Articles
Tanggung Jawab Direksi PT Taspen Berdasarkan Hukum Positif Di Indonesia Ditinjau Dengan Prinsip Good Corporate Governance (GCG)
Dhaifina Fadhilah Alyani;
Nathania Raissa Putri Rungamali;
Nyulistiowati Suryanti;
Deviana Yuanitasari
Eksekusi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Negara Vol. 2 No. 1 (2024): Februari : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Negara
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Administrasi (STIA) Yappi Makassar
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.55606/eksekusi.v2i1.862
A state-owned company has an obligation to implement the principles of Good Corporate Governance (GCG) in order to realize a company that is clean from Ultra Vires actions. However, over time, there are some parties who are not responsible for implementing the GCG principles. The purpose of this research is to see how the responsibility of the Board of Directors towards the implementation of GCG principles and to examine the extent to which the implementation of GCG principles in PT Taspen is carried out. This research uses a normative research method which in its research uses three (3) approaches, namely; statute approach, conceptual approach, and case approach. The intended results are to determine the responsibility of the Board of Directors for the application of GCG principles and to determine the extent to which GCG principles are applied in PT Taspen.
Pernyataan Pailit Pada Penyertaan Modal di Badan Usaha Milik Negara
Widyaningtyas, Kezia Regina;
Ikhwansyah, Isis;
Suryanti, Nyulistiowati
Widya Yuridika Vol 6, No 3 (2023): Widya Yuridika: Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Widya Gama Malang
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31328/wy.v6i3.4462
State-Owned Enterprises (SOE) as a legal entity established and administered by the state obtained its establishment fund from state assets which are separated for BUMN. In conducting the activities to gain profit, of course, loans or legal relations are needed as supports to the business continuity. However, it is not uncommon for these legal relations causing debt. Bankruptcy institutions were formed with the aim to resolve debt matters in accordance with the principles of bankruptcy. In the practice, SOE is often being filed for bankruptcy. However, there are differences in opinions regarding SOE assets that cannot be confiscated, thus the bankruptcy filing is cancelled or rejected. This study aims to analyse the position of capital equity inclusion done by the state based on the relevant law and regulations, as well as to provide answers to the considerations of the judges in deciding the decree regarding SOE bankruptcy cases from time to time. This study implemented an analytical descriptive method and a normative juridical approach by examining the primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. Based on the research and analysis conducted, it was found that there were several SOEs that were being filed for bankruptcy. However, in legal consideration, an inconsistency was found between the decrees of SOE bankruptcy as there was an assumption that the capital provided by the state for SOE could not be confiscated. The included capital has transformed from a public sphere to a private one which is related to the characteristics of the legal entity called separate legal entity.
Analisis Hukum Mengenai Pertanggungjawaban Korporasi Dalam Kasus Tindak Pidana Oleh PT Asuransi Jiwasraya
Arya Jayadiningrat;
Boris William Octaviano;
Nyulistiowati Suryanti;
Deviana Yuanitasari
Jaksa : Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum dan Politik Vol 2 No 2 (2024): April: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum dan Politik
Publisher : Universitas Sains dan Teknologi Komputer
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.51903/jaksa.v2i2.1624
The term "corporation" is defined broadly in positive criminal law, beyond the limits of the conception of legal entities in civil law. This interpretation includes organized entities involving persons and/or assets, whether or not they have the status of legal entities. Corporate crime has not been explicitly regulated in the Indonesian Criminal Code which refers to the Continental European legal system. The main focus of Continental European criminal law is more inclined to individual responsibility than corporate entities. In contrast, in the Anglo-Saxon legal system, corporate liability in criminal cases is explicitly discussed. However, changes in Indonesian legal views show a shift, directing criminal responsibility to the corporation itself. Nonetheless, criminal law in Indonesia previously tended to direct prosecution towards individuals involved in the management of the corporation. The implementation of corporate liability in corruption cases is still limited, but steps were taken by issuing Supreme Court Regulation No. 13 of 2016 concerning Procedures for Handling Criminal Cases by Corporations (PERMA Korporasi). In this PERMA, the identification of individuals involved in corporate crime is expanded, including those who have a relationship with the company even though they are not formally incorporated into the company structure. The PERMA Corporations approach emphasizes that corporate responsibility only applies if it is proven to be directly involved in the criminal act and benefit from the act. The use of the Business Judgment Rule principle and consideration of the benefits to the corporation are key in assessing corporate guilt. Research on PT Asuransi Jiwasraya highlighted violations committed by management in investment management that harmed the company. These violations include non-compliance with the precautionary principle in investment management, resulting in significant financial losses. Violations of the principles of Corporate Governance were also highlighted in this case.
