Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 33 Documents
Search

DEMOKRASI JALAN MENUJU KESEJAHTERAAN : STUDI PADA NEGARA KOREA SELATAN DAN NEGARA INDIA Fadiyah, Dina; Mandela, Muhamad Fathan
Madani Jurnal Politik dan Sosial Kemasyarakatan Vol 17 No 03 (2025): Desember 2025
Publisher : Universitas Islam Darul Ulum Lamongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This research aims to explore the role of democracy as a primary instrument in achieving prosperity and the formation of a welfare state, by comparing the experiences of two Asian nations: South Korea and India. Utilizing a qualitative-descriptive approach and library research methodology, this article analyzes how democratic mechanisms influence the distribution of social security and the effectiveness of public policy. The findings indicate that South Korea's democratic transition following the 1980s transformed a previously limited social security system into an inclusive and collaborative model, with national insurance coverage reaching 98.6% of the population by 2018. Conversely, although India stands as the world's largest democracy, it faces significant hurdles in implementing welfare programs—such as the MGNREGA—due to prevailing practices of populism and clientelism that obstruct citizen accessibility. The comparison of these two countries underscores a positive correlation between a high democracy index and the successful development of a welfare state. In conclusion, a healthy and collaborative democracy is not merely a political procedure but a fundamental prerequisite for fostering equitable economic prosperity for all citizens.
Ketahanan Kelembagaan Unit Kerja Presiden di Indonesia: Temuan Awal Nugroho, Sapto Setyo; Fadiyah, Dina; Andini, Laras Ayu
Journal of Political Issues Vol 7 No 2 (2026): Journal of Political Issues
Publisher : Jurusan Ilmu Politik Universitas Bangka Belitung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33019/jpi.v7i2.367

Abstract

This study examines the dynamics and institutional durability of various delivery units in Indonesia, including the Presidential Work Unit and the Presidential Staff Office, within a comparative cross-administrative framework and the conceptual lens of deliverology, as practiced by the Prime Minister’s Delivery Unit in the United Kingdom. In contrast to short-term approaches driven by leadership style and performance orientation, this study emphasizes the importance of systematizing and sustaining coordination, synchronization, and control functions. The findings reveal that establishing delivery units in Indonesia tends to be temporary and pragmatic, lacking robust legal foundations and strong institutional integration. Political factors, leadership personalization, and overlapping authorities emerge as key impediments. Employing a collective or multiple-case study design with a comparative analytical approach, this research concludes that while several principles of deliverology, such as using targets and performance monitoring, have been adopted, delivery units have yet to be institutionalized as long-term governance instruments. Therefore, the study recommends establishing a stronger legal framework, developing adaptable institutional designs, and promoting professional leadership to ensure the continuity of these units in supporting the implementation of national priority policies.
Evaluasi Kebijakan Publik dalam Mitigasi Krisis Sosial Banjir Tahunan: Studi Kasus Kabupaten Kutai Barat Tahun 2024 Dina Fadiyah; Agustinus
Journal of Politics and Democracy Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026): Journal of Politics and Democracy (Maret)
Publisher : Indonesian Democracy Research Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61183/polikrasi.v5i2.183

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of public policy in mitigating the social crisis caused by annual flooding in West Kutai Regency in 2024. The study employs a qualitative approach using a case study design. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, observation, and document analysis involving local government officials, community leaders, and affected residents. The data were analyzed using a descriptive-interpretative approach to examine the gap between policy design and its implementation. The findings indicate that policy effectiveness remains suboptimal. Although the initial emergency response was relatively rapid, the policy failed to fulfill key dimensions of effectiveness, responsiveness, and adequacy. The main issues include weak inter-agency coordination, inappropriate physical programs that neglect local knowledge, low transparency in aid distribution, and limited attention to the social and psychological dimensions of affected communities. Furthermore, community participation in policy planning remains largely symbolic, resulting in policies that are less contextual and less responsive to local needs. This study highlights that disaster mitigation challenges are not merely technical issues but also reflect weaknesses in governance, particularly in integrating institutional, social, and participatory dimensions. Therefore, improving policy effectiveness requires a more integrated, participatory, and long-term recovery-oriented approach to reduce social vulnerability in disaster-prone areas.