Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
3.108
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JPK (Jurnal Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan) As-Syar'i : Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga Haumeni Journal of Education Journal Of Human And Education (JAHE) Riwayat: Educational Journal of History and Humanities Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat dan Riset Pendidikan KANGMAS: Karya Scientific Community Service is a journal JIMMI: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Multidisiplin Media Sains
Fadil Mas’ud
Universitas Nusa Cendana, Indonesia
Religion Humanities Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemistry Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Physics Social Sciences Other

Published : 24 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search
Journal : Riwayat: Educational Journal of History and Humanities

 1 
Death Penalty for Ferdy Sambo In Human Rights Perspective (Non Derogable Right Vs Derogabel Right) Agus Bambang Nugraha*; Fadil Mas’ud; Sudiyarti Sudiyarti; Achmad Napis Qurtubi; Egidius Fkun
Riwayat: Educational Journal of History and Humanities Vol 6, No 3 (2023): Social, Political, and Economic History
Publisher : Universitas Syiah Kuala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24815/jr.v6i3.33852

Abstract

The Supreme Court judge canceled the death sentence for Ferdy Sambo to life imprisonment. This has caused controversy in the community. One side considers the Supreme Court decision to be unfair and on the other hand considers it fair because the right to life is a basic human right and cannot be reduced under any circumstances and under any circumstances. This research is a qualitative research with a fenomenolgy approach. The data used in this study is secondary data obtained from journals, books, websites and other reliable sources. The data collected was analyzed using several stages including observation, selection, and drawing conclusions. The results showed that the change in the decision on Ferdy Sambo's death sentence to life imprisonment was appropriate because the researchers agreed that the right to life is a right that cannot be limited under any circumstances and under any circumstances.
Non Binary Options in Gender Choice (Perspective on Human Rights and Islamic Religion) Indra Kertati*; Desi Asmaret; Fadil Mas’ud; Muhammad Dheo Adrian Muhari; Nety Novita Hariyani
Riwayat: Educational Journal of History and Humanities Vol 6, No 3 (2023): Social, Political, and Economic History
Publisher : Universitas Syiah Kuala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24815/jr.v6i3.34211

Abstract

Abstract: The Human Rights perspective and the Islamic perspective have quite significant differences in viewing non-binary options in gender choices. This research aims to specifically compare these two perspectives. This research is qualitative research with a comparative descriptive approach regarding human rights and Islamic views on non-binary options in gender choices. The data used in this research is secondary data. The data collection technique in this research uses the library research method. The analysis technique in this research uses analytical techniques for data collection, data selection, data reduction, and drawing conclusions. The results of this research show that from a human rights perspective there is no problem with the inclusion of non-binary options in gender choices. This is in line with the fundamental principles contained in human rights, namely regarding sexuality rights which include the right to privacy, the right to autonomy over oneself, and human rights. This is in contrast to the Islamic perspective which views human gender from a biological aspect as consisting of only two groups, namely men and women. Each group has its own limitations in carrying out worship and muamalah. Even if physically there are humans who are born with two genders. So you are required to choose the most dominant of the two things.  Abstrak: Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia dan perspektif Islam memiliki perbedaan yang cukup signifikan dalam memandang opsi non biner dalam pilihan gender. Penelitian ini bertujuan mengkomparassi secara seskriftif dua perspektif tersebut. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kualitatif dengan pendekatan desriftif komparatif mengenai pandangan Hak Asasi Manusia dan Islam terhadap opsi non biner dalam pilihan gender. Data yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini merupakan data sekunder. Teknik pengumpulan data dalam penelitian ini menggunakan metode pustaka/library research. Teknik analisis dalam peneltian ini menggunakan teknik analisis pengumpulan data, seleksi data, reduksi data, dan penarikan kesimpulan. Hasil penelitan ini menunjukkan, dalam perspktif Hak Assasi Manusia tidak mempermasalahkan masuknya opsi non biner dalam pilihan gender hal tersebut sejalan dengan prinsip-prinsip fundamental yang ada dalam Hak Asasi Manusi yakni mengenai sexuality right yang meliputi hak atas privasi, hak otonom atas diri sendiri, dan hak asasi manusia. Berbanding trebalik dalam perspektif Islam yang memandang gender manusia dari aspek bilogis hanya terdiri darri dua golongan yakni laki-laki dan perempuan. Setiap golongan memiliki batasan masiing-masing dalam melaksanakan ibadah dan muamalah. Bahkan apabila secara fisik terdapat manusia yang terlahir dengan dua jenis kelamin. Maka diharuskan memilih salah satu yang paling dominan dari du hal tersebut. 
Death Penalty for Ferdy Sambo In Human Rights Perspective (Non Derogable Right Vs Derogabel Right) Agus Bambang Nugraha*; Fadil Mas’ud; Sudiyarti Sudiyarti; Achmad Napis Qurtubi; Egidius Fkun
Riwayat: Educational Journal of History and Humanities Vol 6, No 3 (2023): Social, Political, and Economic History
Publisher : Universitas Syiah Kuala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24815/jr.v6i3.33852

