Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
3.244
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Kreano, Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif Jurnal S2 Pendidikan Matematika Journal on Mathematics Education (JME) Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika Jurnal Teknologi Informasi dan Ilmu Komputer Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Al-Jabar : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika AL ISHLAH Jurnal Pendidikan Union: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Indonesian Journal of Science and Mathematics Education BAREKENG: Jurnal Ilmu Matematika dan Terapan International Journal of Computing Science and Applied Mathematics Jurnal Riset Pendidikan dan Inovasi Pembelajaran Matematika (JRPIPM) Jurnal Bumigora Information Technology (BITe) Nusantara Science and Technology Proceedings Journal of Applied Data Sciences Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Jurnal Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Prosiding Seminar Nasional Teknik Elektro, Sistem Informasi, dan Teknik Informatika (SNESTIK) Prosiding SNPBS (Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Biologi dan Saintek) Prosiding Konferensi Nasional Penelitian Matematika dan Pembelajarannya Muslim Education Review Proceeding of International Conference on Humanity Education and Society Jurnal SUTASOMA Proceeding International Conference on Mathematics and Learning Research
Isnandar Slamet, Isnandar
Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Computer Science & IT Control & Systems Engineering Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Energy Engineering Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Mechanical Engineering Medicine & Pharmacology Physics Public Health Social Sciences Transportation Other

Published : 55 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 55 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4   5 
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN PROBLEM POSING DAN PROBLEM SOLVING DENGAN PENDEKATAN PMR TERHADAP PRESTASI BELAJAR DAN KEMAMPUAN KOMUNIKASI MATEMATIS DITINJAU DARI KREATIVITAS SISWA KELAS VII SMP NEGERI DI KABUPATEN SUKOHARJO Hodiyanto, Hodiyanto; Budiyono, Budiyono; Slamet, Isnandar
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 2 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (536.123 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The objective of this research was to investigate the effect of learning models with realistic mathematic education (RME) approach on learning achievement and mathematical communication ability viewed from student creativity. The learning models compared were Problem Posing (PP), Problem Solving (PS) and direct learning models. This research used a quasi-experimental research. The population were the seventh grade students of junior high school in Sukoharjo. The samples of this research were taken by using the stratified cluster random sampling technique. The proposed hypothesis of this research was analyzed by using the two way multivariate analysis of variance with unbalanced cells. The results of the research are as follows: (1) model of PP learning and model of PS learning with RME approach result the same achievement, but model of PP learning with RME approach results in a better mathematical communication ability than model of PS learning with RME. Model of PP learning and model of PS learning with RME approach result in better achievement and mathematical communication ability than direct learning model. (2) the students with the high creativity have better achievement and mathematical communication ability than those with the moderate or low creativity, but the students with the moderate and low creativity have the same achievement and mathematical communication ability. (3) in each creativities of students, model of PP learning and model of PS learning with RME approach result in better achievement and mathematical communication ability than direct learning model. Model of PP learning and model of PP learning with RME approach result the same achievement, but model of PP learning with RME approach results in a better mathematical communication ability than model of PS learning with RME. (4) in each learning models, the students with high creativity have better achievement and mathematical communication ability than those with medium and low creativity, and the students with moderate and low creativity have the same achievement and mathematical communication ability.Keywords: PP Learning, PS Learning, RME Approach, Direct Learning, Mathematical Communication Ability, Achievement, and Creativity of students.
