Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 29 Documents
Search

Dilema Kemanusiaan dan Kedaulatan Negara: Telaah Kebijakan Penolakan Bantuan Asing Dalam Penanggulangan Bencana Alam di Indonesia Usman Rasyid; Novendri M. Nggilu; Mohamad Rivaldi Moha
Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Hukum & Politik Vol 4 No 2 (2026): 2026
Publisher : Yayasan pendidikan dzurriyatul Quran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61104/alz.v4i2.3919

Abstract

Indonesia sebagai negara hukum memiliki kewajiban konstitusional untuk melindungi segenap bangsa dan seluruh tumpah darah Indonesia, termasuk dalam situasi bencana alam. Namun, dalam praktik penanggulangan bencana, muncul dilema antara nilai kemanusiaan yang bersifat universal dan prinsip kedaulatan negara, khususnya terkait kebijakan penolakan atau pembatasan bantuan asing. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis relasi antara kemanusiaan dan kedaulatan dalam negara hukum Indonesia melalui kajian kebijakan penolakan bantuan asing pada penanggulangan bencana banjir bandang di wilayah Sumatera yang melibatkan tiga provinsi. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan pendekatan kasus. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kebijakan penolakan bantuan asing didasarkan pada prinsip kedaulatan negara dan pengendalian terhadap potensi intervensi eksternal, namun kebijakan tersebut harus tetap mempertimbangkan nilai kemanusiaan sebagaimana diamanatkan dalam Pancasila dan Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan keseimbangan antara kedaulatan negara dan kepentingan kemanusiaan agar penanggulangan bencana dapat berjalan efektif tanpa mengabaikan prinsip negara hukum.
Abandoned Land as a Paradox of Prosperity Muhammad, Nur Regita Saputri; Nirwan Junus; Mohamad Rivaldi Moha
Siyasah Dusturiyah: State Law Review Vol. 1 No. 3 (2025): Siyasah Dusturiyah: State Law Review
Publisher : Yayasan Cahaya Generasi Positif

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65101/j06rtm03

Abstract

Land in the context of human life is not merely a physical space, but also a social, economic, cultural, and political symbol that holds strategic functions for the sustainability of life. In the perspective of Indonesian agrarian law, land is positioned as a means to realize social justice as affirmed in Article 33 of the 1945 Constitution and the Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA). However, reality demonstrates that many lands are left uncultivated, giving rise to the phenomenon of abandoned land. This condition reflects a major paradox: on one hand, land is a fundamental and limited necessity, while on the other hand, land is often not utilized in accordance with its function. This research examines the conceptuality of abandoned land using a qualitative empirical approach, involving regional governments, the National Land Agency, village officials, and land certificate holders as informants. Research findings demonstrate that land abandonment is influenced by economic factors, ineffective policies, ownership disputes, and urbanization. In legal terms, abandoned land is considered a violation of the social function of land, whereby the state has the right to revoke land rights and return the land for public interest through a land administration mechanism. In conclusion, abandoned land is not merely an issue of land administration, but also a matter of social justice, economic sustainability, and environmental conservation. Proper handling through regulation, legal socialization, and community empowerment becomes the key to restoring land to its true function as a source of life and collective welfare.
Indonesian Mining Regulations Shift as a Potential Sector in Developing the Economy Amanda Adelina Harun; Fenty U Puluhulawa; Nurul Fajri ElFikri; Mohamad Rivaldi Moha
Jurnal Pamator : Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Trunojoyo Vol 16, No 2: 2023
Publisher : Universitas Trunodjoyo Madura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21107/pamator.v16i2.20114

Abstract

Law/regulation on mining play a significant role, because mining sector is a potential sector for developing the economy of Indonesian. Law on Mining underwent several amendments, namely the era of Law Number 11 of 1967, Law Number 4 of 2009 and Law Number 3 of 2020. This article will analyze shiftss in mining sector regulations from each of these eras. This article uses normative juridical methods, with statutory, contextual, historical, and comparative approaches, and is analyzed qualitatively. The results of the study show that between Law No. 11 of 1967 to Law No. 4 of 2009 and Law no. 3 of 2020 underwent a change, namely from a centralized arrangement, where the mining sector holding power became a matter for the central government to decentralization, handed over to local governments. Another change is in the field of relations between the government and capital or investors, the contract of work model becomes licensing. The impact on the contract of work model is that the state is positioned as a 'party' to the contract, while in terms of licensing the government has a position that tends to be stronger. This Amendment Contract is adapted to Indonesian conditions and the protection of Article 33 of the Indonesian constitution.
State Control Of Electronic Information Resources: Role And Efforts In The Modern Context Putri Ayi Winarsasi; Mutia Cherawaty Thalib; Mohamad Rivaldi Moha; Nurul Fazri Elfikri
Jurnal Pamator : Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Trunojoyo Vol 16, No 2: 2023
Publisher : Universitas Trunodjoyo Madura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21107/pamator.v16i2.20234