Abstract

The Supreme Court judge canceled the death sentence for Ferdy Sambo to life imprisonment. This has caused controversy in the community. One side considers the Supreme Court decision to be unfair and on the other hand considers it fair because the right to life is a basic human right and cannot be reduced under any circumstances and under any circumstances. This research is a qualitative research with a fenomenolgy approach. The data used in this study is secondary data obtained from journals, books, websites and other reliable sources. The data collected was analyzed using several stages including observation, selection, and drawing conclusions. The results showed that the change in the decision on Ferdy Sambo's death sentence to life imprisonment was appropriate because the researchers agreed that the right to life is a right that cannot be limited under any circumstances and under any circumstances.
Non Binary Options in Gender Choice (Perspective on Human Rights and Islamic Religion) Indra Kertati*; Desi Asmaret; Fadil Mas’ud; Muhammad Dheo Adrian Muhari; Nety Novita Hariyani
Riwayat: Educational Journal of History and Humanities Vol 6, No 3 (2023): Social, Political, and Economic History
Publisher : Universitas Syiah Kuala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24815/jr.v6i3.34211

Abstract

Abstract: The Human Rights perspective and the Islamic perspective have quite significant differences in viewing non-binary options in gender choices. This research aims to specifically compare these two perspectives. This research is qualitative research with a comparative descriptive approach regarding human rights and Islamic views on non-binary options in gender choices. The data used in this research is secondary data. The data collection technique in this research uses the library research method. The analysis technique in this research uses analytical techniques for data collection, data selection, data reduction, and drawing conclusions. The results of this research show that from a human rights perspective there is no problem with the inclusion of non-binary options in gender choices. This is in line with the fundamental principles contained in human rights, namely regarding sexuality rights which include the right to privacy, the right to autonomy over oneself, and human rights. This is in contrast to the Islamic perspective which views human gender from a biological aspect as consisting of only two groups, namely men and women. Each group has its own limitations in carrying out worship and muamalah. Even if physically there are humans who are born with two genders. So you are required to choose the most dominant of the two things.  Abstrak: Perspektif Hak Asasi Manusia dan perspektif Islam memiliki perbedaan yang cukup signifikan dalam memandang opsi non biner dalam pilihan gender. Penelitian ini bertujuan mengkomparassi secara seskriftif dua perspektif tersebut. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kualitatif dengan pendekatan desriftif komparatif mengenai pandangan Hak Asasi Manusia dan Islam terhadap opsi non biner dalam pilihan gender. Data yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini merupakan data sekunder. Teknik pengumpulan data dalam penelitian ini menggunakan metode pustaka/library research. Teknik analisis dalam peneltian ini menggunakan teknik analisis pengumpulan data, seleksi data, reduksi data, dan penarikan kesimpulan. Hasil penelitan ini menunjukkan, dalam perspktif Hak Assasi Manusia tidak mempermasalahkan masuknya opsi non biner dalam pilihan gender hal tersebut sejalan dengan prinsip-prinsip fundamental yang ada dalam Hak Asasi Manusi yakni mengenai sexuality right yang meliputi hak atas privasi, hak otonom atas diri sendiri, dan hak asasi manusia. Berbanding trebalik dalam perspektif Islam yang memandang gender manusia dari aspek bilogis hanya terdiri darri dua golongan yakni laki-laki dan perempuan. Setiap golongan memiliki batasan masiing-masing dalam melaksanakan ibadah dan muamalah. Bahkan apabila secara fisik terdapat manusia yang terlahir dengan dua jenis kelamin. Maka diharuskan memilih salah satu yang paling dominan dari du hal tersebut. 
Co-Authors Achmad Napis Qurtubi Agus Bambang Nugraha Amtiran, Morgan Atamukin, Kanisius Kedan Kian Badruddin Nasir Basri Basri Berek, Kristiana Yanti Bureni, Estalin Nepa Daro, Katarina Daud Yefkanius Nassa Desi Asmaret Doko, Meryana Micselen Doko, Yunitha Devrudyan Eddy Silamat, Eddy Egidius Fkun Ence, Eufrasia Gemian, Stefani Bita Harsya, Rabith Madah Khulaili Hasibuan, Kalijunjung Indah, Elisabeth Yohana Indra Kertati Indriya Fathni Irham Wibowo Istianah, Anif Iwan Harsono Izhatullaili Izhatullaili, Izhatullaili Jama, Karolus Budiman Jelita, Maria Trivonia Jeluhur, Helda Jetia, Yovita Erliana Johannes P Kumagaya Kale, Dorkas Yufice Ariyanti Keba, Aprilini Dima Keraf, Veronika Tiara Hingi khusnul khotimah Kian, Selviana Lipat Ara Kollo, Fredik L. Laga, Oskar Enjelius Lau, Clarisa Angelina Aeng Ludung, Goden Harna Hadia Luluk Sarifah Ly, Petrus Made Susilawati Marsi Bani Meo, Matrona Muhammad Dheo Adrian Muhari Nana, Katarina Rensa Negat, Katharina Nety Novita Hariyani Nggandung, Yeheskial Nomeni, Netriana Nuak, Angelina Seran Openg, Wiliam Fenoli Kituk Pandu, Gita Larasti Payong, Emilia Waha Purwoko, Agus Radja, Daud Christo Luis Rinovian Rais Robert Alex Serang Sanung, Florentina Sapay, Yumri Agelvi Soleman D. Nub Uf Sudiyarti Sudiyarti Syunikitta, Mirwanti Tefa, Alencia Tes, Hendri Septiano Tonis, Marselina Uki, Lion Edison Uly, Marselina Wahyudin Noe, Wahyudin Wandal, Yufani Rambu Liga