Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
5.129
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Masalah-Masalah Hukum Jurnal Mahasiswa Bimbingan Konseling Lentera Hukum Jurnal Dinamika Hukum Rechtsidee Perspektif : Kajian Masalah Hukum dan Pembangunan Unes Law Review Jurnal Simbur Cahaya JURNAL RECHTENS Syntax Idea Jurnal Ilmu Hukum KYADIREN Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Ilmu Sosial (JHPIS) Eduvest - Journal of Universal Studies Eksekusi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Negara Jurnal Anti Korupsi Referendum Konsensus: Jurnal Ilmu Pertahanan, Hukum dan Ilmu Komunikasi Jurnal Cendekia Ilmiah PESHUM Jurnal Begawan Hukum Rechtenstudent Journal ALADALAH: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora Jurnal Kajian Pembaruan Hukum INLAW
Ainul Azizah
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Jember
Aerospace Engineering Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Automotive Engineering Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Computer Science & IT Education Health Professions Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Neuroscience Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 40 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 40 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4 
Legal Characteristics of Patents as Collateral Assets in Banking Transactions Habibah Rizqo; Dyah Ochtorina Susanti; Ainul Azizah
Rechtenstudent Vol. 7 No. 2 (2026): Rechtenstudent August 2026
Publisher : Sharia Faculty, Kiai Haji Achmad Siddiq State Islamic University of Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35719/rch.v7i2.426

Abstract

Patents as part of intellectual property possess economic value that can potentially be utilized as collateral in banking financing. The development of Indonesian positive law has normatively recognized patents as fiduciary collateral, particularly following amendments to patent legislation and the enactment of creative economy regulations. Nevertheless, in banking practice, patents have not yet been fully accepted as loan collateral due to various juridical and technical constraints. This article aims to analyze the legal characteristics of patents as objects of fiduciary security, examine their regulation based on the principle of legal certainty, and propose future regulatory directions to enable the effective operationalization of patents as loan collateral. This research employs normative legal research methods using statutory and conceptual approaches. The findings indicate that although patents normatively qualify as fiduciary collateral, the absence of valuation standards, execution mechanisms, and integrated registration systems results in insufficient legal certainty. Therefore, comprehensive implementing regulations and an integrated legal framework are required to optimize patents as banking collateral instruments.
Position of Perma No. 1 of 2013 in the Indonesian Criminal Justice System Danang Tri Hartono; Ainul Azizah; Nurul Ghufron
Eduvest - Journal of Universal Studies Vol. 5 No. 5 (2025): Eduvest - Journal of Universal Studies
Publisher : Green Publisher Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59188/eduvest.v5i5.51281

Abstract

This study examines the position of Perma No. 1 of 2013 within the Indonesian criminal justice system, focusing on its role in asset forfeiture for crimes where suspects remain at large. The research highlights the conflict between Article 79 Paragraph (1) of Law No. 8 of 2010 (Money Laundering Law), which permits in absentia trials, and the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP), which mandates defendant presence. Utilizing a normative juridical approach, the study analyzes legal frameworks, including the Anti-Corruption Law and Perma No. 1 of 2013, to evaluate mechanisms for confiscating assets from fugitive suspects. Findings reveal that while Perma No. 1 of 2013 provides a procedural basis for in rem forfeiture, its implementation faces challenges, particularly regarding assets outside formal accounts. The study concludes that harmonizing legal provisions and enhancing law enforcement awareness are critical to optimizing asset recovery and upholding legal certainty in Indonesia’s criminal justice system.
Model Ganti Kerugian Bagi Korban Penipuan Pasar Modal Ainul Azizah
Simbur Cahaya VOLUME 26 NOMOR 2, DESEMBER 2019
Publisher : Universitas Sriwijaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28946/sc.v26i2.541

