Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Perlindungan Hukum bagi Penggadai Tanah Pertanian dihubungkan dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 56 Tahun 1960 Tentang Penetapan Luas Tanah Pertanian Susanto, Andri; Rahmatiar, Yuniar; Abas, Muhamad
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.805

Abstract

One of the contents of Law Number 56 of 1960 concerning Determination of Agricultural Land Areas regulates the implementation of land mortgages. In reality, many mortgages last for years or even decades, and some are even continued by the heirs of the pawn holder, because the mortgagee is unable to buy back his land. The formulation of the problem in this study. First, what is the legal protection for pawning agricultural land based on Law Number 56 of 1960 concerning Determination of Agricultural Land Areas. Second, how to resolve disputes arising from the implementation of agricultural land mortgages. The purpose of the research is of course to answer the formulation of the problem in this research. This research is a normative research using a normative juridical approach. As for the results of the first study, protection for pawnbrokers eliminates the obligation to pay off debts if it has reached 7 years. Second, settlement of disputes arising from the implementation of land pledges can be pursued through non-litigation and litigation both civil and criminal.
Analisis Yuridis Kepastian Hukum Terhadap Peralihan Hak Atas Tanah dalam Jual Beli Dibawah Tangan (Studi Putusan Nomor 535/Pdt.G/2018/PN.Smg) Nurhidayah, Desyifa; Rahmatiar, Yuniar; Abas, Muhamad
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.881

Abstract

The process of buying and selling land should be carried out in front of an authorized official (PPAT) in order to obtain legal certainty in the form of a Sale and Purchase Deed (AJB) as evidence of the transfer of land rights or transfer of name at the Land Office. In general, there are still many buying and selling processes that are not carried out in front of PPAT or under the hands of some people. The research method used in this research uses qualitative methods and normative juridical approach methods with secondary data as the main data based on statutory approaches and primary data as supporting data obtained in the field. In this case, the sale and purchase carried out under the hand is still valid if it is in accordance with the agreement of the parties, but to ensure legal certainty, an authentic deed made by an authorized official is needed as proof of juridically valid ownership. Legal certainty in an agreement means that the agreement made by the parties applies like a binding law. Even though it is not in accordance with the provisions of the UUPA, the legal actions that occur have met the requirements of cash, light and real. The judge in deciding the case at No.535/Pdt.G/2018/PN/Smg. Stating that the sale and purchase carried out by the parties is valid, but needs to be completed with an authentic deed if it is going to change the name of the certificate or transfer of land rights.
Legal Protection and Rights of Indigenous Peoples: Legal Certainty in Managing Natural Resources Rahmatiar, Yuniar
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 22 No. 001 (2023): Pena Justisia (Special Issue)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v22i3.4999

Abstract

Indigenous peoples possess traditional rights to natural resources within their territories, yet these rights are frequently overlooked or marginalized due to inadequate policies and regulations. This research aims to examine the legal protection of the Baduy tribe's rights in managing natural resources and to explore how legal certainty can be achieved in this regard. Utilizing a normative juridical approach, the study analyzes relevant laws and regulations pertaining to indigenous rights and state-provided legal protection. The findings reveal that the recognition and protection of customary law communities in Indonesia highlight the state's commitment to supporting social entities with autonomy over their lives. Despite the pressures of modern integration, indigenous peoples continue to uphold their identity, traditions, and customary rights. Legal acknowledgment of these rights is enshrined in the 1945 Constitution and various laws, including Law No. 5 of 1960 on Agrarian Affairs, Law No. 4 of 2009 on Mining, Law No. 41 of 1999 on Forestry, and Law No. 7 of 2004 on Water Resources. However, effective implementation is often hindered by regulations that do not adequately address customary rights. While Constitutional Court Decision No. 35 of 2012, which recognizes customary forests as belonging to indigenous communities, represents significant progress, challenges persist. The need for revisions to create more inclusive laws or regulations is pressing. For the Baduy tribe, Lebak Regency Regional Regulation (Perda) Number 32 of 2001 on the Protection of Ulayat Rights is a critical development. This regulation offers legal certainty and safeguards their traditional rights, including customary land and natural resources, and tackles issues like illegal logging and forest encroachment. By acknowledging local wisdom and customs, this regulation aims to preserve Baduy culture and enhance security and social stability in their area.
Law Enforcement against Perpetrator Disposal Toxic And Hazardous Waste Not in Accordance with Management in Karawang Regency Rahmatiar, Yuniar
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 23 No. 1 (2024): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v23i1.5414

