Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
8.343
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Demokrasi Qistie: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Diponegoro Law Review Jurnal IUS (Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan) jurnal niara JURNAL KEPEMIMPINAN DAN PENGURUSAN SEKOLAH Hasanuddin Law Review JURNAL MUQODDIMAH : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hummaniora Jurnal Skala Kesehatan Nagari Law Review Unes Law Review Al-Manhaj: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Islam Law_Jurnal UNES Journal of Swara Justisia Journal of Social Research Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik (JIHHP) Al Hurriyah : Jurnal Hukum Islam Ranah Research : Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development Journal of Progressive Law and Legal Studies Ekasakti Journal of law and Justice Delicti : Jurnal Hukum Pidana Dan Kriminologi Lareh Law Review Kanun: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Aspiration of Health Journal Journal of Creative Power and Ambition (JCPA) International Conference on Social Science Proceedings International Conference on Economic Business and Social Science
Ismansyah Ismansyah
Universitas Andalas
Religion Arts Humanities Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Dentistry Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Health Professions Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Medicine & Pharmacology Nursing Physics Public Health Social Sciences Transportation Veterinary Other

Published : 85 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 85 Documents
Search

 3   4   5   6   7 
PENEGAKAN HUKUM PIDANA TENTANG PEMILIHAN UMUM (STUDI KASUS PADA PEMILIHAN ANGGOTA DPR, DPD DAN DPRD DI SUMATERA BARAT TAHUN 2009) Ardyan, Ardyan; Ismansyah, Ismansyah; Yoserwan, Yoserwan
Jurnal Kepemimpinan dan Pengurusan Sekolah Vol. 9 No. 2 (2024): June
Publisher : STKIP Pesisir Selatan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.34125/jkps.v9i2.454

Abstract

The criminal provisions in each law regarding General Elections (Elections) always increase, this is because there are still acts which in previous elections were not regulated as election crimes. The 2004 and 2009 Election Laws regulate procedural law and time limits for enforcing election criminal law. The Chairman of the Indonesian Election Supervisory Agency (Bawaslu), the Chief of the Indonesian Police and the Attorney General have made a Memorandum of Agreement to form an Integrated Law Enforcement Center (Sentra Gakkumdu) which contains elements from the Police, Prosecutor's Office and Election Supervisory Committee (Panwaslu) and is formed at the center, province and districts/cities which aims to effectively handle election crimes in accordance with the principles of justice, namely fast, simple and low cost as well as free, honest and impartial. The enforcement of election criminal law in the 2009 elections should have been more effective, but it turns out that based on Bawaslu's report the enforcement of election criminal law was very ineffective. This can be seen from the 2629 cases of election criminal violations, only 215 of which were decided in court. Referring to this problem, using a sociological juridical (empirical) legal research method, namely research carried out by analyzing data sources and then conducting interviews to reveal what problems occurred, what the coordination pattern actually was carried out by the Panwaslu with the Gakkumdu Center, how the Panwaslu and The Gakkumdu Center follows up on reports/findings of violations of election crimes, to determine whether many cases forwarded by the Panwaslu to the Gakkumdu Center are declared not to be election crimes, or there is not enough evidence, or the time for resolving election crimes will exceed the time limit, as well as looking for any factors which is an obstacle for both Panwaslu and the Gakkumdu Center in enforcing the law for election crime violations. From the research results, it turns out that coordination between the Panwaslu and the Gakkumdu Center went well, but enforcement of the criminal law for the election of members of the DPR, DPD and DPRD in 2009 failed, this was because reports submitted to the Panwaslu were reviewed and then submitted to the Gakkumdu Center to be reviewed again before being forwarded. to investigators. In the end, the Gakkumdu Center is no longer a forum for speeding up the resolution of handling election crimes, instead it acts as a filter for cases that will be passed on to the trial stage. Apart from that, there is a problem of differences in perception between who has the authority to declare suspected criminal acts, whether the Panwaslu or the Police, and then there is a shifting of duties between each other. for collecting evidence between Investigators and Panwaslu, and it cannot be denied that the quality of Panwaslu's human resources is very limited, most recently due to time restrictions for enforcing election criminal law as regulated in the law on elections. Therefore, it would be better if the law on elections strengthens the position of the Gakkumdu Center as the central institution for reporting and enforcing election criminal law, no longer the Panwaslu.
Penerapan Rehabilitasi Terhadap Korban Penyalahguna Narkotika Ditinjau dari Teori Kemanfaatan: Studi Putusan di Pengadilan Negeri Padang Harisa, Yossi; Ismansyah, Ismansyah; Mulyati, Nani
Ranah Research : Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development Vol. 7 No. 5 (2025): Ranah Research : Journal Of Multidisciplinary Research and Development
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/rrj.v7i5.1737

