Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.696
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Lex Jurnalica (Ilmu Hukum) International Journal of Nusantara Islam Jurnal Asy-Syari'ah Jurnal Ilmiah Al-Syir'ah ADLIYA: Jurnal Hukum dan Kemanusiaan Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-undangan, Ekonomi Islam Transparansi Hukum Al-Qadha: Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Perundang-Undangan Istinbath : Jurnal Hukum Iqtishaduna : Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Hukum Ekonomi Syariah Al-Mutsla: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman dan Kemasyarakatan Al-Muamalat : Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Islam (JHEI) Hakam : Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam dan Hukum Ekonomi Islam Journal of Islamic Communication and Counseling DIKTUM: JURNAL SYARIAH DAN HUKUM Indonesian Research Journal on Education RechtIdee Jurnal As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga International Journal of Nusantara Islam Public Sphere: Jurnal Sosial Politik, Pemerintahan dan Hukum Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Muhamad Kholid, Muhamad
Fakultas Syariah Dan Hukum UIN SGD Bandung
Religion Arts Humanities Chemistry Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Energy Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 28 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 28 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
A Deep Dive into LAPS SJK Cases: A Qualitative Study on Case Types, Resolution Duration, and Party Compliance Hidayat, Agi Attaubah; Anwari, Amalia Nur; Sugiarti, Lilis Diah; Kholid, Muhamad; Najah, Naily Aulia
RechtIdee Vol 20, No 2 (2025): DECEMBER
Publisher : Trunojoyo Madura University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21107/ri.v20i2.32561

Abstract

This study comprehensively analyzes the effectiveness of the Alternative Dispute Resolution Institution for the Financial Services Sector (LAPS SJK) through a juridical-empirical approach that integrates semi-structured interviews, observation, and document analysis of annual reports from 2022–2024. The findings reveal that the composition of disputes is consistently dominated by the banking sector and fintech lending, with mediation serving as the overwhelmingly dominant settlement mechanism. On the other hand, the institution faces significant challenges, including a high case-rejection rate, primarily due to non-compliance with the Internal Dispute Resolution (IDR) process and indications of fraud. In terms of timeliness, LAPS SJK has demonstrated remarkable efficiency by compressing its Service Level Agreement (SLA)driven by digital transformation and process optimization. The most substantive achievement is reflected in the increase in voluntary compliance with decisions, indicating strengthened legitimacy and trust in the institution. This research provides an original contribution through empirical evidence of the paradox between procedural justice in mediation and the role of arbitration in ensuring legal certainty, as well as a projective analysis of the integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the development of ADR systems in Indonesia.
Flexibility of Rejang Semendo System in Modern Marriage Law: An Islamic‑Law Analysis Shesa, Laras; Jalaluddin, Jalaluddin; Yuniardi, Harry; Kholid, Muhamad; Utami, Henny Septia
Jurnal Ilmiah Al-Syir'ah Vol 23, No 2 (2025)
Publisher : IAIN Manado

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30984/jis.v23i2.3595

Abstract

The Semendo constitute an indigenous ethnic group in South Sumatra, Indonesia. This research aims to analyze the flexibility of the Semendo system in Rejang customary law and its conformity with the principles of Islamic law, particularly within the framework of maqāṣid al-syarī'ah. This study employs a normative-juridical method, utilizing a conceptual and comparative approach to analyze customary norms, Islamic legal principles, and national marriage law provisions. The findings indicate that the Semendo system, particularly the Semendo Rajo-Rajo model, demonstrates a significant accommodating character towards the values of justice, equality of rights, and the protection of property and lineage, which are integral parts of maqāṣid al-syarī'ah. Its flexibility allows it to function as a contextual and adaptive alternative model of marriage law. In conclusion, the integration of customary law values and Islamic law in the Semendo system provides a strong foundation for a more inclusive and culturally rooted reformulation of national marriage law in Indonesia. This study contributes to the scientific discourse by offering a methodological framework for harmonizing local wisdom with Islamic legal principles, which can be applied to the study of other customary law systems across the archipelago. Furthermore, it provides an academic foundation for the future development of a more pluralistic and context-sensitive national marriage law.
Restorative Justice Efforts in Resolving Domestic Violence Crimes from the Perspective of Positive Law and Islamic Law Kholid, Muhamad; Achmad; Leliya
Journal of Islamic Communication and Counseling Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): January
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18196/jicc.v5i1.119