Abstract

Indonesia's rapid economic development like two sides mutually exclusive currencies depart behind. In one side This development can be give welfare and prosperity for all over society, on the other hand development economy give bad impact especially in matter pollution and damage environment. Not a few We Look damage environment in various the area that is currently develop rapid including in Karawang Regency. One of reason pollution and damage environment caused by waste material dangerous and poisonous or the usual We know with toxic and hazardous waste. Toxic And Hazardous waste that is managed in a way No appropriate can impact Serious to environment and health society, so that need firm and effective handling. Research This aiming For analyze enforcement law to perpetrator disposal Hazardous and Toxic Materials) waste that is not in accordance with applicable governance, and identify factor obstacles and efforts made For overcome problem The research method used is approach legal normative, with analyze regulation relevant legislation, studies cases, and documents law others. Research results show that Enforcement law to perpetrator disposal Hazardous and Toxic Materials waste in Karawang Regency is very important For prevent pollution environment and protect health society. Law Number 32 of 2009 and Regulations Government Number 101 of 2014 has arrange obligation management Toxic and Hazardous waste with permission as well as give sanctions firm for violations. However, the elimination of Article 102 through Job Creation Law weaken effort enforcement law with remove sanctions criminal, so that potential increase risk pollution. Toxic And Hazardous waste that is not managed with Good can pollute land, water and air, damaging ecosystem, reducing productivity agriculture, as well as trigger disturbance health Serious like disturbance breathing, organ damage, to disease chronic. Impact This confirm importance management good toxic and hazardous waste and enforcement effective law For guard sustainability environment and health public.
TINJAUAN YURIDIS PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI MITRA DRIVER GOJEK YANG DIRUGIKAN AKIBAT PEMESANAN FIKTIF DIHUBUNGKAN DENGAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 8 TAHUN 1999 TENTANG PERLINDUNGAN KONSUMEN Maharani, Dennisya; Rahmatiar, Yuniar; Abas, Muhamad
NUSANTARA : Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial Vol 12, No 10 (2025): NUSANTARA : JURNAL ILMU PENGETAHUAN SOSIAL
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Tapanuli Selatan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31604/jips.v12i10.2025.3980-3987

Abstract

Pemesanan fiktif merupakan tindakan konsumen yang memesan tanpa niat membayar, sehingga merugikan driver secara finansial dan psikologis. Pemesanan fiktif terjadi ketika konsumen melakukan pemesanan tanpa niat untuk membayar, sehingga menyebabkan kerugian bagi mitra driver yang telah menjalankan kewajibannya. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan kualitatif berbasis studi pustaka. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji perlindungan hukum bagi mitra driver GOJEK yang dirugikan akibat praktik pemesanan fiktif pada layanan GoFood dan GoMart. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa meskipun PT. Gojek Indonesia telah menyediakan fitur seperti GoShield dan Lapor Order Fiktif serta memberikan kompensasi, perlindungan yang diberikan masih belum optimal. Mitra driver masih menghadapi risiko kerugian akibat lemahnya sistem keamanan. Secara hukum, mitra driver dapat menempuh upaya non-litigasi dengan melapor kepada PT. Gojek Indonesia, serta litigasi berupa gugatan wanprestasi terhadap konsumen yang melanggar perjanjian. Penelitian ini menekankan pentingnya peningkatan perlindungan hukum dan sistem keamanan digital bagi driver GOJEK dalam ekosistem layanan transportasi online.
STUDI KASUS PENERAPAN PERJANJIAN BAKU DALAM MENJAMIN KEADILAN DITINJAU DARI UNDANG-UNDANG PERLINDUNGAN KONSUMEN Bintang, Muhamad; Rahmatiar, Yuniar; Abas, Muhamad
NUSANTARA : Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial Vol 12, No 10 (2025): NUSANTARA : JURNAL ILMU PENGETAHUAN SOSIAL
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Tapanuli Selatan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31604/jips.v12i10.2025.3961-3969