Abstract

This research focuses on the role and responsibility of the state in controlling and regulating electronic information resources, especially in the scope of e-commerce in Indonesia. In the digital era, the rapid development of e-commerce requires effective and comprehensive regulation to ensure the integrity, security, and growth of this industry. This research discusses several necessary regulations adopted by the Indonesian government, including Law Number 11 of 2008, which was changed to Law Number 19 of 2016 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions, Government Regulation No. 82 of 2012 concerning the Implementation of Electronic Systems and Transactions, Law Number 7 of 2016 concerning Trade, and Bank Indonesia Regulation No.11/12/PBI/2009 concerning Electronic Money. This research shows that these regulations and policies have established a Solid legal framework for e-commerce in Indonesia. However, given the rapidly changing technology and industry dynamics, these regulations and policies must be continuously updated and adapted to new needs. Therefore, the state's role in monitoring industrial developments, adjusting regulations, and educating the public is essential in establishing a fair, safe, and sustainable e-commerce ecosystem. Overall, this research shows that balancing consumer protection and industry growth is critical for the future of e-commerce in Indonesia.
Judicial Review of Constitutional Amendments: Comparison Between India, Germany, Colombia, and the Relevancy with Indonesia Novendri Nggilu; Mohamad Rivaldi Moha; Muhammad Ridho Sinaga; Adelia Rachmaniar
Lex Scientia Law Review Vol. 8 No. 1 (2024): Contemporary Legal Challenges and Solutions in a Global Context
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/lslr.v8i1.1901

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to explore the urgency for a judicial review of the constitutionality of Indonesia's constitutional amendments. In addition, it explores, using Germany, Colombia, and India as comparative materials, the practice of judicial review regarding the constitutionality of constitutional amendments. The main writing approach used in this article, which examined the constitutional texts of Germany, Indonesia, Colombia, India, and Germany, was a comparative one. Similar provisions that are unchangeable explicitly or implicitly may be found in the constitutions of Colombia, Germany, India, and Indonesia. However, there are fundamental differences in efforts to protect, maintain and preserve these unchangeable provisions (as the fundamental structure and identity of the Constitution) in reviewing the constitutionality of constitutional amendments. This mechanism is practiced in India, Germany and Colombia but not in Indonesia. However, if studied carefully, 3 aspects show the urgency of implementing this mechanism in Indonesia: 1) historical aspects (the existence of past events regarding constitutional changes or transitions that are normatively unconstitutional; 2) philosophical and juridical aspects (the existence of Pancasila as state ideology as well as constitutional identity and the existence of Article 37 paragraph (5) which clearly states that the Form of the Republic of Indonesia cannot be changed); and 3) sociological aspects (the issue of constitutional amendments which seems to be patterned at the end of each president's term of office to extend the period of the president's term of office to three terms). These three aspects are the primary consideration and basis for implementing a mechanism for reviewing the constitutionality of constitutional amendments so that the fundamental structure and identity of the Indonesian Constitution are not damaged or eliminated by parliament through constitutional amendment activities.  
Legal Implications of Blank Column for Participation and Pilkada Results in Indonesia Ahmad Riyadi Akili Adam; Zamroni Abdussamad; Mohamad Rivaldi Moha
Journal of Law, Human Rights, Immigration, and Corrections Vol. 1 No. 3 (2026): Journal of Law, Human Rights, Immigration, and Corrections
Publisher : Yayasan Cerdas Pedia Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65101/lawric.v1i3.248

