Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
4.986
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Cita Hukum Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance Journal Evidence Of Law Journal of Innovation Research and Knowledge POLICY, LAW, NOTARY AND REGULATORY ISSUES (POLRI) PENANOMICS: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS Jurnal Sehat Indonesia (JUSINDO) SENTRI: Jurnal Riset Ilmiah ARMADA : Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin Jurnal Hukum Indonesia Mutiara: Multidiciplinary Scientifict Journal Jurnal Riset Ilmiah Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengkajian Ilmiah LAWPASS Asian Journal of Social and Humanities Jurnal Sains, Ekonomi, Manajemen, Akuntansi dan Hukum
Maryano, Maryano
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Aerospace Engineering Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Astronomy Automotive Engineering Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Chemistry Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Control & Systems Engineering Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Dentistry Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Energy Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Immunology & microbiology Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Mechanical Engineering Medicine & Pharmacology Neuroscience Nursing Physics Public Health Social Sciences Transportation Veterinary Other

Published : 39 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search
Journal : Journal of Innovation Research and Knowledge

 1 
EFEKTIFITAS HUKUM PENYELESAIAN PERKARA KECELAKAAN LALU LINTAS MELALUI RESTORATIVE JUSTICE Agus Wicaksono Susanto; Maryano, Maryano; Hedwig Adianto Mau
Journal of Innovation Research and Knowledge Vol. 4 No. 10: Maret 2025
Publisher : Bajang Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53625/jirk.v4i10.9851

Abstract

Normatively, Law Number 22 of 2009 on Road Traffic and Transport has comprehensively regulated various provisions that must be adhered to by the offender in traffic accidents involving victims. In the context of traffic accidents, if the accident is caused by culpa levis, it can be resolved through a restorative justice approach. This research utilizes the theory of restorative justice and the theory of legal effectiveness.This research falls into the category of empirical legal research, using two approaches simultaneously, namely the statute approach and the case approach. The legal materials in this research were obtained from primary and secondary data, consisting of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials. In this research, the results obtained from primary and secondary data were further analyzed. The data analysis process was conducted using an interpretative approach.The research results indicate that the concept of restorative justice in the settlement of traffic accident cases in Indonesia has been applied in various law enforcement agencies, including the Police, the Prosecutor's Office, and the Courts. In the stages of investigation and inquiry, the Police refer to the Chief of Police Regulation Number 8 of 2021, the Prosecutor's Office follows the Prosecutor General Regulation Number 15 of 2020, and the Court refers to the Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 of 2024. Although these regulations are binding for each agency, their implementation remains separate, which leads to the potential for differing interpretations among law enforcement agencies, affecting the justice process received by both the offender and the victim. The effectiveness of settling traffic accident cases through restorative justice has proven to be effective in resolving disputes peacefully, especially in cases of unintentional negligence. However, voluntary participation from both parties is crucial to its success. Although restorative justice has been applied in several cases in court, its implementation in Indonesia is not yet uniform and consistent. Certain cases, particularly those involving accidents with fatalities, still end in prison sentences.
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP PELAKU NOODWEER DALAM TINDAK PIDANA PEMBUNUHAN Ekky Saputra; Maryano, Maryano; Hedwig Adianto Mau
Journal of Innovation Research and Knowledge Vol. 4 No. 10: Maret 2025
Publisher : Bajang Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53625/jirk.v4i10.9856

