Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
6.917
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Yustisia Jurnal Pranata Hukum FIAT JUSTISIA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Jurnal Dinamika Hukum Jurnal Media Hukum Sriwijaya Law Review YUSTISI Sociological Jurisprudence Journal Jurnal Justitia : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Humaniora Cepalo Yustisi: Jurnal Hukum dan Hukum Islam JURNAL RECTUM: Tinjauan Yuridis Penanganan Tindak Pidana PAMPAS: Journal of Criminal Law Jurnal Kewarganegaraan Multidiciplinary Output Research for Actual and International Issue (Morfai Journal) Yustisia Tirtayasa: Jurnal Tugas Akhir MAQASIDI IBLAM Law Review Jurnal Gagasan Hukum Audi Et AP : Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Aurelia: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Indonesia LEX SUPERIOR Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research TOFEDU: The Future of Education Journal Jurnal Pro Justitia (JPJ) JURNAL RETENTUM Kajian Ilmiah Hukum dan Kenegaraan Journal of Accounting Law Communication and Technology SAKOLA: Journal of Sains Cooperative Learning and Law Justice Legislation and Crime Journal Unizar Law Review Journal of Law and Nation
I Ketut Seregig
Universitas Bandar Lampung
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Astronomy Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Energy Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 59 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 59 Documents
Search

 2   3   4   5   6 
Impact of Corona Virus on Criminal Action and Prevention Measures in Indonesia I Ketut Seregig; Bambang Hartono; Budi Waskito
Sociological Jurisprudence Journal Vol. 3 No. 2 (2020)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Warmadewa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22225/scj.3.2.1823.117-125

Abstract

This article is data obtained from interviews with traders in traditional and modern markets about the impact of criminal acts due to the corona virus outbreak in Indonesia. The data is supported by secondary data collected from official sources, among others published by the ministry of trade and other social media. The purpose of writing this article is to provide input on a corona virus epidemic prevention plan and mitigate the impact of criminal acts due to hoax news related to corona virus outbreaks. The impact of the corona virus outbreak in the community is the accumulation of protective masks that cause the price of masks to rise in the market, the spread of hoaxes by people who are not responsible, among others; hoax news with the contents "corona virus cannot stand the heat", and "red ginger, kaempferiagalanga, curcuma, pepper are considered as drugs that can fight the corona virus" which results in an increase in the price of rhizomes and spices and is becoming rare in the traditional market. The stakeholders under the coordination of the Coordinating Ministers undertook strategic actions including the National Police and the Ministry of Health and the Regional Head who carried out market operations for the distribution of masks, ginger and spices distribution in traditional markets. As a result, the team formed by the National Police, assisted by the Ministry of Health, succeeded in capturing mask hoarders in the Jakarta area. The hoarders are prosecuted by carrying out law enforcement and bringing the perpetrators to justice.
Strategies in Countering Hoax and Hate Speech in Indonesia Bambang Hartono; I Ketut Seregig; Budi Wibowo
Sociological Jurisprudence Journal Vol. 4 No. 2 (2021)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Warmadewa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22225/scj.4.2.2021.134-144

Abstract

Hoax and Hate Speech are cyber-crimes that are closely related to ideological, political and religious issues. In Indonesia, just before the 2019 Presidential Election, this crime is very common, mainly used to attack political opponents. In this study, we provide several samples of Hoax and Hate Speech crimes, namely those with ideological, political and religious nuances. We consider these three crime samples to be sufficient to illustrate that Hoax and Hate Speech greatly influence the stability of domestic security. Based on the results of research conducted at the Directorate of Cyber Crime Enforcement of the Indonesian Police Criminal Investigation Agency, we can conclude that the strategic steps that must be taken to tackle Hoax and Hate Speech are Preventive Efforts in the form of Cyber Patrol, Hoax labeling, analyzing media opinion trends, dissemination positive news through text media, clarification and public information, security carried out by cover names, cover jobs, and cover stories, and countermeasures. Then, to provide a deterrent effect to the community, repressive efforts through law enforcement activities must be carried out including investigations by means of the Cyber Patrol to find cyber-crime, providing technical assistance and tactical investigations, investigating units in the region in order to uncover networks of cyber perpetrators, providing assistance in examining digital evidence, and cooperating by exchanging information for the purpose of researching and investigating cyber-crime. With the coping methods described above, especially inter-regional police cooperation that is centrally controlled by maximizing technology, the Indonesian police are able to uncover and dismantle networks of cyber-crime perpetrators that occur in Indonesia such as hoaxes, hate speeches and terrorism.
Potential of Corruption in Contract Procurement of Goods and Government Services by The State Agency I Ketut Seregig; Ni Putu Widhia Rahayu; Anita Noviyanti
Sociological Jurisprudence Journal Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Warmadewa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22225/scj.8.2.2025.128-140

