Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 33 Documents
Search

Kajian Literatur Perbandingan Laboratorium Virtual dan Riil Terhadap Hasil Belajar Kognitif Khalila Humairo Ramadhani; Nayumi Warta Nabila; Bq. Roswin Tiarti Sari; Gunawan Gunawan; Nina Nisrina
Indonesian Journal of Teacher Education Vol. 4 No. 2 (2023): Edisi Juli-Desember 2023
Publisher : Indonesian Publication Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The development of information and communication technology has driven innovations in learning media, including the use of virtual laboratories as an alternative to real laboratories, which are often limited by facilities. This study aims to analyze and compare the effectiveness of virtual and real laboratories on students’ cognitive learning outcomes. The method used is a literature review by examining 15 relevant journal articles obtained through Publish or Perish connected to Google Scholar. The articles were selected based on relevance and analyzed using content analysis techniques to identify and compare research findings. The results indicate that both types of laboratories contribute to improving cognitive learning outcomes. Real laboratories are superior in providing direct experience, while virtual laboratories are more effective in enhancing motivation, flexibility, and conceptual understanding. Some studies also show no significant difference between the two methods. However, the combination of virtual and real laboratories provides the most optimal results. Therefore, the selection of learning methods should be adjusted to learning needs and conditions to achieve optimal outcomes.
Pemanfaatan Laboratorium Virtual Terhadap Pembelajaran Siswa dengan Keterbatasan Fisik: Tinjauan Literatur Baiq Ziadatu Rahmah; Aqirully Ramadhani; Alya Rizkika; Gunawan Gunawan; Nina Nisrina
Indonesian Journal of Teacher Education Vol. 4 No. 2 (2023): Edisi Juli-Desember 2023
Publisher : Indonesian Publication Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Science learning requires practical activities as a means of concretely understanding concepts. However, students with disabilities often face obstacles in accessing conventional laboratories. This study aims to examine the use of virtual laboratories for learning for students with disabilities through a literature review. Twelve scientific articles published between 2014 and June 2023 were analyzed based on inclusion criteria, including topic relevance, research type, and relevance to inclusive learning. The literature selection process involved identification, screening, and eligibility. Data were analyzed using a qualitative thematic analysis approach. The study results indicate that virtual laboratories can improve student accessibility, participation, conceptual understanding, and learning independence. Furthermore, flexibility and security are key advantages in supporting inclusive learning. However, challenges remain, such as limited infrastructure and digital literacy.
Analisis Kesalahan Konseptual Dan Prosedural Dalam Eksperimen Berbasis Laboratorium Virtual Fisika: Sebuah Kajian Literatur Heni Yulianti; Handini Handini; Alpina Pebrianti; Gunawan Gunawan; Nina Nisrina
Indonesian Journal of STEM Education Vol. 5 No. 1 (2023): Edisi Januari-Juni 2023
Publisher : Indonesian Publication Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Physics learning requires both conceptual understanding and procedural skills in conducting experiments. However, limited laboratory facilities often become an obstacle in implementing practicum activities, so virtual laboratories are used as an alternative to support experimental learning. This study aims to analyze students’ conceptual and procedural errors in conducting virtual laboratory–based experiments in physics learning through a literature review. The method employed is a literature study by examining 15 relevant scientific journal articles. The results show that conceptual errors include misconceptions of physics concepts, difficulties in relating simulations to theory, and errors in interpreting experimental results. Meanwhile, procedural errors include inaccuracies in following experimental steps, mistakes in setting variables, and difficulties in analyzing data. Therefore, appropriate instructional strategies are needed, such as structured scaffolding, clear experimental guidelines, conceptual discussions before and after practicum, and teacher guidance during the use of virtual laboratories. Thus, the proper use of virtual laboratories can enhance students’ conceptual understanding and experimental skills.