Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.064
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Ulul Albab: Jurnal Studi Islam JURNAL KARSA (Terakreditasi No. 80/DIKTI/Kep/2012) KARSA: Jurnal Sosial dan Budaya Keislaman (Journal of Social and Islamic Culture) JURISDICTIE Jurnal Hukum dan Syariah Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun NUANSA: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Sosial dan Keagamaan Islam Al-Daulah : Jurnal Hukum dan Perundangan Islam SAMARAH: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam Al Huquq : Journal of Indonesian Islamic Economic Law Al-Manhaj: Journal of Indonesian Islamic Family Law Al-Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum Islam Center of Economic Students Journal (CSEJ) JSE: Jurnal Sharia Economica Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan Jurnal Penelitian Mahasiswa Ilmu Sosial, Ekonomi, dan Bisnis Islam (SOSEBI) Jurnal Ekonomi, Bisnis dan Manajemen
Erie Hariyanto
Jurusan Syariah STAIN Pamekasan
Religion Arts Humanities Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 24 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 24 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
Asset Confiscation in Gold Pawn Corruption Cases : An Analysis from Islamic Law and Positive Law Perspectives Sholihah, Aulia Fitriyatus; Fadllan, Fadllan; Hariyanto, Erie; Haryanto, Rudy
Masyrif : Jurnal Ekonomi, Bisnis dan Manajemen Vol 6, No 2 (2025): Masyrif : Jurnal Ekonomi, Bisnis dan Manajemen
Publisher : Universitas Al-Amien Prenduan Sumenep

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28944/masyrif.v6i2.2439

Abstract

Corruption cases involving gold pawn (rahn) transactions within Islamic financial institutions highlight critical challenges related to sharia governance, fiduciary responsibility, and asset protection. Despite being founded on ethical and religious principles, sharia-compliant financial products remain vulnerable to financial crimes, particularly in high-value, asset-based transactions. This study examines asset confiscation mechanisms in a gold pawn corruption case in Pamekasan, Indonesia, analyzed through the perspectives of Islamic law and positive law. Employing a qualitative case study approach, this research utilizes statutory regulations, court-related legal documents, institutional reports, and secondary data from verified media and academic literature. The findings demonstrate that asset confiscation serves a dual function: as a legal instrument for state loss recovery under Indonesian anti-corruption law and as a normative mechanism aligned with Islamic legal principles such as amanah (trust), hifz al-mal (protection of property), justice, and public interest (maslahah). This study contributes to the literature by integrating Islamic jurisprudence with contemporary asset recovery discourse, emphasizing that asset confiscation is not merely a procedural legal act but a necessary governance mechanism to strengthen accountability and integrity within Islamic financial institutions. The research underscores the importance of harmonizing Islamic law and modern legal systems to restore public trust and enhance anti-corruption frameworks in sharia-compliant finance.
Model Penyelesian Sengketa Akibat Kelalaian PenjagaToko Kelontong Madura dalam Prespektif Amanah Muamalah Rohmatin, Atin; Hariyanto, Erie; Haryanto, Rudy; Fadllan, Fadllan
Center of Economic Students Journal Vol. 8 No. 4 (2025): October-December (2025)
Publisher : Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Muslim Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56750/kbvr5k54

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan membahas model penyelesaiansengketa akibat kelalain penjaga toko kelontong Madura dalam perspektif amanah muamalah. Metode yang digunakanyaitu pendekatan kualitatif, dengan teknik pengumpulan data melalui wawancara dan observasi. Hasil temuan menunjukkanbahwa kerugian yang terjadi disebabkan oleh pemberiankasbon tanpa pencatatan dan penggelapan dana yang melanggar prinsip amanah. penyelesaian sengketa dilakukanmelalui musyawrah kekeluargaan yang hasil keputusanditetapkan penggantian kerugian ditanggung penjaga tokoserta diperkuat melalu pembuatan surat pernyataanbermaterai. Hasil penelitian menemukan bahwa prinsipamanah dan musyawarah menjadi dasar efektif dalammenyelesaikan sengketa pada usaha ritel tradisional berbasiskepercayaan.
MEDIASI MEDIASI SEBAGAI ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR) DALAM KASUS PAKET HILANG / RUSAK PADA EKSPEDISI SHOPEE EXPRESS PAMEKASAN HUB Firmansyah, Hendri; Hariyanto, Erie; Fadllan
JSE: Jurnal Sharia Economica Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): Januari
Publisher : LPPM STAI Muhammadiyah Probolinggo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46773/jse.v5i1.2960

