Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Amicus Curiae

SANKSI PIDANA PERJUDIAN ATAU JARIMAH MAISIR BERDASARKAN QANUN PEMERINTAH ACEH NO. 6 TAHUN 2014 TENTANG HUKUM JINAYAT (PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH SYARI’YAH SINABANG NOMOR 6/JN/2021/MS.SNB): Criminal Sanctions For Gambling Or Jarimah Maisir Based On Aceh Government Qanun No. 6 Of 2014 Concerning Jinayat Law (Syari'yah Court Ruling Sinabang Number 6/jn/2021/ms.snb) Mulyansyah, Muhammad Riza; Susetyo, Heru
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 1 No. 3 (2024): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/8t7jak03

Abstract

The main issues raised are 1.) How is gambling regulated in Islamic law? 2.) How do maisir/gambling regulations compare in the Aceh Qanun and national law? This research uses a type of normative legal research which is descriptive analytical in nature using secondary data obtained through literature study and the data is processed qualitatively using deductive logical conclusions. The author's conclusion is that 1.) The regulation of gambling or Maisir in Islamic law is found in the Al-Quran, Surah Al-Baqarah verse 219 and Surah Al-Ma'idah verses 90-91. Supported by Ahmad, Laits, Ishak, and other adherents of the Shafi'i madzab, it is prohibited to be caned more than ten times if the sanction for the crime committed does not reach the sanction for adultery or theft does not reach the provisions for cutting off one's hand. 2.) The most striking thing in the comparison of the Aceh Qanun and National Law is the sanctions. In the regulation of the Aceh Qanun the criminal sanction for gambling is public caning, while the sanction for gambling in the National Law is imprisonment
TINDAK PIDANA PEMERKOSAAN TERHADAP SEORANG WANITA DALAM KEADAAN TIDAK BERDAYA: Crime of Rape Against a Woman in a State of Helplessness Wibisono, Yusuf; Susetyo, Heru
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 1 No. 3 (2024): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/za9w1f84

Abstract

Currently, the crime of rape is rampant and has received considerable attention from the public. The crime of rape often brings difficulties, both in the stage of investigation, prosecution, and at the stage of imposing a verdict during the settlement of the case. Rape is an act in which a person commits violence or threat of violence to force a woman who is not his wife to have sex with him, as in the case of Decision Number 390/Pid.B/2021/PN Smn, the unnamed perpetrator committed the crime of rape against awoman who was in a state of helplessness or unconsciousness whose punishment was imposed based on Article 285 of the Criminal Code, The main problem is how the crime of rape in theory and its regulationin Indonesia, and whether the application of Article 285 of the Criminal Code to the perpetrator of rape against a woman in a helpless state is appropriate. This research is a normative research that is descriptive analysis, and the data used is secondary data, and data collection is done by literature study.The results concluded that the perpetrator's actions were a type of "exploitation rape", and the victim was a "pure victim", namely a victim who had never had contact with the perpetrator before the rape.The perpetrator's actions also fulfill the elements of Article 285 of the Criminal Code, the perpetrator's actions more fulfill the elements of Article 286 of the Criminal Code.
Co-Authors Abdurakhman Abdurakhman Abdurakhman Abdurakhman Adella Izzati Samiya Afdol Afdol Afdol Anwar Agus Sardjono Ahmad Ghozi Andhonios Joudy, Elnando Angelina, Feymi Anggraini, Nastitie Kusuma Apriyanti, Ira Aritonang, Samuel Ivander Aulia Rahman AK Azhari, Sri Muliana Aziz, Muhammad Izzuddin Abdul Bambang Sumiarto Bernadetha Chelvi Yuliastuti Ceruang Alang Charles Rangga Tabbu Damarina, Retno Deden Ardiansyah Deviana Yuanitasari Doni Hikmat Ramdhan Dyah Ayu Widiasih Fajar Nugraha Fajar Nugraha Farida Prihatini Fatih, Nurroby Febriansyah, Muhammad Febriyanto, Satrio Febriyanto, Satrio Alif Feymi Angelina Fitria Hamadi, Ibrahim Hamadi, Ibrahim Ghifar Hanah, Ummu Haq, Najma Izzatul Hilimi, Nurindah Holy K.M. Kalangit Ilahidayah, Wahyumi Intan Mahabah Ira Apriyanti Jelian Isra Risandy Kaffah, Nurfahmi Islami Kardinal, Rosalinda Estevani Karimah, Iffah Laidinar, Shaubi Latifah, Tien Tis’aini Lu Sudirman M. Nurrobby Fatih Mahabah, Intan Mahilaveda, Nadila Marwa, Radisty Wensy Muhamad Syarief Nurhidayat Muhammad Rendy Rifki Putra Mulyansyah, Muhammad Riza N. Oneng Nurul Bariyah Najma Izzatul Haq Nastitie Kusuma Anggraini Nuridzin, Dion Zein Nurindah Hilimi Okterano, Yanos Pawi, Andi Anugrah Prihatini, Farida Prihatini, Farida Rahmadhani, Suri Rahmawati, Nurlaili Ramdhan, Doni Hikmat Hikmat Rina Shahriyani Shahrullah Sahputra, Rendi Samuel Peratenta Tarigan Satrio Alif Febriyanto selvianah, shely Setyawan Budiharta Simona Bustani, Simona Suri Rahmadhani Tarigan, Samuel Peratenta Taufik Ajiputera, Muhammad Tien Tis’aini Latifah Uswatun Hasanah Violetta, Cicilia Alda Wibowo, Siddiq Yusuf Wibisono