Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
5.186
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Kriminologi Indonesia Al-Ahkam Sriwijaya Law Review Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum Jurnal Ius Constituendum Nagari Law Review Jurnal Meta-Yuridis JURNAL PENDIDIKAN TAMBUSAI JISIP: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan Jurnal Ilmu Kepolisian Jurnal Justitia : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Humaniora JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Cakrawala Repositori Imwi Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences LEGAL BRIEF Journal Justiciabelen (JJ) Indonesian Journal of International Law International Journal of Science and Society (IJSOC) POLICY, LAW, NOTARY AND REGULATORY ISSUES (POLRI) Indonesia Law Review (ILREV) Indonesian Notary Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities Literacy : International Scientific Journals of Social, Education, Humanities Eduvest - Journal of Universal Studies International Journal of Accounting, Management, Economics and Social Sciences (IJAMESC) Asian Journal of Social and Humanities Jurnal Teknologi dan Komunikasi Pemerintahan
Eva Achjani Zulfa
Faculty Of Law Universitas Indonesia
Religion Aerospace Engineering Arts Humanities Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Neuroscience Social Sciences Other

Published : 45 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 45 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4   5 
FATF Recommendation and Charitable Organizations Supervision Policy in Indonesia: A Study on the Prevention of Terrorism Financing Muslim, Fithriadi; Zulfa, Eva Achjani
Indonesian Journal of International Law
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the supervision policies of charitable organisations in Indonesia, particularly in the context of preventing terrorism financing, and comparing them to international provisions, such as the Financial Action Task Force (FATF). It also explores the oversight practices in other countries to identify the best practices that Indonesia can adopt. The research addresses two key questions: (1) How do Indonesia’s supervision policies for charitable organisations prevent terrorism financing? (2) How do Indonesia’s supervision practices compare with international standards in preventing terrorism financing? This study uses a normative juridical approach, focusing on legislative and comparative methods. Primary legal sources include relevant laws and regulations, while secondary sources consist of literature reviews and prior studies. The research analyzes the phenomenon of charitable organisations being misused for terrorism financing and examines the ideal legal framework to prevent such misuse. FATF recommendations on Non-Profit Organisations (NPOs) serve as a benchmark for this analysis. The comparative aspect of this study provides insight into how other countries manage charitable organisations to mitigate the risk of terrorism financing. Insights from countries like the United Kingdom and United States highlight the importance of targeted outreach, mandatory audits, and advanced risk-based policies. Ultimately, this research proposes to integrate these practices into Indonesia’s supervision policies to enhance effectiveness, being aligned with FATF standards, and preserve the integrity of the charitable sector.
REVERSAL BURDEN OF PROOF IN PROCESS OF PROVING MONEY LAUNDERING CASES IN INDONESIA Febriansyah, Artha; Zulfa, Eva Achjani; Yusuf, Muhammad; Banjarani, Desia
Indonesia Law Review Vol. 13, No. 1
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The implementation of reversal burden of proof in money laundering cases still faces obstacles that cause suboptimal and ineffective in legal enforcement. It raises a debate regarding the existence of reversal burden of proof in the proving system, particularly the proof of the crime of money laundering. Based on this background, the problems in this research are related to the regulation and implementation of reversal burden of proof in the process of proving money laundering cases and the steps that can be taken in optimizing the application of reversal burden of proof in the process of proving money laundering cases. The method used in this research is normative research which is supported by empirical data. The results of the study shows that the regulation regarding the reversal burden of proof in the criminal justice system in Indonesia can be found in several Indonesian legal provisions. Regarding the implementation of the reversal burden of proof, Indonesia has several obstacles. These obstacles can be seen after researchers conducted field research on Judges and Prosecutors in Court jurisdictions who had handled money laundering cases with a nominal loss of 900 billion in Provinces that had high and medium risk of money laundering (in the vulnerable 2017 - 2019). To optimize criminal law enforcement, including the application of reversal burden of proof in the money laundering criminal justice system, it can be described based on the following variables: Legal Enforcement Knowledge Capacity; Ability to Actualize Norms; and Adequate Law Enforcement Instruments
Managing Crowdfunding Risks in Terrorism Financing: A Mediated Analysis of Government Intervention and Donation Intentions Muslim, Fithriadi; Zulfa, Eva Achjani; Syauqillah, Muhamad
Indonesia Law Review Vol. 15, No. 2
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Crowdfunding has emerged as a popular platform for collective funding of social, charitable, and commercial projects. However, its increasing use has raised concerns over potential misuse, including as a source of terrorism financing. This study investigates the relationship between donation intentions using crowdfunding and the risk of crowdfunding being used as a source of terrorism financing. Furthermore, it explores the mediating role of government intervention in this relationship. Using a Structural Equation Modeling-Partial Least Squares (SEM-PLS) second-order approach, the research evaluates the interaction between donor intentions, crowdfunding risks, and government regulations. Findings reveal that while donor intentions significantly impact the risk of crowdfunding misuse for terrorism financing, the mediating role of government intervention is statistically insignificant. This suggests that regulatory measures alone may not sufficiently mitigate these risks. These findings highlight the critical need to reevaluate current strategies for preventing the misuse of crowdfunding for illicit purposes. By providing empirical evidence of the limited impact of government intervention, this study contributes valuable insights for policymakers aiming to strengthen oversight mechanisms and ensure safer crowdfunding practices in Indonesia.
PENERAPAN VICARIOUS LIABILITY DALAM TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI TERKAIT DENGAN DISKRESI PENYELENGGARAAN ADMINISITRASI PEMERINTAHAN Eva Achjani Zulfa; Audaraziq Ismail
Jurnal Teknologi dan Komunikasi Pemerintahan Vol 2 No 1 (2020): Jurnal Teknologi dan Komunikasi Pemerintahan
Publisher : Program Studi Teknologi Rekayasa Informasi Pemerintahan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33701/jtkp.v2i1.2300