Abstract

Perdagangan bertujuan mewujudkan kesejahteraan sebagai bagian dari pembangunan nasional. Untuk melindungi hak para pihak dalam aktivitas perdagangan, perjanjian baku diatur dalam UUPK. Perjanjian ini umumnya tidak melalui proses tawar-menawar, sehingga menciptakan ketimpangan posisi antara pelaku usaha dan konsumen. Ketika terjadi pelanggaran akibat perjanjian baku, hak para pihak bisa terlanggar. Oleh sebab itu, penting memahami klausula terlarang sebagaimana diatur Pasal 18 UUPK, seperti klausula pembebasan tanggung jawab, pemutusan sepihak, pengalihan tanggung jawab, perubahan sepihak, dan sanksi tidak proporsional. Asas kebebasan berkontrak kini tidak lagi mutlak, karena perjanjian baku sering bersifat “take it or leave it”. Contohnya, kasus ZS pada Agustus 2019, di mana ia dirugikan oleh perubahan sepihak dalam program tantangan oleh PT Transportasi Online Indonesia. Klausula tersebut melanggar asas keadilan, sebagaimana ditegaskan Mariam Darus Badrulzaman bahwa hukum dibuat untuk melindungi hak dan menciptakan keadilan. Maka, pelaku usaha wajib merancang klausula sesuai hukum demi keadilan bagi semua pihak.
Penyerobotan Tanah Tanpa Izin di Kabupaten Subang Berdasarkan Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang Nomor 51 Tahun 1960 Tentang Larangan Pemakaian Tanah Tanpa Izin yang Berhak Atas Kuasanya (Studi Putusan Nomor: 3/Pen.Pid.C/2021/PN.Sng) Wahyudi, Riyan Ade; Arafat, Zarisnov; Rahmatiar, Yuniar
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): (JIHHP) Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik
Publisher : Dinasti Review Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jihhp.v6i1.6390

Abstract

Studi ini mengulas praktik penyerobotan tanah tanpa izin di Kabupaten Subang yang dianalisis melalui Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Subang Nomor 3/Pid.C/2021/PN.Sng, dengan menitikberatkan pada penerapan Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang (Perppu) Nomor 51 Tahun 1960. Penelitian bertujuan untuk mengetahui bagaimana regulasi tersebut diterapkan, bagaimana pertanggungjawaban pidana pelaku dikonstruksikan, serta sejauh mana efektivitas perlindungan hukum yang diberikan kepada pemilik tanah sah. Metode yang digunakan adalah kualitatif dengan pendekatan yuridis normatif. Data diperoleh melalui studi dokumen berupa putusan pengadilan serta bahan hukum primer, sekunder, dan tersier. Analisis dilakukan dengan menelaah unsur-unsur hukum yang dipertimbangkan hakim, baik dari aspek yuridis berupa pembuktian hak kepemilikan dan pelanggaran unsur “tanpa izin”, maupun aspek non-yuridis seperti kerugian materiil dan kondisi sosial pelaku. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terdakwa terbukti melanggar Pasal 1 jo. Pasal 6 Perppu No. 51 Tahun 1960 dan Pasal 407 ayat (1) KUHP karena menguasai tanah tanpa izin dan merusak tanaman padi milik korban. Hakim menjatuhkan pidana kurungan satu bulan dengan masa percobaan dua bulan. Namun, vonis ini dinilai belum proporsional sehingga tidak memberikan efek jera yang optimal. Perppu No. 51 Tahun 1960 masih relevan sebagai dasar hukum menindak penyerobotan tanah, namun efektivitas penerapannya sangat bergantung pada konsistensi penegakan hukum, kekuatan bukti kepemilikan, dan sosialisasi hukum kepada masyarakat.
Penegakan Hukum Administratif Terhadap Korporasi Atas Pencemaran Limbah B3 Dihubungkan dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 32 Tahun 2009 Tentang Perlindungan dan Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup Firmansyah, Rifqi Adrian; Rahmatiar, Yuniar; Abas, Muhammad
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): (JIHHP) Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik
Publisher : Dinasti Review Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jihhp.v6i1.6517