Abstract

As a manifestation of the principle of the rule of law, every criminal act, referred to in the Indonesian Penal Code (Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana or KUHP) as a criminal offense (delict), can only be resolved through the applicable legal mechanisms, namely criminal law. An individual may be acquitted of charges if proven not guilty or if the act of violence was committed in self-defense, as regulated under Article 49 of the KUHP, commonly known as "noodweer". The theories employed in this study include the theory of legal protection and the theory of justice. Additionally, the author provides a general review of evidence and noodweer based on various sources.This study adopts a normative juridical research approach. The author utilizes the statute approach and case approach, relying on legal materials derived from secondary data, which consist of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials. The data collected through library research is then analyzed descriptively.The findings of this study indicate that the legal provisions for individuals acting in noodweer in cases of homicide refer to Article 49(1) of the KUHP. This provision regulates "emergency defense" or "forced defense" (noodweer) carried out to protect oneself, others, morality, or property from an imminent and unlawful attack or threat of attack. The forms of legal protection granted to individuals acting in noodweer in cases of homicide align with the principle of justice in criminal law, which emphasizes a balance between individual rights protection and legal interests. These forms of legal protection include: Exemption from punishment (strafuitsluitingsgrond), The right to present a defense in court, The right to legal assistance, and Judicial considerations in rendering a verdict, where judges have the discretion to assess whether an act qualifies as noodweer or falls under the category of noodweer excess (excessive self-defense).
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM ATAS LPG 3 KG BERSUBSIDI: UPAYA PREVENTIF TERHADAP PENYALAHGUNAAN OLEH PELAKU USAHA Wanti, Tiara Yuliana; Maryano, Maryano; Achmad Fitrian
Journal of Innovation Research and Knowledge Vol. 5 No. 3: Agustus 2025
Publisher : Bajang Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Fenomena penyalahgunaan tabung gas LPG 3 kilogram bersubsidi oleh pelaku usaha di Indonesia menciptakan tantangan besar dalam implementasi kebijakan perlindungan konsumen. Meskipun subsidi ini dirancang untuk membantu masyarakat miskin, praktik ilegal seperti pengoplosan, penjualan di atas harga eceran tertinggi, dan distribusi yang tidak tepat sasaran masih sering terjadi. Fenomena ini menimbulkan risiko keamanan bagi konsumen dan memengaruhi keadilan distribusi subsidi. Penelitian ini mengguganakan dua teori yaitu: Teori Perlindungan Hukum digunakan untuk menjelaskan bagaimana menjaga ketertiban, ketentraman, dan memastikan hak-hak individu dilindungi dari kesewenang-wenangan. dan Teori Tanggung Jawab Hukum digunakan untuk bagaimana menetapkan dan menentukan siapa yang bertanggung jawab secara hukum atas suatu perbuatan atau tindakan yang merugikan pihak lain, sehingga dapat diterapkan sanksi atau kewajiban hukum yang sesuai. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penyalahgunaan LPG bersubsidi oleh pelaku usaha meliputi berbagai bentuk, seperti pengoplosan isi tabung, distribusi ke konsumen yang tidak berhak, dan penimbunan untuk meningkatkan harga jual. Praktik-praktik ini melanggar peraturan distribusi yang telah ditetapkan dan menimbulkan risiko keamanan, kerugian ekonomi, serta ketidakadilan bagi konsumen miskin yang menjadi target subsidi. Perlindungan hukum preventif dapat dilakukan melalui penguatan pengawasan distribusi menggunakan teknologi digital, seperti sistem berbasis data penerima manfaat untuk memastikan subsidi tepat sasaran. Edukasi masyarakat terkait hak konsumen dan bahaya penyalahgunaan LPG juga menjadi salah satu upaya preventif untuk memberi pemahaman terhadap masyarakat mengenai penggunaan LPG bersubsidi yang aman.
KEPASTIAN HUKUM DALAM PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI TERKAIT UJI FORMIL Ratib, Victor Albadi’u; Hedwig Adianto Mau; Maryano, Maryano
Journal of Innovation Research and Knowledge Vol. 5 No. 4: September 2025
Publisher : Bajang Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Since its establishment, the Constitutional Court of Indonesia has been instrumental in upholding the supremacy of the 1945 Constitution through its constitutional review mechanism. While initially focusing on the substantive aspects of legislation, the Court has progressively extended its scrutiny to include the formal constitutionality of the lawmaking process. This study adopts a normative juridical approach, employing statutory, case, conceptual, and analytical methods. Legal materials were gathered from primary, secondary, and tertiary sources and analyzed through grammatical, systematic, and teleological interpretation. The research finds that the Constitutional Court has evolved from a moderate stanceprioritizing legal continuity—to a more assertive role in guarding procedural legitimacy, particularly through the introduction of the concept of conditional unconstitutionality. Recent jurisprudence, however, demonstrates a pragmatic approach wherein laws are annulled only if procedural violations are deemed substantial and infringe upon democratic principles such as representation and public participation. Decisions No. 27/PUU-VII/2009, No. 91/PUU-XVIII/2020, and No. 132/PUU-XXII/2024 reflect the Court’s increasing commitment to ensuring that legislative procedures align with constitutional standards. These developments reinforce the principle that procedural compliance is not merely formalistic, but essential to the legitimacy of democratic lawmaking and the realization of legal certainty in Indonesia.
TANGGUNG JAWAB NOTARIS DALAM PEMBUATAN AKTA PERJANJIAN PENGIKATAN JUAL BELI TANAH YANG MENGATUR KLAUSUL JUAL BELI DENGAN HAK MEMBELI KEMBALI Novena, Elisabeth; Maryano, Maryano; Putra Hutomo
Journal of Innovation Research and Knowledge Vol. 5 No. 5 (2025): Oktober 2025
Publisher : Bajang Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