Abstract

The procurement of goods and services (hereinafter abbreviated as PBJ) by the government in Indonesia often causes problems related to law. In fact, it is not uncommon to cause company leaders to become entangled in criminal acts of corruption and other criminal acts as a result of a conspiracy carried out between businessmen and authorized officials. In this article we take a sample of one of the state-owned companies in Indonesia, namely PT.Adi Karya (Persero) Tbk, with the intention to find out the PBJ work contract management system that has so far been carried out by PT.Adi Karya (Persero) Tbk, whether it is in accordance with applicable legal provisions in Indonesia or not. The method used in extracting data in the company is the interview method. The appointment of the informant was carried out using the purposive sampling method and the qualitative writing method. After conducting a research in the company, it was found that the implementation of the contract/agreement in PBJ with other parties (government or private) in PT.Adhi Karya (Persero) Tbk is not implemented based on the Decree of the Directors of SKD Number 014-6 /2018/208 dated March 14, 2019, concerning the "power" delegated by the Directors to the General Manager in PBJP, but the "authority" granted by the Directors has been delegated again by the General Manager to the Project Manager / Project Director with a Letter of Assignment. Based on the provisions of the Company Law No. 40 of 2007, those who should act on behalf of PT.Adhi Karya (Persero) Tbk to sign all contracts / agreements with other parties are the General Manager (as the Receiver of Power of Directors) as stated in the Notarial Deed. The General Manager (Power of Attorney) does not have a "legal standing" in reassigning the power he has received to other employees including the Project Manager / Project Director (Article 103 of Company Act Number 40 of 2007).
Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Tanpa Hak Menyimpan Dan Mempergunakan Senjata Api Rakitan Secara Ilegal (Studi Putusan Nomor: 420/Pid.Sus/ 2022/PN. Tjk) Andre Arvendo; I Ketut Seregig; Ansori
Jurnal Kewarganegaraan Vol 4 No 2 (2020): Desember 2020
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS PGRI YOGYAKARTA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31316/jk.v6i4.4375

Abstract

Abstrak Kejahatan selalu tumbuh serta berkembang pada masyarakat, meskipun kita mengetahui banyak pendapat perihal faktor penyebab kejahatan pada masyarakat, satu hal pasti bahwa kejahatan merupakan sikap manusia berkembang seiring menggunakan perkembangan sosial serta teknologi. Perkembangan zaman berjalan sangat cepat, tak hanya pada dunia teknik industri serta perdagangan, namun pula pada dunia hukum. Secara statistik, total tindak pidana Indonesia dari tahun ke tahun terus semakin tinggi, salah satunya ialah tindak pidana melibatkan senjata api. Kontroversi seputar kepemilikan senjata api ilegal sebagai perbincangan hangat. Kepemilikan senjata api ilegal tak hanya dilihat menjadi pelanggaran aturan, namun juga menjadi sarana kejahatan berbahaya oleh para penjahat. Berbagai masalah penyalahgunaan senjata api, termasuk perkelahian, pertengkaran serta perampokan, semuanya tak lepas dari sirkulasi senjata api ilegal pada warga, baik Undang-Undang juga perihal pelanggaran hukum tanpa hak memakai senjata api rakitan secara melawan aturan. Menyimpan serta memakai, pada putusan nomor: 420/Pid.Sus/2022/PN.Tjk, serta pertimbangan hakim pada pelanggaran hukum tanpa hak menyimpan serta memakai senjata api rakitan secara melawan hukum, pada putusan nomor: 420/Pid .Sus/2022/PN.Tjk. Penulisan memakai metode penelitian hukum normatif serta penelitian deskriptif kualitatif. Penerapan hukum pidana terhadap pelaku tindak pidana tanpa hak menyimpan serta memakai senjata api rakitan secara melawan hukum sesuai dengan UU Senjata Api Darurat serta Senjata Tajam No. 12 tahun 1951. Dari keterangan saksi serta terdakwa terdapat bukti adanya alasan meringankan serta alasan memberatkan. Kata Kunci: Senjata Api, Penerapan, Pertimbangan
MOTIVES OF CRIMINAL ACTS OF CORRUPTION IN INDONESIA Seregig, I Ketut
Yustisia Vol 7, No 2: August 2018
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/yustisia.v7i2.21834

