Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

A Comparative Study of the Number of Iqamah in Hadith: Sunni and Shia Perspectives Zahri, Ahmad Fauzan; Afifah, Alvin; Said, Imam Ghazali; Khoshyatulloh, Arfedin Hamas
Ishlah: Jurnal Ilmu Ushuluddin, Adab dan Dakwah Vol. 6 No. 1 (2024): Juni
Publisher : Fakultas Ushuluddin, Adab dan Dakwah IAIN Kerinci

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32939/ishlah.v6i1.328

This study discusses the number of iqamah phrases contained in the Sunni and Shia perspectives. Iqamah has a purpose as a marker in the implementation of prayer to prepare and close the safes. In practice, there are different variations in the number of numbers in the iqamah sentences. This difference occurs between the Sunni and Shia schools of thought because both have different hadith sources as references in the implementation of the iqamah. The research method used is descriptive comparative with the type of research applied is library research. The main sources of literature in this study are Kutub al-Tis‘ah, Uṣūl al-Kāfī and Furū' al-Kāfī. The results show that there are differences in the tradition of iqamah between the two schools of thought. Iqamah has different origins in the Sunni and Shia schools. According to the Sunnis, the iqamah originated from the dream of ‘Abdullāh ibn Zayd which was later confirmed by the Prophet, and the Shias believe that the iqamah is a revelation delivered from the Angel Gabriel. Then in terms of the number of iqamah numbers, Sunnis have three different variations of the number of iqamah, namely the opinion that says 17 sentences, 11 sentences, and 10 sentences. While the Shia argue that the iqamah has 17 sentences, but the content is different from the Sunni school and there is an additional sentence of Ḥayya ‘Alā Khair al-‘Amal which is different from Sunni. Abstrak. Penelitian ini membahas mengenai jumlah bilangan frasa iqamah yang terdapat dalam hadis perspektif Sunni dan Syiah. Iqamah memiliki tujuan sebagai penanda dalam pelaksanaan shalat untuk mempersiapkan dan merapatkan shaf. Pada praktiknya, terdapat perbedaan variasi jumlah bilangan dalam kalimat-kalimat iqamah. Perbedaan ini terjadi di antara mazhab Sunni dan Syiah dikarenakan keduanya memiliki sumber hadis yang berbeda sebagai rujukan dalam pelaksanaan iqamah. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah deskriptif komparatif dengan jenis penelitian yang diterapkan adalah riset kepustakaan (library research). Sumber literatur utama dalam penelitian ini adalah Kutub al-Tis‘ah, Uṣūl al-Kāfī dan Furū‘ al-Kāfī. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa adanya perbedaan tradisi iqamah di antara dua mazhab tersebut. Iqamah mempunyai asal-usul yang berbeda di mazhab Sunni dan Syiah. Menurut Sunni, iqamah berasal dari mimpi ‘Abdullāh ibn Zaid yang kemudian dibenarkan oleh Nabi saw., dan Syiah meyakini bawah iqamah adalah wahyu yang disampaikan dari Malaikat Jibril. Kemudian dari segi jumlah bilangan iqamah, Sunni memiliki 3 variasi jumlah iqamah yang berbeda, yaitu pendapat yang mengatakan 17 kalimat, 11 kalimat, dan 10 kalimat. Sedangkan Syiah berpendapat bahwa iqamah memiliki 17 kalimat, namun isinya berbeda dengan mazhab Sunni dan terdapat tambahan kalimat Ḥayya ‘Alā Khair al-‘Amal yang berbeda dengan Sunni.

The Political Precedence of Wong Cilik’s Collective Historical Memory over the 2024 Election Santosa, Nyong Eka Teguh Iman; Zuhdi DH, Achmad; Said, Imam Ghazali
An-Nur International Journal of Islamic Thought Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): AIJIT-JUNE
Publisher : Yayasan Pesantren Mahasiswa An-Nur

