Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 32 Documents
Search

Participatory local regulations based on local wisdom: study of local regulation formation policy of Kutai Kartanegara regency Yulianingrum, Aullia Vivi; Nur, Insan Tajali; Prasetyo, Bayu; Aidil, Aidil; Haya, Dita Alika Fadia; Paturu, Reni Oktaviani
The International Journal of Politics and Sociology Research Vol. 11 No. 3 (2023): December: Law, Politic and Sosiology
Publisher : Trigin Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35335/ijopsor.v11i3.214

Abstract

This study aims to determine the local government policy of Kutai Kartanegara Regency in arranging participatory local regulations to accommodate the local wisdom of Kutai Kartanegara society in the era of regional autonomy. It also analyzes the implementation of local wisdom regulation to ensure the existence of society. The methodology used is empirical juridical, where researchers use data collection techniques through interviews with the Legal Section of the Regional Government of Kutai Kartanegara Province. The method of data analysis is qualitative and deductive inference, that is, drawing conclusions from a general form to a specific form. The formation of participatory local regulations based on local wisdom becomes urgent when the implementation of regional autonomy is faced with global demands where people must follow technological developments. This can change the cultural values that have been developed in local communities, and the government is obliged to provide legal protection in the form of the formation of local regulations that contain local wisdom values and guarantee their sustainability.
Problematika Pengangkatan Penjabat Kepala Daerah sebagai Dampak Penetapan Pilkada Serentak Tahun 2024 Pratama, Alfani Aldi; Nur, Insan Tajali; Erwinta, Poppilea
Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Vol. 13 No. 01 (2024): Artikel Riset Januari 2024
Publisher : Information Technology and Science (ITScience)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47709/jhb.v13i01.3531

Abstract

Struktur pemerintahan di Indonesia terbagi menjadi provinsi, kabupaten, dan kota, diatur oleh UUD 1945. Pilkada diselenggarakan untuk memilih kepala daerah. Mulai 2024, Pilkada akan serentak demi efisiensi dan untuk mencegah konflik. Namun, kepala daerah yang habis masa jabatan menjelang Pilkada 2024 tidak dapat dipilih kembali hingga November 2024. Pasal 201 ayat (10) dan (11) UU Pilkada mengatur pengangkatan Penjabat Kepala Daerah saat kekosongan jabatan terjadi. Namun, mekanisme pengangkatan dianggap tidak demokratis dan mengundang kontroversi. Pentingnya memperbaiki mekanisme ini untuk lebih melibatkan partisipasi masyarakat dalam proses pemilihan kepala daerah. Peneliti dalam penelitian ini menerapkan metode pendekatan doctrinal atau doctrinal research yaitu pengarahan pada kumpulan norma guna menyasar penelitian melalui analisis norma yang dalam pelaksanaannya secara kualitatif dan berdasar pada studi kepustakaan. Objek penelitian dikaji berdasarkan asas dalam ilmu hukum. Hasil penelitian ialah Pentingnya pengisian jabatan negara dalam pemerintahan daerah untuk menjaga pelaksanaan organisasi negara, administrasi pemerintahan, dan ruang sosial masyarakat. Penunjukan penjabat kepala daerah dapat mengakibatkan sentralisasi kekuasaan, tergerusnya partisipasi masyarakat, dan kemunduran kedaulatan rakyat. Diperlukan prinsip demokrasi yang transparan dan partisipatif dalam penunjukan pejabat negara. Sehingga dari alur penelitian diatas peneliti dapat mengambil kesimpulan bahwa tidak terwujudnya demokrasi dalam penunjukan penjabat (Pj) kepala daerah yang dilakukan oleh pemerintah pusat hal ini dapat dilihat dari mekanismenya yang tidak terdapatnya proses musyawarah-mufakat maupun konsep perwakilan sebagai unsure demokrasi di Indonesia serta berbagai permasalahan-permasalahan di daerah terhadap penunjukan penjabat (Pj) kepala daerah oleh pemerintah pusat.
Reformulasi Undang-Undang Pilkada: Upaya Penanganan Praktik Money Politic di Indonesia Insan Tajali Nur; Vijae Yehezkiel Simanjuntak
Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024): April
Publisher : CV Putra Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58540/isihumor.v2i2.647

