Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
6.771
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn) Tadris: Jurnal keguruan dan Ilmu Tarbiyah Jurnal English Education: Jurnal Tadris Bahasa Inggris PREMISE: Journal of English Education and Applied Linguistics JURNAL ILMIAH PENDIDIKAN FISIKA AL BIRUNI JPS Unimus IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature LENSA (Lentera Sains): Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat MIPA dan Pendidikan MIPA Tarbawi : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan PENDIPA Journal of Science Education Diklabio: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Biologi KONSTAN - JURNAL FISIKA DAN PENDIDIKAN FISIKA BIOEDUSAINS: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi dan Sains Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat UNSIQ BIOSFER : Jurnal Biologi dan Pendidikan Biologi as-sibyan : Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini Jurnal Pengabdian Al-Ikhlas JURNAL PENDIDIKAN MIPA KARST : Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Terapannya JPPIPA (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA) IJECA (International Journal of Education and Curriculum Application) Spizaetus: Jurnal Biologi dan Pendidikan Biologi Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Sains (JPFS) Oryza : Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Experiment: Journal of Science Education Jurnal Riset dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Jurnal Pijar MIPA DIKSAINS : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Sains JIFP (Jurnal Ilmu Fisika dan Pembelajarannya) Al Kawnu : Science and Local Wisdom Journal Edu Research : Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan JRFES DEDIKASI : Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Konstruktivisme : Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran HiJaSE (Hamzanwadi Journal of Science Education) Meta: Journal of Science and Technological Education Indonesian Journal of Science and Education RANGGUK: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat
Ogi Danika Pranata
Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kerinci
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemistry Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Energy Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Immunology & microbiology Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 53 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : PENDIPA Journal of Science Education

 1 
Analisis Tingkat Kejenuhan Siswa Sebelum, Selama, dan Setelah Pembelajaran Sains Amel Fadillah; Ogi Danika Pranata; Lia Angela
PendIPA Journal of Science Education Vol 8 No 1 (2024): February
Publisher : UNIB Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33369/pendipa.8.1.1-9

Abstract

This research aimed to reveal and compare students' levels of boredom before, during, and after science learning, utilizing a quantitative approach with descriptive and comparative methods. The study included a sample of 188 students from MTsN 1 Sungai Penuh City, selected through purposive sampling. Data on student boredom during science learning were collected using the Academic Emotions Questionnaire: Class Related. This questionnaire comprises 80 statements, with 23 for before, 43 for during, and 14 for after participating in science learning. Each statement offers five alternative responses, ranging from strongly agree to strongly disagree. Subsequently, the collected data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and analysis of variance (ANOVA). The research findings indicate that students' overall boredom in science learning falls within the medium category—before (2.14), during learning (2.55), and after science learning (2.40). ANOVA testing revealed a significant difference in boredom levels before, during, and after science learning. Notably, the highest saturation occurred during learning, followed by after and before learning. These results emphasize the need for teachers to consider discussions for each learning condition and factors contributing to student boredom when designing learning experiences. The ultimate goal is to minimize the level of boredom in science learning.
Motivasi Belajar Siswa Pada Pembelajaran Sains: Studi Komparasi Pada Tiga Sekolah Deka Hermiati; Ogi Danika Pranata; Hendra Lardiman
PendIPA Journal of Science Education Vol 8 No 1 (2024): February
Publisher : UNIB Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33369/pendipa.8.1.17-26

Abstract

This research aimed to provide a general overview of students' learning motivation in science at the junior high school level and to compare the level of learning motivation among students from three different schools: SMPN 27 Kerinci, MTsN 1 Sungai Penuh, and MTsS Siulak in the 2023/2024 Academic Year. The sample for this research consisted of 72 students, with 24 students from each school. The research utilized descriptive and comparative methods. Data on students' learning motivation were collected through the Students' Adaptive Learning Engagement in Science Questionnaire and analyzed descriptively and comparatively using the Kruskal-Wallis test. The results indicate that, overall, students exhibit high motivation to learn science, scoring 4.10 on a scale of 5.00. Additionally, students from the three different schools also demonstrated high average learning motivation, with scores of 4.26 (SMP N 27 Kerinci), 4.15 (MTsS Siulak), and 4.01 (MTsN 1 Sungai Penuh). Despite these differences, the Kruskal-Wallis statistical test revealed that the variations were not statistically significant (ρ=0.09). Furthermore, when examining each indicator separately, only one indicator, namely self-regulation (ρ=0.008), showed a significant difference. This distinction in self-regulation was influenced by students' perceptions regarding tasks in science learning, including their views on effort, persistence, punctuality, and a lack of discrimination regarding the form of tasks to be completed.
Co-Authors Adelia, Ismi Ajani, Syairifah Mila Akhmad Jufriadi Amel Fadillah Cahyani, Vivi Dinda Choirul Huda Dady Sulaiman Darwata, Siti Riva Deka Hermiati Deny Ferdiansah Dewi, Mustika Sandra Emayulia Sastria Erniyati, Yelni Evi Lorita, Evi Fadilah, Retno Ferdiansah, Deny Fujiani, Dwi Gusvina, Fadilla Hartono, Rodi Haryanto, Toni Hena Dian Ayu Hendra Lardiman Herayati Herayati Herayati, Herayati Hofifah Anzalina Indah Kencanawati Indah Kencanawati Indah Kencanawati Ismi Adelia Juniyati, Sintia Kusayang, Titin Lia Angela Lia Yuliati M, Novinovrita Marshal, Nobel Mulyani , Dewi Nigita, Silvia Noperma, Noperma Noperta Noperta Noperta, Noperta Nur Sakinah Nurfaizah, Dayang Puspa Cantika Riana Putri Dwi Sundari Putri, Atila Ledia Putri, Diska Hunafa Putri, Melani Tasya Putri, Nazila Wilia Ramadani, Ramadani Rizki, Ririn Melia Saputri, Utari Aulia Tianda Sari, Salsabila Dwita Febri Satrianti, Elza Seprianto Seprianto Seprianto Seprianto Seprianto, Seprianto Sifa Lasira Aprilia Siska Ulandari Siska Ulandari Susanti, Sela Tiara, Tiara Toni Haryanto Ulandari, Siska Wartono Wartono Wike Trisnawati Yulisna, Gita Zebua, Dinyah Rizki Yanti