Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
3.314
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Obsesi: Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini CIVITAS (JURNAL PEMBELAJARAN DAN ILMU CIVIC) Community Development Journal: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat At-Tajdid : Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pemikiran Islam Journal of Education Research Jurnal Maritim Malahayati Mutiara : Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Indonesia Jurnal Multidisiplin Riset Ilmiah (ATRIA) Jurnal Sosial dan Bidang Pendidikan (SABIQ) Jurnal Transportasi dan Bahari (ALTAIR)
Siregar, Muhammad Sapril
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Aerospace Engineering Humanities Automotive Engineering Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Control & Systems Engineering Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Mathematics Public Health Social Sciences Transportation Other

Published : 25 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Jurnal Obsesi: Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini

 1 
The Effectiveness of the CIPP Evaluation Model in Science Learning in the Era of the Industrial Revolution 4.0 Hilmiyati, Fitri; Panggabean, Tongam E; Khoirunnisa, Riza Noviana; Dewanto, Dewanto; Siregar, Muhammad Sapril; Santosa, Tomi Apra
Jurnal Obsesi : Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini Vol. 8 No. 6 (2024)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/obsesi.v8i6.6227

Abstract

This study aims to determine the effectiveness of the CIPP model in evaluating science learning in students in the 4.0 revolution era. This research is a type of quantitative research with a meta-analysis approach. The inclusion criteria in this study are 1) the research was published in 2022-2024; 2) research must be indexed by the Science Technology Index (SINTA) or Scopus; 3) research was obtained through the Google Scholar, Mendeley, and ERIC databases; 4) The research must be relevant and report complete data to calculate the effect size value—data analysis through statistical analysis with the help of JSAP applications. The analysis results of 20 publications obtained a summary effect size value ( d = 0.861; p < 0.001). Effect size is included in the category of very high effect size.  These findings conclude that using the CIPP model has a positive effect on the evaluation of science learning in students compared to other evaluation models. No publication bias was found in this meta-analysis study, so it can be scientifically accounted for.
The Effectiveness of the CIPP Evaluation Model in Science Learning in the Era of the Industrial Revolution 4.0 Hilmiyati, Fitri; Panggabean, Tongam E; Khoirunnisa, Riza Noviana; Dewanto, Dewanto; Siregar, Muhammad Sapril; Santosa, Tomi Apra
Jurnal Obsesi : Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini Vol. 8 No. 6 (2024)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/obsesi.v8i6.6227

Abstract

This study aims to determine the effectiveness of the CIPP model in evaluating science learning in students in the 4.0 revolution era. This research is a type of quantitative research with a meta-analysis approach. The inclusion criteria in this study are 1) the research was published in 2022-2024; 2) research must be indexed by the Science Technology Index (SINTA) or Scopus; 3) research was obtained through the Google Scholar, Mendeley, and ERIC databases; 4) The research must be relevant and report complete data to calculate the effect size value—data analysis through statistical analysis with the help of JSAP applications. The analysis results of 20 publications obtained a summary effect size value ( d = 0.861; p < 0.001). Effect size is included in the category of very high effect size.  These findings conclude that using the CIPP model has a positive effect on the evaluation of science learning in students compared to other evaluation models. No publication bias was found in this meta-analysis study, so it can be scientifically accounted for.
Co-Authors Adi, Panggih Nur Albert Wiweko Albert Wiweko, Albert Amsal Sahban, Muhammad April Gunawan Malau Ardy, Iqbal Muhammad Brahmana, Dhea Haniel Gracella Dahlan, Muhammad Harris H David, Muhammad Dedy Kurniadi Dewanto Dewanto Eka Supriatna Ferdinan, Ahmad Harahap, Ferry Aulia Hartati, Diah Vitaloka Hilmiyati, Fitri Ika Setiawati, Ika Iksan Saifudin Indra Muda, Indra Irawati, Junita Jamil, T. M. Kartayuda, Arnoldus Khabib, Muhammad Kusturi, Nanda Afra Merakati, Indah Nakano, Muhamad Goldy Nugroho, Pasadhena Arief Cahya Nurmala, Eka Panggabean, Tongam E Prayogi, Lilik R., Sulastriani Rafi Zidane Shevchenko Riza Noviana Khoirunnisa Romadhoni, Dita Sabaruddin Salfauqi Nurman, Salfauqi Santosa, Tomi Apra Saputra, Muhammad Sa’id Agil Sasabone, Luana Sinaga, Meidiana Putri Sulastriani, Sulastriani sultan Syahputra, Dinur T. M. Jamil Taharuddin Taryana Taryana, Taryana Utomo, Muhamad Nurji Setyo Wartono, Tono Yusri, Yunisa Friscia Zainal Arifin