Abstract

The Head Election is one of the democratic parties of the Indonesian people. Pilkada is a form of leader regeneration in order to create new ideas and thoughts in an area. Through regional elections, it is hoped that qualified regional leaders will be elected who are in accordance with the will of the people. The practice of holding regional elections in Indonesia has reaped problems which have resulted in the violation of democratic principles. The problem that continues to occur is the practice of money politics which aims to influence the hearts of voters when conducting elections. This problem is caused by various sectors, one of which is regulation. The regulation of money politics, which each tries to divide the provisions of its legal subject, and the existence of structured, systematic and massive (TSM) elements in the administration of administrative sanctions are things that hinder the handling of money politics in Indonesia. Thus, this research will examine the reformulation needed to be able to deal with money politics. The research method used is a normative method. The research results show that there is an urgency to change the regional election law, especially regarding the subject of money politics and the requirements for the TSM element in granting administrative sanctions
LEGAL PROTECTION OF OWNERSHIP OF PROPERTY RIGHTS CERTIFICATES IN FORESTRY CULTIVATION AREAS Riswandi; Rosmini; Nur, Insan Tajali
Awang Long Law Review Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024): Awang Long Law Review
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/awl.v7i1.1468

Abstract

The background of this study examines the overlapping authority in determining forest areas and its implications for the legal protection of ownership of Land Ownership Certificates (SHM). This study found that overlapping authority occurred due to the absence of confirmation of forest area boundaries and systematic spatial planning, thus triggering conflict between communities that own SHM and forestry policies. The state has an obligation to protect community rights, including land rights as evidenced by SHM. The purpose of the study is to answer two things, first, to find out clarity about the factors that cause overlapping in determining forest areas in the Forestry Law, by analyzing the problems that arise from existing provisions. Second, the study looks at the form of legal protection provided by the state to the community in dealing with the problem of overlapping determination of forest areas in Kutai Kartanegara Regency. The type of this research is sociological legal research or Sociolegal studies. The research was conducted in the East Kalimantan Province, (East Kalimantan Province Environmental and Forestry Service, and the East Kalimantan Province Agrarian Spatial Planning Office/National Land Agency). The focus of this research was conducted in Sepati Village, Anggana District, Kutai Kartanegara Regency. This research will use selected respondents (purposive sampling) within the Kutai Kartanegara Regency in the area around the forestry cultivation area, namely Village Heads and Community Leaders. Specifically for respondents, researchers will conduct an interview process (deep-interview) including the use of snow-ball techniques with respondents who have a structured information network. The results of this study conclude that resolving overlapping authorities requires a comprehensive approach involving all related parties. The steps taken are comprehensive spatial planning, land dispute resolution, confirmation of forest area boundaries, strict law enforcement, strengthening institutions and non-litigation resolution.
IMPLEMENTASI KEWENANGAN PENGADILAN AGAMA PADA PERKARA BIDANG EKONOMI SYARIAH WILAYAH KALIMANTAN TIMUR (Kajian Pada Pengadilan Agama Kota Samarinda, Kota Balikpapan, Kota Bontang) Nur, Insan Tajali
Yuriska: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol. 4 No. 1 (2012): February
Publisher : Law Department, University of Widya Gama Mahakam Samarinda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24903/yrs.v4i1.165

Abstract

ABSTRAK Pasal 24 ayat (2) Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 menentukan bahwa kekuasaan kehakiman dilakukan oleh sebuah Mahkamah Agung dan badan peradilan di bawahnya dalam lingkungan peradilan umum, lingkungan peradilan agama, lingkungan peradilan militer, lingkungan peradilan tata usaha negara, dan oleh sebuah Mahkamah KonstitusiLahirnya Undang-Undang Nomor 3 Tahun 2006 Jo Undang-Undang Nomor 50 Tahun 2009 Tentang Perubahan Kedua atas Undang -Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 1989 Tentang Peradilan Agama (selanjutnya disebut UUPAg) telah membawa perubahan besar dalam eksistensi lembaga Peradilan Agama saat ini, dimana salah satu perubahan mendasar adalah penambahan wewenang lembaga Peradilan Agama antara lain dalam bidang ekonomi syari’ah. Ekonomi syariah yang diselesaikan di peradilan agama sangat sedikit. Dibandingkan dengan jumlah perkara keseluruhan yang ditangani peradilan agama, jumlah perkara ekonomi syariah memang terbilang minim.Hukum Realitanya (De Facto) perkara bidang sengketa ekonomi Syariah yang masuk di pengadilan Agama pada Kota Samarinda, Bontang dan Balikpapan belum ada hal ini belum optimalnya Subtansi hukum yang dijalankan. Baru pertama kali menangani perkara ekonomi syari’ah.Masih belum ada hukum materiil ekonomi syari’ah yang terkumpul pada suatu peraturan perundang-undangan tertentu. Bertambahnya kewenangan Pengadilan Agama tersebut yang belum diimbangi dengan payung hukum (umbrella provision) yang memadai.Oleh karena itu, setiap hakim dalam lingkungan Peradilan Agama dituntut supaya mengembangkan kemampuan ijtihad-nya (rechtvinding) yang bagi penulis tidak bertentangan dengan Alqur’an dan Sunnah Nabi Muhammad (Hadist)
MEMANTAPKAN LANDASAN HUKUM FORMIL SEBAGAI ALAT SINGKRONISASI DAN HARMONISASI PERATURAN PERUNDANG - UNDANGAN Nur, Insan Tajali
Yuriska: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol. 10 No. 2 (2018): August
Publisher : Law Department, University of Widya Gama Mahakam Samarinda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24903/yrs.v10i2.355

