Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 25 Documents
Search

The scope of state finances and their implications for combating corruption in Indonesia Ahwan, Ahwan; Ristansti, Yuni
Priviet Social Sciences Journal Vol. 5 No. 12 (2025): December 2025
Publisher : Privietlab

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55942/pssj.v5i12.1191

Abstract

The law enforcement of corruption crimes within the scope of state-owned enterprises (SOEs) continues to spark debate. The epicenter of the debate has been the use of the Business Judgment Rule (BJR) doctrine by law enforcement officials, which is considered disproportionate. A fundamental issue that has been overlooked is the scope of state finances. Excessively broad state financial regulations create grey areas and tend to contribute to chaos in law enforcement. The cases of Richard Joost Lino in 2009 and Ira Puspadewi in 2025 seem to prove that the real problem is not solely related to the use of the Business Judgment Rule doctrine, but more fundamentally to the scope of state finances. The enactment of Law Number 1 of 2025 concerning the Third Amendment to the Law on State-Owned Enterprises, which separates state finances from state-owned enterprise finances, reopens this discourse. Using normative legal research, with a legislative, conceptual, and case approach, this article seeks to respond to several criticisms that have arisen, particularly the assumption that the Law on State-Owned Enterprises will become an instrument that exacerbates corruption within the scope of state-owned enterprises. The analysis shows that several provisions in the State-Owned Enterprises Law clarify the boundaries between state finances and state-owned enterprise finances. This legal instrument is not an obstacle; rather, it provides clear guidelines for law enforcement officials to combat corruption within state-owned enterprises.
Penegakan Hukum terhadap Tindak Pidana Narkotika Berdasarkan UU No. 35 Tahun 2009 dan Pedoman Jaksa Agung No. 11 Tahun 2021 [Law Enforcement Against Narcotics Crimes Based on Law No. 35 of 2009 and the Attorney General's Guidelines No. 11 of 2021] Dudy, Aryadi Almau; Ashady, Suheflihusnaini; Ahwan, Ahwan
Indonesia Berdaya Vol 7, No 1 (2026)
Publisher : UKInstitute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47679/ib.20261388

Abstract

Law enforcement against narcotic crimes in Indonesia requires a proportional and layered approach. Based on Law No. 35 of 2009 and the Attorney General’s Guideline No. 11 of 2021, the enforcement system is built on a differentiation of offenders, whereby users, addicts, and victims of drug abuse are directed toward rehabilitative mechanisms, while dealers, manufacturers, couriers, and network actors are subjected to a repressive approach. The Integrated Assessment serves as a key instrument to determine the legal and medical status of the offender, preventing excessive criminalization and ensuring an appropriate legal response. This study demonstrates that the effectiveness of law enforcement depends heavily on consistent implementation of assessments, the professionalism of law enforcement officers, and cross-agency coordination. In conclusion, Indonesia’s narcotics law enforcement model integrates human rights protection, substantive justice, and firm action against drug trafficking, while positioning the assessment as the primary filter in determining the case handling pathway. Abstrak. Penegakan hukum terhadap tindak pidana narkotika di Indonesia menuntut pendekatan yang proporsional dan berlapis. Berdasarkan UU No. 35 Tahun 2009 dan Pedoman Jaksa Agung No. 11 Tahun 2021, sistem penegakan hukum dibangun dengan diferensiasi pelaku, di mana penyalahguna, pecandu, dan korban penyalahgunaan diarahkan pada mekanisme rehabilitatif, sedangkan pengedar, pembuat, kurir, dan pelaku jaringan ditindak melalui pendekatan represif. Asesmen Terpadu menjadi instrumen kunci untuk menentukan status pelaku secara medis dan yuridis, sehingga mencegah kriminalisasi berlebihan dan memastikan respons hukum yang tepat. Penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa efektivitas penegakan hukum sangat bergantung pada konsistensi penerapan asesmen, profesionalitas aparat, serta koordinasi lintas-instansi. Kesimpulannya, model penegakan hukum narkotika Indonesia telah mengintegrasikan perlindungan HAM, keadilan substantif, dan penindakan terhadap ancaman peredaran gelap, sekaligus menempatkan asesmen sebagai penyaring utama dalam menentukan jalur penanganan perkara.
Penguatan Kesadaran Hukum Komunitas melalui Sosialisasi Pencegahan Peredaran Narkotika di Desa Penujak, Lombok Tengah, Indonesia Ahwan, Ahwan; Lalu Panca Tresna D; Muhammad Rifaldi Setiawan; Ayang Afira Anugerahayu; Yuni Ristanti
Empowerment : Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Vol. 8 No. 03 (2025): Empowerment
Publisher : Program Studi Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Kuningan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25134/empowerment.v8i03.5670