Abstract

This study aims to examine the issue of Mediation as an Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) in Cases of Lost/Damaged Packages in Shopee Express Pamekasan Hub. Consumer disputes in expedition services are a crucial issue, given that business actors are fully responsible for losses suffered by consumers. This study applies a normative legal method that focuses on the analysis of legal norms, principles, doctrines, and applicable laws and regulations. This study uses a descriptive qualitative approach with a case study method. As a solution, this dispute is resolved through mediation. The mediation process usually occurs if internal resolution through the return feature or direct contact with customer service fails or is rejected by one of the parties. This process involves a third-party mediator who is tasked with bridging communication between consumers and Shopee Express representatives to reach a peaceful and fair mutual agreement.
SOCIAL DELEGITIMATION OF RELIGIOUS OBLIGATION: Zakat, Infaq, and Shodaqoh Traditions among Transnational Madurese Migrant Workers of Indonesia-Malaysia Hariyanto, Erie; Wardi, Moch Cholid; Nawawi, Maimun; Effendy, Moh Hafid; Hamzah, Moh; Nurhidayatuloh, N.
Jurisdictie: Jurnal Hukum dan Syariah Vol 16, No 2 (2025): Jurisdictie
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18860/j.v16i2.36809

Abstract

This study examines Islamic Philanthropic practices (Zakat, Infaq, and Sadaqah) within a transnational context that has received limited scholarly attention, particularly among migrant workers. Legal issues arise from regulatory misalignment between Indonesia and Malaysia in Zakat governance, which affects the practice of religious obligations. The objective of this study is to introduce the concept of social delegitimation in relation to transnational religious obligations and to understand the process through which Madurese migrants in Malaysia fulfil Zakat, Infaq, and Sadaqah (ZIS). This research adopts an empirical study using anthropological and comparative approaches and applies Kenneth L. Pike's emic and etic perspectives. The findings indicate that the fulfilment of ZIS takes place through continuous negotiation within conditions of transnational uncertainty. Regulatory misalignment contributes to the social delegitimation of formal zakat institution in Malaysia, leading migrants to prefer channeling their ZIS through networks of kiai (religious scholars) and community groups in their hometowns, which are perceived to guarantee emotional proximity, blessing (barakah), and spiritual accountability. Accordingly, this study demonstrates that religious authority and the legitimacy of Islamic philanthropy in diaspora contexts are shaped more by social relations and transnational resilience strategies than by mere state legal frameworks.Penelitian ini mengkaji praktik filantropi Islam (zakat, infaq, dan sadaqah) dalam konteks transnasional yang jarang dieksplorasi, khususnya di kalangan pekerja migran. Terdapat isu hukum mengenai ketidakselarasan regulasi zakat antara Indonesia dan Malaysia yang memengaruhi praktik kewajiban agama. Tujuan studi ini adalah memperkenalkan konsep delegitimasi sosial terhadap kewajiban agama transnasional dan memahami proses pemenuhan zakat, infaq, dan sadaqah (ZIS) migran Madura di Malaysia. Metode yang digunakan adalah penelitian empiris dengan pendekatan antropologi dan komparatif, serta menerapkan perspektif emik dan etik Kenneth L. Pike. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pemenuhan ZIS berlangsung melalui negosiasi berkelanjutan dalam situasi ketidakpastian transnasional. Ketidakselarasan regulasi mendorong delegitimasi sosial terhadap institusi zakat formal di Malaysia, menyebabkan migran lebih memilih menyalurkan ZIS melalui jaringan kiai dan komunitas di kampung halaman karena dinilai menjamin kedekatan emosional, keberkahan, dan akuntabilitas spiritual. Dengan demikian, kontribusi artikel ini memperlihatkan bahwa otoritas keagamaan dan legitimasi filantropi Islam di diaspora lebih ditentukan oleh relasi sosial dan strategi ketahanan transnasional daripada sekadar kerangka hukum negara.
Co-Authors Anis Sulalah Arif Wahyudi Cahyani, Novita Dikuraisyin, Basar Eka Susylawati Eka Susylawati Fadllan Fadllan Fadllan Faidi, Ach. Firmansyah, Hendri Hamzah, Moh Hamzah, Moh. Hannan, Abd. Harisah, Harisah Hosen, Hosen Ikhwanuddin Harahap Laili, Mahiratul Long, Ahmad Sunawari Maimun Nawawi Moch. Cholid Wardi Moh. Efendi, Moh. Moh. Hafid Effendy, Moh. Hafid Mohammad Ali Al Humaidy Muchsin, Athik Yulia Ni’matunnuriyah, Ni’matunnuriyah Nurhidayatuloh, N. Rohmatin, Atin Rudy Haryanto Saifuddin Zuhri Qudsy Sholihah, Aulia Fitriyatus Siregar, Fatahuddin Aziz Sufyan, Akhmad Farid Mawardi Sulistiyawati Sulistiyawati Suyudi, Mohammad Suyudi, Mohammad Tri Wahyu Faizal, Bhismoadi Umam, Hoirul Umam, Nurul Umi Supraptiningsih