Articles
<![CDATA[PERANAN NOTARIS SEBAGAI SAKSI (SYÂHID) TERHADAP SUATU PERBUATAN MELAWAN HUKUM YANG DILAKUKAN PIHAK DALAM AKTA NOTARIS (Studi Perkara Nomor 269/Pid.B/2015/PN.PDG) ]]>
<![CDATA[Dia Ikhsan]]>;
<![CDATA[Ismansyah Ismansyah]]>
<![CDATA[ Alhurriyah Vol 4, No 1 (2019): Januari-Juni 2019 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Islam Negeri Sjech M. Djamil Djambek Bukittinggi ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (748.648 KB)
|
DOI: 10.30983/alhurriyah.v4i1.1438
<![CDATA[Notary is one of the general officers authorized to create an authentic deed and other authorities as intended in the law. Notary can be called as a notary as a witness, suspect and accused in the event of an act against the law of the Outentic deed made in a notary public. The problem in this writing is 1) the role of notary as a witness against the deeds of the law committed by the parties in Notarial deed and 2) the judgment of judges in the verdict No. 269/Pid. B/2015/PN. PDG about the role of notary as a witness against the deeds of the law committed by the party in notarial deed. The research method used is a method of normative juridical approach empirical. The result of the study of notarial roles as witnesses of the Act against the law by the party in notarial deed came to fulfill the call as a witness in the interest of an investigation, a notary called for investigation Must be approved by the notary Honorary assembly and give information on what is provided by the Parties both oral and written in writing. Notary is called and needs his presence in the examination of criminal matters, in capacity as a general officer who makes authentic deed, it is necessary for his testimony of what is seen, heard and supporting evidence in the creation of authentic deeds The criminal matter, 2) the judgment of judges in the Decree No. 269/Pid. B/2015/PN. PDG about the role of notary as a witness against the deeds of the law conducted by the party in Notarial deed is a notary only as a witness called the court to be heard his description of the conduct of the law Done by the defendant is about the forgery of the SS signatures to make the letter of authorization selling and besides notary also called a witness from the notary party who is a witness in the making of the selling power deed.]]>
<![CDATA[Notary’s Responsibility in Making of Deed Due to Land Acquisition Containing Criminal Corruption ]]>
<![CDATA[Yogi Maron]]>;
<![CDATA[Ismansyah Ismansyah]]>;
<![CDATA[Azmi Fendri]]>
<![CDATA[ Alhurriyah Vol 5, No 1 (2020): Januari - Juni 2020 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Islam Negeri Sjech M. Djamil Djambek Bukittinggi ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (566.164 KB)
|
DOI: 10.30983/alhurriyah.v5i1.2331
<![CDATA[ As happened to the Notary Eli SatriaPilo, S.H, Mkn, who was appointed as the Notary who made the Deed of Relinquishment of Land Rights in the Land Acquisition activities for the Construction of Campus III of the State Islamic Institute (IAIN) of Padang which was located in Sungai Bangek District, Padang in 2010. The method used was descriptive, in which describing the applicable legislation associated with legal theory in the facts and realities about the Notary’s Responsibility in Making Deed of Land Acquisition for the construction of Campus III of IAIN Padang in Sungai Bangek. This study used a Normative Juridical approach, in which researching by using and processing secondary data or literature related to the study. The data collected were in the form of primary data obtained from the District Court of Padang, secondary data obtained from secondary legal materials and primary legal materials. Based on the study, it was found that the role of Notary Eli Satria Pilo, in the land acquisition of campus III IAIN was proven to have misused the authority resulting in violation of the Notary Ethics Code and was responsible for accepting termination disrespectfully. Furthermore, he was also shown to be committing a Criminal Corruption made based on the Deed of Relinquishment of Land Rights in the land acquisition for the construction of Campus III of IAIN Padang, so that the State incurred losses of Rp. 1.946.701.050 (one billion nine hundred forty-six million seven hundred one thousand and fifty rupiahs). And he was responsible for receiving and carrying out the sentence that had been handed down by the District Court of Padang, a prison sentence of 4 (four) years, and paying a fine of Rp. 200.000.000 (two hundred million rupiahs). ]]>
