Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
6.059
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal DOKTRINA: JOURNAL OF LAW Dialogia Iuridica Jurnal Justitia : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Humaniora Jurnal Abdi Ilmu LEGAL BRIEF Iuris Studia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Law_Jurnal Locus Journal of Academic Literature Review Jurnal Pengabdian Mandiri Jurnal Pencerah Bangsa Mahadi : Indonesia Journal of Law Jaksa: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum Dan Politik
Madiasa Ablisar
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Religion Aerospace Engineering Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Astronomy Automotive Engineering Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Chemistry Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Control & Systems Engineering Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Dentistry Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Energy Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Immunology & microbiology Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Mechanical Engineering Medicine & Pharmacology Neuroscience Nursing Physics Public Health Social Sciences Transportation Veterinary Other

Published : 49 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 49 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4   5 
Tuntutan Tindak Pidana Penggelapan Terhadap Perbuatan Wanprestasi Dalam Hukum Perdata (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Tebing Tinggi No. 74/Pid.B/2019/Pn.Tbt Tertanggal 28 Mei 2019) Juni Kristian Telaumbanua; Sunarmi Sunarmi; Madiasa Ablisar; Mahmud Mulyadi
Iuris Studia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Vol 2, No 2 (2021): Juni - September
Publisher : Iuris Studia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55357/is.v2i2.139

Abstract

Tebing Tinggi District Court Decision No. 74/Pid.B/2019/PN.Tbt dated May 28, 2019 where the defendant was charged for having committed late payment of bills after taking goods belonging to PT. Agung Bumi Lestari with arrears of Rp. 226,828,440.- which was agreed upon must be paid no later than 30 days after taking the goods. As a result, the defendant had to serve 2 months in prison. Therefore, it is necessary to study the boundaries that distinguish between default and the criminal act of embezzlement in the agreement and the application of default and embezzlement in the decision of the Tebing Tinggi District Court No. 74/Pid.B/2019/PN.Tbt.
Analisis Yuridis Bentuk Surat Dakwaan Jaksa Penuntut Umum Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Studi Kasus Korupsi Pada Kejaksaan Negeri Kabanjahe) Azwarman Azwarman; Syafruddin Kalo; Madiasa Ablisar; Jelly Leviza
Iuris Studia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Vol 2, No 3 (2021): Oktober 2021 - Januari 2022
Publisher : Iuris Studia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55357/is.v2i3.160

Abstract

The selection of the indictment is very important for the Public Prosecutor. The process of the selection of an indictment by the public prosecutor started an investigation docket study, then the results of research Prosecutors can identify what evidence and the strength of proof is met, then to the inherent weaknesses in the know on the docket to prepare juridical facts accurate to anticipate problems that arise in efforts to prove in court. The selection of the indictment also affect the process of evidence in court because it forms the indictment prosecutors effect to the provisions of an offense must be proved before the court. The problem this thesis is how Prosecutors preparing indictments corruption cases especially using paragraph of article 2 (1) and Article 3 of Law No.. 31 of 1999 and Act No.. 20 of 2001 in the State Attorney Kabanjahe. How the juridical consequences of the indictment Prosecutors at the State Attorney Kabanjahe stacking subsideritas in the examination at the trial.The writing of this thesis used the type of normative juridical methods with the consideration that the issues studied were relevant to regulations and how they handled in judicial practice. From the nature of the study is a descriptive analysis, which is planning a systematic, factual and accurate statement of facts. on the theory of proof systems that are used by the Criminal Procedure Code verification system negatief statutory (negatief wettelijk overtuiging). The thesis used this research method to approach the problem by using the approach of legislation (approach approach) and case approach (case approach).From the results of the research done, it could be summed up as follows: first, Preparation Prosecution indictment on the State Attorney Kabanjahe in corruption cases that use Article 2 paragraph (1) and Article 3 of Law No.. 31 of 1999 and Act No.. 20 of 2001 is in the form of an indictment that vary, sometimes in the form of alternative charges and also in the form of the indictment subsideritas. Second, For the Public Prosecutor to handle corruption cases where criminal charges stated defendant was found guilty of the offenses charged in the indictment primary, but then the judge decided the defendant guilty of the charges of expressed attitudes subsidiary prosecutor to assert legal remedies against the decision
Diversi Terhadap Anak Yang Melakukan Tindak Pidana Penyalahgunaan Narkotika (Studi Penetapan Pengadilan Negeri Medan) Faomasi Laia; Madiasa Ablisar; Marlina Marlina; Edy Ikhsan
Iuris Studia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Vol 2, No 1 (2021): Februari - Mei
Publisher : Iuris Studia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55357/is.v2i1.89