PROSES BERPIKIR SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI 25 SURAKARTA DALAM MEMECAHKAN MASALAH MATEMATIKA DITINJAU DARI TIPE KEPRIBADIAN EXTROVERT-INTROVERT PADA MATERI PERSAMAAN GARIS LURUS Permatasari, Nisa; Budiyono, Budiyono; Slamet, Isnandar
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 3 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan UNS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (263.146 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The objective of this research was to describethe 8th grade students’s thinking process of SMP Negeri 25 Surakarta. The subjects were students of 8th E who has an extrovert and introvert personality. The thinking process was the thought process of assimilation and accommodation in solving mathematical problems based on the type of Krulik and Rudnick on a straight-line equation. The technique of data collection that used was snowball-sampling which the subject stopped when data saturation. Obtained three extrovert students and three introvert students. The validation of data was carried out with time triangulation. The result of research showed that the thinking process of extrovert students in solving mathematical problems based on the type of Krulik and Rudnick step was as follows 1) In read and think step, the used of thinking process was assimilation; 2) In explore and plan step, the used of thinking process was imperfect assimilation; 3) In select a strategy step, the used of thinking process was imperfect assimilation; 4) In find an answer step, the used of thinking process was imperfect assimilation; 5) In reflect and extend step, the used of thinking process was accommodation. The thinking process of introvert students in solving mathematical problems based on the type of Krulik and Rudnick step was as follows: 1) In read and think step, the used of thinking process was assimilation; 2) In explore and plan step, the used of thinking process was assimilation; 3) In select a strategy step, the used of thinking process was imperfect assimilation; 4) In find an answer step, the used of thinking process was assimilation; 5) In reflect and extend step, the used of thinking process was a imperfect assimilation.Keywords: Assimilation and Accommodation, Extrovert and Introvert, Problem Solving. 
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN TIPE NUMBERED HEAD TOGETHER (NHT) DAN THINK-PAIR-SHARE (TPS) DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR SISWA PADA POKOK BAHASAN RELASI DAN FUNGSI KELAS VIIISMP NEGERI SE-KABUPATEN PACITAN TAHUN PELAJARAN 2015/2016 Heritin, Anisak; Budiyono, Budiyono; Slamet, Isnandar
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 6 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan UNS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (448.673 KB)

Abstract

Abstrak: The objective of the research was to know in each category learning style (visual, auditorial, and kinesthetic) which one providing better mathematics learning achievement, NHT, TPS, or direct learning model. This research was a quasi-experimental and designed in a 33 factorial design. The population of research was students in grade VIII of Junior High Schools of Pacitan Regency in this academic year of 2015/2016. The sample was taken by stratified cluster random sampling. Results of this research were concluded as follows: (1) in NHT and TPS model, visual, auditorial, and kinesthetic learning style have similar result of learning achievement, (2) in direct learning model, students of auditorial learning style have better than learning achievement kinesthetic learning style, visual learning style have learning achievement as good as auditorial learning style, students of visual learning style have learning achievement as good as kinesthetic learning style, (3) in visual learning style, NHT have learning achievement as good as TPS, NHT and TPS have better than learning achievement direct learning model, (4) in auditorial learning style, NHT have learning achievement as good as TPS, NHT and TPS have learning achievement as good as direct learning model, and (5) in kinesthetic learning style, NHT have learning achievement as good as TPS, TPS have better learning achievement than direct learning model, NHT have learning achievement as good as direct learning model.Keyword: NHT, TPS, Direct learning Model and Learning Style 
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF PEER TUTORING DAN TGT DENGAN TEKNIK TALKING CHIPS TERHADAP PRESTASI DAN MINAT BELAJAR MATEMATIKA DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR Susanti, Sarah Wahyu; Budiyono, Budiyono; Slamet, Isnandar
