Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 22 Documents
Search

Implementation of Village Fund Policy To Realize Village Accountability and Resilience in Tangerang Regency Sriyani, Sriyani; Akbar, Bahrulah; Achmad, Mansyur; Kusworo, Kusworo; Sunyoto, Edi
ARISTO Vol 12 No 2 (2024): July
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24269/ars.v12i2.8343

Abstract

The Government's attention to development in rural areas has experienced quite significant developments, marked by allocations Village Fund budget which continues to increase and produce development facilities and infrastructure massively in villages. However, the implementation of village fund policies still does not provide an optimal contribution to handle the problem of poverty and improving village independence. The shift in development funding from the center to the regions encourages village officials to commit acts of corruption. This shows that accountability in village fund management and village resilience need to be improved. Although Tangerang Regency is very close to the national economic center, it still cannot create villages which are free from corruption and independent villages. This research aims to analyze policy implementation along with its obstacles in realizing accountability and resilience villages in Tangerang Regency. This study uses a qualitative approach. Study This finds (1) implementation policy management of village funds in Tangerang Regency is still not optimal (2) main obstacles for realizing accountable and independent Village Fund management villages in Tangerang Regency are (a) weak system monitoring and distribution of information Village Fund management; (b) weak resource man Village Fund Manager; and (c) low Village Original Income (PADesa) to total village and shopping income.
Implementation of Rehabilitation Policy for Drug Addicts by the National Narcotics Agency Jakarta Mumtaz, Emka Farah; Kusworo, Kusworo; Taher, Bahrudin; Suprajogo, Tjahjo
International Journal of Law Policy and Governance Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Asosiasi Dosen Peneliti Ilmu Ekonomi dan Bisnis Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54099/ijlpg.v4i2.1561

Abstract

This paper aims to analyse the implementation of the drug addict rehabilitation policy conducted by the National Narcotics Board of DKI Jakarta Province (BNNP DKI Jakarta). The study focuses on evaluating the effectiveness of rehabilitation programmes, identifying supporting and inhibiting factors, and formulating recommendations for strengthening drug policy in Indonesia. A descriptive qualitative approach was employed, using Grindle’s policy implementation model as the analytical framework. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, direct observations, and document analysis. Informants were selected through purposive and snowball sampling, consisting of policy makers, policy implementers, and rehabilitation beneficiaries. The data were analysed through reduction, presentation, and conclusion drawing in line with the Miles and Huberman model, with validity ensured through triangulation of sources, methods, and time. The findings reveal that although the rehabilitation policy is supported by strong legal frameworks such as Law No. 35/2009 and SEMA No. 4/2010, its implementation remains constrained by limited resources, weak inter-agency coordination, and persistent social stigma against drug users. Rehabilitation programmes have largely focused on medical recovery, while social reintegration and post-rehabilitation support remain insufficient, leading to high relapse rates. Nevertheless, family and community support, cross-sectoral collaboration, and institutional commitment serve as important enabling factors in programme success. This study contributes to the literature by addressing the provincial-level implementation gap in Indonesia’s drug rehabilitation policy. It introduces the Neo-Grindleian on Drugs model, which integrates six strategic pillars: adaptive regulation, institutional synergy, resource optimisation, community engagement, evidence-based evaluation, and programme sustainability. The model provides a more inclusive and technology-oriented approach to rehabilitation, expected to enhance the effectiveness and humanistic orientation of public policy in addressing drug abuse.