Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
4.462
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Tafaqquh: Jurnal Penelitian Dan Kajian Keislaman Kamaya: Jurnal Ilmu Agama SHAHIH : Jurnal Ilmu Kewahyuan Jurnal Ibn Abbas JURNAL PENDIDIKAN TAMBUSAI Al-Muaddib : Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Kependidikan Instal : Jurnal Komputer BASHAIR An-Nur : Jurnal Studi Islam Mudabbir: Journal Research and Education Studies Tsaqofah: Jurnal Penelitian Guru Indonesia Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research Madani: Multidisciplinary Scientific Journal AL ISNAD: Journal of Indonesian Hadith Studies Nanggroe: Journal Of Scholarly Service Global Education Journal Nanggroe: Journal of Scholarly Service Jurnal As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga As-Salam: Journal Islamic Social Sciences And Humanities JIS: Journal ISLAMIC STUDIES Nizamiyah: Jurnal Sains, Sosial dan Multidisiplin
Idris Siregar, Idris
Pascasarjana UIN Sumatera Utara
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Medicine & Pharmacology Neuroscience Nursing Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 31 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 31 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4 
AL-QUR’AN DAN HADIS SEBAGAI MASDAR AWAL siregar, idris
Ibn Abbas : Jurnal Ilmu Alquran dan Tafsir VOL 5, NO 2 (2022): OKTOBER-MARET
Publisher : Magister Ilmu Al-Qur'an dan Tafsir UINSU Medan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51900/ias.v5i2.15212

Abstract

AbstrakIslam mempunyai hukum yang wajib dipatuhi oleh pemeluknya. Sumber hukum dalam Islam merupakan al- Qur’ an serta Hadis, kalam Allah serta As- Sunnah Nabi yang ialah landasan utama dalam ajaran Islam. Uraian terhadap kedua sumber hukum tersebut berarti sebab keduanya tidak bisa dipisahkan satu sama lain, ada keterkaitan antara keduanya dalam menarangkan hukum yang berlaku dalam Islam. Hingga telah selayaknya menguasai kedua sumber hukum itu jadi perihal yang utama, bila terjalin kesalahan uraian diantara keduanya hingga hendak mengganggu keberadaan sumber hukum tersebut. Dengan menguasai 2 sumber hukum ialah al- Quran serta Hadis, hingga hendak memperoleh petunjuk hukum yang cocok dengan tuntunan syariat serta sunnah nabi Muhammad. Tulisan ini menguraikan eksistensi antara kedua sumber hukum Islam tersebut dalam pelaksanaannya dalam warga yang majemuk, dengan memakai tata cara tematik.Kata Kunci: Alqu’an, Hadis, As-Sunnah, Hukum dan Islam.
Kalam Insyā’ Ṭalabī Dalam Surah al-‘Alaq: Kajian Balaghah Terhadap Tuntutan Implisit Siregar, Idris; Maha, Intan Permata; Nasution, Ratu Diva Tanzilla; Hasibuan, Muhammad Rezan
Tafáqquh: Jurnal Penelitian Dan Kajian Keislaman Vol. 13 No. 2 (2025): Desember
Publisher : INSTITUT AGAMA ISLAM BANI FATTAH (IAIBAFA)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52431/tafaqquh.v13i2.4348

Abstract

This article examines the kalam insya' in Surah Al-'Alaq by emphasizing the function of the implicit demands contained in the command (amr) and rhetorical istifham. So far, studies of Surah Al-'Alaq have generally focused only on verses 1-5 as the first revelation revealed to the Prophet Muhammad, while the subsequent verses have not been widely analyzed in terms of balaghah, especially within the framework of kalam insya' thalabi. This study uses a qualitative-descriptive method with a balaghah analysis approach through the perspective of ma'ani science, by examining the linguistic structure of the verses of Surah Al-'Alaq and the rhetorical meanings they contain. The results of the study show that Surah Al-'Alaq does not only contain explicit demands such as the command iqra', but also implicit demands conveyed through rhetorical istifham, especially in verses 9-19. This form of istifham is not included to obtain a literal answer, but rather functions as an invitation to reflection, a moral critique of arrogance and rejection of guidance, and an affirmation of theological awareness of God's supervision. This study concludes that the kalam insya' thalabi in Surah Al-'Alaq serves as an effective Quranic rhetorical instrument in establishing continuity between the initial message of revelation and moral demands, while simultaneously strengthening the persuasive and dialogical character of the Quran.
Takhrīj al-Ḥadīṡ Sebagai Metode Kritik Wacana: Menyingkap Bias Otoritas dalam Sejarah Transmisi Hadis Nasution, Maslan; Aini, Putri Sagita Anugrah; Sajidah, Saffina; Siregar, Idris; Nasution , Syah Fitriani
Nizamiyah: Jurnal Sains, Sosial dan Multidisiplin Vol. 1 No. 4 (2025): Nizamiyah: Jurnal Sains, Sosial dan Multidisiplin
Publisher : Yayasan Albahriah Jamiah Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.64691/nizamiyah.v1i4.118

