Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

The Identity of Political Islam in a Democratic Regime: The Ideology of the Prosperious Justice Party (PKS), Indonesia and the Justice and Development Party (AKP), Turkey Fuad, Ahmad Nur; Syafaq, Hammis; Rofhani, Rofhani
Islamica: Jurnal Studi Keislaman Vol. 20 No. 2 (2026): March
Publisher : Postgraduate Studies of UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15642/islamica.2026.20.2.185-211

Abstract

This study focuses on the identity and ideological orientation of two Islamic political parties, as well as their steps towards ideological moderation and specific electoral strategies within the political landscapes of two different countries. This is a library-based research that explores the identity of political Islam ideology in secular democracies, utilizing a combination of historical and political approaches. The sources include literature and writings about political Islam groups in Indonesia and Turkey, specifically PKS and AKP, derived from reputable books and scholarly articles. The study concludes that both PKS and AKP are moderate in ideology and politics. PKS, especially in post-New Order, transformed through moderation and inclusion, maintaining its Islamist identity while forming coalitions with nationalist parties for survival. Meanwhile, AKP combines moderate Islamism with conservative democracy, though Erdogan’s dominant leadership tends toward authoritarianism.
Beyond the Domestic Sphere: Reframing Muslim Husband-Wife Relations through Mubādalah in Indonesian Social Media Nur Lailatul Musyafaah; Hammis Syafaq; Mohammad Hadi Sucipto; Andina Najma Shavia
Journal of Digital Sharia and Contemporary Legal Thought Vol. 1 No. 1 (2026): June
Publisher : Zamzami Scholar Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.64685/JDSCLT.2026.1.1.57-75

Abstract

The rapid expansion of social media has transformed Islamic norm production by shifting representations of Muslim family life from private domestic settings to digitally mediated public arenas. While existing studies on Muslim influencers largely emphasize piety performance and religious commodification, little attention has been paid to how Islamic marital ethics are renegotiated through everyday online representations. This qualitative netnographic study analyzes the Instagram accounts of Indonesian Muslim influencers Alfysaga and Fatmasarizar through the lens of mubādalah (reciprocity) to examine how gender roles are visually and narratively constructed. The findings reveal a participatory marital model grounded in shared domestic responsibilities, collaborative parenting, recognition of personal autonomy, and the affirmation of women’s emotional agency, subtly challenging hierarchical readings of qiwāmah. The article argues that Instagram operates as a site of digital sharia negotiation, where Islamic family norms are interactively interpreted and recalibrated. By integrating digital ethnography with Islamic legal-ethical analysis, this study contributed to Digital Sharia scholarship by demonstrating how mediated visibility reshapes contemporary Muslim marital authority.
Kalender Aboge dalam Perspektif Fikih dan Astronomi Islam: Studi atas Tradisi Lokal di Probolinggo Najib, M. Ainun; Musyafaah, Nur Lailatul; Syafaq, Hammis; Shavia, Andina Najma
Azimuth: Journal of Islamic Astronomy Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025): Juli
Publisher : Program Studi Ilmu Falak, UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15642/azimuth.v6i2.2865

Abstract

Aboge (Alif Rebo Wage) merupakan sistem kalender Jawa-Islam yang berbasis peredaran bulan, namun menggunakan pola aritmatik tetap melalui siklus windu dan kurup tanpa melibatkan observasi hilal (rukyat) maupun perhitungan astronomis aktual (hisab hakiki). Dalam praktiknya, sistem ini masih digunakan oleh sebagian masyarakat di Desa Pondok Wuluh, Probolinggo, sehingga kerap menghasilkan perbedaan penetapan awal Ramadan dan hari raya dibandingkan dengan metode hisab-rukyat yang digunakan oleh Nahdlatul Ulama dan Muhammadiyah. Penelitian ini mengkaji sistem penanggalan Aboge (Alif Rebo Wage) dalam perspektif ilmu falak dan fikih Islam. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah kualitatif dengan pendekatan normatif-analitis berbasis studi kepustakaan, yang mengintegrasikan literatur ilmu falak, fikih, serta penelitian terdahulu, dan didukung data empiris praktik Aboge di masyarakat. Analisis difokuskan pada perbandingan antara sistem penanggalan Aboge dengan standar penentuan awal bulan Hijriah berbasis rukyat dan hisab modern. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa secara astronomis, Aboge memiliki konsistensi internal sebagai sistem aritmatik-siklikal, namun tidak memenuhi kriteria akurasi ilmiah karena tidak mempertimbangkan dinamika posisi bulan secara aktual. Sementara itu, dalam perspektif fikih, Aboge tidak dapat dijadikan dasar normatif dalam penentuan waktu ibadah mahdhah yang bersifat tauqifi, meskipun dapat dipahami sebagai bagian dari praktik ‘urf. Dengan demikian, posisi kalender Aboge lebih tepat ditempatkan sebagai bentuk hisab ‘urfī yang memiliki nilai historis, kultural, dan sosial, namun tidak memiliki otoritas dalam penetapan waktu ibadah yang mensyaratkan validitas astronomis dan dasar dalil syar‘i. Temuan ini menunjukkan adanya diferensiasi yang tegas antara sistem kalender berbasis tradisi dan sistem kalender Islam modern, sekaligus membuka ruang koeksistensi antara keduanya dalam batas-batas yang proporsional.
Navigating Challenges of Islamic Civilization in the Era of Global Modernity Hammis Syafaq; Suqiyah Musafa'ah; Nur Lailatul Musyafaah; Marli Candra; Andina Najma Shavia
Tasfiyah: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam Vol. 10 No. 1 (2026): Tasfiyah: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam
Publisher : University of Darussalam Gontor, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21111/tasfiyah.v10i1.7