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 10 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan UNS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (300.166 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The aim of this research was to determine the effect of learning models toward the learning achievement in Mathematics and the learning interest viewed from the learning styles. The learning models compared were Cooperative Learning Model of Peer Tutoring and Teams Gamest Tournament with the talking Chips Technique. This research used the quasi experimental research method. Its population was all of the students in Grade XI of Senior High Schools of Surabaya City. The samples consisted of 223 students, and they were divided into two groups. First group consisted of 112 students who are for experimental class 1, and the other consiststed of 111 who are for experimental class 2. The instruments used were test of achievement in Mathematics learning, questionaire of learning interst and learning styles. The data was analyzed using multivariate analysis of variance. The results of the research show that: (1) the students exposed to the TGT-TC have a better learning achievement than peer tutoring; (2) the students exposed to peer tutoring have a better learning interest than TGT-TC; (3) the kinesthetic style have learning achievement as well as the auditory style, and the kinesthetic and auditory style have a better learning achievement than the visual style; (4) the kinesthetic style have learning interst as well as the visual style, and the kinesthetic and visual style have a better learning interest than  the auditorial style; (5) in each learning model, either in the cooperative learning model of the peer tutoring or in TGT-TC, the students with kinesthetic style have learning achievement as well as those with auditory style, and the students with kinesthetic and auditory style have a better learning achievement than those with visual style; (6) in each learning model, either in peer tutoring or TGT-TC, the students with kinesthetic style have learning interest as well as those with visual style, and the students with kinesthetic and visual style have a better learning interst than those with auditory style; (7) in each type of learning styles, either the kinesthetic, auditory, and visual, the students have a better learning achievement in Mathematics than peer tutoring; and (8) in each type of learning styles, either the kinesthetic, auditory, and visual, the students exposed to peer tutoring have a better learning achievement in Mathematics than TGT-TC.Key words: Peer Tutoring, TGT, Talking Chips, learning styles, learning achievement, and learning interst. 
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE TEAMS GAMES TOURNAMENT (TGT) DAN THINK PAIR SHARE (TPS) PADA MATERI ALJABAR DITINJAU DARI KECERDASAN LOGIS MATEMATIS SISWA KELAS VII SMP NEGERI SE-KOTA SURAKARTA TAHUN PELAJARAN 2015/2016 Ayuningrum, Retna; Budiyono, Budiyono; Slamet, Isnandar
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 5 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan UNS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (462.55 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The objectives of this research were to find out: (1) which one learning model that provide better mathematics learning achievement, TGT learning model, TPS learning model, or direct learning model, (2) which one category logical matematical intelligence of students that giving better mathematics learning achievement, high, medium, or low, (3) in each category logical matematical intelligence which one providing better mathematics learning achievement, TGT learning model TPS learning model, or direct learning  model. (4) in each learning models which one providing better mathematics learning achievement category self confidence high, medium, or low. The type of this study was a quasi-experimental study with a 3x3 factorial design. The population was all grade VII students of Junior High Schools in Surakarta Regency in the school year of 2015/2016. Population of this research was all VII graders of Junior High School of Surakarta. The samples of the research were taken by using the stratified cluster random sampling. The sample consisted of 291 students: 96 students for experiment I class, 97 for experiment II class and 98 for control class. The instruments used for the data collection were mathematics achievement test and logical mathematical intelligence The data analysis technique used was unbalanced two ways analysis of variance. Based on the hypotheses, the results of the study can be summarized as follows: (1) The use of TGT resulted better achievement than that of TPS and direct learning model, the use of TPS resulted better achievement than that of direct learning model. (2) The students’ achievement who have high logical mathematical intelligence was better than those who have middle or low logical mathematical intelligence, and students who have middle logical mathematical intelligence were better than those who have low logical mathematic intelligence.Keywords: TGT,TPS, Direct Learning, and Logical Mathematical Intelligence.
