Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
4.468
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika Prosiding Seminar Nasional Sains Dan Teknologi Fakultas Teknik Phi : Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Terapan Berkala Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Momentum: Physics Education Journal PEDAGOGIA ORBITA: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Ilmu Fisika Kappa Journal Bubungan Tinggi: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Sains dan Matematika Studies in Philosophy of Science and Education Studies in Learning and Teaching Jurnal Pijar MIPA Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika EduInovasi: Journal of Basic Educational Studies
Mukhayyarotin Niswati Rodliyatul Jauhariyah
Universitas Negeri Surabaya
Religion Astronomy Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemistry Computer Science & IT Earth & Planetary Sciences Education Engineering Mathematics Physics Social Sciences Other

Published : 34 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 34 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4 
Pengembangan Instrumen Soal Terintegrasi Permainan Tradisional Kelereng untuk Mengukur Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Peserta Didik SMA Alifia, Dita; Mukhayyarotin Niswati Rodliyatul Jauhariyah
IPF: Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika Vol. 14 No. 2 (2025): Volume 14 Nomor 2 Tahun 2025
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26740/ipf.v14n2.p170-176

Abstract

Keterampilan abad 21 sangat penting untuk dimiliki oleh peserta didik guna menghadapi tantangan global yang semakin kompleks. Salah satu kompetensi utamanya adalah berpikir kritis, yaitu kemampuan berpikir tingkat tinggi yang mencakup identifikasi asumsi, pemanfaatan pengetahuan sebelumnya, penalaran logis, dan pengambilan keputusan. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk merancang instrumen soal yang mengukur keterampilan berpikir kritis dengan mengintegrasikan permainan tradisional kelereng, serta mengevaluasi kemampuan berpikir kritis peserta didik pada materi momentum, impuls, dan tumbukan. Metode yang digunakan adalah model pengembangan ADDIE, dengan teknik pengumpulan data berupa angket validasi, angket respons, wawancara, dan tes berpikir kritis. Uji coba dilakukan pada mahasiswa Pendidikan Fisika Universitas Negeri Surabaya dan siswa SMA Ta’miriyah Surabaya. Hasil validasi logis menunjukkan tingkat kesesuaian 100% untuk aspek isi, 96,55% untuk konstruksi, dan 92,31% untuk kebahasaan. Dari 20 soal yang dikembangkan, 12 di antaranya terbukti valid secara empiris dengan reliabilitas sedang (0,529). Hasil angket dan wawancara menunjukkan respons positif. Profil berpikir kritis peserta didik terdistribusi sebagai berikut: 5% sangat tinggi, 23% tinggi, 57% sedang, 11% rendah, dan 4% sangat rendah. Oleh karena itu, instrumen ini dinyatakan layak untuk digunakan dalam mengukur keterampilan berpikir kritis.
Identifying Student Misconceptions on Momentum and Impulse Using Four-Tier Diagnostic Test Instrument with CRI Paramita, Uci Vebia; Jauhariyah, Mukhayyarotin Niswati Rodliyatul
Jurnal Pijar Mipa Vol. 19 No. 1 (2024): January 2024
Publisher : Department of Mathematics and Science Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, University of Mataram. Jurnal Pijar MIPA colaborates with Perkumpulan Pendidik IPA Indonesia Wilayah Nusa Tenggara Barat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/jpm.v19i1.6086

Abstract

Identification of students' misconceptions is crucial in Physics learning as an evaluation tool to address and reduce these misconceptions. This study aims to assess the quality of a four-tier diagnostic test using the CRI instrument, assisted by JotForm, and describe the profile of students' misconceptions related to momentum and impulse. The quality of the instrument is evaluated based with validity and reliability. The research follows the ADDIE (Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation) method. The instrument is developed during the analysis, design, and development stages. The implementation and evaluation stages involve capturing the profile and causes of students' misconceptions. The instrument's quality is assessed based on theoretical validity, which reached 89.29%. Empirical content validity haved percentages of false positives 6.93%and false negatives 6.53%. The empirical validity of the construct, with a significance level of 0.05, resulted in an rtableof 0.273. From the 15 questions tested, 12 questions were found to have empirical validity, and a reliability score of 0.475 was obtained. The study revealed that 3 students had low misconceptions, 14 students had medium misconceptions, and 6 students had high misconceptions. The causes of students' misconceptions were primarily false positives and humanistic thinking, accounting for 28.56%. In conclusion, the instrument developed in this study is valid and reliable, and it effectively identifies the profile and causes of students' misconceptions.
Analysis of the Science Literacy Competency Profile of High School Students on Limited Energy Sources Agustya, Nabila Ella; Jauhariyah, Mukhayyarotin Niswati Rodliyatul
Kappa Journal Vol 7 No 3 (2023): Desember
Publisher : Universitas Hamzanwadi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29408/kpj.v7i3.23212

