Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 33 Documents
Search

Right to Be Forgotten in Indonesia and Thailand: Human Rights-Based Legal Reform Inspired by Korea, the U.S., and the European Union Ampuan Situmeang; Lu Sudirman; Ida Bagus Rahmadi Supancana; Nurlaily Nurlaily; Hari Sutra Disemadi
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2026)
Publisher : CV. RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20420285

Abstract

The central legal problem of this study lies in the normative inadequacy and weak enforcement construction of the right to be forgotten within the personal data protection regimes of Indonesia and Thailand amid escalating data breaches in Southeast Asia. This research aims to analyze and compare the normative framework governing the right to be forgotten in Indonesia and Thailand with selected global benchmarks, namely the European Union, South Korea, and the United States, in order to formulate ideal legal constructs adaptable to Southeast Asian contexts. This study employs a normative legal research method supported by a comparative legal approach, examining statutory regulations and secondary legal materials from Indonesia, Thailand, the EU (GDPR), South Korea (PIPA), and the United States (CCPA). The findings reveal that although Indonesia’s Personal Data Protection Law and Thailand’s Personal Data Protection Act formally recognize deletion rights, both frameworks remain incomplete due to limited procedural clarity, weak dispute resolution mechanisms, insufficient third-party deletion obligations, and ambiguous safeguards against re-identification risks. In contrast, the EU’s GDPR mandates third-party takedown obligations and imposes severe financial sanctions, South Korea’s PIPA provides strict deletion duties combined with criminal penalties, and the CCPA establishes structured compliance and notification mechanisms. Consequently, strengthening enforcement pathways, clarifying procedural guarantees, and integrating stricter controller obligations are essential for Indonesia and Thailand to ensure effective realization of the right to be forgotten in rapidly expanding digital societies.
Legal Effectiveness of E-Purchasing Implementation in Government Procurement: An Empirical Study from fhe Perspective of Transparency and Fairness in Indonesia Narendra Tricahya Pratama; Winsherly Tan; Nurlaily Nurlaily
JUSTISI Vol. 12 No. 2 (2026): JUSTISI
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Sorong

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33506/js.v12i2.5264

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of e-purchasing implementation in the government sector from the perspectives of transparency and fairness. The method used in this study is empirical approach with data collected through interviews, observation, documentation, and literature review. Data were analyzed qualitatively using a descriptive-analytical method based on Soerjono Soekanto’s theory of legal effectiveness. The research was conducted in Indonesian government agencies, involving Commitment-Making Officials (PPK) and Budget-Using Officials (KPA) as informants. The novelty of this research lies in the gap between the ideal (das sollen) and reality (das sein) in the implementation of e-purchasing, where, normatively, this system is designed to ensure transparency and accountability; however, in practice, deviations as well as structural and cultural barriers within the procurement bureaucracy are still observed. The results of the study show that although regulations governing the procurement of goods and services are sufficiently robust, the implementation of e-purchasing still faces various challenges, such as technical system barriers, resistance from procurement officials, infrastructure limitations, and a bureaucratic culture that does not yet fully support the principle of transparency. Additionally, indications of fictitious procurement practices were found, suggesting weak oversight and enforcement of the law. Conclusion of this study is that the effectiveness of e-purchasing implementation has not yet been fully achieved. Therefore, it is necessary to strengthen technical regulations, improve human resource capacity and infrastructure, foster a bureaucratic culture that is transparent and accountable, and implement stricter and more systematic oversight to ensure that e-purchasing truly becomes an instrument of procurement modernization oriented toward the public interest.
Aligning Intellectual Property Rights with Climate Imperatives: A Comparative Study of Plant Variety Protection Lu Sudirman; Rufinus Hotmaulana Hutauruk; Agustianto Agustianto; Nurlaily Nurlaily; Hari Sutra Disemadi
QONUN: Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Perundang-undangan Vol 10 No 1 (2026)
Publisher : FASYA Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21093/qj.v10i1.12706

Abstract

Indonesia's agricultural sector has been ridden with stagnation and mismanagement, contrasting Singapore, which despite the lack of potential, has been able to facilitate its agricultural sector to thrive while aligning with sustainability. In this context, Indonesia's Plant Variety Protection (PVP) Law represents an IPR regime that can be analyzed further to explore the potential of helping Indonesia tackle climate change. This research analyzes the legal capacity of Indonesia’s PVP regime to integrate climate action initiatives, which provides a novel perspective by bridging intellectual property rights and sustainability, with the added comparative angle of Singaporean perspective. The findings of this research indicate that Indonesia's PVP regime is outdated and ill-equipped to accommodate the regime’s inherent potential in being a part of the climate action. In contrast, Singapore boasts a more robust legal framework that has facilitated the growth of its modern agricultural sector, despite resource constraints, along with the lack of direct normative connection between sustainability and the PVP regime, due to supporting normative architectures. The perspective from Singapore represents a potential model for Indonesia to consider as it seeks to enhance its PVP regime and align it with broader climate change mitigation strategies.