Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 23 Documents
Search

Law Enforcement of Assault Crimes in Boalemo Regency from Legal Certainty Perspective Syarif Djafar; Fenty Puluhulawa; irlan puluhulawa
Journal of Law, Human Rights, Immigration, and Corrections Vol. 1 No. 3 (2026): Journal of Law, Human Rights, Immigration, and Corrections
Publisher : Yayasan Cerdas Pedia Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65101/lawric.v1i3.377

Abstract

This study examines law enforcement of assault crimes in Boalemo Regency from the perspective of legal certainty. The issue is important because police crime data from 2022 to 2024 show that assault remains a prominent local crime requiring consistent legal handling and community protection. This research uses empirical legal research with statutory and conceptual approaches. Data were obtained from police crime records, interviews with law enforcement officers and perpetrators, and relevant criminal law literature. The findings show that law enforcement must be assessed through the application of the Criminal Code, classification of assault, investigation procedures, article determination, victim protection, and limits of police discretion. Legal certainty is reflected in consistent reporting, evidence collection, case handling, and submission procedures. The study concludes that assault law enforcement in Boalemo requires accurate application of the applicable Criminal Code and stronger preventive legal education.
The Practice Of Deligitimization Decisions Court Due to The Intersection Of Judicial Review in Indonesia Supriyadi A Arief; Sofyan Piyo; Ramadhan Usman; Janwar Hippy; Irlan Puluhulawa
Journal of Law and Policy Transformation Vol 9 No 2 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Internasional Batam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37253/jlpt.v9i2.10120

Abstract

The Post-Decision Intersection Between the Supreme Court and the Constitutional Court in Indonesia. The Constitutional Court Decision No. 70/PUU-XXII/2024 and the Supreme Court Decision No. 23/P/HUM/2024, both addressing the age eligibility requirements for candidacy in the 2024 simultaneous regional elections, have reignited tensions between two branches of judicial power. This tension is further exacerbated by the decision of the House of Representatives (DPR), through a Working Committee meeting, to favor the Supreme Court’s ruling. This study aims to analyze the extent of the intersection between the Supreme Court (MA) and the Constitutional Court (MK) by examining their respective decisions. The analysis adopts a normative approach, relying on secondary data as the primary source, supported by statutory, case law, and conceptual approaches to address the core issues. The findings reveal that the overlap between the Supreme Court and the Constitutional Court in conducting judicial reviews of regulations has led to delegitimization between Supreme Court Decision No. 23/P/HUM/2024 and Constitutional Court Decision No. 70/PUU-XXII/2024. To address this issue, both courts must exercise judicial restraint, particularly regarding substantive matters with potential overlap between their jurisdictions. Such restraint is essential to prevent external parties or institutions from exploiting court decisions to advance their institutional agendas, thereby avoiding unnecessary institutional conflicts.
IMPLIKASI HUKUM KNALPOT RACING DALAM MENINGKATKAN KETERTIBAN DAN KENYAMANAN (Studi Kasus di Kabupaten Bone Bolango) Winda Aprianingsih Aguli; Lisnawaty W. Badu; Irlan Puluhulawa
HYPOTHESIS : Multidisciplinary Journal Of Social Sciences Vol 5 No 01 (2026): HYPOTHESIS : Multidisciplinary Journal Of Social Sciences
Publisher : Pusat Studi Ekonomi Publikasi Ilmiah dan Pengembangan SDM

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62668/hypothesis.v5i01.2358

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis hambatan yang dihadapi oleh aparat penegak hukum di Kabupaten Bone Bolango dalam mengatur penggunaan knalpot racing, serta implikasi hukumnya terhadap ketertiban dan kenyamanan masyarakat. Permasalahan penelitian adalah implikasi hukum knalpot racing dalam meningkatkan ketertiban dan kenyamanan masyarakat di Kabupaten Bone Bolango. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum empiris yang mengkaji bagaimana norma hukum (das Sollen) berfungsi dalam realitas sosial (das Sein) di masyarakat. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa efektivitas penegakan hukum terkait penggunaan knalpot racing di Bone Bolango menghadapi hambatan yang berasal dari lima faktor dalam sistem hukum, yaitu: ketentuan hukum yang mengandung norma yang ambigu; keterbatasan diskresi penegak hukum karena pertimbangan kemanusiaan dalam menghindari korban jiwa; tidak adanya peralatan pendukung seperti alat pengukur tingkat kebisingan untuk bukti material; rendahnya tingkat kepatuhan masyarakat; dan normalisasi budaya kebisingan di dalam masyarakat.