Abstract

Abstrak : Ganti kerugian adalah tindakan lain dari pengadilan yang memerintahkan untuk melakukan tindakan lain kepada orang yang menyebabkan kerugian. Ganti kerugian merupakan konsep yang awalnya  dianut oleh hukum perdata, yang diberikan kepada pihak lain  apabila terjadi wanprestasi dalam perjanjian  maupun adanya perbuatan melawan hukum. Dalam perkembangannya  konsep ganti kerugian dari hukum perdata ini  diadopsi   dalam  hukum pidana dan  hukum administrasi.  Pada akhirnya  konsep   ganti kerugian dijadikan salah satu sanksi pidana tambahan  bagi pelaku kejahatan di beberapa undang undang  yang berlaku di Indonesia salah satunya undang undang pasar modal.  Mekanisme pemberian ganti kerugian kepada korban  berdasarkan Hukum  Acara Pidana yang tercantum dalam  KUHAP. Tetapi model pemberian ganti kerugian dalam KUHAP jika diterapkan dalam penyelesaian ganti kerugian korban kejahatan ekonomi khususnya penipuan pasar modal dipandang  kurang sesuai. Oleh karena itu perlu kebijakan baru berkaitan dengan model ganti kerugian bagi korban   penipuan pasar modal. Isu hukum yang akan dibahas dalam  tulisan ini  adalah bagaimana model ganti kerugian terhadap korban penipuan pasar modal di Indonesia? Penelitian ini menggunakan  metode  yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan konsep, pendekatan perbandingan dan pendekatan undang undang. Isu hukum yang dibahas dalam penelitian ini  adalah model ganti kerugian bagi korban penipuan pasar modal  untuk masa yang akan datang. Hasilnya : terdapat perubahan model ganti kerugian bagi korban penipuan di pasar modal meliputi perubahan caranya atau mekanisme ganti kerugian,  lembaga ganti kerugian terhadap korban penipuan pasar modal   maupun jumlah  ganti kerugiannya kepada korban penipuan pasar modal. 
Prinsip Keadilan Terhadap Pengecualian Bagi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Yang Diancam Pidana Di Bawah 5 Tahun M. Arief Amrullah; Ainul Azizah; Yougha Aulia Mahardi
ALADALAH: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora Vol. 2 No. 4 (2024): Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora
Publisher : LP3M INSTITUT KH YAZID KARIMULLAH

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59246/aladalah.v2i4.923

Abstract

The existence of limitations on criminal penalties of more than 5 years and incapacity in Article 56 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Procedure Code means that those who commit crimes with a penalty of less than 5 years are no longer required to be provided with legal advice. The objectives of this research are limiting the defense of assistance to perpetrators of criminal acts under 5 years in accordance with the criminal justice system, providing assistance to perpetrators who are under 5 years under the principle of justice, reformulating the provision of legal assistance for perpetrators under 5 years. in the future. This research uses doctrinal legal research methods. The method used is to study and analyze legal materials and legal issues related to legal developments and problems. Legal aid is everyone's human right, which is not only provided by the state and not as a mercy from the state, but is the state's responsibility in realizing equality before the law, access to justice, and fair trials. The provision of legal assistance only looks at the criteria that the person is an incapacitated person who has met the requirements. limitations or limitations but it is an obligation for the state which must provide legal assistance to all Indonesian people without exception.
State Financial Losses Recovery Through Asset Forfeiture Raden Yudhi Teguh Santoso; Ainul Azizah; Gautama Budi Arundhati
Rechtenstudent Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025): Rechtenstudent August 2025
Publisher : Sharia Faculty, Kiai Haji Achmad Siddiq State Islamic University of Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35719/rch.v6i2.342

Abstract

Indonesia, as a state governed by law (rechtstaat), guarantees the protection of its citizens' constitutional rights, including economic rights. However, the existence of corruption classified as an extraordinary crime has undermined the nation’s economic foundations and deprived the people of their economic entitlements. Law enforcement against corruption must not only focus on punishing perpetrators but also prioritize the recovery of state losses through the mechanism of asset forfeiture derived from criminal acts. This study examines the urgency and dynamics of asset forfeiture within the framework of Indonesia's positive law, including the relevance of Law No. 31 of 1999 in conjunction with Law No. 20 of 2001, and the Indonesian Penal Code (KUHP) of 2023. Furthermore, it discusses the concept of non-conviction based asset forfeiture and the need for a specific Asset Forfeiture Law as a manifestation of the state's commitment to restoring state finances and upholding the rule of law. This research also analyzes the strategic role of the Prosecutor's Office in the asset recovery process, as well as institutional challenges and inter-agency coordination issues in its implementation.
Legal Framework and Criminal Sanctions for Bitcoin-Based Narcotics Transactions Maria Dona Kristina Wati; Ainul Azizah; Fanny Tanuwijaya
Rechtenstudent Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025): Rechtenstudent August 2025
Publisher : Sharia Faculty, Kiai Haji Achmad Siddiq State Islamic University of Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35719/rch.v6i2.347