Abstract

The illegal distribution of narcotics has spread to rural areas. This poses a serious threat not only to the development of the younger generation in villages, but also to the conduciveness and homeostasis of values upheld by rural communities. Responding to growing concerns about this issue, academic intervention in the form of socialization and legal counseling related to the circulation and dangers of narcotics has become an urgent need. This became the basis for the implementation of community service activities with the topic "Strengthening Community Legal Resilience through Socialization of Narcotics Circulation Prevention". This activity took place in Penujak Village, Central Lombok Regency. In line with the topic, this activity aimed to construct community legal resilience as an intervention compatible with the character of the village community. The activity began with an initial mapping of the village community's understanding through Focus Group Discussions (FGD) and interviews. The results of this mapping were then used as material for the preparation of the socialization material. The activity was very well received by the Penujak Village community, most importantly because it provided the community with additional understanding regarding the illegal distribution of narcotics. The results of the mapping were then used as material for the preparation of outreach materials. This activity was very well received by the community of Penujak Village, most importantly because it increased the community's understanding of the illegal distribution of narcotics. The final evaluation results showed that the community finally understood various things, such as the reporting mechanism and important substances covered by various regulations related to narcotics in Indonesia.
In Silico Evaluation of Cinnamaldehyde and Its Analogues as Potential Alpha-Glucosidase Inhibitors for Antidiabetic Therapy Ahwan, Ahwan; Muhtadi, Muhtadi; Munawaroh, Rima
MEDFARM: Jurnal Farmasi dan Kesehatan Vol 14 No 2 (2025): Medfarm: Jurnal Farmasi dan Kesehatan
Publisher : LPPM Akafarma Sunan Giri Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.48191/medfarm.v14i2.622

Abstract

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a chronic disease that can impact the health and well-being of patients in the long term. According to the International Diabetes Federation (2025), DM sufferers in Indonesia numbered 20.4 million in 2024. This figure is expected to increase to 28.6 million in 2050, DM treatment by inhibiting the alpha-glucosidase receptor. Cinnamaldehyde compounds have antidiabetic activity. This in silico study aims to determine the potential of cinnamaldehyde compounds and their analogs against alpha-glucosidase receptors as antidiabetics. Data on cinnamaldehyde compounds and their analogs were collected through the PubChem database and the alpha-glucosidase structure from the PDB database with the code 3TOP. This study evaluated cinnamaldehyde and its six analogs using molecular docking simulations on alpha-glucosidase receptors with tools such as PyRx 0.8, AutoDockTools-1.5.6, and Biovia Discovery Studio 2024, as well as pharmacokinetic and toxicity predictions using the pkCSM web tools and Lipinski's Rule of Five. The Lipinski's Rule of Five prediction results indicate that acarbose does not meet Lipinski's criteria. In contrast, cinnamaldehyde and its derivatives meet these criteria. Docking analysis shows that acarbose (7.1 kcal/mol) has the highest binding affinity for α-glucosidase, but cinnamaldehyde and its analogs (6.0–6.4 kcal/mol) still exhibit strong interactions at the enzyme's active residues. The ADMET profile supports the potential of cinnamaldehyde as an antidiabetic candidate with a broader systemic action range and a better pharmacokinetic profile than acarbose.
Pola Pikir Regulasi Teknologi dalam Hukum Pidana Indonesia Ahwan, Ahwan
Jurnal Negara Hukum: Membangun Hukum Untuk Keadilan Vol 16, No 2 (2025): JNH VOL 16 NO 2 NOVEMBER 2025
Publisher : Pusat Analisis Keparlemenan Badan Keahlian Setjen DPR RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22212/jnh.v16i2.5109

Abstract

AbstrakPerkembangan teknologi memberi implikasi yang asimetris pada berbagai bidang kehidupan manusia. Hukum menjadi area yang tidak terkecualikan mendapat pengaruh dari invasi masif teknologi. Salah satu bagian hukum, yaitu hukum pidana, menjadi lanskap invasi teknologi. Berbagai inovasi teknologi merambah hampir di semua sisi vital hukum pidana. Selain gegap gempita menyambut berbagai peralatan inovatif yang menawarkan efektifitas dan efisiensi, regulasi yang adaptif juga menjadi sisi lain yang mendapat perhatian serius. Menjadi hal yang penting untuk mengetahui sikap legislatif terhadap kemunculan teknologi baru melalui produk hukum yang dihasilkannya. Salah satu cara yang dilakukan adalah dengan melakukan penelusuran terkait dengan pola pikir regulasi teknologi yang ada di Indonesia. Dengan menggunakan pendekatan doktrinal, artikel ini menganalisis pertanyaan penting terkait pola pikir seperti apa yang mengkarakterisasi regulasi teknologi dalam hukum pidana Indonesia?  Objek kajian dilakukan terhadap Undang-Undang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik, Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Baru (KUHP Baru) serta Undang-Undang terkait lainya yang mengatur tentang teknologi. Artikel ini berpendapat bahwa regulasi teknologi dalam hukum pidana Indonesia didasarkan pada pola pikir Koherentisme yang mengarah pada Instrumentalis Regulasi. Keduanya secara utuh mampu merepresentasikan kondisi faktual regulasi teknologi dalam hukum pidana Indonesia sekarang ini.