Abstract

This study examines the legal implications of blank columns (empty boxes) on voter participation and electoral outcomes in Indonesia’s single-candidate regional elections (Pilkada). Utilizing normative legal research with statutory and case approaches, this paper analyzes how the blank column operates within the constitutional framework of local democracy. The findings indicate that while the blank column procedurally protects voting rights by preventing the automatic victory of single candidates, it fundamentally highlights a structural deficit in substantive democracy due to a severe lack of political competition. Furthermore, a blank column victory legally disrupts governance continuity, necessitating the appointment of unelected interim regional heads. Consequently, this study demonstrates that the blank column functions merely as a post-facto corrective mechanism rather than a preventive solution for flawed candidate recruitment. It concludes that Indonesian electoral design requires substantial reform to foster genuine political contestation and safeguard substantive democratic legitimacy.
KONSEP PENGATURAN HUKUM YANG IDEAL TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA SEXTORTION DI INDONESIA: KAJIAN KOMPARATIF DAN PERSPEKTIF PEMBARUAN HUKUM PIDANA Rafli H. Husain; Dian Ekawaty Ismail; Mohamad Rivaldi Moha
Public Sphere: Jurnal Sosial Politik, Pemerintahan dan Hukum Vol 5, No 2 (2026): JPS (Jurnal Sosial Politik, Pemerintahan dan Hukum)
Publisher : CV Widina Media Utama

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59818/jps.v5i2.3046

Abstract

The absence of specific regulations governing the criminal offense of sextortion in Indonesia has resulted in fragmented provisions across the Criminal Code, the Electronic Information and Transactions Law, the Pornography Law, and the Law on Sexual Violence Crimes, creating legal uncertainty, inconsistent law enforcement, and inadequate victim protection. This study aims to formulate an ideal legal framework for regulating sextortion in Indonesia. The research employs a normative legal method using statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches by examining the legal frameworks of Utah (United States) and the Philippines. The findings indicate that an ideal regulatory framework should encompass five key elements: a comprehensive definition of the offense, an expanded concept of benefit covering non-material gains, gender-based victim protection, strengthened digital forensic capacity, and integration of legal norms into the national legal system. The study concludes that establishing a specific offense of sextortion is essential to ensuring legal certainty, effective victim protection, and responsive criminal law reform for gender-based digital crimes.  ABSTRAKKetiadaan pengaturan khusus mengenai tindak pidana sextortion di Indonesia menyebabkan fragmentasi pengaturan dalam KUHP, UU ITE, UU Pornografi, dan UU TPKS yang berdampak pada ketidakpastian hukum, inkonsistensi penegakan, dan belum optimalnya perlindungan korban. Penelitian ini bertujuan merumuskan konsep pengaturan hukum yang ideal terhadap tindak pidana sextortion di Indonesia. Penelitian menggunakan metode hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan perbandingan hukum terhadap regulasi di Utah (Amerika Serikat) dan Filipina. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa konsep pengaturan yang ideal mencakup lima elemen utama, yaitu perumusan delik sextortion yang komprehensif, perluasan makna keuntungan hingga mencakup aspek nonmaterial, penguatan perlindungan korban berbasis perspektif gender, peningkatan kapasitas forensik digital, serta integrasi norma ke dalam sistem hukum nasional. Penelitian menyimpulkan bahwa pembentukan delik khusus sextortion merupakan langkah strategis untuk mewujudkan kepastian hukum, perlindungan korban, dan pembaruan hukum pidana yang responsif terhadap kejahatan digital berbasis gender.
KONSTRUKSI HUKUM KETERWAKILAN PEREMPUAN DALAM PEMILU: KAJIAN TERHADAP KARAKTER LEX IMPERFECTA DAN REGULATORY GAP DALAM SISTEM PEMILU INDONESIA Riqqah Rifqah Raihannah Monoarfa; Zamroni Abdussamad; Mohamad Rivaldi Moha
Public Sphere: Jurnal Sosial Politik, Pemerintahan dan Hukum Vol 5, No 2 (2026): JPS (Jurnal Sosial Politik, Pemerintahan dan Hukum)
Publisher : CV Widina Media Utama