A notary holds an essential role in drafting the Land Sale and Purchase Binding Agreement (PPJB). Issues arise regarding the buy back clause as regulated in the Indonesian Civil Code (KUHPerdata). De facto, this clause is no longer relevant following the enactment of the Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA). In practice, it is found that notaries sometimes prepare PPJBs whose provisions contradict agrarian law principles and are disguised as loan agreements. This research examines two main issues: (1) What are the legal consequences of a PPJB deed that regulates a sale and purchase agreement with a buy-back clause? (2) What are the responsibilities of a notary in drafting a PPJB deed that includes a sale and purchase agreement with a buy back clause? The analysis in this research employs the Theory of Legal Consequences by R. Soeroso and the Theory of Legal Responsibility by Hans Kelsen. The method used in this research is normative juridical research, especially Library Law research or secondary data with primary, secondary and tertiary sources of law. The research approaches used include legislative approaches, case studies, conceptual, and analytical methodologies. And the method of collecting such legal materials is carried out by identifying and inventorying positive law, journals and other sources of law. The method used in analyzing the material of grammatical laws and systematic interpretation. The research findings indicate that a Land Sale and Purchase Binding Agreement (PPJB) containing a buy back clause is null and void by law, as it contradicts agrarian law and is misused as a loan agreement A notary who fails to ensure the conformity of the deed with the actual facts may be held administratively and civilly liable under the Articles 84 and 85 of Indonesian Notary Law (UUJN). Therefore, notaries are obliged to provide legal counseling and exercise due diligence to prevent the misuse of PPJB, and regulators should amend Article 17 of the UUJN concerning the prohibition for notaries, specifically prohibiting notaries from drafting a PPJB of land with a buy-back clause.
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI KEPADA PEKERJA TERHADAP PENGABAIANHAK GANTI RUGI DALAM PEMUTUSAN HUBUNGAN KERJA Fitri, Aidil; Maryano, Maryano; Achmad Fitrian
Journal of Innovation Research and Knowledge Vol. 5 No. 10 (2026): Maret 2026
Publisher : Bajang Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Dalam ketentuan Pasal 62 Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2003 Tentang Ketenagakerjaan mengatur mengenai pemberian ganti rugi karena pemutusan kontrak kerja. Prakteknya, perusahaan tidak menjalankan ganti rugi kepada pekerja yang diakhiri hubungan kerjanya dengan menyalahi aturan hukum ketenagakerjaan sebagaimana yang terdapat dalam ketiga kasus dalam penelitian ini. Hal tersebut tentunya merugikan bagi pekerja. Rumusan dalam penelitian ini yaitu Bagaimana akibat hukum terhadap perusahaan atas pengabaian ganti rugi dalam pemutusan kontrak kerja? serta Bagaimana perlindungan hukum kepada pekerja atas tidak dibayarkannya ganti rugi dalam pemutusan kontrak kerja? Dari hasil penelitian dapat diperoleh bahwa Akibat hukum bagi perusahaan atas tindakan pemutusan kontrak kerja terhadap pekerja dengan menyalahi aturan hukum ketenagakerjaan akan menimbulkan suatu hak-hak bagi pekerja yaitu perusahaan wajib membayar ganti rugi kepada pekerja sebesar upah pekerja/buruh sampai batas waktu berakhirnya jangka waktu perjanjian kerja. Perlindungan terhadap pekerja yang diputus kontrak kerjanya sebelum perjanjian kerja berakhir berupa perlindungan hukum represif yaitu pekerja berhak untuk melakukan upaya hukum non litigasi atau litigasi yaitu berupa Bipatrit, Tripartit dan mengajukan gugatan ke Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial bahkan pekerja juga dapat mengajukan eksekusi terhadap putusan Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial.
Co-Authors Achmad Fitrian Agil, Marwan Agus Wicaksono Susanto Aidil Fitri, Aidil Akbar, Muhammad Aulia Akkapin , Supaphorn Akkapin, Supaphorn Alam, Dippo Alan, Alan Robert White Anggraeni, RR Dewi Arianti, Nofalinda Chandra, Tofik Yanuar Dandel, Lukman Syafri Darodjat, Tubagus Achmad Dharmansyah, Moh. Irwan Diana, Anisa Roshda Dwi Budi Santoso Ekky Saputra Ekwanto, Hafiz Nur Erich, Erich Fuspitasari, Nova Hedwig Adianto Mau Hendri, Fahzal Herwibowo, Bambang Hajar Hutomo, Putra Iqbal, Mochamad Ismed, Mohamad Kendati, Cynthia Kirana, Claradyta Koto, Zulkarnein Krisna Murti Kristiawanto, Kristiawanto Kumeang, Indira Assadiyah Lingga, Win Salamsyah Martanti, Yurisa Mau, Hedwig A Mau, Hedwig A. Mochammad Imron Awalludin Mustafa, Marni Emmy Mustofa, Marni Emmy Nara, Vicheth Naser, Andi Natalius, Natalius Nianzah, Raodha Putri Ningsih, Eci Marisna Novena, Elisabeth Purba, Reni Putra Hutomo Rahmansyah, Fuad Ratib, Victor Albadi’u Rattanapun , Supot Rattanapun, Supot Soesilo, Soesilo Somajaipeng , Kacha Sriwiyati, Kati Syafri Hariansah Trapsilo, Lier Budhi TW, Gatut Hendro Wanti, Tiara Yuliana Widodo, Gatut Hendro Tri Yuhelson Yuhelson Yusuf Hasibuan, Fauzie Zaenudin, Aa Muhamad ZULKARNAIN, DEBI