Abstract

The rapid development of digital technology has transformed the global financial landscape with the emergence of virtual currencies such as Bitcoin. As a decentralized digital asset based on blockchain technology, Bitcoin enables fast, anonymous, and cross-border transactions without central authority intervention. While these features offer convenience, they also pose risks of abuse in illegal activities, including narcotics transactions. In Indonesia, the use of Bitcoin in drug-related offenses presents complex legal challenges due to the absence of explicit criminal regulations governing such usage. This study examines the criminal liability of narcotics offenders who utilize Bitcoin, focusing on three core issues: the juridical basis for punishment, the characteristics of punishment under Indonesia’s legal system, and an ideal penal concept for the future. The research employs a normative juridical method with statutory, conceptual, and case study approaches. Findings indicate that punishment remains based on Law No. 35 of 2009 on Narcotics, with Bitcoin regarded as a means rather than a core element of the crime. Although it does not constitute a new offense, its use may aggravate punishment through individualized sentencing. Sanctions involving digital assets remain suboptimal due to regulatory gaps. Therefore, this study recommends revising criminal laws to explicitly regulate Bitcoin use in drug crimes, developing sentencing guidelines that consider technological factors, and formulating responsive penal policies, including asset seizure and inter-agency collaboration through blockchain forensic technology.
Amnesti Sebagai Bagian Instrumen Hukum Dalam Peradilan Pidana Dwi Novantoro; Nurul Ghufron; Ainul Azizah
Indonesian Journal of Law Vol. 3 No. 3 (2026): INLAW - Maret 2026
Publisher : PT. INOVASI TEKNOLOGI KOMPUTER

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Sistem Peradilan Pidana merupakan rangkaian elemen-elemen dalam penanggulangan kejahatan, yang bukan hanya menilai benar atau salah, elemen mana terintegrasi dengan melibatkan kepolisian, kejaksaan, pengadilan, dan lembaga pemasyarakatan. Amnesti adalah tindakan pengampunan atau penghapusan hukuman yang diberikan oleh Presiden kepada individu atau sekelompok individu yang telah melakukan tindak pidana tertentu. Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Darurat Nomor 11 Tahun 1954, amnesti mengakibatkan penghapusan semua akibat hukum pidana terhadap orang yang diberikan amnesti. Dalam konstitusi modern, amnesti menjadi salah satu bagian instrumen hukum dalam peradilan pidana. Tidak seperti mekanisme peradilan pidana biasa, amnesti beroperasi dengan menangguhkan atau menghapus tanggung jawab hukum melalui tindakan kebijaksanaan kedaulatan
Penerapan Pemidanaan Terhadap Anak Sebagai Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Berdasarkan Prinsip Perlindungan Anak Nadya Melinda Oktarina; Fanny Tanuwijaya; Ainul Azizah
Jurnal Begawan Hukum (JBH) Vol. 2 No. 1 (2024): Jurnal Begawan Hukum (JBH)
Publisher : Lembaga Pengabdian Masyarakat Universitas Ichsan Gorontalo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62951/jbh.v2i1.103

Abstract

The legal principle states "nullum crimen sine poena legal", which means there is no criminal act without a crime according to the law. In principle, this principle means that no crime can be punished if it is not prohibited by law, so that actions and crimes must first be regulated by law. Likewise with this crime of murder. Where the crime of murder is a crime that violates very serious norms. The crime of murder is not only committed by adults, but children can also be involved in this crime.The crime of murder is a crime that can occur because it is carried out intentionally or because of someone's negligence/negligence, resulting in victims or the loss of another person's life.Handling of children involved in crime, especially children who are perpetrators of murder, must be given serious attention. Not only for the government but also for law enforcement officers and other parties including the surrounding environment. This treatment is quite important because the perpetrators who are categorized are still children. Handling cases in children cannot be the same as handling cases in adults, so there are many things that must be paid attention to and taken into consideration. One of them is the juvenile justice system.
Kebijakan Penerapan Tindak Pidana Penistaan Agama Di Indonesia I Gede Widhiana Suarda; Ainul Azizah; Ahmad Fahrudin
JURNAL HUKUM, POLITIK DAN ILMU SOSIAL Vol. 2 No. 2 (2023): Juni: JURNAL HUKUM, POLITIK DAN ILMU SOSIAL
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/jhpis.v2i2.1642