Abstract

Learning in the 21st century requires students to have the ability to face the times. One of the essential skills that must be possessed is scientific literacy. Scientific literacy is using scientific knowledge to identify questions, acquire new knowledge, explain scientific phenomena, and draw conclusions based on scientific evidence. This research aims to describe the scientific literacy profile of high school students in the subject matter of limited energy sources. Three competency indicators refer to PISA 2018: a) Explaining phenomena scientifically, b) Evaluating and designing scientific investigations, and c) Interpreting data and evidence scientifically. This research uses a quantitative approach with a descriptive analysis method. The study was conducted in June 2023 in the Even Semester of the 2022/2023 Academic Year at a public high school in Surabaya. The population in this study was 60 students. The instrument used is a scientific literacy test developed with a valid category and a reliability value of 0.811. The results of this study were that students' scientific literacy competency profiles were obtained at 37% low, 33% sufficient, 18% high, and 12% very high. As for the results of the percentage of students' scientific literacy abilities based on scientific literacy competencies, the highest category in the first competency of 63%, namely explaining phenomena scientifically, while the second competency of 62%, namely evaluating and designing scientific investigations obtains a lower percentage than the first competence, and 56%, namely interpreting data and evidence scientifically, has the lowest result among the three scientific literacy competencies.
Human Versus Artificial Intelligence in Creative Physics Thinking: A Philosophical Reflection on Learning and Cognition Sofita, Mita; Damarsha, Adrian Bagas; Prasetya, Joenathan Eka; Yuliatin, Elisa Dwi; Rahma, Nur Fitri; Suprapto, Nadi; Jauhariyah, Mukhayyarotin Niswati Rodliyatul; Saphira, Hanandita Veda
Studies in Philosophy of Science and Education Vol. 5 No. 3 (2024): November
Publisher : National Dong Hwa University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46627/sipose.v5i3.676

Abstract

The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) has led to its increasing integration into education, including in subjects like physics that require high-level cognitive skills. This study compares human responses with those generated by AI models (ChatGPT and DeepSeek) to physics problems designed to measure creative thinking skills, while exploring the philosophical patterns in AI reasoning as a reflection of human cognition. Using a qualitative-comparative method, responses were analyzed based on fluency, elaboration, originality, and flexibility, focusing on the concept of moment of inertia within the traditional "Kekehan" game. Findings show that while AI responses demonstrated structured reasoning and elaboration, human answers were more contextually relevant and original, rooted in experience. DeepSeek produced more detailed responses than ChatGPT, but both showed tendencies toward generalization. The results indicate that AI, though useful as a support tool, lacks the genuine creativity of human thinking. The study suggests that reliance on AI in education should be balanced with strategies that foster human creativity and critical thinking. Philosophical reflection is necessary to redefine AI's role in education, ensuring it complements rather than replaces human intellectual development.
Co-Authors Abu Zainuddin Agustya, Nabila Ella Ahmad Marzuki Alfarizy, Yusril Alfin Nuryani Alifia, Dita Azuminatun Nadhifah Cari Cari Cari, Cari Damarsha, Adrian Bagas Elfrida Ratnawati Eti Sukadi, Eti Faradila Aulia' Alifteria Hanandita Veda Saphira Hanifah Roihana Labibah Hariyono, Eko Hazmi, Hanifah Rahmania Indasa, Nita Iqbal Ainur Rizki Irda Sukmawati Dewi Irsyad Yusuf Santoso Isna Zakhiyah Khaerus Syahidi Ladika Zuhrotul Wardi Lugas Haryo Pradigdo Madlazim Madlazim Mahmud Mahmud Masithoh, Nadia Dewi Muizzah, Novy Ainul Nabila Ayunda Putri Nadi Suprapto Nadia Dewi Masithoh NUR ROHMAH, SITI Nurita Apridiana Lestari Nuriyah, Saidatun - Nurul Hikmah Paramita, Uci Vebia Prasetya, Joenathan Eka Rahma, Nur Fitri Reny Dwi Astutik RISKA FEBRIYANTI, PUTRI Rizki, Iqbal Ainur Salsabilla Putri Saharani Samsul Hidayat Saphira, Hanandita Veda Satriawan, M Sharvina Yudatika Sherliyanti, Yeni Sofita, Mita TITIN SUNARTI Wardi, Ladika Zuhrotul Wasis Wasis, W Wirawan Fadly Woro Setyarsih Yuliatin, Elisa Dwi YUSRILIA PERMATASARI, NIKMATUS Zainuddin, Abu Zakaria, Azar