Abstract

This study examines the application of integrated assessments in sentencing drug abuse offenders to rehabilitation, using the theory of utility. Employing normative and sociological legal methods, data were collected from court decisions and interviews. Findings indicate that judges consider integrated assessments when the offender is not involved in drug trafficking. While rehabilitation offers legal and health benefits, its implementation is hindered by vague regulations, limited funding, and inadequate facilities.
Penegakan Hukum, Penyidikan, Pen Penegakan Hukum Pada Penyidikan Terhadap Tindak Pidana Pencemaran Nama Baik Yang Dilakukan Di Media Sosial (Studi Kasus Kepolisian Resor Kerinci): Penegakan Hukum Pada Penyidikan Terhadap Tindak Pidana Pencemaran Nama Baik Yang Dilakukan Di Media Sosial (Studi Kasus Kepolisian Resor Kerinci) Yetti, Hafiza; Ismansyah, Ismansyah; Mulyati, Nani
Lareh Law Review Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): Lareh Law Review
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Andalas

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25077/llr.3.1.46-62.2025

Abstract

Defamation through social media is included in information crimes and Electronic Transactions regulated in the Criminal Code and Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions as last amended by Law Number 1 of 2024 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions used to protect victims of defamation, The problems in this thesis are: 1) How is the interpretation of defamation committed on social media in criminal law? 2) How is the enforcement of criminal law against perpetrators of criminal acts of defamation through social media in Sungai Penuh City? 3) What are the obstacles and efforts in enforcing the law against criminal acts of defamation committed on social media in Sungai Penuh City? This study uses an empirical legal method, is descriptive in nature using primary data obtained from interviews with investigators and the research location at the Kerinci Police Resort. The results of the study show that: 1) The interpretation of defamation in the Criminal Code that is still in effect, the New Criminal Code, the Old ITE Law, the New ITE Law, and the Constitutional Court Decision No. 78/PUU-XXI/2023. The provisions of the Criminal Code that are still in force are more general, while the New Criminal Code and the New ITE Law more clearly regulate defamation. The Constitutional Court's decision also provides legal certainty. 2)Iinvestigation stage of reports received from 2022-2024 there were 13 cases and 4 cases that were processed were resolved through mediation. 3) Obstacles faced by Kerinci Police investigators in enforcing the law on criminal acts of defamation through social media are problems with evidence, limited technical expertise in the field of digital forensics, lack of legal awareness among the public, limited budget and resources, cultural and social differences in society. Keywords : Defamation, Investigation, Law Enforcement, Social Media
Kemanfaatan dalam Penghentian Penuntutan berdasarkan Keadilan Restoratif pada Perkara Kekerasan dalam Rumah Tangga Wicaksana, Maharani Adhyaksantari; Ismansyah, Ismansyah; Mulyati, Nani
Ranah Research : Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025): Ranah Research : Journal Of Multidisciplinary Research and Development
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/rrj.v8i1.1836