Abstract

Ethnicity, religion, race and intergroup (SARA) are social elements that have an important role in human life, therefore, the freedom of each party must be respected and guaranteed. Religion is an important element of human existence and perhaps the most impressive element that can exert an important influence on the behavior of individuals. Indonesian positive law regulates punishment for perpetrators of religious blasphemy regulated in Article 156a of the Criminal Code. The initial purpose of enacting this article was against the backdrop of the many sects of belief and mysticism teachings that were considered heretical and not in accordance with the religious teachings of the Indonesian people. Article 156a of the Criminal Code is intended to prevent religious teachings from being distorted which are considered as the main teachings by the leaders or religious leaders concerned; and this rule protects religious peace in society and maintains the values of religious teachings that are maintained by the community from insults/humiliations and from teachings not to embrace a religion based on Belief in the One Supreme God.
Prinsip Keadilan Restoratif Dalam Penghentian Penuntutan Perkara Pidana Berdasarkan Peraturan Jaksa Agung Nomor 15 Tahun 2020 Ainul Azizah; I Gede Widhianan Suarda; Mardiyono Mardiyono
JURNAL HUKUM, POLITIK DAN ILMU SOSIAL Vol. 2 No. 2 (2023): Juni: JURNAL HUKUM, POLITIK DAN ILMU SOSIAL
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/jhpis.v2i2.1643

Abstract

Restorative justice or better known as restorative justice in the development of schools of law and punishment in human civilization, where the state returns the ius ponale and ius poniendi mandates to the community within the framework of healing, recovery and recovery. Restorative justice is a concept of thinking that responds to the development of the criminal justice system by focusing on the need to involve actors, communities and victims as a social recovery step in social relations. The principle of restorative justice is one of the principles of law enforcement in resolving cases which can be used as an instrument of recovery and has been implemented by the supreme court in the form of policy implementation (Supreme Court Regulations and Supreme Court Circulars). Restorative justice is considered a model of modern punishment that is more humane than the retributive justice used in the current justice system. One of the applications of this is the termination of the prosecution process by the prosecutor.
Co-Authors Aan Efendi Afrihasa, Balqis Nurdiniasari Ahmad Fahrudin Ahmad Mukhlasul Abidin Alex Prasetyo Alon Maemanah Amelia Nur Ramadhani Angga Wardana Anwar, Iryana Balqis Nurdiniasari Afrihasa Danang Tri Hartono Dominikus Rato Dwi Novantoro Dyah Ochtorina Susanti Fanny Tanuwijaya Fanny Tanuwijaya Farah Nizrinia Aulia Fina Fakhriyah Firda Yunita Dewi Furqoni, Laili Gautama Budi Arundhati, Gautama Budi Habi Burrohim Habibah Rizqo Halif Halif Halif Halif, Halif I Gede Widhiana Suarda Jadmiko, Widhi Kahar, Muhammad Paeway Ebiem Khoidin, Muhammad Laely Wulandari M. Arief Amrullah M. Arief Amrullah M. Khoidin Mardiyono Mardiyono Maria Dona Kristina Wati Moh. Ali Moh. Ali Multazaam Muntahaa Nadya Melinda Oktarina Nur Fajrie Nurul Ghufron Pika Sari Pintami Nanda Prihatmini, Sapti Prisma Diyah Ratrini Putri, Dinda Fefty Miranda Raden Yudhi Teguh Santoso Rahmatullah, Khoirul Lukman Ratrini, Prisma Diyah Sieldy Aprilia Utami Silaban, Rendy Tridolok Silvia Anggraini SITI KHODIJAH Sugiarto, Risma Putri Tajus Subki Tannuwijaya, Fanny Y. A Triana Ohowaitun Y. A. Triana Ohoiwutun, Y. A. Triana Yanuarto, Totok Yougha Aulia Mahardi Yougha Aulia Mahardi Yuris, Faza