PENGEMBANGAN PAKET NEKAMEDIA MATEMATIKA KURIKULUM 2013 MENGGUNAKAN MODEL PROBLEM BASED LEARNING (PBL) PADA MATERI BANGUN RUANG SISI DATAR KELAS VIII SMP DI KOTA SURAKARTA Anggraini, Putri Nurika; Budiyono, Budiyono; Slamet, Isnandar
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 9 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan UNS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (225.325 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: This study was aimed to obtain 2013 Curriculum of mathematics mutlimedia kit using Problem Based Learning (PBL) model in plane geometry lesson of eighth grade junior high school in Surakarta which is considered as a valid, practical, and effective to be applied for learning. Furthermore, the goal was to discover whether the student’s achievement of plane geometry lesson using the developed mutlimedia kit is better than using the prior product. The study type was Research and Development (R & D) to generate and verify product effectiveness. Study procedure refers to modified Four-D model (Define, Design, Develope, Disseminate) which is appropriate to study requirements and limitations. In the effort to obtain a valid, practical, and effective mutlimedia kit to be applied for learning, we used questionnaire to obtain these following data: (1) comments and recommendations from experts about mutlimedia kit; (2) learning feasibility score by teachers and follow-up recommendations; (3) activity score of students and follow-up recommendations; and (4) appreciation and eagerness level of students toward mutlimedia kit. We used test as an attempt to figure out whether the student’s achievement of plane geometry lessons using the developed mutlimedia kit is better than using the prior product. Study results conclude that mutlimedia kit is valid, practical, and effective to be used in learning activity. Percentage of learning feasibility by teachers is 92%, percentage of students’ activities is 80%, and percentage of students who appreciate and want to use mutlimedia kit is 80%. After being tested, final student’s achievement of experimental class is better than final student’s achievement of control class.Key words: mathematics mutlimedia kit, 2013 Curriculum, Problem Based Learning (PBL) model, plane geometry.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE GROUP INVESTIGATION (GI), THINK PAIR SHARE (TPS), DAN PEMBELAJARAN LANGSUNG PADA MATERI ALJABAR DITINJAU DARI KECERDASAN MAJEMUK SISWA SMP NEGERI SE-KOTA SURAKARTA TAHUN PELAJARAN 2015/2016 Hermawati, Evi; Budiyono, Budiyono; Slamet, Isnandar
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 7 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan UNS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (498.096 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: This research aimed to find out: 1) which one providing better mathematics learning achievement: Group Investigation (GI)  model, Think Pair Share (TPS) model, or direct instructional model, 2) which one providing better mathematics learning achievement: linguistic intelligence students, mathematics-logic intelligence students, or interpersonal intelligence students, 3) in each type of multiple intelligences which one providing better mathematics learning achievement: GI model, TPS model, or direct instructional model, and 4) in each learning models which one providing better mathematics learning achievement: linguistic intelligence students, mathematics-logic intelligence students, or interpersonal intelligence students. This research used the quasi experimental research method. The design of the research was a 3 × 3 factorial. The population was the students of the seventh grade of Junior High School in Surakarta City on academic year 2015/2016. The technique of sampling was stratified cluster random sampling. The proposed hypothesis of the research were tested by the unbalanced two-way analysis of variance. The conclusions of this research were as follows. 1) GI model provided better mathematics learning achievement than TPS model, or direct instructional model; TPS model provided mathematics learning achievement as good as direct instructional model. 2) The mathematics-logic intelligence students had better mathematics learning achievement than linguistic intelligence students, or interpersonal intelligence students; the mathematics learning achievement of linguistic intelligence students as good as interpersonal intelligence students. 3) In each type of multiple intelligences, GI model provided better mathematics learning achievement than TPS model, or direct instructional model; TPS model provided mathematics learning achievement as good as direct instructional learning. 4) In each learning models, the mathematics-logic intelligence students had better mathematics learning achievement than linguistic intelligence students, or interpersonal intelligence students; the mathematics learning achievement of linguistic intelligence students as goog as interpersonal intelligence students.Keywords: Group Investigation, Think Pair Share, direct instructional learning, multiple intelligence, mathematics learning achievement 
