Recovery Through Asset Forfeiture Raden Yudhi Teguh Santoso; Ainul Azizah; Gautama Budi Arundhati
Rechtenstudent Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025): Rechtenstudent August 2025
Publisher : Sharia Faculty, Kiai Haji Achmad Siddiq State Islamic University of Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35719/rch.v6i2.342

Abstract

Indonesia, as a state governed by law (rechtstaat), guarantees the protection of its citizens' constitutional rights, including economic rights. However, the existence of corruption classified as an extraordinary crime has undermined the nation’s economic foundations and deprived the people of their economic entitlements. Law enforcement against corruption must not only focus on punishing perpetrators but also prioritize the recovery of state losses through the mechanism of asset forfeiture derived from criminal acts. This study examines the urgency and dynamics of asset forfeiture within the framework of Indonesia's positive law, including the relevance of Law No. 31 of 1999 in conjunction with Law No. 20 of 2001, and the Indonesian Penal Code (KUHP) of 2023. Furthermore, it discusses the concept of non-conviction based asset forfeiture and the need for a specific Asset Forfeiture Law as a manifestation of the state's commitment to restoring state finances and upholding the rule of law. This research also analyzes the strategic role of the Prosecutor's Office in the asset recovery process, as well as institutional challenges and inter-agency coordination issues in its implementation.
Legal Framework and Criminal Sanctions for Bitcoin-Based Narcotics Transactions Maria Dona Kristina Wati; Ainul Azizah; Fanny Tanuwijaya
Rechtenstudent Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025): Rechtenstudent August 2025
Publisher : Sharia Faculty, Kiai Haji Achmad Siddiq State Islamic University of Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35719/rch.v6i2.347

Abstract

The rapid development of digital technology has transformed the global financial landscape with the emergence of virtual currencies such as Bitcoin. As a decentralized digital asset based on blockchain technology, Bitcoin enables fast, anonymous, and cross-border transactions without central authority intervention. While these features offer convenience, they also pose risks of abuse in illegal activities, including narcotics transactions. In Indonesia, the use of Bitcoin in drug-related offenses presents complex legal challenges due to the absence of explicit criminal regulations governing such usage. This study examines the criminal liability of narcotics offenders who utilize Bitcoin, focusing on three core issues: the juridical basis for punishment, the characteristics of punishment under Indonesia’s legal system, and an ideal penal concept for the future. The research employs a normative juridical method with statutory, conceptual, and case study approaches. Findings indicate that punishment remains based on Law No. 35 of 2009 on Narcotics, with Bitcoin regarded as a means rather than a core element of the crime. Although it does not constitute a new offense, its use may aggravate punishment through individualized sentencing. Sanctions involving digital assets remain suboptimal due to regulatory gaps. Therefore, this study recommends revising criminal laws to explicitly regulate Bitcoin use in drug crimes, developing sentencing guidelines that consider technological factors, and formulating responsive penal policies, including asset seizure and inter-agency collaboration through blockchain forensic technology.
Amnesti Sebagai Bagian Instrumen Hukum Dalam Peradilan Pidana Dwi Novantoro; Nurul Ghufron; Ainul Azizah
Indonesian Journal of Law Vol. 3 No. 3 (2026): INLAW - Maret 2026
Publisher : PT. INOVASI TEKNOLOGI KOMPUTER

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Sistem Peradilan Pidana merupakan rangkaian elemen-elemen dalam penanggulangan kejahatan, yang bukan hanya menilai benar atau salah, elemen mana terintegrasi dengan melibatkan kepolisian, kejaksaan, pengadilan, dan lembaga pemasyarakatan. Amnesti adalah tindakan pengampunan atau penghapusan hukuman yang diberikan oleh Presiden kepada individu atau sekelompok individu yang telah melakukan tindak pidana tertentu. Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Darurat Nomor 11 Tahun 1954, amnesti mengakibatkan penghapusan semua akibat hukum pidana terhadap orang yang diberikan amnesti. Dalam konstitusi modern, amnesti menjadi salah satu bagian instrumen hukum dalam peradilan pidana. Tidak seperti mekanisme peradilan pidana biasa, amnesti beroperasi dengan menangguhkan atau menghapus tanggung jawab hukum melalui tindakan kebijaksanaan kedaulatan
Co-Authors Aan Efendi Afrihasa, Balqis Nurdiniasari Ahmad Fahrudin Ahmad Mukhlasul Abidin Alex Prasetyo Alon Maemanah Amelia Nur Ramadhani Angga Wardana Anwar, Iryana Balqis Nurdiniasari Afrihasa Danang Tri Hartono Dominikus Rato Dwi Novantoro Dyah Ochtorina Susanti Fanny Tanuwijaya Farah Nizrinia Aulia Fina Fakhriyah Firda Yunita Dewi Furqoni, Laili Gautama Budi Arundhati, Gautama Budi Habi Burrohim Habibah Rizqo Halif Halif Halif Halif, Halif I Gede Widhiana Suarda Jadmiko, Widhi Kahar, Muhammad Paeway Ebiem Khoidin, Muhammad Laely Wulandari M. Arief Amrullah M. Arief Amrullah M. Khoidin Mardiyono Mardiyono Maria Dona Kristina Wati Moh. Ali Moh. Ali Multazaam Muntahaa Nur Fajrie Nurul Ghufron Nurul Ghufron Pintami Nanda Prihatmini, Sapti Prisma Diyah Ratrini Putri, Dinda Fefty Miranda Raden Yudhi Teguh Santoso Rahmatullah, Khoirul Lukman Ratrini, Prisma Diyah Sari, Pika Sieldy Aprilia Utami Silaban, Rendy Tridolok Silvia Anggraini SITI KHODIJAH Sugiarto, Risma Putri Tajus Subki Tannuwijaya, Fanny Y. A Triana Ohowaitun Y. A. Triana Ohoiwutun, Y. A. Triana Yanuarto, Totok Yougha Aulia Mahardi Yougha Aulia Mahardi Yuris, Faza