Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
3.194
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JURNAL PENDIDIKAN TAMBUSAI Unes Law Review JMECS (Journal of Measurements, Electronics, Communications, and Systems) Al-Adl : Jurnal Hukum INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL, POLICY AND LAW (IJOSPL) Mejuajua Inspirasi & Strategi (INSPIRAT) : Jurnal Kebijakan Publik & Bisnis Journal Of Human And Education (JAHE) Jurnal Derma Pengabdian Dosen Perguruan Tinggi (Jurnal DEPUTI) LEBAH Jurnal Hasil Pengabdian Masyarakat (JURIBMAS) CONSEN: Indonesian Journal of Community Services and Engagement Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research JURNAL RETENTUM Public Sphere: Jurnal Sosial Politik, Pemerintahan dan Hukum
Sitepu, Karolina
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Aerospace Engineering Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Astronomy Automotive Engineering Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Chemistry Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Control & Systems Engineering Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Dentistry Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Energy Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Immunology & microbiology Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Mechanical Engineering Medicine & Pharmacology Neuroscience Nursing Physics Public Health Social Sciences Transportation Veterinary Other

Published : 24 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 24 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
Penyelesaian Kejahatan Genosida yang Dilakukan oleh Pemerintah Myanmar Terhadap Etnis Muslim Rohingya di Myanmar dalam Perspektif Hukum Pidana Internasional Zebua, Efiziduhu; Sitepu, Karolina; Na’im, Khairun; Darma, Mospa
Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research Vol. 5 No. 4 (2025): Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research
Publisher : Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/innovative.v5i4.20208

Abstract

Genosida merupakan pelanggaran berat dalam hukum pidana internasional yang bertujuan melenyapkan suatu kelompok berdasarkan identitas etnis, ras, atau agama. Kasus kekerasan terhadap etnis Muslim Rohingya di Myanmar menjadi salah satu contoh nyata dari kejahatan ini. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji faktor penyebab kejahatan genosida terhadap Rohingya dan menganalisis upaya penyelesaiannya melalui pendekatan hukum pidana internasional. Metode yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif melalui studi pustaka terhadap dokumen hukum primer dan sekunder. Hasil menunjukkan bahwa tindakan militer Myanmar memenuhi unsur genosida menurut Pasal 6 Statuta Roma. Faktor penyebab mencakup sejarah diskriminasi, kebijakan politik eksklusif, dan lemahnya perlindungan hukum. Penelitian ini menegaskan pentingnya penegakan tanggung jawab pidana individu melalui Mahkamah Pidana Internasional (ICC) serta tanggung jawab negara secara hukum internasional untuk mencegah impunitas dan menegakkan keadilan bagi korban. Kata kunci: genosida, Rohingya, hukum pidana internasional, ICC, Statuta Roma.
Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Perdagangan Orang Untuk Tujuan Eksploitasi Organ Tubuh (Analisis Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Lubuk Pakam Nomor 318/Pid.Sus/2024/PN.Lbp Tanggal 24 Juli 2024 Husna, Rifka Syafira; Sitepu, Karolina; Na’im, Khairun
Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research Vol. 5 No. 4 (2025): Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research
Publisher : Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/innovative.v5i4.21121

Abstract

Tindak pidana perdagangan orang untuk tujuan eksploitasi organ tubuh merupakan kejahatan luar biasa yang menimbulkan dampak fisik, psikis, sosial, dan hukum bagi korban. Tingginya permintaan organ, khususnya ginjal, mendorong munculnya pasar gelap dan jaringan kriminal terorganisir, sehingga menjadi tantangan serius bagi penegakan hukum di Indonesia. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan studi kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Lubuk Pakam Nomor 318/Pid.Sus/2024/PN.Lbp, yang berakhir dengan putusan bebas karena unsur pembuktian tidak terpenuhi sesuai Pasal 183 KUHAP. Faktor utama penyebab kasus ini meliputi kemiskinan, rendahnya pendidikan, ketidakharmonisan keluarga, lemahnya kesadaran hukum, serta tingginya permintaan organ. Hasil penelitian menegaskan pentingnya penerapan pembuktian yang tepat, penguatan regulasi donor organ, edukasi hukum masyarakat, peningkatan kapasitas aparat, dan kerja sama lintas sektor untuk menjamin perlindungan HAM serta efektivitas penegakan hukum.
RATIO LEGIS OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE STRENGTH OF THE DECISION OF THE CONSUMER DISPUTE RESOLUTION BODY IN RESOLVING DISPUTES Siregar, Dahris; Sitepu, Karolina; Elyani, Elyani
UNES Law Review Vol. 5 No. 4 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v5i4.579