Abstract

Penegakkan hukum harus dapat menghindari timbulnya persoalan maupun kerugian lain yang dialami oleh korban. Hukum yang baik adalah hukum yang membawa kemanfaatan terhadap masyarakat. Kemanfaatan di sini dapat juga diartikan dengan kebahagiaan. Perkara kekerasan dalam rumah tangga (KDRT) merupakan salah satu tindak pidana yang dapat diselesaikan melalui penerapan prinsip keadilan restoratif. Jika penegakkan hukum dengan penjara tidak bisa memberikan asas kemanfaatan hukum itu sendiri kepada masyarakat terlebih lagi untuk korban, maka penegak hukum harus memperhatikan pendekatan keadilan restoratif. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaturan penghentian penuntutan berdasarkan keadilan restoratif dan manfaat penerapan pendekatan keadilan restoratif dalam perkara KDRT. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode normatif dengan menggunakan bahan hukum primer dan sekunder. Metode pendekatan yang digunakan adalah pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan kasus dengan teknik pengumpulan data studi kepustakaan yang kemudian dianalisis dengan alur berpikir deduktif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pengaturan penghentian penuntutan berdasarkan keadilan restoratif telah termuat dalam Peraturan Kejaksaan RI Nomor 15 Tahun 2020 tentang Penghentian Penuntutan Berdasarkan Keadilan Restoratif dan Surat Edaran Jaksa Agung Tindak Pidana Umum Nomor: 01/E/EJP/02/2022 tentang Pelaksanaan Penghentian Penuntutan Berdasarkan Keadilan Restoratif. Kemudian, penyelesaian perkara KDRT dengan menggunakan pendekatan restoratif akan memberi manfaat kepada tersangka dan korban, seperti tersangka langsung keluar dari tahanan dan dapat kembali beraktivitas sebagai tulang punggung keluarga untuk memenuhi kebutuhan anak dan istrinya, serta mencegah stigma negatif terhadap keluarga korban/tersangka di lingkungan masyarakat.
Upaya Pembuktian dalam Menerapkan Pidana Denda Bagi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Narkotika Hidayat, Zulfian; Ismansyah, Ismansyah; Rias, A. Irzal
Ranah Research : Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development Vol. 8 No. 1 (2025): Ranah Research : Journal Of Multidisciplinary Research and Development
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/rrj.v8i1.1875

Abstract

In Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics, the threat of criminal fines has significant punishment characteristics, with the amount of fines ranging from one hundred million rupiah to twenty billion rupiah. However, Article 148 of the Narcotics Law only stipulates a maximum imprisonment of 2 (two) years as a substitute for a fine, so there is a normative difference between the amount of the threat of criminal fines and the provisions of criminal penalties in lieu of fines. This certainly does not meet the judge's considerations in imposing criminal fines and efforts to prove the application of criminal fines for perpetrators of narcotics abuse. This research is an empirical, descriptive juridical research using primary data obtained by interviewing the Panel of Judges at the Payakumbuh District Court and using secondary data obtained from library studies of various legal literature and then analyzed qualitatively. The results of this study The judge's consideration in imposing sanctions tends to be more on imprisonment than fines because there is an imbalance between the amount of the fine threatened with a relatively light substitute prison sentence. The perpetrator's economic factors and the low substitute prison sentence (maximum 2 years) cause convicts to prefer serving a prison sentence rather than paying a fine.
DAMPAK PEMERIKSAAN SETEMPAT TERHADAP PUTUSAN BEBAS DALAM KASUS DUGAAN TINDAK PIDANA CABUL DIPANDANG DARI ASPEK KEPASTIAN HUKUM DAN KEADILAN Awilda, Awilda; Ismansyah, Ismansyah; Zurnetti, Aria; Muchtar, Henni
UNES Journal of Swara Justisia Vol 7 No 2 (2023): Unes Journal of Swara Justisia (Juli 2023)
Publisher : Program Magister Ilmu Hukum Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/ujsj.v7i2.341

Abstract

Penelitian ini berangkat dari adanya kekosongan hukum mengenai pelaksanaan Pemeriksaan Setempat dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana (KUHAP), yang menimbulkan ketimpangan, mengingat hasil Pemeriksaan Setempat tak jarang dijadikan salah satu dasar pertimbangan hakim dalam menjatuhkan putusan bebas, termasuk perkara pencabulan. Tesis ini bermaksud untuk mencari tahu bagaimana konsep keadilan dan kepastian hukum diterapkan dalam analisis hakim atas mengenai temuan dan dampak pemeriksaan setempat saat memutus bebas suatu tindak pidana pencabulan. Dengan menggunakan metode yuridis-normatif dan memanfaatkan data sekunder yang diuraikan dengan pendekatan deskriptif-analitis, penelitian ini menemukan bahwa Pemeriksaan Setempat dalam hukum acara pidana pada saat ini dapat dinilai sebagai suatu bentuk sebuah terobosan hukum untuk memperoleh keyakinan hakim, bahkan dapat mengenyampingkan semua alat bukti yang telah dihadirkan oleh Penuntut Umum dalam persidangan. Kendati demikian, pelaksanaan pemeriksaan setempat yang belum berdasarkan pada ketentuan normatif dikhawatirkan akan berdampak negatif pada jalannya penanganan perkara pidana karena seolah bertentangan dengan tuntutan perwujudan kepastian hukum dan keadilan.
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP JUSTICE COLLABORATOR DALAM MENGUNGKAP TINDAK PIDANA NARKOTIKA DITINJAU DARI ASAS KEADILAN Jardan, Gerry; Ismansyah, Ismansyah; Mulyati, Nani
UNES Journal of Swara Justisia Vol 7 No 2 (2023): Unes Journal of Swara Justisia (Juli 2023)
Publisher : Program Magister Ilmu Hukum Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/ujsj.v7i2.356