<![CDATA[Law Enforcement Against Criminal Acts Local Elections by Gakkumdu ]]>
<![CDATA[Muslihannisa Muslihannisa]]>;
<![CDATA[Ismansyah Ismansyah]]>;
<![CDATA[Nani Mulyati]]>
<![CDATA[ Journal of Social Research Vol. 2 No. 4 (2023): Journal of Social Research ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[International Journal Labs ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.55324/josr.v2i4.803
<![CDATA[The election of the Regional Head of Padang Pariaman Regency as a form of democracy must be carried out in accordance with the provisions of the legislation, but in the process of its implementation it cannot be separated from various actions that can harm a lot of people, and the integrity of the implementation of the Regional Election. In this case, the integrated law enforcement center (Gakkumdu) enforces the law on the crime of regional head elections. The research method used in this study is empirical juridical. Based on the results of the study, it can be concluded: Law enforcement against criminal acts of integrated law enforcement centers in handling criminal acts for the election of the head of Padang Pariaman region is ineffective because of the 3 (three) findings of criminal cases handled there are no cases has reached the court level, all cases stop on the second discussion of Sentra Gakkumdu. The obstacles faced in law enforcement of criminal acts are associated with factors that affect law enforcement consisting of 5 (five) namely legal factors, law enforcement, facilities and facilities, society, and culture. To overcome obstacles by the integrated law enforcement center in law enforcement of regional election crimes is to carry out its duties as a law enforcement holder without any internal and external influence of a policy with the aim that the democratic process runs with the creation of justice, safely, and peacefully.]]>
<![CDATA[DAMPAK PEMERIKSAAN SETEMPAT TERHADAP PUTUSAN BEBAS DALAM KASUS DUGAAN TINDAK PIDANA CABUL DIPANDANG DARI ASPEK KEPASTIAN HUKUM DAN KEADILAN ]]>
<![CDATA[Awilda Awilda]]>;
<![CDATA[Ismansyah Ismansyah]]>;
<![CDATA[Aria Zurnetti]]>;
<![CDATA[Henni Muchtar]]>
<![CDATA[ UNES Journal of Swara Justisia Vol 7 No 2 (2023): UNES Journal of Swara Justisia (Juli 2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Program Magister Ilmu Hukum Universitas Ekasakti ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31933/ujsj.v7i2.341
<![CDATA[Penelitian ini berangkat dari adanya kekosongan hukum mengenai pelaksanaan Pemeriksaan Setempat dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana (KUHAP), yang menimbulkan ketimpangan, mengingat hasil Pemeriksaan Setempat tak jarang dijadikan salah satu dasar pertimbangan hakim dalam menjatuhkan putusan bebas, termasuk perkara pencabulan. Tesis ini bermaksud untuk mencari tahu bagaimana konsep keadilan dan kepastian hukum diterapkan dalam analisis hakim atas mengenai temuan dan dampak pemeriksaan setempat saat memutus bebas suatu tindak pidana pencabulan. Dengan menggunakan metode yuridis-normatif dan memanfaatkan data sekunder yang diuraikan dengan pendekatan deskriptif-analitis, penelitian ini menemukan bahwa Pemeriksaan Setempat dalam hukum acara pidana pada saat ini dapat dinilai sebagai suatu bentuk sebuah terobosan hukum untuk memperoleh keyakinan hakim, bahkan dapat mengenyampingkan semua alat bukti yang telah dihadirkan oleh Penuntut Umum dalam persidangan. Kendati demikian, pelaksanaan pemeriksaan setempat yang belum berdasarkan pada ketentuan normatif dikhawatirkan akan berdampak negatif pada jalannya penanganan perkara pidana karena seolah bertentangan dengan tuntutan perwujudan kepastian hukum dan keadilan.]]>
<![CDATA[PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP JUSTICE COLLABORATOR DALAM MENGUNGKAP TINDAK PIDANA NARKOTIKA DITINJAU DARI ASAS KEADILAN ]]>
<![CDATA[Gerry Jardan]]>;
<![CDATA[Ismansyah Ismansyah]]>;
<![CDATA[Nani Mulyati]]>
<![CDATA[ UNES Journal of Swara Justisia Vol 7 No 2 (2023): UNES Journal of Swara Justisia (Juli 2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Program Magister Ilmu Hukum Universitas Ekasakti ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31933/ujsj.v7i2.356