Abstract

Perkembangan industri menimbulkan masalah serius berupa pencemaran limbah Bahan Berbahaya dan Beracun yang mengancam ekosistem dan kesehatan masyarakat. Penelitian ini bertujuan mengkaji penegakan hukum terhadap korporasi pencemar limbah Bahan Berbahaya dan Beracun berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 32 Tahun 2009 tentang Perlindungan dan Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup, dengan fokus pada penerapan prinsip strict liability. Metode yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif melalui kajian peraturan perundang-undangan, literatur hukum, dan analisis kasus pencemaran limbah medis di Desa Karangligar, Karawang. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Undang-Undang Perlindungan dan Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup bersama Peraturan Pemerintah No. 101 Tahun 2014 telah menyediakan dasar hukum yang kuat melalui prinsip polluter pays dan strict liability, dimana korporasi wajib menanggung biaya pemulihan tanpa perlu dibuktikan unsur kesalahan. Namun, implementasi di lapangan masih lemah. Penegakan hukum lebih sering terbatas pada sanksi administratif berupa peringatan atau perbaikan, sementara aspek pidana cenderung dianggap sebagai ultimum remedium. Kasus RS Bayukarta dan RS Hermina membuktikan lemahnya pengawasan, karena meski terbukti lalai mengelola limbah medis, sanksi yang dijatuhkan tidak menimbulkan efek jera. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan dan menegaskan pentingnya penerapan prinsip strict liability secara konsisten untuk mempercepat proses hukum, menghindari kendala pembuktian, serta memberikan efek jera kepada korporasi. Strategi penegakan hukum yang lebih tegas, terintegrasi, dan berkeadilan diperlukan agar perlindungan lingkungan dan hak masyarakat dapat terjamin.
Kekuatan Hukum Putusan BPSK Terhadap Kewajiban Ahli Waris dalam Pelunasan Utang Debitur yang Telah Meninggal Dunia Ditinjau dari Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 Tentang Perlindungan Konsumen (Studi Putusan Nomor: Arbitrase/017/BPSK-KRW/VIII/2022) Wiranata, Muhammad Ardi; Rahmatiar, Yuniar; Abas, Muhamad
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): (JIHHP) Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik
Publisher : Dinasti Review Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jihhp.v6i1.6524

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji kekuatan hukum putusan Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen (BPSK) terhadap kewajiban ahli waris dalam pelunasan utang debitur yang telah meninggal dunia, yaitu dengan studi kasus putusan BPSK Karawang Nomor Arbitrase/017/BPSK-KRW/VIII/2022 dalam sengketa yang terjadi antara ahli waris Almarhum Restina Lumban Gaol dengan PT. Oto Multiartha mengenai kontrak kredit mobil nomor 10-113-16-01884. Permasalahan ini muncul ketika perusahaan pembiayaan yaitu PT. Oto Multiartha menuntut pelunasan utang kepada ahli waris berdasarkan klausula baku yang menyatakan utang menjadi jatuh tempo apabila debitur meninggal dunia, hal ini dianggap bertentangan dengan prinsip perlindungan konsumen. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode hukum normatif dengan mengacu pada literatur yang terkait dengan permasalahan hukum yang dibahas seperti peraturan perundang-undangan, putusan pengadilan, serta mengkaji norma hukum, asas hukum pendekatan lapangan melalui wawancara mendalam dengan Ketua BPSK Karawang. Data primer yang diperoleh dari putusan BPSK dan Pengadilan Negeri Karawang, sedangkan untuk data sekunder berupa literatur hukum dan jurnal ilmiah. Analisis dilakukan secara deskriptif untuk menjawab permasalahan mengenai kewenangan BPSK dan kekuatan hukum putusannya dalam konteks perlindungan konsumen. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa BPSK Karawang memiliki kewenangan penuh untuk menangani perkara tersebut berdasarkan Pasal 52 UUPK, dengan catatan bahwa kedua belah pihak harus sepakat untuk menyelesaikan sengketa melalui mekanisme BPSK. BPSK memutuskan bahwa klausula baku yang membebankan kewajiban pelunasan kepada ahli waris melanggar Pasal 18 UUPK dan dinyatakan batal demi hukum, sehingga kewajiban pelunasan berakhir dengan meninggalnya debitur. Putusan BPSK memiliki kekuatan hukum mengikat berdasarkan Pasal 54 dan 58 UUPK, namun dalam praktiknya menghadapi kendala implementasi karena ketiadaan kesepakatan para pihak dan kemungkinan upaya hukum ke pengadilan negeri.
Effectiveness of Government Regulation Number 22/2021 in Controlling Air Pollution from Brick-Making Industry Pranata, Rifo Andi; Rahmatiar, Yuniar; Abas, Muhamad
Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum Vol 12, No 2 (2025): Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum
Publisher : UNISSULA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26532/jph.v12i2.47411