Abstract

Justice collaborator sangat berperan penting dalam membantu aparat penegak hukum dalam memberantas kejahatan terorganisir seperti tindak pidana narkotika, Peran justice collaborator dalam upaya pengungkapan kasus tindak pidana narkotika karena dapat menarik dan menjerat bandar atau pelaku lainnya. dengan adanya pemberian perlindungan hukum terhadap justice collaborator ini diharapkan akan membantu dan memaksimalkan penegakan hukum terhadap pelaku kejahatan penyalahgunaan narkotika yang tentunya mempertimbangkan asas keadilan. Rumusan masalah yang dibahas dalam penelitian ini ialah menganalisis (1) pengaturan perlindungan hukum terhadap justice collaborator dalam mengungkap tindak pidana narkotika dan menganalisis (2) tinjauan asas keadilan terhadap justice collaborator dalam mengungkap tindak pidana narkotika dalam Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Pekanbaru. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif, maka teknik pengumpulan data yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini bersifat studi kepustakaan namun juga didukung dengan data yang bersumber dari wawancara. Hasil yang diperoleh dari penelitian didapatkan kesimpulan (1) Perlindungan hukum terhadap Justice Collaborator diatur dalam Undang-undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2006 Jo. Undang-undang Nomor 31 Tahun 2014 tentang Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban, Peraturan Bersama Menteri Hukum dan HAM Republik Indonesia, Jaksa Agung Republik Indonesia, Kepala Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia, Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi Republik Indonesia, dan Ketua Lembaga Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban Tahun 2011 tentang Perlindungan bagi Pelapor, Saksi Pelapor, dan Saksi Pelaku yang Bekerjasama dan SEMA Nomor 4 Tahun 2011 Tentang Perlakuan Bagi Pelapor Tindak Pidana (Whistleblower) Dan Saksi Pelaku Yang Bekerjasama (Justice Collaborator) Di dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Tertentu yang pada intinya mengatur mengenai syarat untuk menjadi justice collaborator, pedoman memperlakukan justice collaborator dan perlindungan yang berupa perlindungan fisik maupun psikologis serta pemberian reward berupa pengurangan hukum hingga remisi dan bebas bersyarat atas jasa yang diberikan dalam membantu mengungkap tindak pidana Narkotika. (2) Dari tiga putusan yang dianalisis dapat disimpulkan bahwa putusan hakim tidak terikat dengan peraturan yang merupakan keadilan prosedural melainkan hakim memberikan pertimbangan berdasarkan keadilan substansial yang diperoleh dari proses berlangsungnya persidangan dengan memperhatikan fakta-fakta yang ada. Tidak satupun tindakan menjadi justice collaborator membebaskan dari pemidanaan karena pada dasarnya tidak menghilangkan kesalahan pelaku melainkan penghargaan pengurangan hukum atas bantuannya dalam mengungkap tindak pidana.
Tinjauan Yuridis Tindak Pidana Pencemaran Nama Baik Dalam Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Pidana Dikaitkan dengan Pasal 27 Ayat (3) Undang-undang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik: Studi Putusan Nomor 1909 K/Pid.Sus/2021 Zhafira, Indy; Ismansyah, Ismansyah; Yoserwan, Yoserwan
UNES Journal of Swara Justisia Vol 7 No 3 (2023): Unes Journal of Swara Justisia (Oktober 2023)
Publisher : Program Magister Ilmu Hukum Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/ujsj.v7i3.408