Abstract

The phenomenon of domestic violence (KDRT) in Indonesia remains a serious issue that impacts the psychological, social, and human rights aspects of victims. Through a restorative justice approach and normative analysis of positive law and Islamic law, this study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of restorative approaches in resolving domestic violence cases. The research employs a qualitative method with data collection techniques including literature review, legal document analysis, and interviews with relevant stakeholders. The findings indicate that the restorative justice approach holds strong relevance both from the perspective of positive law, as regulated in Law No. 23 of 2004 on the Elimination of Domestic Violence and Indonesian National Police Regulation No. 8 of 2021, and from the perspective of Islamic law, which emphasizes the principles of ishlah (reconciliation) and sulh (peaceful settlement). This approach aligns with efforts to restore victims (ḥifẓ al-nafs) and maintain family harmony (ḥifẓ al-usrah). However, its implementation faces challenges such as patriarchal cultural resistance, inadequate mediation infrastructure, and lack of coordination between law enforcement agencies and religious leaders. This study concludes that integrating restorative justice approaches based on positive law and Islamic legal principles can create a more holistic and equitable model for resolving domestic violence cases. Policy recommendations include strengthening mediator capacity, developing integrative guidelines, and enhancing collaboration between the government and religious communities.
HAK KEKAYAAN INTELEKTUAL SEBAGAI OBJEK JAMINAN PEMBIAYAAN DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM EKONOMI SYARIAH Jalaludin, Diding; Padhilah, Piqi Rizqi; Rojikin, Umar; Kholid, Muhamad; Astarudin, Tatang
JURNAL HAKAM Vol 9, No 2 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Nurul Jadid

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33650/jhi.v9i2.11878

Abstract

This article examines the status of Intellectual Property (IP) as collateral for financing within the framework of Islamic Economic Law. IP—covering trademarks, patents, copyrights, industrial designs, trade secrets, and communal intellectual property—embodies reputation and economic value, thereby raising the question of whether it may qualify as māl (property) and function as marhūn (pledged collateral). Employing a descriptive-analytical method and a juridical-empirical approach through library research, the study analyzes statutory regulations on IP-based security, relevant fatwas, and contemporary Islamic legal scholarship. The findings suggest that IP conceptually corresponds to ḥaqq al-ibtikār (creative/authorial right), which is increasingly recognized as a proprietary right containing both economic and moral dimensions. Its legitimacy is frequently grounded in ‘urf (recognized custom) and maṣlaḥah mursalah (public interest), supporting the permissibility of utilizing IP as collateral under the general maxim that commercial transactions are allowed unless proven otherwise. The article further proposes Sharia-compliant operational models—such as rahn combined with murābaḥah, ijārah, istiṣnā‘, and profit-sharing schemes (muḍārabah/mushārakah)—subject to strict avoidance of ribā, gharar, and maysir, and contingent upon reliable valuation standards, secondary-market readiness, and enforceable execution mechanisms. Divergent scholarly views are mapped, particularly regarding intangibility, valuation volatility, and moral-right constraints.
Copyright Infringement in Indonesia: Applicable Sanctions and Legal Procedures Makruf, Solihan; Mufti, Rizal Agung; Sembada, Radja Haehta; Maulana, Iqbal Taufik; Kholid, Muhamad
Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-Undangan dan Ekonomi Islam Vol. 18 No. 1 (2026): Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-Undangan dan Ekonomi Islam
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah IAIN Langsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32505/jurisprudensi.v18i1.11495

Abstract

Ideally, copyright, as part of intellectual property rights, should receive full protection from the state through firm and effective legal instruments. Law Number 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright provides a clear legal framework to ensure such protection. However, in reality, copyright infringement remains widespread in Indonesia, taking forms such as piracy, unauthorized use, and illegal distribution through digital platforms. This condition highlights a gap between the ideal legal norms and their implementation in practice. This study aims to analyze the sanctions and legal processes applicable to copyright infringement in Indonesia and evaluate the effectiveness of their implementation based on the existing laws and regulations. The methodology used in this research is a normative juridical approach, with primary data sources consisting of statutory regulations, academic literature, and relevant court decisions. The findings indicate that although Indonesia has relatively comprehensive regulations on copyright, the implementation of sanctions and legal procedures still faces obstacles, such as weak law enforcement, low public awareness, and the challenges of digitalization that facilitate the rapid spread of infringement. Therefore, a synergistic effort among policymakers, law enforcement authorities, and society is needed to build an effective and adaptive copyright protection system in response to contemporary developments.
Politik Hukum Arbitrase Dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia: Analisis Kritis Terhadap Naskah Akademik Rancangan Undang-Undang Tentang Perubahan Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 1999 Diding Jalaludin; Muhamad Kholid; Tatang Astarudin; Asep Rozali
Iqtishaduna: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Hukum Ekonomi Syariah Vol 7 No 2 (2026): Januari
Publisher : Jurusan Hukum Ekonomi Syariah Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum Uin Alauddin Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24252/iqtishaduna.v7i2.65142