Abstract

The regulation in the Regional Regulation is faced with the problem of how the Regional Regulation can regulate the affairs of authority in accordance with the characteristics of the region. But it does not conflict with the higher laws and regulations. One of the problems is Disharmony legislation resulting in differences in interpretation in its implementation; the emergence of legal uncertainty; Legislation is not carried out effectively and efficiently, and legal dysfunction, in a disharmonic manner, the rules and regulations - Invitation under the above laws and regulations is an evaluation material. But de facto, there are a number of draft regulations based on rules outside the order of the laws.Whereas in Article 7 paragraph 2 of Act Number 12 of 2011 confirms the strength of the laws of the legislation in accordance with the hierarchy in paragraph 1. Continued related to Article 140 paragraph (3) of Law Number 23 of 2014 concerning the Establishment of Legislation as has undergone the second amendment to the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 9 of 2015 concerning Regional Government, states that the procedure for preparing a draft Regional Regulation from the Governor or Regent / Mayor is regulated by a Presidential Regulation. Then Article 141 paragraph (2) of the Law on Regional Government states that further Provisions concerning the procedure for preparing the Regional Regulation are regulated in the DPRD Rules of Procedure.Based on the principle of the formation of laws and regulations, the Minister of Home Affairs's regulation violates the principle of conformity between types and materials of content, because the substance should be the material of the contents of the Presidential Regulation as part of the hierarchy of the Order of Regulations - Invitation and the contents of the DPRD Rules of Procedure.
STRENGTHENING THE AUTHORITY OF THE JUDICIAL COMMISSION IN UPHOLDING THE ETHICS OF JUDGES IN INDONESIA Ghafur, Abd.; Rosmini, Rosmini; Tajali Nur, Insan
Al-Mubin Jurnal Ilmiah Islam
Publisher : Department of Research and Community Service at the Ummul Quro Al-Islami Bogor Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51192/almubin.v8i1.1772

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of the authority of the Judicial Commission (KY) in the enforcement of the ethics of judges in Indonesia and propose an ideal construction to strengthen the authority of this institution. The KY, which is regulated by the 1945 Constitution and related laws, has an important role in maintaining the integrity of judges through supervision and recommendation of sanctions, but is constrained by limited authority that is limited to recommendations to the Supreme Court (MA), which is often not followed up. Through a doctrinal approach and qualitative analysis of primary, secondary, and tertiary data, this study examines the challenges faced by the KY in carrying out its duties, and offers a solution in the form of granting greater authority in imposing direct sanctions on judges who violate the code of ethics. This research is expected to make a theoretical and practical contribution in strengthening a clean and transparent judicial system in Indonesia
Pelaksanaan Restorative Justice dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan di Wilayah Hukum Kejaksaan Negeri Samarinda Ansar Fajar Pratama; Ivan Zairani Lisi; Insan Tajali Nur
Desentralisasi : Jurnal Hukum, Kebijakan Publik, dan Pemerintahan Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): November : Desentralisasi : Jurnal Hukum, Kebijakan Publik, dan Pemerintahan
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/desentralisasi.v2i4.1102

