Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 33 Documents
Search

Positifikasi Hukum Islam di Indonesia: Prospek dan Problematikanya Sodiqin, Ali
Supremasi Hukum: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum Vol. 1 No. 2 (2012): Supremasi Hukum
Publisher : UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/sh.v1i2.1922

Abstract

Implementation of Islamic law in Indonesia has any problems, internal aspectand external one. In reality, the relationship between Islam and the state have caused afriction of interests between of moslem in one side and the state in another. As areligion, Islam put all its norms into effect for its adherents,meanwhile the state isimpossible to conduct rule of law from one religion. In other hand, institutionalizationof Islamic law faced two problems, firstly,related to the position of Islamic law in thenational law, and secondly, related to internal aspect of Islamic law. These problems areimplicate to the developmental prospect of Islamic law in Indonesia. The suggestedfactors of Islamic law are majority in adherents, widely the object,and supporting ofIslamic organizations. The handicaps of implementing of Islamic law are uncompletelyin its institutionalization, and dichotomy of Islamic thought, and influence ofunstability political law in Indonesia.
Halal but Forbidden? A Systems Approach to Tompangan Transactions in Sumenep, Madura Suaidi; Sodiqin, Ali
El-Mashlahah Vol 15 No 2 (2025)
Publisher : Sharia Faculty of State Islamic Institute (IAIN) Palangka Raya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23971/el-mashlahah.v15i2.9049

Abstract

The tompangan tradition in Sumenep, Madura, is a long-standing form of communal cooperation involving exchanging money and goods. However, on November 12, 2023, during a bahsul masā’il session, the Sumenep branch of Nahdlatul Ulama (PCNU), led by KH. Hafidzi Syarbini declared that the practice is “permissible but prohibited.” This ruling reflects growing public concerns over its negative effects, as tompangan has increasingly shifted from social solidarity toward profit-oriented practices that burden families economically. The study examined the transformation through the lens of maqāṣid al-syarī‘ah using Jasser Auda’s systemic approach. Employing a socio-legal, qualitative-exploratory method, data were collected through interviews and literature review. The findings reveal a shift in value from social to profit-driven orientations; many transactions have become individualistic, self-serving, and textually exclusive, neglecting broader ethical and social considerations. As the result, this shift fails to realize both the al-hadaf (immediate goals) and al-gayah (ultimate purposes) of Islamic law, diverging from Auda’s systemic interpretation of the maqāṣid. The study contributes by framing tompangan, not merely as a socio-cultural phenomenon but also as a legal-ethical case that illustrates the tension between ʿurf and the higher objectives of Islamic law. The findings enrich contemporary Islamic legal discourse by offering the systemic maqāṣid framework as a critical analytical tool for evaluating socio-religious practices.
Towards an Integrated Legal Studies Department in Indonesia: Transdisciplinary Framework for Legal Higher Education Nasrudin, Muhamad; Sodiqin, Ali; Mujib, Abdul
Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Konstitusi Vol. 8 Issue 2 (2025) Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Konstitusi
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia, Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Profesor Kiai Haji Saifuddin Zuhri Purwokerto, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24090/volksgeist.v8i2.12985

Abstract

Indonesia’s pluralistic legal system institutionalizes legal education into four departments—Legal Sciences, Islamic Legal Sciences, Hindu Legal Sciences, and Customary Legal Sciences—reflecting its colonial and post-colonial legal heritage. Yet, this segmentation fosters a fragmented curriculum that hampers graduates’ holistic legal competence and limits their capacity to uphold justice and legal certainty. Moreover, inter-departmental disparities have led to systemic exclusion from legal professions for certain groups. This paper proposes a unifying framework—grounded in systems theory, Friedman’s legal system model, and Amin Abdullah’s integration–interconnection paradigm—to merge these departments into a single Indonesian Legal Studies Department. In this model, current departments would serve as concentrations within a cohesive structure, producing graduates equipped to address contemporary legal challenges. The objective is to nurture professionals endowed with broad, integrated, and robust perspectives, enabling them to uphold legal certainty, advance substantive justice, and contribute to public welfare within a progressive legal system. It is therefore recommended that the reform of Indonesian legal education be directed toward establishing an integrated governance framework supported by a unified national curriculum, faculty capacity-building, institutional exchanges, and recognition of diverse legal traditions, in order to realize genuinely transdisciplinary legal scholarship and professional practice.