Abstract

Discretion is used as a solution to deal with the problem of the principle of legality in terms of governance that is not regulated by law. On the other hand, discretion is relevant to corruption where the actions of state officials and corrupt government will hinder the achievement of state goals. Therefore, it is necessary to identify who is responsible for the misuse of discretion. In this article, we will discuss the implementation of vicarious liability in corruption related to the administration of regional government administration in order to effectively impose criminal sanctions on corruptors in the misuse of discretion in the context of administering government administration. Keywords: Criminal Liability, Corporations, Government Institutions
AKIBAT HUKUM IDENTITAS PALSU DALAM AKTA PERJANJIAN KREDIT YANG MELIBATKAN PIHAK KETIGA PEMBERI JAMINAN Pasaribu, Puspa; Zulfa, Eva Achjani
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 4 No. 2 (2021): NOVEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v4i2.4050

Abstract

 Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui akibat hukum identitas palsu debitur dalam akta notaris mengenai perjanjian kredit terhadap pihak ketiga pemberi jaminan serta upaya hukum yang dapat ditempuh untuk membatalkan akta notaris tersebut. Notaris seyogyanya teliti dan berhati-hati dalam membuat akta autentik, terlebih mengenai perjanjian kredit yang melibatkan pihak ketiga pemberi jaminan. Sebab, pihak ketiga pemberi jaminan memiliki kepentingan yang berbeda dengan debitur atau kreditur. Jika debitur secara beritikad buruk memberikan identitas palsu dalam suatu perjanjian, maka akibat hukum adanya identitas palsu tersebut perlu dianalisis dari perspektif Pasal 1320 KUHPerdata. Penelitian ini diharapkan dapat memberikan jalan keluar terkait perlindungan serta kepastian hukum bagi pihak ketiga pemberi jaminan. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan yuridis normatif dengan menggunakan data sekunder melalui studi dokumen dan penelusuran literatur. Penelitian ini memiliki kebaharuan perspektif karena menganalisis akibat hukum identitas palsu dalam akta notaris terhadap pihak selain debitur dan kreditur, yakni pihak ketiga pemberi jaminan. Hasil penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa akibat hukum yang timbul terhadap suatu akta dengan identitas palsu adalah dapat dibatalkan karena terdapat penipuan di dalamnya, sebagaimana diatur dalam Pasal 1321 KUHPerdata. Penipuan mengakibatkan perjanjian dalam akta tersebut tidak memenuhi syarat subjektif berupa kesepakatan yang bebas berdasarkan Pasal 1320 KUHPerdata. Namun, untuk membatalkan akta notaris tersebut, penipuan harus terbukti dan tidak dapat dipersangkakan. Oleh karena itu, sangat penting untuk memperoleh putusan pidana berkekuatan hukum tetap yang membuktikan adanya penipuan agar gugatan pembatalan akta memiliki dasar yang kuat. Sebaliknya, akta tersebut tidak dapat dibatalkan jika unsur penipuannya tidak terbukti sehingga masih menjadi akta autentik dan tetap mengikat.
Co-Authors Adriyanti, Nadya Fitriza Ahmad Sarinawi Almond, Mustaqim Andhita Indirayanti Anggara, Matius Evan Anisya Ramdlonaning Arianda Lastiur Paulina Arie Afriansyah artha Febriansyah Artha Febriansyah Audaraziq Ismail Audaraziq Ismail Banjarani, Desia Bayquni Bayquni, Bayquni Benito Harleandra Cahyono, Aditya Budi Efendi, Nindy Putri Nur Hamonangan Albariansyah Handayani, Riska Sri Hanita, Margaretha Hastu Nuring Yudanti Hegar Gagah Anantaka Hendy Febrianto Kurniawan Hidayatulloh Hidayatulloh Ilahi, M. Ridho Imam Khomaeni Hayatullah Indriyanto Seno Aji Ismail, Audaraziq Iza Fadri Jelang Ramadhan Kamarusdiana, Kamarusdiana Khusnus Sa'bani Lathifah, Amalia Lazira, Fatiatulo M. Nurul Irfan Mahendra Tri Octavianus Majdi, Muhammad Aditya Marlini Alianita Mawaridi, Gholib Yudha Muhamad Syauqillah Muhammad Syaroni Rofii Muhammad Yusuf Muslim, Fithriadi Nita, Surya Norcha Satria Adi Nugroho Nurkumalawati, Intan Nurul Insi Syahruddin Pasaribu, Puspa RA Gismadiningrat Ramadhan, Jelang Ridwan Arifin Runturambi, Arthur Josias Simon Satria Fajar Putra Dipayana Sulistiandriatmoko, Sulistiandriatmoko Surya Nita Topo Santoso Viny Dwivi Yulianti, Lulu Yutcesyam, Yutcesyam