Abstract

The data presented in this study are legal facts that come from informants who are directly involved in the investigation of corruption crime at Lampung Provincial Health Office, conducted by the High Prosecutor Attorney Lampung as well as the Prosecutor and the decision of the Panel of Judges who tried the case of corruption of Ambulance procurement project, Mobile Hospital support unit, 4 WD Ambulance sourced from APBD Lampung Province in 2013 worth of IDR 7,600,000,000.00 (seven billion six hundred million rupiah). The result of research is that corruption crime in Indonesia is done by more than one perpetrator, which is divided in two variables that support each other that is between leader and subordinate. This variable is consistent with the conclusion of Lambsdorff's research which states "there is a strong relationship between the head and subordinate in a corruption act called 'corrupt head' and 'corrupt subordinate'. Lambsdorff research results are used as a knife analysis in exploring the factors that strongly influence the occurrence of corruption in Indonesia (International Journal Elsevier, 2016). When examined from the sociological aspect, about the criminal acts of corruption that occur in Indonesia, it turns out that the perpetrators of corruption in performing acts are not alone, but more than one person, divided into 2 (two) groups, namely the superior group as the holder of power / authority and subordinate group as the executor of the activity. In this study it is found that the factors that encourage perpetrators to commit criminal acts of corruption is the existence of sociological factors, among others; factor of proximity / trust between superiors and subordinates, feelings of indebtedness of subordinates, because they have been promoted to good positions. 
Kewenangan Jaksa Dalam Melakukan Penyadaoan Terhadap Setiap Orang Yang Berpotensi Melakukan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Di Bandar Lampung I Ketut Seregig; Nur Amalia Zahra; Zainab Ompu Jainah
Kajian Ilmiah Hukum dan Kenegaraan Vol 4 No 2 (2025): Desember
Publisher : Penerbit Goodwood

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35912/kihan.v4i2.6209

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to analyze the legal basis and limitations of the prosecutor’s authority to conduct wiretapping against parties potentially involved in corruption offenses, and to examine its implementation in the practice of corruption law enforcement.Research Methodology: This study employs a juridical-empirical approach. The research was conducted at the Bandar Lampung District Prosecutor’s Office. Data were collected through in-depth interviews with prosecutors and related law enforcement officers, supported by a review of laws and regulations, legal documents, and scholarly literature on prosecutorial authority, wiretapping, and corruption offenses.Results: The findings indicate that prosecutors in Indonesia do not have general or independent authority to conduct wiretapping. The Prosecutor’s Law does not explicitly regulate wiretapping authority for prosecutors. In practice, prosecutors do not carry out wiretapping directly, but only make use of wiretapping results lawfully obtained by authorized institutions, such as the Corruption Eradication Commission, in accordance with applicable legal procedures.Conclusions: This study is limited to law enforcement practice at the Bandar Lampung District Prosecutor’s Office and relies on interview data from a limited number of informants, so its findings do not fully represent the practice of wiretapping by prosecutors in other regions of Indonesia.Contribution: This study contributes to the development of criminal law and criminal procedure law by clarifying the limits of prosecutorial authority in wiretapping practices, and provides insights for policymakers and law enforcement agencies to strengthen legal certainty and human rights protection in corruption law enforcement.
CRIMINAL LIABILITY FOR PERPETRATORS OF AGGRAVATED THEFT: AN ANALYSIS OF DECISION NUMBER 157/PID.B/2025/PN BTA I Ketut Seregig; Rachmat Fadhil Pradhana
Multidiciplinary Output Research For Actual and International Issue (MORFAI) Vol. 6 No. 5 (2026): Multidiciplinary Output Research For Actual and International Issue
Publisher : RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.22021452

Abstract

Aggravated theft remains a persistent conventional crime that harms individuals and disrupts public order. This study examines the factors contributing to aggravated theft and evaluates the criminal liability of the perpetrator in Decision Number 157/Pid.B/2025/PN Bta. The research applies normative and empirical legal approaches. Primary data were obtained through interviews with an investigator of the East OKU Police, a public prosecutor at the East OKU District Prosecutor's Office, and a judge of the Baturaja District Court, while secondary data were collected from legislation, judicial decisions, legal scholarship, and relevant journal articles. The data were processed through editing, classification, and systematization and were then analyzed qualitatively. The findings show that the offense was influenced by the social environment, social interaction and communication, the learning of criminal techniques, economic motives accompanied by rationalization, and the dominance of definitions favorable to lawbreaking. These factors are consistent with Sutherland's differential association theory. The defendant was criminally liable because the elements of the offense, fault, capacity for responsibility, and absence of excuses were established. The court imposed two years' imprisonment.
Kewenangan Jaksa Dalam Melakukan Penyadaoan Terhadap Setiap Orang Yang Berpotensi Melakukan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Di Bandar Lampung I Ketut Seregig; Nur Amalia Zahra; Zainab Ompu Jainah
Kajian Ilmiah Hukum dan Kenegaraan Vol 4 No 2 (2025): December
Publisher : Penerbit Goodwood