Abstract

This article analyzes the dynamics and challenges faced by Islamic civilization amid the dominance of Western modernity, which has now transformed into neoliberal globalization, digital capitalism, and epistemic hegemony. The study explores how Islamic civilization can reformulate its strategic role in constructing a modern Muslim society that is not only technologically advanced but also spiritually and ethically grounded. Employing a qualitative library-based method with a descriptive-analytical approach and a civilizational analytical framework, this research examines classical and contemporary literature on civilizational theory, modernization, the coloniality of knowledge, and Islamic reformism. The findings indicate that Western modernity does not merely generate scientific and institutional progress; it also promotes a secular-materialistic paradigm that tends to marginalize the dimension of transcendence from the public sphere. In this context, the crisis experienced by Muslim societies is not a theological crisis, but rather an epistemic one crisis and a crisis of civilizational confidence. Historically, Islamic civilization was built upon the integration of dzikr (spiritual consciousness) and fikr (intellectual rationality) as two fundamental pillars of societal advancement. Therefore, the revitalization of Islamic civilization in the global era requires the reconstruction of epistemology, educational reform, and the strengthening of a civilizational identity that engages modernity in a selective and critical manner.
Integrating Fiqhiyyah Legal Maxims and Positive Law Principles in the Formation of Indonesia's New National Criminal Code Ahmad Agus Ramdlany; Ahmad Musadad; Hammis Syafaq; Maher Ali Ahmad Al-Khaldi; Saleem Asouli
Nusantara: Journal of Law Studies Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): Nusantara: Journal of Law Studies
Publisher : PT. Islamic Research Publiser

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.66325/nusantaralaw.v5i1.156

Abstract

Although Indonesia is not formally constituted as an Islamic state, Islamic legal values have significantly influenced the development of its national legal system, particularly in the formation of modern legislation. This study aims to examine the integration of fiqhiyyah legal maxims into the foundational principles of Law No. 1 of 2023 concerning Indonesia's New National Criminal Code (KUHP). Employing a qualitative approach grounded in normative juridical methods, this research draws upon primary legal documents, classical fiqh literature, and contemporary legal scholarship. Data were collected through a systematic literature review and analysed using conceptual and statutory approaches to identify patterns of normative convergence and doctrinal alignment. The findings indicate that at least eight fiqhiyyah legal maxims are substantively embedded within the core principles of the KUHP. Notably, the maxim la jarimata wa la 'uqubata illa bi al-nass corresponds to the principle of legality as stipulated in Articles 1(1) and 2(1). The principle of non-retroactivity is reflected in la raj'iyyah fi al-tashri' al-jina'i, while the doctrine of limited retroactivity aligns with inna al-tashri' al-jina'i yajuzu an yakuna lahu atharun raji'un as reflected in Article 3(1). Furthermore, the maxim inna al-shari'ah al-islamiyyah tutabbaqu' ala kulli jarimah underpins the principles of active and passive nationality in Articles 5 and 8. This study contributes to the discourse on legal pluralism by demonstrating that Indonesia's criminal law reform embodies a substantive harmonisation between positive Law and Islamic legal reasoning. It highlights the epistemological relevance of fiqhiyyah maxims as a normative bridge in shaping a responsive, adaptive, and contextually grounded modern legal system in a pluralistic society.
Religious Moderation through Friday Sermons: A Collaborative Governance Model in Surabaya Mosques Ahmad Habibul Muiz; Hammis Syafaq; Achmad Yani; Moehammad Anfa’ul Ulum; Yassirly Amrona Rosyada
Mimbar Agama Budaya Vol. 43 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Center for Research and Publication (PUSLITPEN), UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/mimbar.v43i1.50604

