Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 27 Documents
Search

EFFECTIVNESS OF DIVORCEMEDIATION IN INDONESIA: COMPARATIVE LEGAL STUDY OF UNITED STATES Ayu Ningtyas , Dyah Palupi; Al Uyun, Dhia; Susmayanti, Riana
IBLAM LAW REVIEW Vol. 3 No. 3 (2023): IBLAM LAW REVIEW
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat (LPPM IBLAM)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52249/ilr.v3i3.141

Abstract

Victims of Domestic Violence (KDRT) are increasing every year, which is one of the causes of divorce. CATAHU Komnas Perempuan 2022 reported that as many as 4,779 cases of divorce were due to domestic violence. The divorce process is preceded by a mediation stage as a dispute resolution by mediators at the Religious Courts. Mediators who handle divorce cases must be thorough and have a strategy for identifying and dealing with domestic violence. Domestic violence screening (KDRT screening) needs to be done so that the identification of cases of domestic violence can be explained specifically. One of the countries that have implemented screening is the United States, which considers it an appropriate and effective method. Comparison of the legal system becomes an analytical knife regarding the legal process of mediation between Indonesia and the United States. Domestic violence screening conducted in divorce mediation can identify violence that occurs. If there is an act of violence, the mediator can use a different approach during mediation. Mediation should be able to help both parties reach an agreement that is fair and profitable for both while taking into account the rights and obligations of the parties.
Supreme and Constitutional Court’s Decisions on Permission of Ex-Corruptors to be Parliamentary Candidates : Whose Rights Should be Protected ? Susmayanti, Riana; Hidayat, Fitri
Brawijaya Law Journal Vol. 12 No. 2 (2025): The Evolution of International Humanitarian Law : Historical Roots to Future D
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Brawijaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21776/ub.blj.2025.012.02.09

Abstract

Along with the trend of many Parliamentary members being caught in corruption, Law No. 7/2017 on General Elections apparently allows ex-corruptor to run for or be nominated as Parliamentary members. Parliamentary is an institution that has the legislative power to form laws (including the Anti-Corruption Law, etc). Allowing ex-corruptors to run for Parliamentary candidate means that the seriousness of this country's fight against corruption is questionable. This study analyzes the permissibility of ex-corruptors to become parliamentary candidates based on KPU Regulation 20/2018 and 31/2018, Law 7/2017, Supreme Court Decision No. 46 P/HUM/2018 and Constitutional Court Decision No. 87/PUU-XX/2022. Moving on from that analysis, this normative juridical research is intended to answer the legal issues : 1) What is the human rights perspective of ex-corruptors regarding on permission of ex-corruptors from running for or being nominated as members of parliament ? and 2) What is the human rights perspective of other citizens regarding on permission of ex-corruptors from running for or being nominated as members of parliament ? Using the case, conceptual and statutory approach, the author aims to show that it is not only the human rights of ex-corruptors that must be protected, but also the human rights of the other citizen to get members of Parliament who are clean from corruption. Some previous studies discuss former corruptors as parliamentary candidates, such as Agus Amelia Virismanda Vantri (2019 and also Andri Yanto and Faidatul Hikmah (2023), but none have examined human rights from the perspective of former corruptors and citizens of other countries. When the author presented this paper at an international conference, it turned out that ex-corruptors becoming parliamentary candidates is also a problem in other countries, making this theme important for foreign readers.
Urgensi Penyelenggaraan Pelayanan Publik Ditinjau dari Peraturan Presiden Nomor 89 Tahun 2021 Daud, Erita Rosa Larasati; Prasetyo, Ngesti Dwi; Susmayanti, Riana
Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan Vol 10, No 1 (2025): Maret 2025
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.17977/um019v10i1p82-91