Abstract

Pencemaran nama baik merupakan salah satu tindak pidana yang termasuk ke dalam kualifikasi penghinaan. Pencemaran nama baik diatur dalam Pasal 310 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana dan dalam Pasal 27 Ayat (3) Undang-Undang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik. Tujuan dari adanya aturan hukum tentang pencemaran nama baik ini adalah untuk melindungi harkat dan martabat setiap orang, khususnya mengenai harga diri kehormatan (eer) maupun nama baik (goeden naam) seseorang. Namun dalam penerapannya ditemukan adanya ketidaksesuaian antara aturan hukum pencemaran nama baik yang tertulis dengan apa yang diterapkan oleh hakim selaku aparat penegak hukum. Rumusan masalah yang dibahas dalam penelitian ini ialah menganalisis (1) Pengaturan tindak pidana pencemaran nama baik dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana dan Pasal 27 Ayat (3) Undang-Undang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik (2) Analisis pertimbangan hakim dalam putusan nomor 1909K/Pid.Sus/2021 tentang pencemaran nama baik dikaitkan dengan Surat Keputusan Bersama Pedoman Implementasi Undang-Undang ITE. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian normatif, yaitu penelitian yang bertumpu pada sumber data sekunder sebagai data rujukan utama. Hasil yang diperoleh dari penelitian didapatkan kesimpulan (1) Pengaturan mengenai tindak pidana pencemaran nama baik diatur dalam Pasal 27 ayat (3) Undang-Undang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik. Untuk menentukan telah dipenuhinya unsur pencemaran nama baik dalam Undang-Undang ITE harus merujuk pada Pasal 310 KUHP. (2) Dari putusan nomor 1909K/Pid.Sus/2021 yang penulis teliti, maka dapat dianalisis bahwa putusan hakim dalam perkara tersebut telah menyimpangi beberapa poin pedoman implementasi Pasal 27 ayat (3) Undang-Undang ITE sebagaimana yang dimuat dalam Surat Keputusan Bersama Pedoman Implementasi Undang-Undang ITE, tepatnya poin (j) dan (k). Padahal Surat Keputusan Bersama Undang-Undang ITE dikeluarkan pemerintah untuk menjadi pedoman dalam penerapan Pasal 27 ayat (3) UU ITE yang bertujuan menciptakan kepastian hukum.
Kepastian Hukum Akta Jual Beli Tanah Di Bawah Tangan Yang Disahkan Oleh Notaris Di Kabupaten Sidenreng Rappang Provinsi Sulawesi Selatan Rully, Jodie Angelia; Ismansyah, Ismansyah; Fendri, Azmi
AL-MANHAJ: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Islam Vol. 5 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah INSURI Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37680/almanhaj.v5i2.3404

Abstract

Article 37 paragraph (1) PP No. 24 of 1997 concerning land registration, explains that the transfer of land rights can be carried out by transferring rights such as sale and purchase, exchange, gift, auction, inheritance, transfer of rights due to merger or consolidation and other transfers of rights. All transfers except auctions can only be registered if proven by a deed made by the Land Deed Official (PPAT). In the event that the land you wish to trade does not yet have a certificate, the process of transferring rights in accordance with the provisions of this Article cannot be carried out. Currently, many land buying and selling processes are carried out, not through PPAT, but buying and selling is done by deed under the hands of the parties. To strengthen the proof of private deeds, Article 1874 of the Civil Code regulates the ratification of private deeds as a form of strengthening private deeds by a notary. Therefore, the main problem is why the people in Sidenreng Rappang district choose to buy and sell land with a private deed legalized by a notary and what is the legal certainty of the private land sale and purchase deed that has been legalized by a notary. The sale and purchase of land using a private deed ratified by a notary is because the condition of the object of sale and purchase is not yet certified, buying and selling land using a private deed ratified by a notary is felt to be easier, faster and more affordable. Ratification by a notary of the private deed will guarantee that the parties really signed it, and that the private deed was indeed signed on that date.
PERANAN NOTARIS SEBAGAI SAKSI (SYÂHID) TERHADAP SUATU PERBUATAN MELAWAN HUKUM YANG DILAKUKAN PIHAK DALAM AKTA NOTARIS (Studi Perkara Nomor 269/Pid.B/2015/PN.PDG) Ikhsan, Dia; Ismansyah, Ismansyah
Alhurriyah Vol 4 No 1 (2019): Januari-Juni 2019
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sjech M. Djamil Djambek Bukittinggi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30983/alhurriyah.v4i1.1438