Abstract

This article departs from the epistemological problem in hadith studies, which positions takhrīj al-Ḥadīṡ primarily as a normative verification technique to determine the quality of narrations, thereby tending to overlook the dimensions of power relations, the production of authority, and the discursive dynamics at work in the history of hadith transmission. This approach limits the takhrīj’s ability to read the sanad selection process as a socio-intellectual practice laden with interests and scholarly hierarchies. This study aims to reconstruct takhrīj al-Ḥadīṡ as a tool of discourse criticism that enables the disclosure of authority bias in the formation of the hadith canon. The study uses a qualitative method based on literature studies with a critical discourse analysis approach to takhrīj texts, works of rijāl al-Ḥadīṡ, and the dominant sanad assessment practices in the classical tradition. The results of this study indicate that takhrīj operates as a non-neutral discursive practice, as it systematically reproduces certain authorities through hierarchies of narrators, privileging dominant transmission networks, and mechanisms of exclusion against narrations originating from marginalized or outside-the-mainstream figures. The analysis also reveals that the criteria for authenticity are not merely technical, but are articulated in the configuration of scholarly discourse that affirms the legitimacy of certain groups while limiting the possibility of alternative interpretations. The implications of this study emphasize the need to reposition takhrīj al-Ḥadīṡ in contemporary hadith studies as a critical-analytical tool capable of reading hadith not only as normative texts, but also as products of power relations and constructions of historical authority, thus opening up a more reflective and contextual reading space.
Takhrīj al-Ḥadīṡ sebagai Metode Analisis Historis: Integrasi Kritik Sanad, Matan, dan Konteks Sosial Periwayatan Siregar, Idris; Sari, Friskila Santika; Putri, Aprilia; Siregar, Faliha Aulia; Siregar, Agung Julian
Nizamiyah: Jurnal Sains, Sosial dan Multidisiplin Vol. 1 No. 4 (2025): Nizamiyah: Jurnal Sains, Sosial dan Multidisiplin
Publisher : Yayasan Albahriah Jamiah Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.64691/nizamiyah.v1i4.119

Abstract

This article departs from the methodological problems in contemporary hadith studies that tend to reduce takhrīj al-Ḥadīṡ as a technical-verification procedure to assess the validity of the sanad, while ignoring the historical, discursive, and social dimensions of the hadith transmission process. This reduction causes analytical limitations in understanding hadith as a product of knowledge transmission that occurs in a specific spatial and temporal context. This study aims to reconstruct takhrīj al-Ḥadīṡ as an integrative historical analysis method by combining sanad criticism, matn criticism, and analysis of the social context of transmission within a single integrated methodological framework. This study uses a qualitative method with a historical-critical approach through a review of classical and contemporary hadith literature, a comparative analysis of transmission routes, and an examination of the relationship between hadith texts, narrators, and the socio-intellectual conditions that underlie them. The results of this study indicate that the integration of sanad criticism, matn criticism, and social context allows analysis of the reading of hadith not only as a static normative text, but as a dynamic historical process, reflecting the interaction between the authority of the narrators, social structures, and the epistemic needs of the early Muslim community. This approach reveals variations in redaction, shifts in meaning, and social rationalities that influence the selection and transmission of hadith. Theoretically, this study has implications for the development of contemporary hadith study methodology by expanding the function of takhrīj al-Ḥadīṡ from a verification tool to an instrument of historical analysis capable of bridging the classical critical tradition with modern scientific approaches.
Metodologi Takhrīj Berbasis Rijāl: Menggabungkan Jarḥ wa al-Taʻdīl dan Evidence-Based Approach Juwita, Frasiska Sari; Munthe , Khoirotun Nisah Br; Irhamsyah, Muhammad; Rifa’i, M. Mashduqi; Siregar, Idris
Nizamiyah: Jurnal Sains, Sosial dan Multidisiplin Vol. 1 No. 4 (2025): Nizamiyah: Jurnal Sains, Sosial dan Multidisiplin
Publisher : Yayasan Albahriah Jamiah Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.64691/nizamiyah.v1i4.122

