Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 22 Documents
Search

The Impact of Using Learning Video Media Animaker in Social Studies Learning Outcomes: (Quasi Experiment Study for class VII. 3 and VII 4 at SMP N 1 Cikarang Selatan) Teguh Putra Socrates; Kokom Komalasari; Wildan Insan Fauzi
Heritage Vol. 3 No. 2 (2022): Heritage: Journal Of Social Studies
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Kiai Haji Achmad Siddiq Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35719/hrtg.v3i2.87

Abstract

This research is motivated by the increasingly uncertain pandemic Covid-19 situation and has yet to show when it will end. Learning during the pandemic is carried out using the Distance Learning (PJJ) system using limited media. Learning could be carried out face-to-face but returned online due to the increasing number of Covid-19 cases. One of the problems teachers face during online learning is low learning outcomes, especially in social studies subjects. The value of learning outcomes can be increased continuously during the learning process, one of which is utilizing and maximizing learning media. This study aimed to determine whether or not the use of Animaker-based instructional video media on social studies learning outcomes for seventh-grade students of SMP N 1 Cikarang Selatan. This study uses a quasi-experimental quantitative approach with a non-equivalent control group design—data collection techniques used learning outcomes tests and questionnaires distributed to the research sample. The sample in this study is class VII.3 as the experimental class and VII.4 as the control class. The analytical technique used is hypothesis testing with the Wilcoxon test technique or the Mann-Whitney test, using statistical tests assisted by IBM SPSS Statistics Version 25. The results of processing and testing research data show differences that at least increase the learning outcomes of experimental class students after the treatment is applied. , with an Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) value of 0.000 < 0.05. These results align with the questionnaire data on student responses to the use of Animaker-based learning video media, which received positive acceptance as a medium in social studies learning with a percentage of 81%.
OPIPA and the Decolonization of Scientific Governance in Indonesia, 1948–1956 Ayi Budi Santosa; Wildan Insan Fauzi; Dimas Aldi Pangestu
KASTA : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Agama, Budaya dan Terapan Vol. 6 No. 4 (2026): October
Publisher : Lembaga Bale Literasi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58218/kasta.v6i4.5135

Abstract

This article examines the role of the Organisasi Penjelidikan dalam Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam (OPIPA), which developed from the Dutch Organisatie voor Natuurwetenschappelijk Onderzoek (ONO), in the decolonization of scientific governance in Indonesia between 1948 and 1956. Histories of Indonesian science have generally regarded the Indonesian Council of Sciences (Majelis Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia, MIPI) as a major milestone in the consolidation of national science, while OPIPA’s role in this transformation has received less attention. Using a historical approach, this study draws on State Secretariat archives and ONO/OPIPA records, including government decisions, organizational records, conference resolutions, correspondence, publications, and documents on international scientific relations. The findings show that OPIPA retained several coordinating practices from the colonial period while adapting them to the needs of the Indonesian state. OPIPA coordinated research, collected information on scientific personnel, supported technical training, and maintained Indonesia’s connections with international scientific network. Yet the Indonesianization of institutional leadership advanced more rapidly than the development of national scientific capacity. OPIPA remained constrained by limited authority, shortages of expertise, financial limitations, and its disciplinary scope. These experiences contributed to debates over a broader framework for scientific governance and the establishment of MIPI in 1956. The article argues that Indonesian scientific institutions changed gradually after independence. Existing networks and practices were retained where they remained useful, but were increasingly placed under Indonesian authority.