<![CDATA[Justice collaborator sangat berperan penting dalam membantu aparat penegak hukum dalam memberantas kejahatan terorganisir seperti tindak pidana narkotika, Peran justice collaborator dalam upaya pengungkapan kasus tindak pidana narkotika karena dapat menarik dan menjerat bandar atau pelaku lainnya. dengan adanya pemberian perlindungan hukum terhadap justice collaborator ini diharapkan akan membantu dan memaksimalkan penegakan hukum terhadap pelaku kejahatan penyalahgunaan narkotika yang tentunya mempertimbangkan asas keadilan. Rumusan masalah yang dibahas dalam penelitian ini ialah menganalisis (1) pengaturan perlindungan hukum terhadap justice collaborator dalam mengungkap tindak pidana narkotika dan menganalisis (2) tinjauan asas keadilan terhadap justice collaborator dalam mengungkap tindak pidana narkotika dalam Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Pekanbaru. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif, maka teknik pengumpulan data yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini bersifat studi kepustakaan namun juga didukung dengan data yang bersumber dari wawancara. Hasil yang diperoleh dari penelitian didapatkan kesimpulan (1) Perlindungan hukum terhadap Justice Collaborator diatur dalam Undang-undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2006 Jo. Undang-undang Nomor 31 Tahun 2014 tentang Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban, Peraturan Bersama Menteri Hukum dan HAM Republik Indonesia, Jaksa Agung Republik Indonesia, Kepala Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia, Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi Republik Indonesia, dan Ketua Lembaga Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban Tahun 2011 tentang Perlindungan bagi Pelapor, Saksi Pelapor, dan Saksi Pelaku yang Bekerjasama dan SEMA Nomor 4 Tahun 2011 Tentang Perlakuan Bagi Pelapor Tindak Pidana (Whistleblower) Dan Saksi Pelaku Yang Bekerjasama (Justice Collaborator) Di dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Tertentu yang pada intinya mengatur mengenai syarat untuk menjadi justice collaborator, pedoman memperlakukan justice collaborator dan perlindungan yang berupa perlindungan fisik maupun psikologis serta pemberian reward berupa pengurangan hukum hingga remisi dan bebas bersyarat atas jasa yang diberikan dalam membantu mengungkap tindak pidana Narkotika. (2) Dari tiga putusan yang dianalisis dapat disimpulkan bahwa putusan hakim tidak terikat dengan peraturan yang merupakan keadilan prosedural melainkan hakim memberikan pertimbangan berdasarkan keadilan substansial yang diperoleh dari proses berlangsungnya persidangan dengan memperhatikan fakta-fakta yang ada. Tidak satupun tindakan menjadi justice collaborator membebaskan dari pemidanaan karena pada dasarnya tidak menghilangkan kesalahan pelaku melainkan penghargaan pengurangan hukum atas bantuannya dalam mengungkap tindak pidana.]]>
<![CDATA[Perlindungan Hukum Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah (PPAT) terhadap Tindakan Pemalsuan Data pada Akta Jual Beli oleh Penghadap ]]>
<![CDATA[Reza Sri Maulani]]>;
<![CDATA[Ismansyah Ismansyah]]>;
<![CDATA[Syofiarti Syofiarti]]>
<![CDATA[ UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.855
<![CDATA[Land Deed Making Officer is a general official who is authorized to make authentic deeds regarding certain legal deeds regarding land rights or property rights to flats. One of the deeds made by the Land Deed Maker Officer is the sale and purchase deed. In making a sale and purchase deed, it is not uncommon to be disputed by parties or other third parties who feel aggrieved by the deed because of alleged falsification of data on the deed, causing the Land Deed Making Officer to be involved in the matter and be examined by the authorities. In this study, the formulation of problems related to the legal protection of Land Deed Making Officials the act of falsifying data on the sale and purchase deed by the face is : 1. What is the form of legal protection of the Land Deed Making Officer against the act of falsifying data on the sale and purchase deed by the facer? 