Abstract

In Indonesia, there are 2 (two) ways to resolve disputes between business actors and consumers, namely by litigation and non-litigation. Dispute resolution process dispute resolution process through court channels or what is also called litigation will take a relatively long time. relatively long time. Meanwhile, on the contrary, settlement through non-litigation litigation, namely through one of the quasi-judicial institutions, namely the Consumer Dispute Settlement Body, which is mandated by Law Number 8 Year 1999 on Consumer Protection. 1999 on Consumer Protection. The research results show that settlement of consumer disputes through the Consumer Dispute Settlement Body (BPSK) can be considered ineffective. This is evidenced by the fact that there are still many parties who do not agree with BPSK's decision. This is also supported by several obstacles contained in it.
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM DALAM KONTRAK KOMERSIAL ELEKTRONIK: ANALISIS KOMPREHENSIF TANTANGAN, IMPLEMENTASI, DAN KERANGKA REGULASI DALAM TRANSFORMASI EKONOMI DIGITAL INDONESIA: JURNAL_IJOSPL_FINAL_BENAR - Niamualago Laia Sitepu, Karolina; Laia, Niamualago; Laia, Yurmanius; Ndruru, Hadirin; Gulo, Boby Putra Meiman
IJOSPOL - International Journal of Social, Policy and Law Vol. 7 No. 2 (2026): April 2026
Publisher : IJOSPOL - International Journal of Social, Policy and Law

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.8888/ijospol.v7i2.261

Abstract

The exponential growth of Indonesia's digital economy has fundamentally transformed the paradigm of commercial transactions, with electronic contracts emerging as the predominant mechanism for conducting business operations across diverse sectors. This comprehensive research examines the multifaceted legal protection framework governing electronic commercial contracts in Indonesia, conducting an in-depth analysis of implementation challenges, regulatory effectiveness, and the adequacy of existing legal mechanisms in addressing the complexities of digital commerce. Employing a rigorous normative legal research methodology, this study systematically examines Law No. 19 of 2016 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions (ITE Law), Government Regulation No. 71 of 2019 on Electronic System and Transaction Implementation, Law No. 27 of 2022 concerning Personal Data Protection, alongside foundational provisions from the Indonesian Civil Code and Law No. 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection. The research reveals that while Indonesia has established a relatively comprehensive legislative framework for electronic contracts, substantial implementation gaps persist, particularly concerning consumer protection enforcement, digital signature authentication infrastructure, cross-border transaction jurisdiction, data privacy safeguards, and dispute resolution mechanisms tailored to digital commerce characteristics. Critical findings indicate that legal certainty in electronic contracts encounters significant obstacles stemming from inadequate digital authentication infrastructure, limited certification authority networks, insufficient public awareness regarding legal rights and obligations in e-commerce transactions, complex jurisdictional challenges in international digital transactions, and the absence of specialized dispute resolution mechanisms designed specifically for electronic commerce disputes. The study identifies critical deficiencies in evidentiary procedures for electronic documents, contractual validity verification processes, consumer protection implementation, and the enforcement of regulatory provisions against non-compliant electronic system operators. This research makes substantial contributions to understanding the legal challenges confronting Indonesia's rapidly evolving digital economy by providing comprehensive analysis of regulatory frameworks, identifying systemic implementation gaps, and offering evidencebased recommendations for strengthening legal protection mechanisms. The findings possess particular relevance for policymakers tasked with regulatory development, legal practitioners navigating electronic contract enforcement, businesses operating in digital marketplaces, academic researchers examining digital commerce law, and consumers seeking to understand their rights in electronic transactions. The research proposes specific recommendations including enhanced inter-agency regulatory coordination, expanded digital authentication infrastructure with subsidized access for small and medium enterprises, comprehensive digital literacy and legal awareness programs, development of specialized online dispute resolution platforms, harmonization with international e-commerce legal standards, and implementation of adaptive regulatory frameworks capable of responding to technological innovation while maintaining adequate protection standards for all stakeholders in Indonesia's digital economy ecosystem.
Co-Authors Adlina, Min Ahmad Zaini Ahmad Zaini Al Habsyi , Bobby Andi Prasetyo Ari Usman, Ari arma, Mospa D Azwir Agus Br. Silalahi, Dita Regina Dahris Siregar Damanik, Rudang Sari Ayu Darma, Mospa Dina Rizka Yusra Elyani, Elyani Gea, Herti Gulo, Boby Putra Meiman Hafizha, Syahna Hajatina, Hajatina Halawa, Polius Harahap, Faisal Sadat Harahap, Faisal Sadat Soaduon Harahap, Faisal Sadat. S. Harfan Hian Ryanu Husna, Rifka Syafira Karina Mia Berutu Laia, Niamualago Laia, Teti Krisdayanti Laia, Yurmanius Levy Olivia Nur LUBIS, INDAH SARI LIZA Lubis, Muhammad Dhobit Azhary Mendrofa, Sepkris Mawarni Muhammad Rivai Nababan, Samuel Na’im, Khairun Ndruru, Hadirin Pradifta, Denni Satria Puput, Muharni Saputri Ramadanty, Alvi Sahara Razali Razali Riansyah, Aldi Rismayanti Rismayanti Rony, Zahara Tussoleha Sabila, Puji Chairu Salim, Akhmad Raihan Saputri, Muharni Setha, Donny Setha, Dony Sri Wahyuni Tampubolon, Anggiat Martua Tarigan, M. Tommy Umaro Umaroh, M.Tommy Vinsensius Sigit Widhi Prabowo Wiwik Handayani Zai, Cut Rana Wati Zebua, Efiziduhu