Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
4.987
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Kertha Negara : Journal Ilmu Hukum JURNAL MAGISTER HUKUM UDAYANA Pandecta JURISDICTIE Jurnal Hukum dan Syariah Unram Law Review Jurnal Health Sains International Journal of Social Service and Research Journal of Sustainable Development Science Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities West Science Interdisciplinary Studies West Science Interdisciplinary Studies Journal of Contemporary Law Studies Kertha Semaya : Journal Ilmu Hukum
Sagung Putri M. E. Purwani
Unknown Affiliation
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Dentistry Economics, Econometrics & Finance Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Medicine & Pharmacology Nursing Public Health Social Sciences Veterinary

Published : 23 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 23 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
PENYELESAIAN MASALAH KETERSINGGUNGAN HUKUM PIDANA DAN HUKUM ADMINISTRASI NEGARA DALAM PENYALAHGUNAAN DISKRESI PEJABAT PUBLIK I Putu Gede Putra Sentana; Sagung Putri M.E Purwani; Ni Gusti Ayu Dyah Satyawati
Kertha Semaya: Journal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 13 No. 12 (2025)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/KS.2025.v13.i12.p10

Abstract

Penanganan penyalahgunaan diskresi oleh pejabat publik berada diantara dua lapangan hukum, yaitu hukum administrasi dan hukum pidana. Dalam hukum administrasi, penyalahgunaan diskresi terjadi karena tindakan melampaui wewenang, mencampuradukkan wewenang, dan sewenang-wenang. Sementara dalam hukum pidana penyalahgunaan diskresi tergolong pada penyalahgunaan kewenangan yang menimbulkan kerugian negara. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menemukan solusi atas persinggungan tersebut. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, perbandingan, dan konseptual. Hasil penelitian ini menyimpulkan pertama, Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 telah mengatur sanksi yang cukup komprehensif terhadap penyalahgunaan diskresi, termasuk sanksi administratif, ganti rugi dan penggantian kerugian negara serta memberikan kewenangan absolut penilaian penyalahgunaan kewenangan pada pengadilan tata usaha negara. Kedua, kedudukan mekanisme administratif sebagai primum remidium dan mekanisme pidana sebagai ultimum remidium ditegaskan melalui penafsiran konstitusional Mahkamah Konstitusi melalui Putusan Nomor 25/PUU-XIV/2016. ABSTRACT The abuse of discretion by public officials intersects administrative and criminal law. In administrative law, it arises from actions that exceed, conflate, or misuse authority. Meanwhile, in criminal law, abuse of discretion falls under abuse of power that causes state financial losses. This study aims to find a solution to this overlap. It employs normative legal research methods with statutory, comparative, and conceptual approaches. The findings of this study conclude, first, that Law Number 30 of 2014 provides comprehensive sanctions for abuse of discretion, including administrative sanctions, compensation, and restitution of state losses, and grants absolute authority to the administrative court to assess abuse of power. Second, the position of the administrative mechanism as primum remedium and the criminal mechanism as ultimum remedium is affirmed through the constitutional interpretation of the Constitutional Court in Decision Number 25/PUU-XIV/2016.
Protection of Human Rights on The Life of Indigenous Communities in Bali Anak Agung Linda Cantika; I Gede Yusa; Putu Gede Arya Sumerta Yasa; Sagung Putri M.E. Purwani
Journal of Sustainable Development Science Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Dwijendra Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46650/jsds.8.1.1834.53-68

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the protection of human rights within the life of indigenous peoples (masyarakat hukum adat) in Bali. This issue becomes particularly significant when examined in light of the constitutional recognition under Article 18B paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, which acknowledges the existence and rights of indigenous communities. Such recognition entails not only an obligation to respect and protect these rights, but also to ensure their fulfilment. Human rights, as stipulated in Law Number 39 of 1999 on Human Rights, fundamentally represent inherent powers or entitlements possessed by individuals. Given their fundamental nature, the fulfilment of these rights is imperative. In practice, indigenous communities in Bali constitute organized social entities governed by customary law, residing within defined territories, possessing leadership structures, and holding both tangible and intangible assets, including control over natural resources within their territorial domain. This research employs an empirical legal method, conceptualizing law as a social phenomenon observable within real-life contexts. Referring to human rights enforcement, Article 6 paragraph (1) emphasizes that the needs of indigenous communities must be acknowledged and protected by law, society, and the government. Human rights protection for indigenous communities in Bali encompasses several key aspects, including: the rights of women and children; the prohibition of cruel and inhumane punishment in relation to customary sanctions; land rights associated with the protection of cultural identity and communal land rights (hak ulayat); and the rights of local communities in tourism development, considering Bali’s position as a major tourism hub.
POLITIK HUKUM SANKSI ADMINISTRASI DALAM PERATURAN PRESIDEN TENTANG PENGADAAN BARANG DAN JASA PEMERINTAH Firmansyah Krisna Maulana; Sagung Putri M.E Purwani; Ni Gusti Ayu Dyah Satyawati
Kertha Semaya: Journal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 14 No. 2 (2026)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/KS.2026.v14.i02.p07