Abstract

The study of takhrīj hadith has so far been dominated by a normative approach that positions the assessment of rijāl primarily as a reproduction of classical authority, so that the process of verifying narrator and sanad data often lacks a systematic, transparent, and methodologically traceable evaluation mechanism. This condition has implications for the limited consistency and replicability of hadith assessment in the context of contemporary hadith studies that demand higher scientific accountability. This study aims to reconstruct the methodology of takhrīj based on rijāl through the integration of the principles of jarḥ wa al-Taʻdīl with an evidence-based approach, so that the assessment of narrators and sanad is not only based on normative authority, but also on structured data management and verification. The study uses a qualitative-analytical approach with a critical analysis of rijāl literature, works of jarḥ wa al-Taʻdīl, and the scientific evidence framework that has developed in the modern research tradition. The results of this study indicate the formation of a takhrīj methodological framework that places rijāl data as the primary basis of analysis through the stages of source inventory, cross-verification of narrator information, assessment of the evidential weight of jarḥ and taʻdīl, and consistent synthesis of findings in the evaluation of sanad. This framework allows for a more structured, transparent, and consistent hadith assessment process, while minimizing subjectivity and fragmentation of assessment. The implications of this research lie in strengthening the validity and reliability of hadith assessment, as well as its contribution to developing a takhrīj methodology that is adaptive to the demands of contemporary hadith studies without abandoning the foundations of classical scholarship.
Menilai Ulang Objektivitas Takhrīj al-Ḥadīṡ: Antara Klaim Metode Ilmiah dan Bias Ideologis Aulia, Annisa Rahma; Harahap, Nurul Amelia; Siregar, Idris; Simangungsong, Liwardha; Salman, Salman
Nizamiyah: Jurnal Sains, Sosial dan Multidisiplin Vol. 1 No. 4 (2025): Nizamiyah: Jurnal Sains, Sosial dan Multidisiplin
Publisher : Yayasan Albahriah Jamiah Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.64691/nizamiyah.v1i4.123

Abstract

This article reassesses the claim of objectivity of takhrīj al-Ḥadīṡ, which has long been positioned as a scientific and neutral methodological procedure in the discipline of ʻulūm al-Ḥadīṡ, by highlighting the problem of ideological bias inherent in its historical and epistemological practices. The research background departs from the dominant assumption that takhrīj functions solely as a value-free sanad and matan verification technique, while several textual indications and scientific practices point to the intervention of mażhab preferences, the hierarchy of narrators’ authority, and the construction of orthodoxy that influence the results of hadith assessments. This study aims to critically evaluate the methodological objectivity of takhrīj al-Ḥadīṡ by examining the epistemic consistency between the claim of scientific procedures and their operational reality in classical hadith literature and contemporary discourse. This study employs a qualitative-critical approach with an epistemological analysis of representative takhrīj works, the rijāl al-Ḥadīṡ, and modern methodological studies, through comparative reading and critical discourse analysis. The results demonstrate a structural tension between technical procedures claimed to be objective—such as assessing the fairness and reliability of narrators—and ideological influences operating through source selection, establishing credibility standards, and legitimizing certain scholarly authorities. These findings indicate that the objectivity of takhrīj is historically and discursively framed, not absolute, thus demanding a more reflective methodological reformulation. The theoretical implications of this study lie in strengthening the critical paradigm in hadith studies, by encouraging the integration of epistemological analysis and ideological criticism to broaden the horizon of a more transparent and accountable hadith methodology.
Takhrīj al-Ḥadīs Digital: Tantangan Epistemologis Penggunaan Basis Data Hadis dalam Verifikasi Riwayat Agustina, Mery; Siregar, Idris; Bintang , Muhammad Arif Yasin; Masliani, Masliani; Nidaulhaq, Fatiya
Nizamiyah: Jurnal Sains, Sosial dan Multidisiplin Vol. 1 No. 4 (2025): Nizamiyah: Jurnal Sains, Sosial dan Multidisiplin
Publisher : Yayasan Albahriah Jamiah Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.64691/nizamiyah.v1i4.124

