Nas Haryati Setyaningsih
Jurusan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, Fakultas Bahasa Dan Seni, Universitas Negeri Semarang

Published : 52 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Proceeding of International Conference on Science, Education, and Technology

Skills of 4Cs Prospective Manuscript Editors in the Era of Digitalization (Research of Language Error Analysis Course in MBKM Framework) Meilan Arsanti; Ida Zulaeha; Subyantoro Subyantoro; Nas Haryati Setyaningsih
International Conference on Science, Education, and Technology Vol. 8 (2022)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Students of the Indonesian Language and Literature Education Study Program are strongly encouraged to become candidates for manuscript editors. In addition to the 4Cs skills, students must also have the proficiency of Indonesian language skills which can be obtained from the Language Error Analysis course. In this paper, three things are described, namely 1) 4Cs skills that must be mastered by students as a provision in pursuing the profession as a script editor other than as a teacher or educator, 2) the duties and roles of script editors in the era of digitalization, and 3) learning strategies for the Language Error Analysis course within the MBKM framework. The method used in this research is descriptive qualitative to dig up information related to the researched problem. Based on research that in addition to mastering good language skills, manuscript editors must also master skills that are in accordance with 21st century competencies, namely 4C to support their performance in the digitalization era. In this digitalization era, the role of the script editor is very important to maintain the dignity of the Indonesian language so that it is not influenced by foreign languages. These 21st century skills can be obtained from the lecture process and by applying internship programs at book publishers within the framework of Merdeka Belajar Kampus Merdeka (MBKM).
CIPP Evaluation of Literature Learning in the Indonesian Language Education Study Program Armariena, Dian Nuzulia; Nuryatin, Agus; Supriyanto, Teguh; Setyaningsih, Nas Haryati
Proceedings of International Conference on Science, Education, and Technology Vol. 11 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The goal of learning literature is to enhance students' language skills and broaden their understanding of literary texts. This includes improving reading comprehension, expanding vocabulary, and developing speaking and writing abilities, which are essential for effective language communication. This study is based on creating a literary learning model that promotes student creativity and self-evaluation as a more engaging way to appreciate literature. With the CIPP evaluation method that emphasizes the process and product components, it is necessary to evaluate literature education by creating a learning model that relates to a comprehensive understanding of learning plans and their effectiveness. The research was conducted at Unsri, Unanti, and UPGRIP. Data for this study was gathered using document review techniques, which were then analyzed using descriptive analysis methods. The study discovered that the method of teaching appreciative literature varies. The items are also varied. The goal of the curriculum—that students learn to appreciate, express, and produce literature—has, however, been mostly accomplished by literary appreciation education. The context variables in this scenario have a greater influence on the process than the produced input. The context here refers to the students' academic success, their good conduct, and their genuine interest in literature. Furthermore, the context also refers to experienced instructors and individuals who take the learning process seriously in order to accomplish their goals. The research indicates that the assessment of literature instruction in terms of both its process and outcomes falls under the "good" category.