Abstract

The phenomenon of air pollution caused by the brick-making industry has become a pressing environmental issue demanding resolution. Various studies have shown that emissions from the brick-kiln process contribute significantly to the decline in ambient air quality in industrial areas and their surroundings. This study aims to evaluate the environmental impacts of brick-kiln operations and to assess the effectiveness of government policy implementation in controlling air pollution from the industrial sector. This study adopts a normative and empirical research paradigm as its primary methodological framework. A qualitative approach is used because of its ability to facilitate in-depth exploration of phenomena in the natural environment, with the researcher acting as the primary instrument for data collection and analysis. The result of this study are brick-kiln operations in Mekarmulya Village cause significant air, noise, and land degradation impacts, with the community gradually normalizing pollution due to weak regulatory oversight and limited institutional capacity in enforcing environmental policies for micro-enterprises. The study concludes that ineffective environmental governance and limited institutional capacity have allowed the micro-scale brick-kiln industry in Mekarmulya Village to cause significant pollution and land degradation, highlighting the need for the implementation of adaptive, socially aware, and inclusive environmental policies for the informal sector.
Co-Authors Abas, M Abas, Muhamad Abas, Muhammad Abbas, Muhamad Agus Antoni, Mochamad Agustian, Muhammad Ryo Akup, Apriliyanto Juwan Sukmana Amaliya, Lia Amanda Salsabila Surya Ana Ximenes Sousa Andri Susanto Andriani, Nina Anggraeni, Kiki Aprilia, Dinda Arafat, Zarisnov Ardiansyah, Ata Asnanda, Anggraeni Asyhadi, Farhan Atmaja, Annisa Tri Aulia, Salvia Nur Bintang S, Andi Muhamad Bintang, Muhamad Chicka Aircheny Dede Nurhayatie Dewi, Merliana Dewi, Yogita Dhiafajaazka, Siti Ethan Lim kong Fauziah, Margie Rahayu Febrian, M. Ibnu Firmansyah, Rifqi Adrian Guntara, Deny Handito, Angga Putra Hendiko Siregar, Piki Lestari, Nopita Lestari, Widya Annisa Pudji Lubis, Adyan Lubis, Desi Lestari Machestian, Hario Bismo Maharani, Dennisya Maharani, Raden Bella Bintang Malau, Masnida Mardias, Deni Maryam, Zulfa Nurul Melliana, Melliana Muhamad Abas Muhammad Fakhrurrozi Mulyana, Adin Ningrum, Wulan Cahya Nugraha Putra, Muhamad Nugraha, Safaat Nugraha, Tirta Nugroho, Gynastiar Nurhidayah, Desyifa Oktapianti, Desi Ayu Padilah, Muhamad Pranata, Rifo Andi Pratiwi, Dwi Nuraeni Priyatna, Harariawan Putra, Affian Fandi Putri, Dinni Rizky Amalia Putri, Ina Malia Rahayu, Wulan Sri Rahmalia, Indah Ramadhan, Topani Rizki Rahmawati, Rizki Safitri, Diana Alpiani Sanjaya, Suyono Sanu, Primawan Yunior Saripudin, Asep Septian, Fazrian Siahaan, Holmen Sri Wahyuni Sudjadi, Agung Sutrisno, Sutrisno Syarif, Soultan Taofik Rohman, Paisal Targana, Tatang Tasry, Nuzul Adnin Toha, Imam Sofii Ubaidillah, Nauval Viyanda, Karina Wahyudi, Rikes Wahyudi, Riyan Ade Wakono, Nur Wilianita, Ani Wiranata, Muhammad Ardi Yani, Abdul Yudda Ramadhan, Khelvin Yulianita, Donna Yunior Sanu, Primawan Zaenury, Ahmad Goza Zahra Alfianti, Kartika