MENDAPAT PEMBELAJARAN BERBASIS MASALAH DENGAN SISWA YANG MENDAPAT PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE THINK PAIR SHARE DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR SISWA SMP NEGERI SE-KOTA METRO, LAMPUNG TAHUN PELAJARAN 2014/2015 Pratama, Yulian Surya; Budiyono, Budiyono; Slamet, Isnandar
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 8 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Pendidikan Matematika Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan UNS

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (305.734 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The purpose of this research was to know the effect of the learning models on the problem solving ability and mathematics communication ability viewed from the learning style. The learning models compared were Problem Based Learning, Think Pair Share learning and Classical. The type of this study was a quasi-experimental study with a 3 x 3 factorial design. The study population was all grade VIII students of Junior High School in Metro city. Sample was collected by stratified cluster random sampling and consisted of 245 students which where divided into three groups,  83 students in Experimental Group 1, 81 students in Experimental Group 2, and 81 students in Control Group . The instruments of the research include problem solving ability test, mathematics communication ability test and learning style test. The technique of analyzing data used the two-way multivariate analysis of variance with unbalanced cell. The results of this research could be concluded as follows. (1) Problem Based Learning and Think Pair Share have better problem solving and mathematics communication ability aspects than the Classical learning, Besides that, Think Pair Share and Classical Learning  have the same problem solving and mathematics communication ability; (2) The students who have visual learning style have better problem solving and mathematics communication ability than students who have kinesthetic learning style. In addition, students with auditory learning style have the same problem solving and mathematics communication ability as kinesthetic learning style (3) In each of the learning style, the learning model of Problem Based Learning give a better problem solving and mathematics communication ability than the Classical model, and the cooperative learning model of Think Pair Share and Classical Learning give the same problem solving and mathematics communication ability; (4) In each learning model, the students with visual and auditory learning style have better problem solving and mathematics communication ability than students who have kinesthetic learning style, and the students with visual and auditory learning style have the same problem solving and mathematics communication ability.Keywords: Problem Based Learning, Think Pair Share, Learning Style, Problem Solving Ability, Mathematics Communication Ability.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE TEAM ASSISTED INDIVIDUALIZATION (TAI), GROUP INVESTIGATION (GI), DAN PEMBELAJARAN LANGSUNG PADA MATERI PERSAMAAN GARIS LURUS DITINJAU DARI KEMANDIRIAN BELAJAR SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI SE-KOTA SURAKARTA Meilasari, Venty; Budiyono, Budiyono; Slamet, Isnandar
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 6, No 1 (2016): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education
Publisher : Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (298.3 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: This research aimed to find out: (1) which one providing better mathematics learning achievement, TAI model, GI model or direct instruction model, (2) which one providing better mathematics learning achievement, the high, medium or low independence of learning students, (3) in each learning models, which one providing better mathematics learning achievement, the high, medium, or low independence of learning students, (4) in each categories of independence of learning, which one providing better mathematics learning achievement, TAI model, GI model or direct instruction learning model. This research used the quasi-experimental research method. The research design was a 3×3 factorial design. The population were all students of the eight class of junior high school in Surakarta on academic year 2015/2016. The sample was taken using stratified cluster random sampling and consisted of 281 students. The instruments used were independence of learning questionnaire and mathematics achievement test. The proposed hypothesis of the research were analyzed by using two-way analysis of variance with unbalanced cells. The conclusions of this research were as follow. (1) TAI model