Abstract

This study aims to identify the urgency of implementing a Public Service Mall in the context of Indonesian bureaucracy and the challenges of implementing it in light of Presidential Regulation Number 89 of 2021. This study used a normative juridical method with a descriptive qualitative approach, focusing on the analysis of secondary legal materials such as laws and regulations, official documents, and other legal literature. Data collection techniques in this study were conducted through library research. Data analysis in this study uses qualitative normative techniques to interpret legal provisions and examine their legal implications. The Public Service Mall is a strategic innovation aimed at improving the effectiveness, efficiency, and quality of public services. The implementation of the Public Service Mall in practice still faces various challenges, such as inter-agency coordination, infrastructure readiness, and service system integration. The success of the Public Service Mall requires ongoing commitment and synergy from all stakeholders to realize modern, transparent, and adaptive public services.
Application of Academic Papers in Formulation Legal Products at the Regional Antari, Putu Eva Ditayani; Fadli, Moh.; Negara, Tunggul Anshari Setia; Susmayanti, Riana
Journal of Law, Society, and Islamic Civilization Vol 11, No 2: Oktober 2023
Publisher : Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jolsic.v11i2.78309

Abstract

The formation of legal products in the regions cannot be separated from the preparation of academic texts as the basis for their formation. However, the existence of alternative explanations/information as a substitute for academic texts has caused legal products at the regional level not to fully use academic texts. Based on this, it is necessary to elaborate on the urgency of academic papers in the formation of legal products at the regional level. In addition, further explanation regarding the mechanism for implementing academic papers in the formation of legal products at the regional level is the main research objective. The research method used in research is normative legal research or doctrinal legal research which bases arguments on theories, principles, concepts, and laws and regulations. The selection of the normative method is based on the existence of legal issues regarding the blurring of norms regarding the regulation of academic texts in the formation of legal products at the regional level. An explanation of this can only be obtained by conducting a doctrinal study. The results of the research lead to the conclusion that academic papers are needed as guidelines in drafting legal products at the regional level. Implementation of academic drafting should be carried out in the pre-legislative stage by identifying problems in society and elaborating them theoretically so that solutions can be formulated as outlined in the draft legal products at the regional level. The preparation of academic manuscripts also requires collecting data through interviews, observations, and literature studies to find solutions to problems in society. These results then go through a dissemination process in the form of FGDs with community representatives and parties related to the regional regulations that will be formed.
Desentralisasi dalam Negara Kesatuan : Implikasi terhadap Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan Daerah di Indonesia Deang Simanjuntak; Az Zahra Widjanarka; Darrell Fajriyatdinansyah; Khalista Nurra Permana; Riana Susmayanti
Jurnal Hukum Ekualitas Vol 2 No 2 (2026): Jul-Des 2026
Publisher : PT. AORSA ADIVISI KAKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56607/rj1eq734

Abstract

Abstrak Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 memberikan dasar normatif bagi pelaksanaan desentralisasi di Indonesia melalui Pasal 18 yang menegaskan kewenangan daerah dalam mengatur dan mengurus urusan pemerintahan. Regulasi pelaksanaan desentralisasi terus mengalami perubahan, mulai dari UU No. 22 Tahun 1999, UU No. 32 Tahun 2004, hingga UU No. 23 Tahun 2014 beserta perubahannya. Dinamika regulasi ini mencerminkan adanya tantangan dalam menjaga keseimbangan antara kewenangan pemerintah pusat dan daerah. Penelitian yuridis normatif ini menggunakan pendekatan statute approach dan conceptual approach dengan metode kualitatif, serta memanfaatkan sinkronisasi vertikal dan horizontal untuk menganalisis implementasi desentralisasi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa desentralisasi membawa dampak positif berupa peningkatan partisipasi masyarakat, percepatan pelayanan publik, dan penguatan akuntabilitas politik lokal. Namun, di sisi lain juga muncul dampak negatif berupa maraknya praktik korupsi di tingkat lokal, ketimpangan pembangunan antarwilayah, serta lemahnya kapasitas kelembagaan daerah. Kasus korupsi Dana Desa di Nunukan menjadi salah satu contoh konkret dampak negatif dari lemahnya pengawasan dalam pelaksanaan otonomi fiskal. Dengan demikian, implementasi desentralisasi di Indonesia bersifat ambivalen, sehingga diperlukan konsistensi regulasi, penguatan kapasitas birokrasi daerah, serta mekanisme pengawasan yang lebih efektif agar tujuan utama desentralisasi, yakni peningkatan kesejahteraan masyarakat dan pemerataan pembangunan, dapat tercapai.
DISPARITAS “HASIL PENGAWASAN APARAT PENGAWASAN INTERN PEMERINTAH” DALAM PENGUJIAN UNSUR PENYALAHGUNAAN WEWENANG Awaludin Nur Ihfan; Shinta Hadiyantina; Riana Susmayanti
Veritas et Justitia Vol. 12 No. 1 (2026): Veritas et Justitia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Parahyangan Catholic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25123/vej.v12i1.9712

