Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 24 Documents
Search

Fatwā on The Ruling of Hajj Without Taṣrīh; The Case of Indonesian Hajj Pilgrims in 2024 Maram, Ahmad Nabilul; Said, Imam Ghazali; Tutik, Titik Triwulan
AL-IHKAM: Jurnal Hukum & Pranata Sosial Vol. 19 No. 2 (2024)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia IAIN Madura collaboration with The Islamic Law Researcher Association (APHI)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19105/al-lhkam.v19i2.15437

Abstract

Compliance with government regulations and religious fatwas is essential to ensure the legality and safety of the hajj pilgrimage. However, performing hajj without a taṣrīh (official visa) has become a significant issue, particularly for Indonesian pilgrims with long waiting periods for official visas. This study examines the perspectives of religious scholars and fatwā institutions on the validity of hajj without taṣrīh factors that contribute to non-compliance and policy recommendations for Indonesian and Saudi authorities to address these violations. Using a qualitative case study approach, the research includes direct observation, in-depth interviews, and thematic analysis to explore the reasons and experiences of unauthorized pilgrims while depicting the perspectives of religious authorities and community leaders. Findings reveal that taṣrīh violations involve various actors, including individual pilgrims, public officials, and religious leaders like kiai, who use their influence to facilitate unauthorized hajj. Conflicting fatwas from authorities such as Nahdlatul Ulama, Muhammadiyah, and Hay'ah Kibār al-ʻUlamā’ add complexity to the issue. This study highlights the need for harmonized fatwā issuance and enhanced education on the implications of unauthorized hajj. Policy recommendations aim to improve compliance, align Sharia law with government regulations, and ensure a safe, orderly pilgrimage.
Diskursus tentang Kebolehan Jamak Salat dalam Hadis Perspektif Sunni dan Syiah Roihana Purnamasari, Umi Nashiroh; Said, Imam Ghazali
Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Ushuluddin Vol 5, No 1 (2025): Januari
Publisher : Faculty of Ushuluddin UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/jpiu.41345

Abstract

This article discusses the comparison of the permissibility of combining prayers according to the hadith from the perspective of Sunni and Shia, two major schools of thought in Islam. This study aims to discuss the hadith basis that underpins the practice of combining prayers, both in emergency situations and outside of emergency situations, according to the interpretations of both sects.The method used is qualitative analysis through literature review, such as hadith books, books containing the views of prominent scholars from each school of thought, articles and related scientific works. The research results show that the Sunni school generally permits combining prayers under certain conditions such as travel, rain, or emergencies, based on hadiths narratedā by the Prophet's companions. Meanwhile, the Shia school of thought is more flexible in allowing combining prayers, not limited to emergency conditions, based on the traditions of the Infallible Imams. This comprehensive research reveals that the differences in perspective are rooted in the methodological approaches to hadis interpretation and the mechanisms of authority legitimation in legal determination.
Diskursus tentang Kebolehan Jamak Salat dalam Hadis Perspektif Sunni dan Syiah Roihana Purnamasari, Umi Nashiroh; Said, Imam Ghazali
Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Ushuluddin Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025): Januari
Publisher : Faculty of Ushuluddin UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/jpiu.41345

Abstract

This article discusses the comparison of the permissibility of combining prayers according to the hadith from the perspective of Sunni and Shia, two major schools of thought in Islam. This study aims to discuss the hadith basis that underpins the practice of combining prayers, both in emergency situations and outside of emergency situations, according to the interpretations of both sects.The method used is qualitative analysis through literature review, such as hadith books, books containing the views of prominent scholars from each school of thought, articles and related scientific works. The research results show that the Sunni school generally permits combining prayers under certain conditions such as travel, rain, or emergencies, based on hadiths narratedā by the Prophet's companions. Meanwhile, the Shia school of thought is more flexible in allowing combining prayers, not limited to emergency conditions, based on the traditions of the Infallible Imams. This comprehensive research reveals that the differences in perspective are rooted in the methodological approaches to hadis interpretation and the mechanisms of authority legitimation in legal determination.
A Comparative Study of the Number of Iqamah in Hadith: Sunni and Shia Perspectives Zahri, Ahmad Fauzan; Afifah, Alvin; Said, Imam Ghazali; Khoshyatulloh, Arfedin Hamas
Ishlah: Jurnal Ilmu Ushuluddin, Adab dan Dakwah Vol. 6 No. 1 (2024): Juni
Publisher : Fakultas Ushuluddin, Adab dan Dakwah IAIN Kerinci