Abstract

The legal arrangements regarding diversion for children who have committed criminal acts are contained in several laws and regulations, government regulations, regulations of the Supreme Court which have regulated the procedures for implementing diversion for children who have committed criminal acts. In Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System, which has explained about diversion, namely as in Article 1 point 7 states that diversion is the transfer of settlement of juvenile cases from the criminal justice process to processes outside of criminal justice The results of this research can be seen, the legal basis for diversion is regulated in Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Criminal Justice System for Children, Government Regulation Number 65 of 2015 concerning the Implementation of Diversion and Handling of Children who are not 12 (twelve) years old, and Regulations Supreme Court Number 4 of 2014 concerning Guidelines for the Implementation of Diversion in the Juvenile Criminal Justice System. And in these laws and regulations, the objectives of diversion are stated in article 6 of Law Number 11 of 2012, namely: achieving peace between victims and children, resolving cases of children outside the judicial process, preventing children from being deprived of liberty, encouraging the public to participate , and instill a sense of responsibility in children
Peran Hakim Terhadap Penerapan Diversi Sebagai Upaya Menciptakan Restoratif Justice Dalam Tindak Pidana Anak Esther Wita Simanjuntak; Madiasa Ablisar; Sutiarnoto Sutiarnoto; Marlina Marlina
Iuris Studia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Vol 2, No 2 (2021): Juni - September
Publisher : Iuris Studia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55357/is.v2i2.141

Abstract

In Law No. 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System, it is regulated regarding the obligations of law enforcers to seek diversion (settlement through non-formal channels) before entering all stages of the legal process. For cases of criminal acts committed by children, Restorative Justice at least aims to repair or restore criminal acts committed by children with actions that are beneficial to children, victims and their environment that involve them directly (reintegration and rehabilitation) in solving problems. This research is a normative juridical research with analytical descriptive nature. The technique of collecting secondary data was obtained by means of a literature review (Library Research), while the primary data was obtained directly in the field using the interview method. Data analysis was carried out qualitatively.
Penerapan Sanksi Pidana Mati Bagi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pengedar Narkotika Di Wilayah Hukum Kota Tanjung Balai Sutan Sinomba Parlaungan Harahap; Madiasa Ablisar; Ekaputra Ekaputra; Sunarmi Sunarmi
Iuris Studia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Vol 2, No 2 (2021): Juni - September
Publisher : Iuris Studia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55357/is.v2i2.149

Abstract

The provision of the death penalty for narcotics crimes is one of the measures taken by the state to execute drug dealers that could damage generations of the nation, and with Law No. 35 of 2009 on Narcotics can ensnare dealers or drug dealers by giving the harshest punishment that is the death penalty. The issues raised in this study are how to set up criminal sanctions, the application of criminal sanctions in the form of the death penalty, and the consideration of judges in imposing criminal sanctions in the form of the death penalty for the perpetrators of narcotics dealer crimes, especially in the jurisdiction of Tanjung Balai City. To find the answer to the problem, this study used a type of normative legal research that is descriptive analytical, in which this normative legal research uses secondary data as the primary data by using data collection techniques carried out by library reseacrh, as well as data analysis using qualitative data analysis methods.
Perampasan Aset Korupsi Tanpa Pemidanaan Dalam Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia Teuku Isra Muntahar; Madiasa Ablisar; Chairul Bariah
Iuris Studia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Vol 2, No 1 (2021): Februari - Mei
Publisher : Iuris Studia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55357/is.v2i1.77

