Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Jurnal Sains Student Research

Fenomenologi: Karl Popper (Falsifikasi) dan Dekonstruksi Jacques Derrida Nur Hasanah Hasibuan; Eva Dewi; Khairil Anwar
JOURNAL SAINS STUDENT RESEARCH Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): Jurnal Sains Student Research (JSSR)
Publisher : CV. KAMPUS AKADEMIK PUBLISING

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61722/jssr.v3i1.3433

Abstract

This article examines phenomenology as a philosophical approach to exploring Karl Popper's concept of falsification and Jacques Derrida's notion of deconstruction. Karl Popper argues that falsification serves as the primary criterion for distinguishing science from non-science. According to this perspective, a theory can only be considered scientific if it allows for tests that could potentially falsify it. Conversely, Jacques Derrida, through his concept of deconstruction, offers a critical analysis of the structure of language and meaning, emphasizing the inherent ambiguity and uncertainty within texts and discourses. This study employs a qualitative method with a conceptual analysis approach to investigate the relationship and comparison between these two perspectives. The findings indicate that falsification is more applicable to the domain of empirical science, focusing on theoretical testing and validation, whereas deconstruction is better suited for the fields of literary criticism and philosophy, with its emphasis on deconstructing and dismantling foundational assumptions. Although emerging from distinct areas of thought, these two approaches can complement each other within the framework of phenomenology. Falsification provides an empirical foundation for the search for truth, while deconstruction opens opportunities to uncover hidden biases, frameworks, and hierarchies in thought. This article underscores the importance of integrating scientific and philosophical critique to gain a deeper and more comprehensive understanding of phenomena.
INTEGRASI AGAMA DAN SAINS DALAM PERSPEKTIF ZIAUDDIN SARDAR Mawar Fita Sari; Amril Amril; Eva Dewi
JOURNAL SAINS STUDENT RESEARCH Vol. 2 No. 3 (2024): Juni : Jurnal Sains Student Research
Publisher : CV. KAMPUS AKADEMIK PUBLISING

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61722/jssr.v2i3.1395

Abstract

Many people think that science and religion have their respective positions where science in obtaining truth is based on obtaining epistemological data through several studies. This research is research that discusses religious integration and the efforts made by Ziauddin Sardar and his group to formulate parameters for Islamic Science as an alternative solution to modern science. This research is a type of library research to describe the integration of religion and science from Ziauddin Sardar's perspective. Meanwhile, the method used is analytical descriptive, which is a method used systematically to describe all results related to the main problem. With this analytical descriptive method, it is hoped that Islamic science parameters will be found which can be an alternative solution to the currently developing scientific system. The results of this research on Islamic science explain that according to Ziauddin Sardar, he developed a system of terms which was the basis for his Islamization of science project, which included Tauhid, Khilafah, Worship, Ilmu, Halal, Haram, Fair, Zalim, Istislah, and Dhiya'.