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32939/ishlah.v6i1.328

Abstract

This study discusses the number of iqamah phrases contained in the Sunni and Shia perspectives. Iqamah has a purpose as a marker in the implementation of prayer to prepare and close the safes. In practice, there are different variations in the number of numbers in the iqamah sentences. This difference occurs between the Sunni and Shia schools of thought because both have different hadith sources as references in the implementation of the iqamah. The research method used is descriptive comparative with the type of research applied is library research. The main sources of literature in this study are Kutub al-Tis‘ah, Uṣūl al-Kāfī and Furū' al-Kāfī. The results show that there are differences in the tradition of iqamah between the two schools of thought. Iqamah has different origins in the Sunni and Shia schools. According to the Sunnis, the iqamah originated from the dream of ‘Abdullāh ibn Zayd which was later confirmed by the Prophet, and the Shias believe that the iqamah is a revelation delivered from the Angel Gabriel. Then in terms of the number of iqamah numbers, Sunnis have three different variations of the number of iqamah, namely the opinion that says 17 sentences, 11 sentences, and 10 sentences. While the Shia argue that the iqamah has 17 sentences, but the content is different from the Sunni school and there is an additional sentence of Ḥayya ‘Alā Khair al-‘Amal which is different from Sunni. Abstrak. Penelitian ini membahas mengenai jumlah bilangan frasa iqamah yang terdapat dalam hadis perspektif Sunni dan Syiah. Iqamah memiliki tujuan sebagai penanda dalam pelaksanaan shalat untuk mempersiapkan dan merapatkan shaf. Pada praktiknya, terdapat perbedaan variasi jumlah bilangan dalam kalimat-kalimat iqamah. Perbedaan ini terjadi di antara mazhab Sunni dan Syiah dikarenakan keduanya memiliki sumber hadis yang berbeda sebagai rujukan dalam pelaksanaan iqamah. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah deskriptif komparatif dengan jenis penelitian yang diterapkan adalah riset kepustakaan (library research). Sumber literatur utama dalam penelitian ini adalah Kutub al-Tis‘ah, Uṣūl al-Kāfī dan Furū‘ al-Kāfī. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa adanya perbedaan tradisi iqamah di antara dua mazhab tersebut. Iqamah mempunyai asal-usul yang berbeda di mazhab Sunni dan Syiah. Menurut Sunni, iqamah berasal dari mimpi ‘Abdullāh ibn Zaid yang kemudian dibenarkan oleh Nabi saw., dan Syiah meyakini bawah iqamah adalah wahyu yang disampaikan dari Malaikat Jibril. Kemudian dari segi jumlah bilangan iqamah, Sunni memiliki 3 variasi jumlah iqamah yang berbeda, yaitu pendapat yang mengatakan 17 kalimat, 11 kalimat, dan 10 kalimat. Sedangkan Syiah berpendapat bahwa iqamah memiliki 17 kalimat, namun isinya berbeda dengan mazhab Sunni dan terdapat tambahan kalimat Ḥayya ‘Alā Khair al-‘Amal yang berbeda dengan Sunni.
The Political Precedence of Wong Cilik’s Collective Historical Memory over the 2024 Election Santosa, Nyong Eka Teguh Iman; Zuhdi DH, Achmad; Said, Imam Ghazali
An-Nur International Journal of Islamic Thought Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): AIJIT-JUNE
Publisher : Yayasan Pesantren Mahasiswa An-Nur

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62032/aijit.v3i1.70

Abstract

تركز هذه المقالة على سؤالين رئيسيين: كيف هي الذاكرة التاريخية الجماعية لوونغ سيليك (wong cilik) فيما يتعلق بالتنافس الانتخابي في الانتخابات الرئاسية لعام 2019 وما هي السوابق السياسية الموجودة لتنفيذ الانتخابات العامة لعام 2024. ويستند النقاش إلى البيانات التي تم جمعها على أرض الواقع في ثلاث مناطق/مدن: سورابايا، وسيدوارجو، وبانجكالان. يتخذ هذا البحث نهج التاريخ السياسي. تشير نتائج الدراسة إلى أن الأشخاص من الطبقة الدنيا (وونغ سيليك) يتمتعون بنضج سياسي كافٍ، كما يتضح من عرض الذاكرة التاريخية والنظر في المشاركة في الانتخابات المقبلة. لا ينبغي المبالغة في التأثير السلبي لمناورة الزواج السياسي بين المرشحين المتنافسين في عام 2019 على مستوى المشاركة السياسية. تظل ثقة القاعدة الشعبية وتوقعاتها في العملية الديمقراطية عالية.
Differences in The Practice of Qunut Before and After Rukuk: Analytical Studies in the Shafi'i, Maliki, and Hanbali Schools Arofah, Fajriyatul; Ghazali Said, Imam
Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Ushuluddin Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): April
Publisher : Faculty of Ushuluddin UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/jpiu.41805