Abstract

Confiscation of assets without conviction or NCB using the principle of presumption of guilt is an effective alternative in returning criminal assets, but faces challenges on the basis of human rights violations. This normative research discusses the problem of NCB's conflict with human rights violations. It was concluded that, the existing regulations have not regulated NCB but are in accordance with the constitution (Article 28H paragraph 4 and Article 28G paragraph 1 of the 1945 Indonesian Constitution), Article 29 paragraph (2) DUHAM / UDHR, Article 70 and Article 29 paragraph (1) UUHAM , European Human Rights Commission Decree 1986, and ICJ Decree 1959, where the state has the authority to control illegal assets or tainted with corruption. The UUPTPK still adheres to criminal forfeiture, depending on criminal wrongdoing, only applies if the perpetrator dies, does not apply if the criminal error is not proven, cannot seize the assets of no-owner and third party assets Its application is not against human rights if during the NCB process the third party is still given the opportunity to argue and is not done arbitrarily. The principle of presumption of guilt is aimed at assets, while the principle of presumption of innocence is directed at the perpetrator. Nor does it contradict the principle of ne bis in idem because civil suit and criminal prosecution are two different things. It is hoped that the Asset Confiscation Bill is corrected and promulgated, then regulates the NCB in the UUPTPK, improves MLA regulations for civil matters. The application must be carried out with extreme caution because it is vulnerable to human rights violations
PEMBERDAYAAN MASYARAKAT DALAM MITIGASI BENCANA BANJIR DAN SISTEM PERINGATAN DINI DENGAN TEKNOLOGI INTERNET OF THINGS (IOT) DI PERUMAHAN DEFLAMBOYAN DESA TANJUNG SELAMAT Pujiati; Syarifah; Ritha F Dalimunthe; Madiasa Ablisar
JURNAL PENGABDIAN MANDIRI Vol. 1 No. 4: April 2022
Publisher : Bajang Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (201.131 KB)

Abstract

XXXXX
Ancaman Pidana Cambuk Dalam Qanun Aceh Nomor 6 Tahun 2014 Tentang Hukum Jinayat Terhadap Kasus Tindak Pidana Maisir: (Studi Kasus Di Wilayah Hukum Kabupaten Gayo Lues Provinsi Aceh) Ayu Anisa; Madiasa Ablisar; Mohammad Ekaputra; Marlina Marlina
Locus Journal of Academic Literature Review Volume 1 Issue 5 - September 2022
Publisher : LOCUS MEDIA PUBLISHING

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56128/ljoalr.v1i5.74

Abstract

Keistimewaan dan Otonomi Khusus yang diberikan untuk Daerah Istimewa Aceh diberikan berdasarkan UU No. 44 Tahun 1999, UU No. 18 Tahun 2001, serta UU No. 11 Tahun 2006. Keistimewaan ini menyangkut beberapa hal, salah satunya mengenai hukum pidana. Hukum yang diberlakukan adalah Hukum Islam yang diimplementasikan dalam bentuk Qanun. Diantara Qanun yang telah diberlakukan Di Aceh yaitu Qanun No. 6 Tahun 2014 tentang Hukum Jinayat, merupakan Qanun yang mengatur tentang tindak pidana khusus di Aceh yang pengaturannya tidak ada atau berbeda dengan Undang-undang di Indonesia. Salah satu jenis tindak pidana yang diatur dalam Qanun ini yaitu tindak pidana maisir (judi), sebelumnya tindak pidana maisir ini diatur dalam Qanun Aceh No. 13 Tahun 2003 tentang maisir, kemudian diperbaharui kedalam Qanun No. 6 Tahun 2014 tentang Hukum Jinayat. Tulisan ini akan mengkaji lebih mendalam terhadap pengaturan tindak pidana maisir di Aceh dengan mengkaji rumusan formulasi tindak pidana maisir, alasan penjatuhan hukuman cambuk terhadap pelaku tindak pidana maisir, serta hambatan dan upaya yang dilakukan penegak hukum dalam pelaksaan pidana cambuk terhadap pelaku tindak pidana maisir di Kabupaten Gayo Lues Provinsi Aceh. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa penjatuhan pidana cambuk ini ditujukan sebagai upaya edukatif agar pelaku malu dan masyarakat yang menyaksikan agar takut akan berbuat kesalahan yang sama, pidana cambuk ini diberlakukan juga karena melihat beberapa keunggulan dibandingkan dengan pidana penjara, seperti dari segi biaya yang lebih efektif dibandingkan dengan pidana penjara. Hambatan yang dialami oleh Wilayatul Hisbah dan Mahkamah Syar’iyah Blangkejeren seperti kurangnya tingkat penyidik, kurangnya sarana dan prasarana serta keterbatasan dana, namun dalam hal ini juga telah dilakukan upaya seperti mengajukan tambahan penyidik serta mengajukan anggaran dana untuk mencukupi dana dalam pelaksanaan pidana cambuk di Kabupaten Gayo Lues.
Tinjauan Yuridis Upaya Hukum Peninjauan Kembali Yang Diajukan Oleh Penuntut Umum Dalam Perkara Pidana Muhammad Ridwanta Tarigan; Madiasa Ablisar; Sunarmi Sunarmi; Mahmud Mulyadi
Locus Journal of Academic Literature Review Volume 1 Issue 6 - October 2022
Publisher : LOCUS MEDIA PUBLISHING