provided the mathematics achievement as good as GI model, TAI model and GI model provided better mathematics achievement than direct instruction model. (2) The high independence of learning student had better mathematics achievement than medium and low independence of learning students, and the medium had better than low independence of learning students. (3) In TAI model and direct instruction model, the high, medium, and low independence of learning had the same mathematics achievement, in GI learning model, the high independence of learning students had mathematics achievement as good as the medium independence of learning students, the high independence of learning had better than the low independence of learning, and the medium independence of learning students had the same as the low independence of learning students. (4) In high and low independence of learning, TAI model, GI model, and direct instruction model provided the same achievement, in medium independence of learning, TAI model and GI model provided the same achievement, TAI model provided better achievement than direct instruction model, GI model was the same as direct instruction model.Keyword: TAI, GI, Direct Instruction, Independence of Learning, and Mathematics Achievement
PENGEMBANGAN MODUL PEMBELAJARAN DENGAN PENDEKATAN DISCOVERY LEARNING PADA MATERI LIMIT FUNGSI ALJABAR KELAS X DI SMA INSAN CENDEKIA SUKOHARJO TAHUN AJARAN 2015/2016 Wulandari, Setyati Puji; Budiyono, Budiyono; Slamet, Isnandar
Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Vol 7, No 1 (2017): Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education
Publisher : Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (276.933 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The aims of this research were to: 1) determine the validity of the results of the development of learning modules with discovery learning approach on the material of limit algebra functions; 2) determine the practicality of the development of learning modules; 3) determine the effectiveness of the development of learning modules; 4) determine whether students achievement in the material of limit algebra functions using learning modules is better than the students who don’t use it. The development of the modules was done through the modified Four D, namely define, design, development, and disseminate. Data were analyzed using descriptive analysis. Validity analysis was based on an expert assessment. Practicality analysis was based on implementation of learning module. Effectiveness analysis was based on student response after using the module. Analysis of student achievement was based on t-test hypothesis. The result concluded that: 1) learning modules with discovery learning approach to the material limit algebra functions declared fit for use by experts with the validity score of 3.44 and be in very good criteria; 2) learning modules expressed practical use in learning with the practicality score gained from the sheet of implementation of learning is 0.919 and be in very good criteria; 3) learning modules is effective for use in learning with the scores of effectiveness obtained from the sheet of students response to the module is 3.03 and be in good criteria; 4) learning achievement of students who use the learning module is better than students who don’t use it, but isn’t significant.Keywords: learning module, discovery learning, limit algebra functions.
Co-Authors Adi Wicaksono, Nanda Anggraini, Putri Nurika Aprilia, Nabila Churin Aulia Ar Rakhman Awaludin Ayuningrum, Retna Azhar, Zenitha Amalia B Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono, Budiyono Ek Ajeng Rahmi Pinahayu Fachry Abda El Rahman Fhadilla, Nahdatul Fitriana, Laila Fitriana, Laila Nur Getut Pramesti Hadi Prayitno, Hadi Handajani, Sri Sulistijowati Heldy Ramadhan Putra P Hendriyanto, Agus Heritin, Anisak Hermawati, Evi Hodiyanto, Hodiyanto Husna Afanyn Khoirunissa Ikrar Pramudya, Ikrar Imam Sujadi Imam Suryadi, Imam Indra Raditya , Dionisius Indra Setyawan Irwan Susanto Isnaini, Bayutama Janah, Rahmawati Fatkhul Kadar, Jimmy Abdel Kayyisa, Alfien Diva Lintang Fitra Utami Mardiyana Mardiyana Meilasari, Venty Muhammad Riza Naufalia Nuraya, Naufalia Neyun, Ignasia N.G. Ningrum, Sri Adiningsih Utami Nugraha, Titis Jati Nugroho, Muhamad Asif Cahya Aji Nur Hasanah Nurfauziyyah, Nuha Pardede, Hilman Ferdinandus Permatasari, Nisa Permatasari, Nisa Pitra Dwiningsih, Pitra Pratama, Yulian Surya PUJI LESTARI Raditya, Dionisius Indra Ratri, Aninda Puspa Respatiwulan, Respatiwulan Sari, Putri Permata Shanti Indah Lestari, Shanti Indah Sri Subanti Suci Irawati Sugianto Sugianto Sugiyanto - Sugiyanto, Sugiyanto Sulandari, Winita Susanti, Sarah Wahyu Susilotomoa, Dhestahendra Citra Tajuddin, Annas Tasyah Tririnika, Yuliana Valentino, Yohanes Felix Vera Rosalina Bulu Wahyu Kurniawan Winita Sulandari Wulandari, Setyati Puji Yudi Pramono Pawiro, Yudi Pramono Yuliana Susanti, Yuliana Zukhronah, Etik