Analisis Penerapan Doktrin Business Judgment Rule Terhadap Keputusan Direktur Utama PT Krakatau Steel Tbk Dalam Kasus Pembangunan Blast Furnace Complex
Anindita Maharani;
Nadya Hanifah;
Nyulistiowati Suryanti;
Deviana Yuanitasari
Mandub : Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora Vol. 2 No. 1 (2024): Maret : Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora
Publisher : STAI YPIQ BAUBAU, SULAWESI TENGGARA
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.59059/mandub.v2i1.873
In business activities in the form of a Company, there are often legal problems involving directors as a result of the decisions and policies they make in carrying out their duties and authority in the company. The Board of Directors is one of the most important organs in a Limited Liability Company whose duty is to run the company as stated in Law Number 40 of 2007 (UU PT) concerning Limited Liability Companies. In the event of a loss caused by the decision or policy, the board of directors can be sued personally either criminally or civilly. This research aims to analyze the case of former President Director of PT Krakatau Steel (KS) Fazwar Bujang in making decisions on the construction of the Blast Furnace Complex plant in 2011 which is considered to have harmed the state of Rp 2.3 trillion and USD 292 or up to Rp 6 trillion and has benefited the MCC Ceri consortium, a company from China and PT Krakatau Engineering and others. The first result shows that the business judgment rule doctrine is a concept in corporate law that provides protection to company directors regarding the decisions and policies they make, to ensure that directors can make decisions based on good faith, prudence, and the best interests of the company without having to be personally liable for losses that may arise from business decisions. In Indonesia, the business judgment rule doctrine is only regulated in UU PT, but it has not been regulated in the law completely. Second, in the case of the construction of PT Krakatau Steel's Blast Furnace Complex, the business judgment rule cannot be applied because the business policies taken do not meet the requirements of the business judgment rule stipulated in Article 97 paragraph (3) of the UU PT.
The Existence of Individual Companies As Legal Entities In Micro and Small Enterprises In Indonesia: A Review of The Problems of The Alter Ego Doctrine
Salma Syakira, Kineisha;
Firdaus, Nur Sa’adah;
Suryanti, Nyulistiowati;
Yuanitasari, Deviana
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Tambun Bungai Vol 9 No 1 (2024): June 2024
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Tambun Bungai Palangka Raya
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.61394/jihtb.v9i1.284
The enactment of the Job Creation Law affects the provisions of Limited Liability Companies. The mechanism for establishing an Individual Company which is explained implicitly in the Company Law and the Job Creation Law raises issues related to the process of organ responsibility in an Individual Company which states that directors can concurrently hold positions as shareholders and vice versa. One of the problems of the presence of Individual Companies in MSEs in Indonesia is the birth of Alter Ego conditions. The solution to limit the unlimited liability of corporate organs is that the government needs to strengthen and reinforce the doctrine of Piercing the Corporate Veil for Individual Companies and provide legal certainty regarding the regulation of corporate organs in the Company Law and Government Regulation No. 8 of 2021. This article examines the existence of individual companies in the context of micro and small businesses in Indonesia. The focus of the analysis lies on the concept of the alter ego doctrine which often becomes a problem in business practice. This research utilizes a document analysis approach and literature study to explore the legal and practical implications of the alter ego doctrine on individual companies in Indonesia. The analysis shows that the alter ego doctrine has a significant impact on the personal liability of micro and small business owners. The implications of these findings are discussed in the context of business regulation and legal protection for micro and small business owners in Indonesia.
Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 23/PUU-XIX/2021 tentang memperbolehkan upaya hukum kasasi terhadap PKPU
Agustinus Pandiangan, Lumiere Rejeki;
Suryanti, Nyulistiowati;
Rahmawati, Ema
Nautical : Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Indonesia Vol. 2 No. 12 (2024): Nautical: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Indonesia
Publisher : ARKA INSTITUTE
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.55904/nautical.v2i12.647
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 23/PUU-XIX/2021 hadir dengan memberikan konsekuensi yuridis untuk mengubah acara hukum pada perkara yang diawali dengan pengajuan permohonan penundaan kewajiban pembayaran utang dan ditolaknya tawaran perdamaian dari debitur. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk meninjau putusan a quo berdasarkan asas keadilan dan diwujudkan dengan gagalnya kewajiban pembayaran utang yang berdimensi cepat. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif pada penelitian hukum kepustakaan atau penelitan hukum doktrinal sebagai penelitian hukum dengan cara mengkaji bahan Pustaka atau data-data sekunder. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa berdasarkan asas keadilan, debitur dan masing-masing kreditor dapat mempertahankan hak-haknya dalam rangka penyelesaian utang piutang dengan membukanya upaya hukum kasasi.
AKIBAT HUKUM OBJEK PERKARA PAILIT BERADA DI PIHAK KETIGA TERHADAP PEMBAYARAN UTANG
Dewi, Reza Liasta;
Adlila, Iqlima;
Suryanti, Nyulistiowati;
Yuanitasari, Deviana
FAIRNESS AND JUSTICE Vol 20, No 1 (2022): FAIRNESS AND JUSTICE
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Jember
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.32528/faj.v20i1.22292
Majelis Hakim menolak Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Medan Nomor 6/Pdt-Sus.Pailit/2023/PN Mdn dengan alasan karena tidak terdapat fakta atau keadaan yang terbukti secara sederhana sebagaimana dimaksud dalam Pasal 2 ayat (1), jo. Pasal 8 ayat (4) UU KPKPU yang mengakibatkan setelah putusan diambil, menyebabkan permasalahan utang dan penagihan utang antara debitur dan kreditur belum juga menemukan penyelesaiannya, sehingga timbul pertanyaan-pertanyaan lain, diantaranya yaitu bagaimana kedudukan debitur dan kelanjutan pembayaran hutang pihak termohon pailit kepada pemohon pailit. Permasalahan di atas diteliti dengan menggunakan metode-metode sebagai berikut, metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah normatif. Penelitian ini bersifat preskriptif. Metode pendekatan yang digunakan adalah pendekatan kasus (case appoarch). Jenis dan sumber data antara lain: bahan primer yaitu KUHPerdata dan Undang-Undang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Hutang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004, bahan sekunder berupa buku dan majalah, serta bahan non hukum berupa KBBI. Teknik pengumpulan bahan hukum studi pustaka dan studi kasus. Teknik analisis data menggunakan logika deduktif. Hasil penelitian terhadap permasalahan pertama yaitu ditolaknya suatu putusan dalam perkara pailit tidak menyebabkan kedudukan debitur berubah, sehingga debitur tetap memiliki kewenangan dalam melakukan perbuatan pengalihan dan pengurusan kekayaannya, asalkan hal itu tidak merugikan kreditur. Permasalahan kedua, Akibat hukum objek perkara pailit yang berada di pihak ketiga terhadap pembayaran utang adalah debitur masih memiliki kewajiban dalam membayar hutang kepada kreditur namun kreditur tidak dapat mengeksekusi objek jaminan yang berada di pihak ketiga untuk membayar utang debitur pailit.