Abstract

Peraturan Presiden Nomor 46 Tahun 2025 tentang Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah (selanjutnya disebut Perpres 46/2025) menandai perubahan penting dalam tata kelola pengadaan dengan menekankan sanksi administratif sebagai instrumen utama penegakan hukum. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi prinsip serta ruang lingkup sanksi administratif, dan menganalisis arah politik hukum yang melandasi pengaturannya. Penelitian menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan dan konseptual. Analisis dilakukan terhadap sejumlah regulasi kunci dan literatur hukum untuk mengkaji struktur hukum serta relevansi penerapan sanksi administratif dalam mencegah penyimpangan prosedur pengadaan. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa Perpres 46/2025 mengedepankan model penegakan hukum yang bertahap, dengan sanksi administratif ditempatkan sebagai instrumen awal yang responsif dan proporsional sebelum sanksi pidana dijatuhkan. Namun demikian, efektivitasnya masih sangat bergantung pada konsistensi implementasi dan kapasitas pengawas internal dalam menerapkan mekanisme sanksi secara adil dan transparan. Temuan ini menegaskan perlunya keselarasan antara desain regulasi dengan realitas kelembagaan agar tujuan penegakan integritas pengadaan dapat tercapai secara sistemik. ABSTRACT Presidential Regulation Number 46 of 2025 on Government Procurement of Goods and Services (hereinafter referred to as Presidential Regulation 46/2025) signifies an important shift in procurement governance by emphasizing administrative sanctions as the primary instrument of legal enforcement. This article aims to identify the principles and scope of administrative sanctions and to analyze the legal policy direction underpinning their regulation. The study employs a normative juridical method with statutory and conceptual approaches. The analysis draws upon key regulatory instruments and legal literature to examine the legal structure and the relevance of administrative sanctions in preventing procedural deviations within procurement processes. The findings demonstrate that Presidential Regulation 46/2025 advances a gradual enforcement model, positioning administrative sanctions as an initial, responsive, and proportionate mechanism prior to the imposition of criminal sanctions. Nevertheless, its effectiveness remains highly dependent on consistent implementation and the institutional capacity of internal oversight bodies to apply sanction mechanisms fairly and transparently. These findings underscore the need for alignment between regulatory design and institutional realities to ensure that the objective of strengthening procurement integrity can be systematically achieved.  
Co-Authors A A Sagung Cahaya Dewi Savitri Anak Agung Ayu Anaya Widya Sukma Anak Agung Ayu Windah Wisnu Kesuma Sari Anak Agung Linda Cantika Anak Agung Ngurah Wirasila Anak Agung Ngurah Yusa Darmadi Anak Agung Sinta Paramisuari Anggun Kharisma Dewi Bagus Gede Brahma Putra Darwin Jeremia Sitinjak Desak Putu Dewi Kasih Dewa Nyoman Rai Asmara Putra Eriska Kurniati Sitio Firmansyah Krisna Maulana GDE MADE SWARDANA Gde Made Swardhana Hariyawan, Agus Sukma I Dewa Ayu Diah Anjani I G A Ayu Dewi Satyawati I Gede Yusa I Gusti Agung Mas Rwa Jayantiari, I Gusti Agung I Gusti Ayu Putri Kartika, I Gusti Ayu I Gusti Ketut Ariawan I Gusti Made Adika Kornia I Gusti Ngurah Nyoman Krisnadi Yudiantara I Kadek Niko Suardi I Ketut Rai Setiabudhi I Made Budi Arsika I Made Tjatrayasa I Made Walesa Putra I Nengah Maliarta I Nyoman Agus Adi Priantara I Nyoman Suyatna I Putu Gede Putra Sentana I Wayan Parsa Ida Bagus Miswadanta Pradaksa Ida Bagus Surya Dharma Jaya Juniati, Ni Ketut Kadek Ayu Trisnawati Kadek Novita Dwi Irianti Kadek Setia Budiawan Kadek Velantika Adi Putra Kadek Yogi Barhaspati Linawati Luh Amelia Savitri Luh Putu Divani Anggarani Mulyawan Made Sisca Anggreni Manuaba, Fajar N Wahyu Triashari Ni Desak Gede Sekar Widhiasih Ni Gusti Ayu Dyah Satyawati Ni Gusti Ayu Dyah Satyawati Ni Kadek Ayu Wistiani Ni Kadek Dwi Oktiapiani Ni Kadek Eniantari Ni Komang Hyang Permata Danu Asvatham Ni Luh Putu Ratih Sukma Dewi Ni Made Sutrisna Dewi Ni Nengah Adiyaryani Ni Putu Resha Arundari Ni Putu Tya Suindrayani Ni Putu Yulita Damar Putri Nyoman Kinandara Anggarita Putu Ayu Gayatri Putu Eka Oktaviani Putu Gede Arya Sumerta Yasa Putu Mas Ayu Cendana Wangi Putu Mery Lusyana Dewi Putu Mita Apsari Dewi Putu Reksa Rahmayanti Pratiwi Putu Ria Purnami Putu Trisna permana Radha Rani, Ni Made Dwi Rainer S.C. Sinaga Resae Novita Resta, Ngurah Wahyu Restiana, Adevia Ayu Robertus Dicky Armando Rohmatul Hajiriah Nurhayati Sagung Dinda Surya Paramitha Seri Karna, Kadek Yoga Maheswara Sutrisnawati, Gusti Ayu Eka Yosef Faizal Frans Yutika Tri Bhuana Dewi