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56128/ljoalr.v1i6.82

Abstract

Peninjauan kembali merupakan upaya hukum terakhir yang biasanya diajukan oleh terpidana atau ahli warisnya. Namun dalam praktik peradilan pidana di indonesia, upaya hukum peninjauan kembali sering diajukan oleh jaksa penuntut umum. Hal ini kuhap tidak mengatur larangan mengenai jaksa penuntut umum untuk mengajukan peninjauan kembali, begitupula beberapa putusan mahkamah agung diperbolehkan bagi jaksa penuntut umum untuk mengajukan peninjauan kembali. Oleh karena itu, tulisan ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis tentang kewenangan penuntut umum dalam mengajukan peninjauan kembali dalam perkara pidana, serta kerangka konsep pengajuan peninjauan kembali oleh penuntut umum dalam perkara pidana. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah jenis penelitian hukum normatif, dan didukung dengan sumber data primer dan sekunder, serta dilakukan analisis secara kualitatif. Hasil penelitian ditemuka bahwa jaksa dapat mengajukan permintaan peninjauan kembali, dengan persyaratan apabila dalam putusan yang dimintakan peninjauan kembali itu, suatu perbuatan yang didakwakan telah dinyatakan terbukti akan tetapi tidak diikuti dengan pemindanaan. Meskipun pasal 30C huruf h Undang‑Undang Kejaksaan yang memberikan kewenangan kepada jaksa untuk mengajukan PK menimbulkan polemik, karena keberadaan aturan itu sesungguhnya telah menyimpangi atau mengesampingkan Putusan MK yang bersifat mengikat secara umum. Berlakunya pasal a quo berpotensi menimbulkan ketidakpastian atau ambiguitas dalam pelaksanaan PK. Sehingga, hak Pemohon untuk memperoleh jaminan penegakan hukum yang berkeadilan dan berkepastian hukum terlanggar.
Putusan Bebas Atas Tuntutan Tindak Pidana Penghinaan dan/atau Pencemaran Nama Baik Melalui Media Sosial: (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Poso No. 262/Pid.Sus/2017/PN.PSO) Mauliza Mauliza; Madiasa Ablisar; Edi Yunara; Agusmidah Agusmidah
Locus Journal of Academic Literature Review Volume 1 Issue 6 - October 2022
Publisher : LOCUS MEDIA PUBLISHING