Abstract

The development of information technology has driven a significant shift in the practice of hadith retrieval, from manual searches based on classical texts to the use of digital hadith databases that offer speed, accessibility, and ease of search. This shift, while providing methodological efficiency, raises complex epistemological issues, particularly regarding the validity of knowledge, scholarly authority, and the relationship between classical hadith methods and computational logic. This study aims to critically analyze the use of digital hadith databases in the process of narration verification, highlighting the accompanying epistemological implications. The study uses a qualitative-analytical method through an epistemological approach, supported by a review of classical and contemporary literature, as well as a critical analysis of a number of digital hadith platforms widely used in hadith studies. The results of the study indicate a shift in scientific authority from the individual competence of muḥaddith to technological authority that relies on data structures and algorithm design, the limitations of search algorithms in representing the complexity of sanad and matn, the fragmentation of the scientific context of hadith due to the separation of narration from its historical and methodological framework, and the fundamental tension between the evaluative-qualitative epistemology of ʻulūm al-Ḥadīs and the quantitative and reductionist digital logic. These findings confirm that digital hadith databases cannot yet replace the critical function of classical methodology, but rather act as supporting instruments that require a strict epistemological framework. Academically, this study has implications for the need to develop an integrative takhrīj model that synergizes traditional scientific authority with digital technology critically and reflectively in the digital era.
Takhrīj al-Hadīṡ Digital: Metode Ekstraksi Sanad-Matan dari Naskah Klasik Berbasis Corpus Terstruktur Sari, Aulia Permata; Rizki, Miladur; Saragih, Anisah Ramadhani; Siregar, Idris; Al-Fikri, Hafiz
Nizamiyah: Jurnal Sains, Sosial dan Multidisiplin Vol. 1 No. 4 (2025): Nizamiyah: Jurnal Sains, Sosial dan Multidisiplin
Publisher : Yayasan Albahriah Jamiah Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.64691/nizamiyah.v1i4.125

Abstract

The development of digital hadith studies demands methodological updates in the practice of takhrīj al-Ḥadīṡ, especially when dealing with a large-scale, multi-layered, and editorially heterogeneous corpus of classical hadith texts. Conventional takhrīj approaches that rely on manual book searches and thematic indexes show limitations in efficiency, consistency, and the ability to systematically manage the complexity of sanad and matan variations. This study aims to develop and test a digital takhrīj al-Ḥadīṡ method through structured corpus-based sanad–matan extraction compiled from classical hadith manuscripts. The research method uses a qualitative-analytical approach with the integration of digital text processing on a curated hadith corpus, including the stages of text normalization, sanad–matn segmentation, mapping of narrator relationships, and verification of transmission patterns based on the rules of hadith science. The results show that the developed method can reconstruct the sanad–matn structure more explicitly and consistently, identify the boundaries of sanad and matan with a high degree of accuracy, and trace variations in editorial and transmission paths comparatively across sources. Digital extraction demonstrates its effectiveness in accelerating the takhrīj process, reducing data redundancy, and improving the traceability of sanads without violating the basic principles of hadith criticism. The level of conformity of digital methods with the principles of hadith science is reflected in its ability to maintain the hierarchy of narrators, continuity of transmission, and differentiation of matan redactions. Implicatively, this study confirms the methodological contribution of digital takhrīj al-Ḥadīṡ as a complementary approach that broadens the horizon of contemporary hadith analysis, strengthens research accuracy, and opens up opportunities for the integration of hadith science with digital corpus studies more systematically and sustainably.
Takhrīj al-Ḥadīṡ Berbasis Isu: Model Metodologis untuk Membaca Hadis dalam Wacana Keadilan dan Hak Asasi Ayu, Sekar; Syahira, Filza; Maulida, Ananda; Daulay, Tsuibatul Aslamiyah; Siregar, Idris
Nizamiyah: Jurnal Sains, Sosial dan Multidisiplin Vol. 2 No. 1 (2026): In Press
Publisher : Yayasan Albahriah Jamiah Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.64691/nizamiyah.v2.i1.132

Abstract

Contemporary hadith studies often face methodological challenges in connecting classical hadith texts to modern humanitarian issues, particularly in the discourse of social justice and human rights, without neglecting the scientific rigor of hadith. The classical takhrīj al-Ḥadīṡ approach, which focuses on verifying the sanad and matan, is often considered to not fully address the need for contextual reading of contemporary social dynamics. However, to date, there are still limited methodological models that systematically integrate takhrīj rigor with issue-based analysis. Therefore, this article aims to formulate and test the issue-based takhrīj al-Ḥadīṡ model as an alternative methodological framework in contemporary hadith studies. This study uses a qualitative approach with library research methods. Data were analyzed descriptively and analytically through the stages of issue identification, thematic classification of hadith, sanad and matan analysis, and applied synthesis. The results show that the issue-based takhrīj model is able to systematically map hadith based on specific social problems while maintaining the validity of transmission and consistency of the text’s meaning. The implementation of this model on hadiths about collective responsibility in preventing injustice and the principle of universal compassion demonstrates the relevance of Islamic values in building awareness of social justice and protecting human dignity. In conclusion, the issue-based takhrīj al-Ḥadīṡ model is effective as a methodological approach that bridges the tradition of classical hadith criticism with the need for contextual and applicable hadith readings in addressing contemporary humanitarian challenges.
Menjaga Kemurnian Bahasa Arab: Sejarah Lahirnya Ilmu Balaghah dan Ragam Gaya Bahasa Tasybih Siregar, Idris; Azmi, Amalia; Mawalda, Marisa; Ritonga, Syahril Sofyan
MUDABBIR Journal Research and Education Studies Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): Vol. 5 No. 2 Juli-Desember 2025
Publisher : Perkumpulan Manajer Pendidikan Islam Indonesia (PERMAPENDIS) Prov. Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56832/mudabbir.v5i2.2398