Abstract

This research aims to examine the differences in the practice of the qunut prayer before and after the bowing (rukuk) in prayer based on the views of the three main Islamic jurisprudence schools, namely the Shafi'i, Maliki, and Hanbali schools. This study also explores the historical background, legal arguments, and the relevance of the practice in the context of contemporary Islamic worship. The research approach used is qualitative with a library research. The purpose of this descriptive-comparative study was to identify the similarities and differences among the three schools of thinking about qunut practice. The results of the extensive inquiry show that, although qunut is not recommended in the Hanbali school, it is done during the Fajr prayer before rukuk in the Maliki school and after rukuk in the Shafi'i school. This analysis concludes that variations in qunut practice are significantly influenced by historical contexts and hadith interpretations. Future research should concentrate on how social dynamics and regional norms affect the acceptance and use of qunut in contemporary Muslim communities.
Reexamining The First Hijrah as A Foundation for Ethical Pluralism in Ethiopia Imam, Mohammad Fuyudun Ni'am; Imam Ghazali Said; Ahmad Nabilul Maram; Achmad Zainulloh Hamid
MUSLIM HERITAGE Vol 10 No 1 (2025): Muslim Heritage: Jurnal Dialog Islam dengan Realitas
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Kiai Ageng Muhammad Besari Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21154/muslimheritage.v10i1.11183

Abstract

Abstract This article revisits the First Hijrah to Abyssinia and the Muslim community’s engagement with the Christian kingdom of Najāshī as a foundational narrative for ethical pluralism and shared political sovereignty within Islamic thought. In contrast to conventional historiography that marginalizes Islam’s role in Ethiopia’s state formation, this study foregrounds the early interfaith alliance between Muslim migrants and their Christian host, King Najāshī. Drawing on classical sources such as Ibn Hishām, al-Sarakhsī, and al-Shāfiʿī, the article reconstructs the legal and ethical discourse surrounding Muslim military involvement in Najāshī’s defense. It critiques traditional jurisprudential interpretations that condition Muslim solidarity on Najāshī’s conversion to Islam and instead emphasizes a paradigm of mutual protection founded on trust and civic responsibility. By contextualizing this episode within Ethiopia’s religious historiography and political tensions, the study challenges nationalist and colonial narratives that erase Muslim agency. The findings advocate for reviving this legacy of interfaith coexistence as a model for ethical citizenship in plural societies—affirming the right to live together through a shared commitment to justice rather than doctrinal uniformity.   Abstrak Artikel ini meninjau kembali peristiwa Hijrah Pertama ke Habasyah dan keterlibatan komunitas Muslim dengan kerajaan Kristen Najāshī sebagai narasi dasar bagi pluralisme etis dan kedaulatan politik bersama dalam tradisi pemikiran Islam. Berbeda dengan historiografi konvensional yang meminggirkan peran Islam dalam pembentukan negara di Ethiopia, kajian ini menyoroti aliansi antaragama pada masa awal antara para migran Muslim dan tuan rumah Kristen mereka, Raja Najāshī. Dengan merujuk pada sumber-sumber klasik seperti Ibn Hishām, al-Sarakhsī, dan al-Shāfiʿī, artikel ini merekonstruksi wacana hukum dan etika mengenai keterlibatan militer Muslim dalam membela Najāshī. Tulisan ini mengkritisi pandangan fikih tradisional yang menggantungkan legitimasi solidaritas Muslim pada konversi Najāshī ke dalam Islam, dan justru menekankan paradigma perlindungan timbal balik yang didasarkan pada rasa saling percaya dan tanggung jawab sipil. Dengan membingkai episode ini dalam lanskap historiografi keagamaan dan ketegangan politik di Ethiopia, studi ini menantang representasi nasionalis dan kolonial yang menghapus agensi Muslim. Temuan artikel ini menegaskan pentingnya menghidupkan kembali warisan koeksistensi lintas iman tersebut sebagai model kewargaan etis dalam masyarakat plural, yang menegaskan hak untuk hidup berdampingan melalui komitmen bersama terhadap keadilan, bukan melalui keseragaman doktrinal. Keywords: Abyssinia; Ethical pluralism; Ethiopia; Interfaith relations; Islamic political ethics
Reexamining The First Hijrah as A Foundation for Ethical Pluralism in Ethiopia Imam, Mohammad Fuyudun Ni'am; Imam Ghazali Said; Ahmad Nabilul Maram; Achmad Zainulloh Hamid
MUSLIM HERITAGE Vol 10 No 1 (2025): Muslim Heritage: Jurnal Dialog Islam dengan Realitas
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Kiai Ageng Muhammad Besari Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21154/muslimheritage.v10i1.11183