2. What are the legal consequences of the sale and purchase deed made by the Land Deed Making Officer in which there is data falsified by the face? This research uses a juridical-empirical approach method. The results of the study found that: 1. Legal protection of Land Deed Making Officials against the act of falsifying data on the sale and purchase deed by the face in the form of providing legal assistance carried out by the Ministry, Board of Trustees and Supervisors of Land Deed Making Officials in the form of advice, assistance in investigations and / or expert statements in court both as witnesses and suspects. 2. The legal consequences of the sale and purchase deed in which there is falsified data are sales and purchase deeds that are proven to be legally defective due to non-fulfillment of the legal conditions of the agreement and / or non-fulfillment of the formal and material conditions for making the deed, so that the position of the sale and purchase deed as an authentic deed is canceled or declared null and void to have no binding legal force.]]>
<![CDATA[Kekuatan Pembuktian Surat Dibawah Tangan yang Dilegalisasi oleh Notaris (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 362/PID.B/2020/PN PDG) ]]>
<![CDATA[Novitra Nanda]]>;
<![CDATA[Ismansyah Ismansyah]]>;
<![CDATA[Azmi Fendri]]>
<![CDATA[ UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.900
<![CDATA[Humans as social beings are always in contact with other humans, where in human relations they often make agreements both verbally and in writing which lead to an agreement. An agreement made in writing intends to provide legal certainty and legal protection for both parties if a dispute occurs between them at any time. In a written agreement, the subject and object of the agreement will be clearly visible. While the object can be described as something that is done by the subject, namely things that are obligatory to the authorities against which party has the right. A written agreement can be made by private deed or by authentic deed. Authentic deed made by a Notary. Notary as a public official who is the only one authorized to make authentic deeds and other authorities determined by law. In court, if what is presented as evidence is only an underhanded deed considering the limited strength of evidence, then other supporting evidence is still being sought so that evidence is obtained which is considered sufficient to reach the truth according to law. Based on this, problems arise regarding: 1) What is the judge's consideration of Decision Number 362/Pid.B/2020/PN Pdg regarding private letters legalized by a Notary. 2) What are the legal consequences of private letters legalized by a Notary against Decision Number 362/Pid.B/2020/PN Pdg. This study uses the Normative method, namely by examining primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. Based on the results of the research, the judge's consideration of Decision Number 362/Pid.B/2020/PN Pdg is related to private letters legalized by a Notary, proof of letters, namely the legalization of private deeds which only have formal evidentiary strength, namely the strength of evidence which provides certainty that an incident has actually occurred which is contained in the private deed by the parties and public officials have acknowledged it. single public prosecutor. The legal consequence of private documents legalized by a notary is that private deeds do not have perfect evidentiary legal consequences because they lie in the signatures of all parties to the agreement. An underhand deed only gives legal consequences of proof that are perfect for the benefit of the party to whom the signatory wants to provide evidence, while for third parties the legal consequences of proof are free.]]>
<![CDATA[Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Korban Tindak Pidana Peretasan (Hacking) Berkaitan dengan Pencurian Data ]]>
<![CDATA[Tri Andika Hidayatullah]]>;
<![CDATA[Ismansyah Ismansyah]]>;
<![CDATA[Nani Mulyati]]>
<![CDATA[ UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.935