Abstract

Notary is one of the general officers authorized to create an authentic deed and other authorities as intended in the law. Notary  can be called as a notary as a witness, suspect and accused in the event of an act against the law of the Outentic deed made in a notary public. The problem in this writing is 1) the role of notary as a witness against the deeds of the law committed by the parties in Notarial deed and 2) the judgment of judges in the verdict No. 269/Pid. B/2015/PN. PDG about the role of notary as a witness against the deeds of the law committed by the party in notarial deed.  The research method used is a method of normative juridical approach empirical. The result of the study of notarial roles as witnesses of the Act against the law by the party in notarial deed came to fulfill the call as a witness in the interest of an investigation, a notary called for investigation Must be approved by the notary Honorary assembly and give information on what is provided by the Parties both oral and written in writing. Notary is called and needs his presence in the examination of criminal matters, in capacity as a general officer who makes authentic deed, it is necessary for his testimony of what is seen, heard and supporting evidence in the creation of authentic deeds The criminal matter, 2) the judgment of judges in the Decree No. 269/Pid. B/2015/PN. PDG about the role of notary as a witness against the deeds of the law conducted by the party in Notarial deed is a notary only as a witness called the court to be heard his description of the conduct of the law Done by the defendant is about the forgery of the SS signatures to make the letter of authorization selling and besides notary also called a witness from the notary party who is a witness in the making of the selling power deed.
Co-Authors Afwanul Bahri Ajang, Yupiter Anton Luter Apred Zenegger, Tigor Ardyan, Ardyan Aria Zurnetti, Aria Awilda Awilda Awilda, Awilda Azmi Fendri Bahary, Syamsul Berliana Suzeta Berri Septianda Budiyanto Budiyanto Cantiqa, Karenina Dafit Riadi Dea Tri Afrida Dia Ikhsan Edita Elda Elwi Danil Endang Suparta Fadhil Andika Satria Fadhillah Sabri Fadillah Sabri Firmansyah Firmansyah Frana Andrianur Gerry Jardan Habibiellah Huda Hafiz Aulia Harisa, Yossi Henni Muchtar Hidayat, Zulfian Hidayatullah, Tri Andika Ikhsan, Dia Indah Eka Putri Indy Zhafira Iqbal Pahlawan Borotan Jardan, Gerry Jhon Tyson Pelawi Jhon Tyson Pelawi Khairani Khairani Khairul Fahmi Khofifah Kusuma Wardani Kusuma Wardani, Khofifah Lucky Raspati Luter, Anton Marlina Marlina Marlina Marlina Maron, Yogi Maulani, Reza Sri Muhammad Fajri Akbar Perdana Muhammad Yamin Muhammad Yamin Lubis, Muhammad Yamin Mukhti, Putri Cempaka Mursalin, Adinda Faradilla Muslihannisa Muslihannisa Nanda, Novitra Nani Mulyati Nidya Sari, Tri Novitra Nanda Nur Afdhaliyah Nur Afdhaliyah Nursyahid Siregar Nurul Fadhilah Syakbani Otong Rosadi Pratama, Yuda Amgu Purwantoro Agung Sulistyo Ramli Ramli Regianda, Kevin Rembrandt Rembrandt Resmi Yani Reza Sri Maulani Rias, A. Irzal Ridwan Rinaldi Sarza Rully, Jodie Angelia Runtung Saidin Sari, Santi Kumala Sarza, Rinaldi Satya Marta Ruhiyat Shanty Syafyuana Putri Silvy Handayani Siska Elvandari Sitohang, Yeni Maria Rosalina Sofyan, Syofirman Subardy, Muhammad Rizky Suharizal, Suharizal Sukmareni Sukmareni, Sukmareni Susi Delmiati Suzeta, Berliana Syofiarti Syofirman Syofyan Tri Andika Hidayatullah Wetria Fauzi Wicaksana, Maharani Adhyaksantari Yasniwati, Yasniwati Yetti, Hafiza Yogi Maron Yoserwan Yoserwan Yoserwan Yoserwan, Yoserwan Yudari, Laras Yudhi Harioga Yunita Eka Putri Yunita Eka Putri Zainul Daulay Zhafira, Indy