Abstract

Abstract This article revisits the First Hijrah to Abyssinia and the Muslim community’s engagement with the Christian kingdom of Najāshī as a foundational narrative for ethical pluralism and shared political sovereignty within Islamic thought. In contrast to conventional historiography that marginalizes Islam’s role in Ethiopia’s state formation, this study foregrounds the early interfaith alliance between Muslim migrants and their Christian host, King Najāshī. Drawing on classical sources such as Ibn Hishām, al-Sarakhsī, and al-Shāfiʿī, the article reconstructs the legal and ethical discourse surrounding Muslim military involvement in Najāshī’s defense. It critiques traditional jurisprudential interpretations that condition Muslim solidarity on Najāshī’s conversion to Islam and instead emphasizes a paradigm of mutual protection founded on trust and civic responsibility. By contextualizing this episode within Ethiopia’s religious historiography and political tensions, the study challenges nationalist and colonial narratives that erase Muslim agency. The findings advocate for reviving this legacy of interfaith coexistence as a model for ethical citizenship in plural societies—affirming the right to live together through a shared commitment to justice rather than doctrinal uniformity.   Abstrak Artikel ini meninjau kembali peristiwa Hijrah Pertama ke Habasyah dan keterlibatan komunitas Muslim dengan kerajaan Kristen Najāshī sebagai narasi dasar bagi pluralisme etis dan kedaulatan politik bersama dalam tradisi pemikiran Islam. Berbeda dengan historiografi konvensional yang meminggirkan peran Islam dalam pembentukan negara di Ethiopia, kajian ini menyoroti aliansi antaragama pada masa awal antara para migran Muslim dan tuan rumah Kristen mereka, Raja Najāshī. Dengan merujuk pada sumber-sumber klasik seperti Ibn Hishām, al-Sarakhsī, dan al-Shāfiʿī, artikel ini merekonstruksi wacana hukum dan etika mengenai keterlibatan militer Muslim dalam membela Najāshī. Tulisan ini mengkritisi pandangan fikih tradisional yang menggantungkan legitimasi solidaritas Muslim pada konversi Najāshī ke dalam Islam, dan justru menekankan paradigma perlindungan timbal balik yang didasarkan pada rasa saling percaya dan tanggung jawab sipil. Dengan membingkai episode ini dalam lanskap historiografi keagamaan dan ketegangan politik di Ethiopia, studi ini menantang representasi nasionalis dan kolonial yang menghapus agensi Muslim. Temuan artikel ini menegaskan pentingnya menghidupkan kembali warisan koeksistensi lintas iman tersebut sebagai model kewargaan etis dalam masyarakat plural, yang menegaskan hak untuk hidup berdampingan melalui komitmen bersama terhadap keadilan, bukan melalui keseragaman doktrinal. Keywords: Abyssinia; Ethical pluralism; Ethiopia; Interfaith relations; Islamic political ethics
Resiliensi Santri: Studi Internet Addiction pada Generasi Alpha Subahri, Bambang; Said, Imam Ghazali
Jurnal Psikologi Integratif Vol. 13 No. 1 (2025): Psikologi Integratif
Publisher : UIN Sunan Kalijaga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/jpsi.v13i1.3236