<![CDATA[Hacking is used for other purposes that are detrimental. Legal protection for hacking is regulated in Law Number 19 of 2016. Problem Formulation What is the legal action taken by law enforcers regarding the eradication of criminal acts related to data theft? What is the legal protection for victims of hacking crimes related to data theft? What obstacles do law enforcers encounter in legal protection for victims of hacking crimes related to data theft? Type of research Normative legal research is supported by interviews. Data sources include primary data and secondary data. Data collection techniques are document studies and interviews. Data were analyzed descriptive-analytical. Conclusion of the research results: Law enforcement against hacking or hacking still does not reflect effective law enforcement due to a lack of understanding by investigators. Legal protection is divided into two kinds of preventive legal protection and repressive legal protection. Obstacles encountered by law enforcers in protection law against victims of criminal acts of hacking related to data theft, consists of several aspects, namely: investigator aspects, aspects of evidence in the investigation process, aspects of facilities, aspects of jurisdiction]]>
<![CDATA[Kekuatan Pembuktian Akta Dibawah Tangan yang Disahkan oleh Notaris pada Perkara Perdata (Studi Kasus Perkara Nomor 75/Pdt.G/2020/PN Pdg) ]]>
<![CDATA[Rinaldi Sarza]]>;
<![CDATA[Ismansyah Ismansyah]]>;
<![CDATA[Azmi Fendri]]>
<![CDATA[ UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.938
<![CDATA[This study aims to find out and analyze how the power of underhanded deeds legalized by a notary as evidence in the trial process at court in civil cases, to find out and analyze the judge's consideration of civil case decisions, and to find out and analyze the notary's responsibility for the deed has been legalized in the Civil Code. The research method in this research is the normative research method. Normative legal research is legal research carried out by examining library materials or secondary data. The results of this study, want to show how the power of underhanded deeds legalized by a notary in civil cases, basically the strength of proof of underhanded deeds legalized by a notary the power of proof cannot be equated with an authentic deed, underhanded deed legalized by a notary if denied the power changes as proof of the beginning of writing.]]>
<![CDATA[Pertimbangan Penuntut Umum Memilih Tempat Terjadinya Tindak Pidana Dalam Mendakwa Pelaku Yang Melakukan Tindak Pidana di Luar Daerah Hukumnya Pada Surat Dakwaan Register Perkara: Pdm-15/Ppjng/Eoh.2/03/2021 ]]>
<![CDATA[Yunita Eka Putri]]>;
<![CDATA[Ismansyah Ismansyah]]>;
<![CDATA[Aria Zurnetti]]>
<![CDATA[ UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.940
<![CDATA[Public Prosecutor is a prosecutor at the Attorney General's Office of the Republic of Indonesia who is authorized by law to conduct prosecutions, which process includes the authority to compose indictments. In exercising this authority, Article 15 and Article 137 of the Criminal Procedural Code (KUHAP) provide limitations for Public Prosecutors to conduct prosecutions within their jurisdictions, however, in practice it is found that Public Prosecutors indict criminal offenders who committed crimes outside their given jurisdiction (extra-jurisdictional). To study this phenomenon and its legal consequences, this research examines the consideration of the Public Prosecutor at Padang Panjang District Prosecutor's Office who indicted the perpetrator of criminal offense outside its given jurisdiction, as found in indictment No. PDM-15/PPJNG/Eoh.2/03/2021 on behalf of the defendant Aziarlis Bin Ameh Pgl Ziar, by employing empirical legal research methods based on primary data obtained by interviewing related Judges, lawyer and Public Prosecutors and also based on secondary data obtained through literature studies of various regulations and references that are analyzed qualitatively. This study finds that despite the restrictions imposed by KUHAP, extra-jurisdictional indictment is made possible through several provision in legislation, including Article 2 paragraph (3) of Law Number 16 Year 2004 concerning the Attorney General’s Office of the Republic of Indonesia. This study also recommends that the Supreme Court should consistently apply Article 4 paragraph (1) of Law No. 49 year 2009 concerning the Second Amendment to Law No. 2 Year 1986 concerning General Courts, which is included as a consideration in Chief Justice Decree No. 200/KMA/SK/X/2018.]]>
