Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
6.771
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn) Tadris: Jurnal keguruan dan Ilmu Tarbiyah Jurnal English Education: Jurnal Tadris Bahasa Inggris PREMISE: Journal of English Education and Applied Linguistics JURNAL ILMIAH PENDIDIKAN FISIKA AL BIRUNI JPS Unimus IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature LENSA (Lentera Sains): Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat MIPA dan Pendidikan MIPA Tarbawi : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan PENDIPA Journal of Science Education Diklabio: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Biologi KONSTAN - JURNAL FISIKA DAN PENDIDIKAN FISIKA BIOEDUSAINS: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi dan Sains Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat UNSIQ BIOSFER : Jurnal Biologi dan Pendidikan Biologi as-sibyan : Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini Jurnal Pengabdian Al-Ikhlas JURNAL PENDIDIKAN MIPA KARST : Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Terapannya JPPIPA (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA) IJECA (International Journal of Education and Curriculum Application) Spizaetus: Jurnal Biologi dan Pendidikan Biologi Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Sains (JPFS) Oryza : Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Experiment: Journal of Science Education Jurnal Riset dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Jurnal Pijar MIPA DIKSAINS : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Sains JIFP (Jurnal Ilmu Fisika dan Pembelajarannya) Al Kawnu : Science and Local Wisdom Journal Edu Research : Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan JRFES DEDIKASI : Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Konstruktivisme : Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran HiJaSE (Hamzanwadi Journal of Science Education) Meta: Journal of Science and Technological Education Indonesian Journal of Science and Education RANGGUK: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat
Ogi Danika Pranata
Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kerinci
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemistry Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Energy Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Immunology & microbiology Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 53 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Jurnal Pijar MIPA

 1 
Science Learning Motivation Among Students at Junior and Senior High Schools in Sungai Penuh: A Comparative Study Satrianti, Elza; Pranata, Ogi Danika; Tiara, Tiara
Jurnal Pijar Mipa Vol. 19 No. 1 (2024): January 2024
Publisher : Department of Mathematics and Science Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, University of Mataram. Jurnal Pijar MIPA colaborates with Perkumpulan Pendidik IPA Indonesia Wilayah Nusa Tenggara Barat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/jpm.v19i1.6101

Abstract

Student motivation in science learning has significantly changed during the pandemic. Consequently, it is crucial to trace how student motivation in science has evolved. This study uses a descriptive and comparative research approach to obtain a general overview of students' science learning motivation and compare the levels of student learning motivation, providing a comprehensive overview of student motivation at different educational levels. The total sample size for this study is 104 students, selected using purposive sampling techniques from two schools, junior high school (madrasa) 1 and senior high school 1 Sungai Penuh. A questionnaire on students' motivation for learning science, adapted from a previous study, was utilized to collect student motivation data. Student responses were converted into quantitative data using a Likert Scale of 1 to 5. The collected data were processed and analyzed using descriptive and Mann-Whitney U-test statistics. The results reveal a significant difference in the motivation for learning science between senior high school 1 and junior high school (madrasa) 1 students. The group of students from senior high school 1 exhibited a higher level of science learning motivation than those from junior high school (madrasa) 1. When comparing indicators, no significant differences were found in the motivation of students from junior high school (madrasa) 1 and senior high school 1 Sungai Penuh for learning goal orientation, self-efficacy, and self-regulation. The difference in motivation indicators was only significant in task value. These findings can guide classroom teachers in refocusing their teaching practices and assessing the effectiveness of intervention programs. Exploring other factors across various subjects and school levels is also recommended to gain a more comprehensive understanding of the variations in student learning experiences.
Students Perception of Science and Technology in Science Learning: A Gender Comparative Study Putri, Atila Ledia; Pranata, Ogi Danika; Sastria, Emayulia
Jurnal Pijar Mipa Vol. 19 No. 1 (2024): January 2024
Publisher : Department of Mathematics and Science Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, University of Mataram. Jurnal Pijar MIPA colaborates with Perkumpulan Pendidik IPA Indonesia Wilayah Nusa Tenggara Barat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/jpm.v19i1.6153

Abstract

Teachers face a dilemma. On the one hand, science and technology significantly benefit students, providing greater opportunities for future generations. On the other hand, students' interest in science and technology continues to decrease. The rapid advance of science and technology also widens inequities and enhances gender differences. Understanding students' perceptions of technology in learning, especially science, and their daily lives is necessary. The research employs both descriptive and comparative methods as its primary methodologies. The descriptive method provides an overview of students' perceptions of science and technology. The comparative method helps uncover differences in students' perceptions based on gender. The study encompasses 200 participants from a junior high school in Kerinci. This research utilized the "My Opinions about Science and Technology" questionnaire. The questionnaire was translated into Indonesian and formatted into an online survey using Google Forms. It comprises 16 research statements about science and technology designed to collect essential data, employing a 4-point scale response. The Independent Samples T-test, facilitated by SPSS, compared male and female perceptions of science and technology. The descriptive statistics reveal that the average student perception is 3.06. Based on the level of each student, no students are categorized as having a low level of perception of science and technology. Based on gender, female students exhibit an average perception of 3.02, and males display an average of 3.11. Based on the mean or average values, it can be concluded that there is a difference in the average perception between female and male students, with male students showing a higher perception of science and technology than female students. The independent samples t-test results confirm that the average perception of females regarding science and technology is lower than that of males, with a mean difference of -0.093 on a 4-point scale. The disparity in perception based on gender was found to be statistically significant. Male students have a higher percentage of high-level perception compared to female students. Males exhibit high perceptions regarding the development of scientific theories, the impact of science and technology on environmental problems, and the potential for science and technology to improve life, create more interesting jobs and help eradicate poverty and famine. The theoretical and practical implications of these results are discussed.
Co-Authors Adelia, Ismi Ajani, Syairifah Mila Akhmad Jufriadi Amel Fadillah Cahyani, Vivi Dinda Choirul Huda Dady Sulaiman Darwata, Siti Riva Deka Hermiati Deny Ferdiansah Dewi, Mustika Sandra Emayulia Sastria Erniyati, Yelni Evi Lorita, Evi Fadilah, Retno Ferdiansah, Deny Fujiani, Dwi Gusvina, Fadilla Hartono, Rodi Haryanto, Toni Hena Dian Ayu Hendra Lardiman Herayati Herayati Herayati, Herayati Hofifah Anzalina Indah Kencanawati Indah Kencanawati Indah Kencanawati Ismi Adelia Juniyati, Sintia Kusayang, Titin Lia Angela Lia Yuliati M, Novinovrita Marshal, Nobel Mulyani , Dewi Nigita, Silvia Noperma, Noperma Noperta Noperta Noperta, Noperta Nur Sakinah Nurfaizah, Dayang Puspa Cantika Riana Putri Dwi Sundari Putri, Atila Ledia Putri, Diska Hunafa Putri, Melani Tasya Putri, Nazila Wilia Ramadani, Ramadani Rizki, Ririn Melia Saputri, Utari Aulia Tianda Sari, Salsabila Dwita Febri Satrianti, Elza Seprianto Seprianto Seprianto Seprianto Seprianto, Seprianto Sifa Lasira Aprilia Siska Ulandari Siska Ulandari Susanti, Sela Tiara, Tiara Toni Haryanto Ulandari, Siska Wartono Wartono Wike Trisnawati Yulisna, Gita Zebua, Dinyah Rizki Yanti