Abstract

The scope of the Administrative Court’s authority to examine elements of abuse of authority under Article 2 paragraph (2) of Supreme Court Regulation Number 4 of 2015 remains contentious, particularly regarding the interpretation of the phrase “APIP Supervision Results”. Divergent interpretations in judicial practice have generated legal uncertainty and affected access to legal protection for government officials seeking judicial review of alleged abuse of authority. This article examines the interpretive disparities surrounding the phrase and analyzes the implications of the diversity of supervisory mechanisms within Indonesia’s regulatory framework. With normative legal research using statutory, case, and conceptual approaches to examine relevant legislation, judicial decisions, and doctrinal perspectives concerning internal government supervision and administrative justice, the findings in this research indicate that differing judicial interpretive approaches have contributed significantly to legal uncertainty regarding the admissibility of petitions concerning abuse of authority. Moreover, the diversity of supervisory forms regulated in various laws demonstrates that interpretation based solely on the classification or form of supervision is inadequate. This study proposes a shift from a formalistic toward a substantive interpretive approach, whereby “APIP Supervision Results” are assessed based on the substance and objectives of the supervisory findings rather than their formal categorization. Therefore, it recommends vertical and horizontal harmonization of supervisory regulations to strengthen legal certainty and ensure effective legal protection for government officials through the mechanism for examining abuse of authority.
Ambiguity in APIP Supervisory Findings and the Limits of Administrative Court Jurisdiction in Indonesia Awaludin Nur Ihfan; Shinta Hadiyantina; Riana Susmayanti
Jurnal Ius Constituendum Vol. 11 No. 2 (2026): JUNE
Publisher : Magister Hukum Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/jic.v11i2.13807

Abstract

This study examines the ambiguity of the phrase “APIP Supervision Results” in Article 2(2) of Supreme Court Regulation No. 4 of 2015, which has led to inconsistent judicial interpretations and legal uncertainty regarding the jurisdiction of the Administrative Court in reviewing alleged abuse of authority. While existing studies primarily address the general relationship between administrative courts and supervisory mechanisms, they have not sufficiently analyzed the plurality of APIP supervisory regimes and their implications for jurisdictional limits. Employing normative legal research with statutory, case, conceptual, and philosophical approaches, this study analyzes regulatory frameworks and divergent court decisions to identify interpretative inconsistencies. The findings reveal that APIP supervision operates within a pluralistic and fragmented regulatory structure, encompassing multiple forms beyond regular and specific-purpose supervision, thereby rendering a purely formal interpretation inadequate. This study argues that limiting the meaning of “APIP Supervision Results” to specific supervisory typologies undermines legal certainty and restricts access to judicial protection. Accordingly, it proposes a shift toward a substantive interpretative approach based on normative criteria capable of accommodating diverse supervisory practices. The novelty of this research lies in its systematic reconstruction of the concept of APIP supervision results through a substantive-normative framework that integrates the plurality of supervisory regimes with theories of authority and legal certainty. Its contribution is to provide a doctrinal basis for clarifying the limits of administrative judicial authority and to offer practical guidance for achieving consistency in judicial interpretation, thereby strengthening legal certainty and administrative justice in Indonesia.