Abstract

The application of restorative justice in the Indonesian criminal justice system cannot be immediately implemented in all cases, particularly for assault crimes. This is due to limitations in implementation and inhibiting factors that arise in the field. Facts show that some law enforcement officers are still less than optimal in expediting the restorative justice process. This condition creates legal uncertainty and anxiety, especially for prosecutors handling cases. This situation also impacts the prosecutor's position, which could be questioned by superiors and supervisory committees if case resolution does not proceed according to regulations. This study uses a socio-legal research approach to examine two main issues. First, the author analyzes the implementation of restorative justice in resolving assault cases in the jurisdiction of the Samarinda District Attorney's Office. Second, the author identifies obstacles faced in implementing restorative justice in that jurisdiction. Based on the results of the study, 14 cases of assault were handled. Of these, 11 cases were successfully resolved through restorative justice mechanisms, while 3 cases were declared failed. This failure is generally influenced by the failure to meet several important requirements, including: the perpetrator being a recidivist or having previously committed a crime, a sentence exceeding five years, the absence of a peace agreement between the perpetrator and the victim, and the perpetrator's failure to fulfill their obligation to provide compensation. Therefore, it can be concluded that although restorative justice plays a crucial role in achieving a more humane and equitable resolution of cases, its implementation still faces structural and technical obstacles. Consistent efforts by law enforcement and increased understanding of the concept of restorative justice are needed for this mechanism to operate effectively, provide legal certainty, and address the community's need for justice.
Studi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 114/PUU-XX/2022 Terhadap Eksistensi Sistem Proporsional Terbuka Sebagai Identitas Demokrasi Di Indonesia Paisal Abdi; Insan Tajali Nur; Rosmini
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 1 No 1 (2024): September
Publisher : CV Putra Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58540/jih.v1i1.619

Abstract

This research was carried out in order to conduct an assessment of the Constitutional Court decision number 114/PUU-XX/2022 regarding the existence of an open proportional system as the identity of democracy in Indonesia. As is known, the decision rejected the review of several articles in the law relating to the open proportional system ( Law Number 7 of 2017 concerning General Elections) so the implication is that the open proportional system is still used as a mechanism for the general election system in Indonesia. As well as looking from another perspective regarding the advantages and disadvantages of the proportional system itself, the history of the application of open and closed proportional systems in Indonesia in the implementation of general elections, why the open proportional system was stated by constitutional judges as the ideal system to be implemented in Indonesia, and seeing how consistent the judges are constitution in deciding cases related to the open proportional system by comparing several constitutional court decisions related to the open proportional system. The author uses a doctrinal (normative juridical) approach. Research carries out analysis and research based on expert opinions and related theories in conducting discussions. Thus creating a correlation which thus sees the conclusion drawn by the constitutional judges that the open proportional system is the ideal system to be applied in general elections in Indonesia and that the existence of the open proportional system as a system in general elections in Indonesia is increasingly strengthened.
Analisis Pertimbangan Hakim Terhadap Hinaan Masyarakat Sebagai Alasan Meringankan Hukum Pidana Dalam Perspektif Keadilan (Studi Putusan Nomor 29/Pid.Sus-Tpk/2021/Pn.Jkt.Pst) Hawanda Paonganan, Lucky; Insan Tajali Nur; Khristyawan Wisnu Wardana
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 1 No 1 (2024): September
Publisher : CV Putra Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58540/jih.v1i1.620

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the judge's consideration of public insults as a reason to reduce criminal sentences in cases of criminal acts of corruption based on Decision Number: 29/Pid.Sus-Tpk/2021/PN.Jkt.Pst. The research method used is normative juridical research with a case study approach. Primary data was obtained through court decision documents, while secondary data was collected from relevant legal literature, journals and other legal sources. The results of the research show that in the judge's consideration, public insults are often used as one of the reasons for mitigating criminal sentences. This is based on the view that social pressure and negative stigma from society can have a significant psychological effect on the defendant, which in some cases can be considered a form of additional punishment beyond the sentence imposed by the court. In the decision studied, the judge considered that the defendant had experienced severe social pressure due to insults and ridicule from society, which was then used as a reason to reduce the criminal sentence imposed. This research also found that the use of public insults as a reason to reduce criminal sentences still raises pros and cons among legal practitioners and academics. Some parties argue that this reason should not be used because it can reduce the deterrent effect of criminal punishment. On the other hand, other parties argue that these considerations need to be taken into account to provide more humane justice for the defendant. The conclusion of this research is that the judge's consideration of public insults as a reason to reduce criminal sentences has a strong basis in an effort to achieve a balance between legal justice and social justice. However, there needs to be clearer and more consistent guidelines in the application of these reasons to ensure objective and equitable justice.