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35912/kihan.v4i2.6209

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to analyze the legal basis and limitations of the prosecutor’s authority to conduct wiretapping against parties potentially involved in corruption offenses, and to examine its implementation in the practice of corruption law enforcement.Research Methodology: This study employs a juridical-empirical approach. The research was conducted at the Bandar Lampung District Prosecutor’s Office. Data were collected through in-depth interviews with prosecutors and related law enforcement officers, supported by a review of laws and regulations, legal documents, and scholarly literature on prosecutorial authority, wiretapping, and corruption offenses.Results: The findings indicate that prosecutors in Indonesia do not have general or independent authority to conduct wiretapping. The Prosecutor’s Law does not explicitly regulate wiretapping authority for prosecutors. In practice, prosecutors do not carry out wiretapping directly, but only make use of wiretapping results lawfully obtained by authorized institutions, such as the Corruption Eradication Commission, in accordance with applicable legal procedures.Conclusions: This study is limited to law enforcement practice at the Bandar Lampung District Prosecutor’s Office and relies on interview data from a limited number of informants, so its findings do not fully represent the practice of wiretapping by prosecutors in other regions of Indonesia.Contribution: This study contributes to the development of criminal law and criminal procedure law by clarifying the limits of prosecutorial authority in wiretapping practices, and provides insights for policymakers and law enforcement agencies to strengthen legal certainty and human rights protection in corruption law enforcement.
Criminal Liability of Children Involved in Narcotics Offenses: A Juridical Analysis of Decision Number 21/Pid.Sus-Anak/2025/PN.Mgl I Ketut Seregig; Melani Putri Adelia
Kajian Ilmiah Hukum dan Kenegaraan Vol 5 No 1 (2026): June
Publisher : Penerbit Goodwood

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35912/kihan.v5i1.6995

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to analyze the criminal liability of children involved in narcotics offenses based on Decision Number 21/Pid. Sus-Anak/2025/PN.Mgl, focusing on the application of juvenile criminal law, judicial considerations, and sanctions imposed.Research Methodology: This study uses a normative juridical method with a case study approach and a qualitative approach. Data were collected through an analysis of court decisions, legal regulations, and the relevant literature on juvenile justice and narcotics offenses. The data were analyzed qualitatively to examine the legal reasoning and application of criminal provisions.Results: The findings show that a child involved in a narcotics offense is subject to criminal liability based on the fulfillment of criminal elements and applicable juvenile justice provisions. The judge considered the child’s legal status, nature of the offense, and child protection principles in determining sanctions. This decision reflects an effort to balance law enforcement with restorative justice and rehabilitation approaches.Conclusions: Criminal liability for children involved in narcotics offenses necessitates the integration of legal certainty, child protection, and rehabilitation principles to ensure proportionate sanctions and the best interests of the child.Limitations: This study analyzed only one court decision, limiting the generalization of the findings to other narcotics cases involving children.Contributions: This study contributes to the juvenile criminal law literature by demonstrating how judicial reasoning in narcotics cases involving children integrates criminal liability, evidentiary assessment, and restorative justice principles within the framework of child protection.
Co-Authors Achmad Putra Syeban Agustina, Tiara Amelia Alika Kristinawati Alika Kristinawati Andre Arvendo Andre Arvendo Angga Alfian Anggalana Anita Noviyanti Annisa, Intan Ansori Ansori Anugrah, M. Iqbal Atika Atika Bambang Hartono Bambang Hartono Budi Waskito Budi Wibowo Cahyono, Riki Cintya Anindita Choirunnisa Deta Merly Oktavianti Fadilla, Leoni Fatikha, Dhea Amalya Febriyanta, Ade Armanda Febriyanti, Aulia Fernanda, Cindy Aldila Hanyfah, Zaskia Harimurti, Pangestika Raras Helmi Rangkuti Hutagalung, Rona Taruli Jaya, Farhan Agung Kelana, Nurico Mareza Kris Chandra Aldyanto Kris Chandra Aldyanto Labibah, Auliya Dhiya Lintang Sakti Pangestu Lukmanul Hakim Luthfi Gama Albarik Melani Putri Adelia Melisa Safitri Michael Victor Manalu Muhamad Ertami Amanda Muhammad Kevin Alandru Muntari, Amanda Mutiara Fitri Nadira Nadira Nadira Ni Putu Widhia Rahayu Nur Amalia Zahra Okta Ainita Opan Saputra R Riagung Rachmat Fadhil Pradhana Rafiqo Mauli Novita Rafiqo Mauli Novita Ramadhan, Liuzpili Fhilo Retno Wulansari Riagung, R Saputra, Aditya Rahmad Suta Ramadan Tami Rusli Tianasati, Fathi Wahyu R, Amar Wahyu Saputra B M Yulia Hesti Yulia Hesti Yustina Ndari Zainab Ompu Jainah