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59818/jps.v5i2.2848

Abstract

Women’s representation in Indonesia’s electoral legal system has been recognized through a minimum quota of 30 percent for legislative candidates. However, the effectiveness of this provision is not determined solely by the existence of the norm, but also by how that norm is enforced in practice. Existing regulations, whether in Law No. 7 of 2017 or the KPU’s technical regulations, place greater emphasis on compliance with administrative procedures rather than on the consequences of noncompliance. As a result, this obligation tends to function as a flexible formal requirement. This situation reflects the nature of lex imperfecta—that is, norms that are not accompanied by strict sanctions—thereby creating a regulatory gap and weakening law enforcement. This phenomenon was evident in the 2024 General Election in Gorontalo Electoral District 6, where the provisions on women’s representation were not fully complied with but were nonetheless accepted in the electoral process. This study employs a normative legal method using a statutory approach and a case-based approach through an analysis of Constitutional Court Decision No. 125-01-08-29/PHPU.DPR-DPRD-XXII/2024. The novelty of this study lies in the analysis of women’s representation not only as an affirmative action policy but as an issue concerning the nature of legal norms, examined through the concepts of lex imperfecta and regulatory gaps in the Indonesian electoral system. In addition, this study specifically examines the implications of the absence of sanctions for the authority and law enforcement practices of the General Elections Commission (KPU) following the Constitutional Court’s ruling. The results of the study indicate that the weakness of sanction mechanisms has caused the provisions on women’s representation to lose their enforceability and to rely more on political compliance by parties than on the effectiveness of the legal norms themselves. ABSTRAKKeterwakilan perempuan dalam sistem hukum pemilu Indonesia telah diakui melalui ketentuan kuota minimal 30 persen dalam pencalonan anggota legislatif. Namun, efektivitas ketentuan tersebut tidak hanya ditentukan oleh keberadaan norma, melainkan juga oleh bagaimana norma tersebut ditegakkan dalam praktik. Pengaturan yang ada, baik dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2017 maupun regulasi teknis KPU, lebih menekankan pada pemenuhan prosedur administratif dibandingkan dengan konsekuensi atas ketidakpatuhan. Akibatnya, kewajiban tersebut cenderung berfungsi sebagai persyaratan formal yang fleksibel. Kondisi ini menunjukkan karakter lex imperfecta, yaitu norma yang tidak disertai sanksi yang tegas, sehingga menimbulkan regulatory gap dan memperlemah penegakan hukum. Fenomena ini tampak dalam Pemilu 2024 di Dapil Gorontalo 6, di mana ketentuan keterwakilan perempuan tidak sepenuhnya dipatuhi namun tetap diterima dalam proses pemilu. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan kasus melalui analisis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 125-01-08-29/PHPU.DPR-DPRD-XXII/2024. Kebaruan (novelty) penelitian ini terletak pada analisis keterwakilan perempuan tidak hanya sebagai kebijakan afirmatif, tetapi sebagai persoalan karakter norma hukum yang dikaji melalui konsep lex imperfecta dan regulatory gap dalam sistem pemilu Indonesia. Selain itu, penelitian ini juga mengkaji secara spesifik implikasi kekosongan norma sanksi terhadap kewenangan dan praktik penegakan hukum oleh KPU pasca putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa lemahnya mekanisme sanksi menyebabkan ketentuan keterwakilan perempuan kehilangan daya paksa dan lebih bergantung pada kepatuhan politik partai dibandingkan efektivitas norma hukum itu sendiri.
Penguatan Pembentukan Hukum Demokratis: Analisis Kelayakan Penerapan Mekanisme Public Inquiry di Indonesia Mohamad Rivaldi Moha; Ramadhan Usman; Usman Rasyid; Dicky Andika Rauf; Muhammad Iqbal Mustapa
Eksekusi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Negara Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): Eksekusi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Negara
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Administrasi (STIA) Yappi Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/eksekusi.v4i1.2503

Abstract

This study examines the structural weaknesses of public participation in Indonesia’s legislative process and evaluates the feasibility of adopting a public inquiry mechanism to strengthen Evidence-Based lawmaking. Although the 1945 Constitution and Law Number 13 of 2022 formally guarantee public involvement, existing parliamentary hearings and public consultations remain largely procedural and fail to meet deliberative democratic standards. This condition raises urgent concerns regarding legislative legitimacy, transparency, and the substantive use of public input. The research employs a normative-comparative approach combined with juridical-empirical analysis. It analyzes Indonesia’s participatory legal framework and compares it with public inquiry models in the United Kingdom, Australia, and New Zealand, focusing on institutional independence, transparency, and investigative authority. Empirical assessment of legislative practices reveals a persistent gap between normative guarantees and practical implementation, resulting in symbolic participation with limited policy impact. Comparative findings demonstrate that public inquiry mechanisms can enhance deliberative quality and accountability through systematic evaluation of evidence. The study concludes that a hybrid public inquiry model integrating parliamentary procedures with independent expert panels is legally and institutionally feasible, provided that regulatory reform, institutional capacity building, and political safeguards are effectively implemented.