Abstract

Friday sermons play a strategic role in shaping public religious understanding among Muslim communities. This study analyzes the collaborative governance of Friday sermons as an instrument for strengthening religious moderation in two urban mosques in Surabaya, namely Masjid Al-Falah and Masjid Ar-Rahmah. Using a qualitative comparative case study, data were collected through in-depth interviews with mosque administrators, media managers, and congregants, supported by documentation of mosque digital media practices. The data were analyzed through condensation, display, coding, thematic categorization, and conclusion drawing. The findings reveal four interconnected dimensions of sermon governance: structural, cultural, substantive, and digital collaboration. These dimensions appear in preacher selection, theme confirmation, sensitivity to congregational characteristics, moderation of sermon content, digital production, and mitigation of sensitive issues. The study concludes that religious moderation in Friday sermons is achieved through collaborative mosque governance that involves administrators, preachers, media teams, and congregants.
Kebebasan Berekspresi di Media Sosial: Dialektika Hak Asasi Manusia dan Hukum Islam dalam Pembentukan Regulasi Digital Gufron Zainal Abidin Sdawi Manasiq; Mohsi Mohsi; Hammis Syafaq; Fahmi Assulthoni; Abd Ghani
Qisth : Jurnal Studi dan Penelitian Hukum Islam Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Miftahul Ulum Pamekasan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36420/qfmm9k86

Abstract

The normative regulation of freedom of expression on social media platforms remains unresolved, particularly in Muslim-majority countries that simultaneously operate under international Human Rights (HR) frameworks and Islamic Law principles. Available comparative scholarship tends to address this issue in general terms, without examining its specific implications within digital ecosystems. Drawing on a qualitative-comparative approach grounded in document analysis, this study examines international HR instruments specifically Article 19 of the UDHR and ICCPR alongside Islamic normative sources comprising the Qur'an, Sunnah, fatwa council rulings, and maqasid al-shari'ah literature. Both systems recognize freedom of expression as a fundamental right, yet differ substantially in philosophical foundation. HR frameworks condition restrictions on the principles of legality, legitimate aim, necessity, and proportionality; Islamic Law, by contrast, frames expression as a moral trust bounded by the protection of maqasid al-shari'ah and the principle of amar ma'ruf nahi munkar. This tension produces concrete regulatory gaps in digital content moderation, particularly regarding hate speech, blasphemy, and disinformation. In response to these gaps, the study proposes a three-component integrative regulatory model: balanced cyber-regulation design, multi-stakeholder co-regulation mechanisms, and digital literacy grounded in cross-perspectival communication ethics. The model offers an operational framework for policymakers and digital platforms seeking to develop fair and contextually sensitive content moderation policies.
Pilgrimage to Sunan Ampel's Tomb from the Perspective of Kiai and Habib in Surabaya Ubaidillah, Romi; Izzati, Nailatur Rahmah; Anggraini, Yuni; Syafaq, Hammis
Komparatif: Jurnal Perbandingan Hukum dan Pemikiran Islam Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): June
Publisher : Department of Comparative Mazhab Comparative, Fakulty of Shariah and Law

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Sunan Ampel's tomb in Surabaya is one of the pilgrimage sites with important religious, historical, and social significance. Although tomb pilgrimage is generally accepted as a religious practice, its meaning can differ based on the pattern of religious understanding of the figure who guides the community. This study aims to analyze the meaning of the pilgrimage to Sunan Ampel's tomb based on the views of Kiai Badar Thomthomi and Habib Hasan bin Faruq Alkaff. This study uses an empirical legal method with a comparative approach. The main data was obtained through interviews with Kiai Badar Thomthomi and Habib Hasan bin Faruq Alkaff, while supporting data was obtained through literature and documentation studies. The results of the study show that both figures view pilgrimage as a means of getting closer to Allah, praying for the dead, remembering death, and strengthening faith. The difference lies in the pressure point of meaning. According to Kiai Badar Thomthomi, in pilgrimage, pilgrims must pray for the dead and not make a place to ask for the deceased. Meanwhile, Habib Hasan bin Faruq Alkaff put greater emphasis on the spiritual dimension, tawasul, wasilah, tabarruk, self-reflection, and the continuity of the archipelago's Islamic tradition. Nevertheless, both reject the belief that the wali has independent power beyond the will of Allah.