Abstract

This research examines the academic resilience of Alpha generation students who experience internet addiction, with a focus on the impact of digital technology on their psychological development in the Islamic boarding school environment. In addition, this study also seeks to understand the mechanism of students’ resilience in fighting the challenges of internet addiction, to support their personality development and achievement in the digital era. This study uses a qualitative case study approach to explore factors such as social support, coping skills, religiosity, and Islamic boarding school values ​​that offer solutions based on Islamic psychology to strengthen the mental resilience of students in the digital era. The conclusion of this study states that internet addiction among students has a significant impact on their ability to adapt to more discipline and limited access to technology in Islamic boarding school life. Dependence on the internet causes students to feel isolated, anxious, and frustrated which hinders their resilience in facing academic and social challenges in a new environment. However, Islamic Boarding Schools address this problem with character-building programs that emphasize discipline and responsibility and provide Islamic guidance and counselling services that help identify and overcome internet addiction, as well as alternative facilities such as sports. Arts are also offered to distract students from excessive internet use, support the development of interests and talents, and strengthen their academic resilience.Penelitian ini mengkaji resiliensi akademik santri generasi Alpha yang mengalami kecanduan internet, dengan fokus pada dampak teknologi digital terhadap perkembangan psikologis mereka di lingkungan pondok pesantren. Selain itu, penelitian ini juga berupaya memahami mekanisme resiliensi santri dalam menghadapi tantangan kecanduan internet, guna mendukung perkembangan kepribadian dan pencapaian prestasi mereka di era digital. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif studi kasus untuk mengeksplorasi faktor-faktor seperti dukungan sosial, keterampilan coping, religiusitas dan nilai kepesantrenan yang menawarkan solusi berbasis psikologi islam untuk memperkuat ketahanan mental. Kesimpulan dari penelitian ini menyatakan bahwa kecanduan internet di kalangan santri, menunjukkan dampak signifikan terhadap kemampuan mereka untuk beradaptasi dengan kehidupan pesantren yang lebih disiplin dan terbatas akses teknologi. Ketergantungan pada internet menyebabkan santri merasa terisolasi, cemas dan frustrasi yang menghambat resiliensi mereka dalam menghadapi tantangan akademik dan sosial di lingkungan yang baru. Namun demikian, Pondok Pesantren mengatasi masalah ini dengan program pembinaan karakter yang menekankan disiplin dan tanggung jawab, serta menyediakan layanan bimbingan dan konseling islam yang membantu mengidentifikasi serta mengatasi kecanduan internet, juga fasilitas alternatif seperti olahraga dan seni juga diberikan untuk mengalihkan perhatian santri dari penggunaan internet berlebihan, mendukung pengembangan minat dan bakat, serta memperkuat resiliensi akademik mereka.
ḌAʿĪF JIDDAN VS. MAWḌŪʿ: A COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT OF ḤADĪTH BY IBN AL-JAWZĪ IN AL-MAWḌŪʿĀT AND AL-ʿIRĀQĪ IN AL-MUGHNĪ ʿAN ḤAML AL-ASFĀR FĪ AL-ASFĀR Mas'ud, Marwan Mas'ud; Imam Ghazali Said; Mohammed Alghiffar Alwalid
Al-Majaalis : Jurnal Dirasat Islamiyah Vol 13 No 1 (2025): AL-MAJAALIS : JURNAL DIRASAT ISLAMIYAH
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Dirasat Islamiyah Imam Syafi'i Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37397/al-majaalis.v13i1.1130

Abstract

This study explores the methodological differences in ḥadīth classification between al-ʿIrāqī and Ibn al-Jawzī, prompted by the broader discourse on the authenticity of Islamic traditions. The research primarily compares five aḥādīth judged as ḍaʿīf jiddan by al-ʿIrāqī and as mawḍūʿ by Ibn al-Jawzī, focusing on their distinct approaches in evaluating isnād and matn. A secondary focus lies in examining al-ʿIrāqī’s precision in takhrīj and isnād analysis versus Ibn al-Jawzī’s critical stance toward unreliable transmitters and implausible texts. This qualitative, descriptive-comparative study adopts a library-based approach and deductive reasoning, relying on primary and secondary sources within the discipline of jarḥ wa-taʿdīl. The research aims to determine which scholar's assessment aligns more accurately with the standards of ḥadīth criticism. The findings reveal that one narration concerning the virtue of bread is more appropriately classified as ḍaʿīf jiddan, while the remaining four about ʿUmar ibn al-Khaṭṭāb’s virtues, curbing desires, bringing goods from the market, and generosity are best regarded as mawḍūʿ. These results highlight the richness of the ḥadīth critical tradition and affirm that ḥadīth authority in Islam must rest on rigorous scholarly verification, balancing both isnād reliability and matn coherence.