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56128/ljoalr.v1i6.85

Abstract

Tindak pidana penghinaan dan/atau pencemaran nama baik melalui media sosial merupakan salah satu tindak pidana yang timbul akibat dampak negatif dari adanya kemajuan tekhnologi dan informasi. Beberapa kasus tindak pidana penghinaan dan/atau pencemaran nama baik melalui media sosial mendapatkan vonis hukuman pidana penjara maupun pidana penjara dengan hukuman percobaan, selain itu ada juga yang mendapatkan putusan bebas. Salah satu vonis hakim menjatuhkan putusan bebas yaitu putusan pengadilan negeri Poso No. 262/Pid.Sus/2017/PN.PSO dengan terdakwa bernama Mohamad Aksa Patundu. Tujuan penulisan ini yaitu untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis mengapa hakim dalam putusan Pengadilan Negeri Poso No. 262/Pid.Sus/2017/PN.PSO memutuskan putusan bebas terhadap terdakwa. Hasil penelitian antara lain konstruksi putusan bebas (vrijspraak) yang diatur dalam Pasal 191 ayat (1) KUHAP menyatakan bahwa putusan bebas (vrijspraak) dijatuhkan berdasarkan tiada kesalahan dari diri pelaku akan tetapi di dalam penjelasan Pasal 191 ayat (1) KUHAP tidak menyebutkan unsur kesalahan namun unsur perbuatan yang didakwakan oleh Penuntut Umum, sehingga dapat terjadinya kontradiktif dalam menafsirkan antara isi dengan penjelasannya. Penafsiran bahasa menjadi dasar dalam menentukan seseorang terkait dalam tindak pidana penghinaan dan/atau pencemaran nama baik atau tidak, karena tindak pidana penghinaan dan/atau pencemaran nama baik sangat erat kaitannya dengan bahasa yang disampaikan oleh pelaku kepada korban. Dikaitkan dengan teori penafsiran hukum yang multidisipliner maka diperlukan keilmuan lain selain ilmu hukum yang harus dikuasai oleh hakim terutama dalam disiplin ilmu bahasa, dalam memeriksa dan mengadili suatu tindak pidana penghinaan dan/atau pencemaran nama baik melalui media sosial yang dihadapkan kepadanya.
Co-Authors Adi Chandra Agung Anugrah Lubis Agusmidah Agusmidah Almunawar Sembiring Alvi Syahrin Alvin Ziawa Andri Dharma Annisa Hafizah Ayu Anisa Azwarman Azwarman B.A.S. Faomasi Jaya Laia Brivan Sitompul Budi Prakarsa Ketaren Cecep Priyayi Chairul Bariah Choky Permana Hutagalung Deny Setiawan Siregar Dwina Elfika Putri Edi Suranta Sinulingga Edi Yunara Ediwarman Ediwarman Edy Ikhsan Edy Suranta Tarigan Ekaputra Ekaputra Ekaputra, Mohammad Esther Wita Simanjuntak Fadli Imam Syahputra Harahap Faomasi Laia Gheanina Prisilia Kaban Hendy Iskandar Herlina Sitorus Hermoko Febriyanto Ismawansa Ismawansa Jelly Leviza Jenda Riahta Silaban Jimmy Donovan Joy Ananda Putra Sianipar Juni Kristian Telaumbanua M. Adityo Andri Cahyo Prabowo M. Ainul Yaqin M. Eka Putra M. Ekaputra M. Hamdan Mahmud Mulyadi MAHMUL SIREGAR Marlina, Marlina Martuasah Tobing Mauliza Mauliza Mirza Nasution Muhammad Ridwanta Tarigan Nadya Chairani Pujiati Rafiqoh Lubis Ramboo Loly Sinurat Regi Putra Manda Ria Ekawardani Riamor Bangun Ritha F Dalimunthe Rosmalinda Ruth Gladys Sembiring Saur Sihaloho Sri Delyanti Sudarma Setiawan Suhaidi Suhaidi Sunarmi, Sunarmi Supian Natalis Sutan Sinomba Parlaungan Harahap Sutiarnoto Sutiarnoto Sutiarnoto Sutiarnoto Syafruddin Kalo Syafruddin S. Hasibuan Syafrudin Kalo Syarifah Taryono Raharja Teuku Isra Muntahar Wamilik Mabel Wessy Trisna Yudi Syahrudin Zulkarnain Zulkarnain