Abstract

Kajian ini membahas tentang betapa pentingnya peran ilmu balaghah dalam menjaga keaslian bahasa Arab, serta melihat kembali sejarah awalnya sebagai cara mempertahankan gaya bicara bangsa arab. Munculnya ilmu ini bermula dari keinginan para ahli untuk menjaga agar pesan dalam al-Quran tidak salah dipahami akibat masuknya pengaruh asing yang merusak tata bahasa. Pembahasan utama dalam tulisan ini adalah tentang gaya bahasa tasybih yang sering digunakan untuk membandingkan dua hal dalam ilmu bayan. Dengan menggunakan cara penjelasan yang sederhana dan mengambil dasar dari pemikiran tokoh besar seperti Abdul Qahir al-Jurjani tulisan ini mengupas bagian dalam tasybih seperti benda yang dibandingkan serta alasan kesamaannya. Hasil dari pembahasan ini menunjukkan bahwa tasybih bukan sekadar hiasan agar kalimat terdengar indah saja tetapi juga berfungsi untuk menjelaskan ide yang sulit agar lebih mudah dimengerti lewat contoh nyata. Memahami sejarah dan jenis tasybih merupakan kunci utama agar seseorang bisa tetap lancar dan benar dalam berbahasa Arab. Maka ilmu balaghah adalah penjaga abadi bagi keindahan dan kebenaran makna bahasa arab agar tetap terjaga di tengah perkembangan zaman.
Co-Authors Abdillah Hasibuan Ahmad Affandi Aini, Putri Sagita Anugrah Akbar, Husain Al-Fikri, Hafiz Amanda, Tasya Amin, Muhammad Nasrul Asrar Mabrur Faza, Asrar Mabrur Aulia, Annisa Rahma Ayu, Sekar Azmi, Amalia Bintang , Muhammad Arif Yasin Daulay, Tsuibatul Aslamiyah Dewi, Nabila Syahlita Fedian, Imelda Harahap, Alwi Padly Harahap, Nurul Amelia Harefa, Airil Ihza Hasibuan, Muhammad Rezan Hasibuan, Nafis Hasyim, Uday Husni, Khoirurrijal Ilka Zufria Ilmi, Riyadhotul Irwansyah, Rio Isroq, Aziz Juita, Juita Juwita, Frasiska Sari Maha, Intan Permata Mahendra, Ihza Masliani, Masliani Maulida, Ananda Mawalda, Marisa Mery Agustina, Mery Monang, Sori Muhammad Iqbal Fahreza Rambe Muhammad Irhamsyah Muhammad Yusuf Munthe , Khoirotun Nisah Br Musa, Tazkia Shuhaila Nasution , Syah Fitriani Nasution, Maisyarah Nasution, Maslan Nasution, Ratu Diva Tanzilla Nidaulhaq, Fatiya Nisak, Khairun Nur Aisyah Nurfadila Putri, Aprilia Putri, Nadilla Rabbani, M. Yaffi Riadi, Annisa Khumairoh Rifa’i, M. Mashduqi Ritonga, Syahril Sofyan Rizki, Miladur Rustam Efendi Sajidah, Saffina Salman Salman Salsabila, Indah Saragih, Anisah Ramadhani Sari, Aulia Permata Sari, Friskila Santika Simangungsong, Liwardha Siregar, Agung Julian Siregar, Faliha Aulia Siregar, Ilham Jaya Kusuma Siregar, M. Ramadhan Siregar, Miktahul Hasanah Siti Khadijah Siti Khoiriah Harahap Sulidar Syahfrizal, Dicky Syahira, Filza Yusuf Ramadhan Nasution, Yusuf Ramadhan Zikraa