Pertanggungjawaban Negara Atas Keadaan Persero BUMN Yang Pailit
Arzetta Zahra Metthania;
Mhd. Azmi Farid Lubis;
Nyulistiowati Suryanti;
Deviana Yuanitasari
Jurnal Hukum Sasana Vol. 9 No. 2 (2023): Jurnal Hukum Sasana: December 2023
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31599/edqfke95
Kepailitan merupakan sebuah keadaan yang bisa saja terjadi dalam Persero BUMN. Istaka karya, merupakan salah satu dari beberapa Persero BUMN. Setelah melewati berbagai tahun dengan kondisi keuangan yang tak kunjung membaik, berbagai kabar berita mengenai perusahaan ini dengan berbagai partisipasi aktif di dunia konstruksi, akhirnya resmi ditutup akibat pailit pada 2023 ini, dengan sederet utang kepada para kreditor juga penunggakan pembayaran gaji kepada para karyawannya. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kepastian hukum yang didapatkan oleh para kreditor, serta pertanggungjawaban negara dalam hal pailitnya sebuah Persero BUMN ini. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukan lemahnya posisi kreditor dalam mendapatkan hak nya. Oleh karena itu, untuk memberikan kepastian hukum, tidak hanya berlandaskan Undang-undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang saja, akan tetapi pihak direksi juga harus bertanggungjawab penuh atas seluruh utang kepada para kreditor menggunakan harta pribadi yang dimiliki, namun tidak termasuk dengan harta yang telah dinyatakan pailit oleh Pengadilan Niaga.
Kajian Yuridis Penerapan Asas Keberlangsungan Usaha Dalam Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang Untuk Mencegah Pailit
Damayanti, Retno;
Pasaribu, Parlin Sahat Ivandamme;
Suryanti, Nyulistiowati;
Yuanitasari, Deviana
Jurnal Restorative Justice Vol 7 No 2 (2023): Jurnal Restorative Justice
Publisher : Universitas Musamus
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.35724/jrj.v7i2.5596
This research discusses the application of the Principle of Business Continuity in Debt Payment Suspension in Indonesia over the last three years. The Principle of Business Continuity is a bankruptcy law principle that allows companies to address financial difficulties through restructuring rather than bankruptcy. This study analyzes the Principle of Business Continuity in the context of Debt Payment Suspension and the influencing factors, including financial conditions, future prospects, restructuring plans, creditor support, and management. Practical recommendations include enhancing transparency, consulting legal and financial experts, and maintaining effective communication with creditors. The research also highlights the role of research in applying the Principle of Business Continuity in Debt Payment Suspension. It is expected that this research will provide guidance for companies, the government, creditors, and relevant parties in addressing financial and legal challenges with the aim of preserving business continuity and fairness in Debt Payment Suspension.
Analisis Penerapan Good Corporate Governance (GCG) oleh PT Garuda Indonesia (Persero) Tbk dalam Masa Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang (PKPU)
Anwar Hafidz Amrullah;
Alfi Taufiq Asyidqi;
Joshua Suwandi;
Anggun Ratna Alifa;
Nur Gita Oktaviani;
Nyulistiowati Suryanti
Bulletin of Community Engagement Vol. 4 No. 2 (2024): Bulletin of Community Engagement
Publisher : CV. Creative Tugu Pena
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.51278/bce.v4i2.1292
PT Garuda Indonesia (Persero) Tbk is one of the State-Owned Enterprises that has passed the postponement of debt payment obligations (PKPU) period well until it escaped the threat of bankruptcy. The escape of PT Garuda Indonesia from the threat of bankruptcy is inseparable from its success in applying the principles known in Good Corporate Governance (GCG). This research uses a normative method with a statutory approach, and with the specification of this research using an analytical descriptive method. The result of this research is that PT Garuda Indonesia managed to recover its company and show positive growth, maintaining its role as a national airline with more stable operational sustainability through the sustainable implementation of GCG principles of Transparency, and Accountability. The GCG principles also not only play an important role in efforts to save the company from bankruptcy, but also forever