Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 35 Documents
Search

Penetapan Teori Tahkim dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Hak Anak (Hadlanah) di Luar Pengadilan Menurut Hukum Islam Jauhari, Iman
Asy-Syir'ah: Jurnal Ilmu Syari'ah dan Hukum Vol 45 No 2 (2011)
Publisher : UIN Sunan Kalijaga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/ajish.v45i2.20

Abstract

Tujuan penulisan ini adalah untuk menjelaskan pengaturan hukum positif tentang hak asuh anak (hadhanah) di Indonesia. Menjelaskan pandangan hukum Islam dalam penyelesaian sengketa hak asuh anak (hadhanah) diluar pengadilan, dan penerapan teori tahkim untuk penyelesaian sengketa  hadhanah dalam hukum positif. Metode yang digunakan dalam penulisan ini adalah content analysis(analisis isi) dari berbagai referensi yang relevan dengan permasalahan yang dibahas. Pandangan Hukum Islam dalam penyelesaian sengketa hak asuh anak di luar pengadilan tidak hanya mengacu pada peraturan perundangan-undangan saja, tetapi harus memperhatikan nilai-nilai hukum masyarakat, kaidahkaidah agama, lingkungan dari ayah dan ibu yang akan diberi hak hadhanah, demi kemaslahatan diri anak yang akan menjadi asuhannya. Penerapan teori  tahkim dalam penyelesaian sengketa hadhanahsangat efektif, cepat, murah dan memenuhi rasa keadilan dalam menemukan kemaslahatan anak.
Kewajiban Nafkah Hadanah Dan Rada'ah Terhadap Anak Di Indonesia Jauhari, Iman
Asy-Syir'ah: Jurnal Ilmu Syari'ah dan Hukum Vol 46 No 2 (2012)
Publisher : UIN Sunan Kalijaga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/ajish.v46i2.48

Abstract

Effect of  busy  parents often  neglected  duty  towards their  children.  So  in  this  paper  a  problem  concerning maintenance obligations hadanah  and rada'ah for children. The method  used  is  the  approach  to  library  research  with  content analysis  of  the various  references  relevant to  the subject matter covered.  Parents are  obliged to provide  a living  hadanah  against children because a child needs someone who can nurture, guide and  educate  well.  Obligations of  parents  towards  children  has been started  from the time  the fetus  until the baby  where  the mother  is obliged to  provide  a living  rada'ah  (feeding  the baby) in addition  to  the health  of the baby  also  for the health of  the mother.  In  Islam  keeping  the  kemaslahatan  and  survival  of  a child  is a  parental responsibility,  which should not be  ignored either by the mother or father.
Perbandingan Sistem Hukum Perlindungan Anak Antara Indonesia Dan Malaysia Jauhari, Iman
Asy-Syir'ah: Jurnal Ilmu Syari'ah dan Hukum Vol 47 No 2 (2013)
Publisher : UIN Sunan Kalijaga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/ajish.v47i2.70

Abstract

This paper aims to compare child protection law between Indonesia and Malaysia especially in terms of family law (marriage), child definition and age limit, as well as other foundational principles. Content analysis method of a variety of relevant references is used and a comparative approach to child protection law in Indonesia and Malaysia is taken. There are many similarities between child protection law in Malaysia and Indonesia, in which both systems specify the state, family, and parents responsibilities towards children. Also specified are handling of child’s position, guardianship, rearing, adoption, religion, and abandonment. In addition, special protection such as maintenance, recovery, custody, care, investigation, nursing, education, prevention of economic exploitation, prevention of sexual abuse, prevention of child torture, and disability treatment are also included. This paper concludes that in Malaysia child protection law has been fully synthesised in Children Act of 2001 (Act 611), while in Indonesia child protection law is scattered in a number of laws related to children including the Child Protection Law.
Reinterpreting Islamic Inheritance: Supreme Court Jurisprudence and Gender Justice in Indonesia Roslina, Roslina; Abbas, Syahrizal; Ismail, Ilyas; Jauhari, Iman
Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun Vol. 13 No. 3 (2025): Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun
Publisher : SCAD Independent

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26811/peuradeun.v13i3.1593

Abstract

The implementation of Islamic inheritance law in Indonesia continues to face interpretive challenges in balancing classical jurisprudence with contemporary demands for gender justice. This study examines how the Indonesian Supreme Court, through landmark decisions—Decision No. 86 K/AG/1994 and Decision No. 184 K/AG/1995—has redefined inheritance principles by granting daughters the legal authority to block the inheritance rights of the testator’s siblings. Employing a normative–juridical approach that integrates statutory, conceptual, and case-based analyses, this research explores the Court’s interpretive reliance on Ibn ʿAbbās’s minority opinion concerning Qur’an 4:176, which equates the inheritance positions of sons and daughters. The findings reveal that the Court’s jurisprudence prioritizes genealogical proximity (qarābah al-dam) over gender preference, thereby reconfiguring inheritance distribution and affirming daughters as residuary heirs (ʿaṣabah). This reinterpretation represents a progressive form of ijtihād qaḍāʾī that harmonizes Islamic law with constitutional principles of equality and justice. Academically, the study contributes a contextual model for integrating maqāṣid al-sharīʿah and civic reason within Indonesia’s plural legal framework; practically, it offers a reference for reforming the Compilation of Islamic Law and advancing gender-equitable inheritance jurisprudence across Muslim-majority societies.
Power of Power To Sell as Collateral Confiscation In Debt Repayment Based on The Debt Recognition Deed Tasia Zein, Tia; Jauhari, Iman; Rahmah, Siti
Asian Journal of Social and Humanities Vol. 2 No. 5 (2024): Asian Journal of Social and Humanities
Publisher : Pelopor Publikasi Akademika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59888/ajosh.v2i5.247

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to determine the power of power to sell as collateral confiscation in debt repayment based on the debt recognition deedDeed of Debt Recognition is a deed made by a notary in the form of a Grosse Deed containing the irah-irah "For Justice Based on the One and Only God" which means it has the same executory power as the Court Decision. However, in practice the Deed of Debt Recognition is made followed by the preparation of the Deed of Power of Attorney to Sell as a new deed, even though one form of legal protection outside of the guarantee institution is the making of the Grosse Deed of Debt Recognition. Thus, it is interesting to study further why the use of the power to sell is used as a guarantee for debt repayment under the Deed of Debt Recognition is more desirable and how the form of legal protection for debtors defaults and settlement of disputes arising from the Deed of Power to Sell. This research uses normative legal research types and qualitative methods. The result of the study is that the parties prefer to use the Power of Attorney to Sell because it does not go through a long procedure, does not take time and does not incur more costs. The legal protection obtained by the defaulting debtor is to obtain the remaining proceeds from the sale of collateral and the selling price of the collateral which must not be below the value of the collateral that should be, and the creditor must not have a collateral object if the debtor defaults.