Abstract

Abstrak          Penelitian ini mengeksplorasi dan mengkaji secara kritis politik hukum RUU tentang perubahan UU No. 30 Tahun 1999 tentang Arbitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa dengan menelaah naskah akademik RUU dan membandingkannya dengan kondisi normatif dan praktik penyelesaian sengketa melalui arbitrase di Indonesia guna memberikan kontribusi terhadap RUU tersebut dalam mengatasi problematika aktual. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan yuridis normatif dan analisis kualitatif terhadap berbagai literatur mutakhir dari bahan hukum primer, sekunder dan tersier. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukan politik hukum dalam RUU perubahan UU No. 30 Tahun 1999 tentang Arbitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa merupakan peluang strategis untuk memperbaiki sistem arbitrase Indonesia, namun harus dilakukan secara cermat dengan mengakomodir berbagai aspek seperti keadilan, kepastian hukum, konflik norma, arbitrase syariah, arbitrase internasional, dan penyelarasan dengan disrupsi teknologi (e-arbitration). Kata kunci: Politik Hukum, Arbitrase, Naskah Akademik RUU Arbitrase dan APS   Abstract This research explores and critically examines the legal policy of the draft bill on amendments to Law No. 30 of 1999 on Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution by reviewing the academic text of the draft bill and comparing it with the normative conditions and practices of dispute resolution through arbitration in Indonesia in order to contribute to the draft bill in addressing current issues. This research uses a normative juridical approach and qualitative analysis of various recent literature from primary, secondary, and tertiary legal sources. The results of this study indicate that the legal policy in the draft amendment to Law No. 30 of 1999 on Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution is a strategic opportunity to improve the Indonesian arbitration system. but it must be done carefully by accommodating various aspects such as fairness, legal certainty, conflict of norms, sharia arbitration, international arbitration, and alignment with technological disruption (e-arbitration). Keywords: Legal Policy, Arbitration, Academic Papers on Arbitration Bill and APS
Negotiating Haqq al-Ibtikar and State Patent Law: A Socio-Legal Study of Maslahah and Intellectual Property among Indonesian Muslim SMEs lilis, lilis diah sugiarti; Hidayat, Agi Attaubah; Anwari, Amalia Nur; Zulvia, Ransya Ayu; Kholid, Muhamad
DIKTUM: Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum Vol. 24 No. 2 (2026): DIKTUM: Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum Islam Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Parepare

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35905/diktum.v24i2.14622

Abstract

Background: Indonesia’s 64 million SMEs drive 61% of national GDP yet face critical barriers in patent protection due to costly procedures, legal complexity, and low IP literacy. Purpose: This study analyzes systemic gaps in Indonesia’s patent law (Law No. 13/2016) hindering SME innovation and proposes inclusive legal reforms. Methods: A normative juridical approach examines statutory frameworks, case studies, and secondary data from academic literature (2017–2025) Results: Key findings reveal: (1) High patent registration costs (up to IDR 20.9 million) exclude 87% of SMEs; (2) First-to-file systems disadvantage grassroots innovators; (3) Enforcement remains inaccessible due to lengthy litigation (avg. 30 months) and minimal ADR mechanisms. Implication: Structural reforms are urged: specialized IP courts, tiered fee subsidies, and SME-tailored simple patents. Indonesia’s model could inform Global South patent policies. Originality: This research introduces the inclusive patent framework—integrating open licensing, communal IP rights, and university-SME collaboration—as a novel juridical paradigm for equitable innovation.
EFEKTIVITAS BPSK DALAM MENANGANI SENGKETA KONSUMEN: STUDI KUALITATIF TENTANG POLA PENGADUAN, MEKANISME PENYELESAIAN, DAN KEPATUHAN PELAKU USAHA Prayogi, Prayogi; Hendarman, Hari; Kholid, Muhamad
Public Sphere: Jurnal Sosial Politik, Pemerintahan dan Hukum Vol 5, No 1 (2025): JPS (Jurnal Sosial Politik, Pemerintahan dan Hukum)
Publisher : CV Widina Media Utama

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59818/jps.v5i1.2749

Abstract

This study analyzes the effectiveness of the Consumer Dispute Settlement Agency (BPSK) in providing access to justice for consumers through a juridical-empirical approach that combines semi-structured interviews with BPSK stakeholders in Bandung, observation of the settlement process, and a review of the regulations underlying the establishment of the agency. Based on Presidential Regulation No. 90 of 2001, BPSK acts as a non-litigation institution that resolves disputes between consumers and business actors through conciliation, mediation, and arbitration, and has the authority to impose administrative sanctions on business actors who violate regulations. The findings show that the structure of the council, which consists of representatives from the government, businesses, and consumers in equal proportions, is an instrument of impartiality in the dispute adjudication process. However, the effectiveness of BPSK services still faces a number of challenges: limited institutional coverage because not all districts/cities have a BPSK, resulting in a centralized caseload and potential barriers to access for consumers from remote areas; conventional evidence procedures; and dependence on the good faith of business actors in implementing decisions. Nevertheless, the BPSK has succeeded in acting as the first line of legal protection before disputes escalate to litigation, with mediation remaining the dominant mechanism and strengthening the principle of procedural justice for the parties. This study contributes to the understanding of the BPSK's role in resolving consumer disputes and provides insights for improving its effectiveness.ABSTRAKPenelitian ini menganalisis efektivitas Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen (BPSK) dalam memberikan akses keadilan bagi konsumen melalui pendekatan yuridis-empiris yang memadukan wawancara semi-terstruktur dengan pemangku kepentingan BPSK Kota Bandung, observasi proses penyelesaian, serta kajian regulasi yang mendasari berdirinya lembaga tersebut. Berdasarkan Perpres Nomor 90 Tahun 2001, BPSK berperan sebagai lembaga non-litigasi yang menyelesaikan sengketa antara konsumen dan pelaku usaha melalui konsiliasi, mediasi, dan arbitrase, serta berwenang menjatuhkan sanksi administratif kepada pelaku usaha yang melanggar. Temuan menunjukkan bahwa struktur keanggotaan majelis yang terdiri atas unsur pemerintah, pelaku usaha, dan konsumen dengan proporsi seimbang merupakan instrumen imparsialitas dalam proses ajudikasi sengketa. Namun, efektivitas layanan BPSK masih menghadapi sejumlah tantangan: keterbatasan cakupan kelembagaan karena belum seluruh kabupaten/ kota memiliki BPSK sehingga menimbulkan beban perkara terpusat serta potensi hambatan akses bagi konsumen dari wilayah pinggiran; prosedur pembuktian yang masih konvensional; dan ketergantungan penyelesaian pada itikad baik pelaku usaha dalam menjalankan putusan. Meski demikian, BPSK berhasil berperan sebagai garda awal perlindungan hukum sebelum sengketa meningkat ke ranah litigasi, dengan mekanisme mediasi tetap menjadi pilihan dominan dan memperkuat asas keadilan prosedural bagi para pihak. Penelitian ini memberikan kontribusi empiris dalam memahami posisi BPSK sebagai bagian dari arsitektur alternatif penyelesaian sengketa di Indonesia serta membuka ruang evaluasi terhadap urgensi peningkatan digitalisasi proses dan perluasan kelembagaan menuju efektivitas yang lebih optimal di masa mendatang.
Co-Authors Abdulah Safe’i Achmad Anwari, Amalia Nur Asep Rozali Astarudin, Tatang Azis, Pahrudin Didi Sumardi, Didi Diding Jalaludin Dikri Abdul Jabar Ahmad Elan Jaelani Elan Jaelani, Elan Harry Yuniardi Hendarman, Hari Hidayat, Agi Attaubah Isak, Endang Jaenudin Jaenudin Jalaluddin Jalaluddin Jalaludin, Diding Kayantri, Ganindya Kusuma, Nelfia Laras Shesa Leliya lilis, lilis diah sugiarti Makruf, Solihan Maulana, Iqbal Taufik Mufti, Rizal Agung Najah, Naily Aulia Nasrudin Nasrullah Nasrullah Nurlaeli, Suci Padhilah, Piqi Rizqi Prayogi Prayogi Ransya Ayu Zulvia Rojikin, Umar Saepullah, Usep Safe’i, Abdulah Safei, Abdulah Sembada, Radja Haehta Senja, Kinanti Shesa, Laras Sugiarti, Lilis Diah Umarudi, Farkhan Utami, Henny Septia Utang Rosidin Uu Nurul Huda, Uu Nurul Yuniardi, Harry Zulvia, Ransya Ayu