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62032/aijit.v3i1.70

تركز هذه المقالة على سؤالين رئيسيين: كيف هي الذاكرة التاريخية الجماعية لوونغ سيليك (wong cilik) فيما يتعلق بالتنافس الانتخابي في الانتخابات الرئاسية لعام 2019 وما هي السوابق السياسية الموجودة لتنفيذ الانتخابات العامة لعام 2024. ويستند النقاش إلى البيانات التي تم جمعها على أرض الواقع في ثلاث مناطق/مدن: سورابايا، وسيدوارجو، وبانجكالان. يتخذ هذا البحث نهج التاريخ السياسي. تشير نتائج الدراسة إلى أن الأشخاص من الطبقة الدنيا (وونغ سيليك) يتمتعون بنضج سياسي كافٍ، كما يتضح من عرض الذاكرة التاريخية والنظر في المشاركة في الانتخابات المقبلة. لا ينبغي المبالغة في التأثير السلبي لمناورة الزواج السياسي بين المرشحين المتنافسين في عام 2019 على مستوى المشاركة السياسية. تظل ثقة القاعدة الشعبية وتوقعاتها في العملية الديمقراطية عالية.

Differences in The Practice of Qunut Before and After Rukuk: Analytical Studies in the Shafi'i, Maliki, and Hanbali Schools Arofah, Fajriyatul; Ghazali Said, Imam
Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Ushuluddin Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): April
Publisher : Faculty of Ushuluddin UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/jpiu.41805

This research aims to examine the differences in the practice of the qunut prayer before and after the bowing (rukuk) in prayer based on the views of the three main Islamic jurisprudence schools, namely the Shafi'i, Maliki, and Hanbali schools. This study also explores the historical background, legal arguments, and the relevance of the practice in the context of contemporary Islamic worship. The research approach used is qualitative with a library research. The purpose of this descriptive-comparative study was to identify the similarities and differences among the three schools of thinking about qunut practice. The results of the extensive inquiry show that, although qunut is not recommended in the Hanbali school, it is done during the Fajr prayer before rukuk in the Maliki school and after rukuk in the Shafi'i school. This analysis concludes that variations in qunut practice are significantly influenced by historical contexts and hadith interpretations. Future research should concentrate on how social dynamics and regional norms affect the acceptance and use of qunut in contemporary Muslim communities.

Reexamining The First Hijrah as A Foundation for Ethical Pluralism in Ethiopia Imam, Mohammad Fuyudun Ni'am; Imam Ghazali Said; Ahmad Nabilul Maram; Achmad Zainulloh Hamid
MUSLIM HERITAGE Vol 10 No 1 (2025): Muslim Heritage: Jurnal Dialog Islam dengan Realitas
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Kiai Ageng Muhammad Besari Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21154/muslimheritage.v10i1.11183

Abstract This article revisits the First Hijrah to Abyssinia and the Muslim community’s engagement with the Christian kingdom of Najāshī as a foundational narrative for ethical pluralism and shared political sovereignty within Islamic thought. In contrast to conventional historiography that marginalizes Islam’s role in Ethiopia’s state formation, this study foregrounds the early interfaith alliance between Muslim migrants and their Christian host, King Najāshī. Drawing on classical sources such as Ibn Hishām, al-Sarakhsī, and al-Shāfiʿī, the article reconstructs the legal and ethical discourse surrounding Muslim military involvement in Najāshī’s defense. It critiques traditional jurisprudential interpretations that condition Muslim solidarity on Najāshī’s conversion to Islam and instead emphasizes a paradigm of mutual protection founded on trust and civic responsibility. By contextualizing this episode within Ethiopia’s religious historiography and political tensions, the study challenges nationalist and colonial narratives that erase Muslim agency. The findings advocate for reviving this legacy of interfaith coexistence as a model for ethical citizenship in plural societies—affirming the right to live together through a shared commitment to justice rather than doctrinal uniformity. Abstrak Artikel ini meninjau kembali peristiwa Hijrah Pertama ke Habasyah dan keterlibatan komunitas Muslim dengan kerajaan Kristen Najāshī sebagai narasi dasar bagi pluralisme etis dan kedaulatan politik bersama dalam tradisi pemikiran Islam. Berbeda dengan historiografi konvensional yang meminggirkan peran Islam dalam pembentukan negara di Ethiopia, kajian ini menyoroti aliansi antaragama pada masa awal antara para migran Muslim dan tuan rumah Kristen mereka, Raja Najāshī. Dengan merujuk pada sumber-sumber klasik seperti Ibn Hishām, al-Sarakhsī, dan al-Shāfiʿī, artikel ini merekonstruksi wacana hukum dan etika mengenai keterlibatan militer Muslim dalam membela Najāshī. Tulisan ini mengkritisi pandangan fikih tradisional yang menggantungkan legitimasi solidaritas Muslim pada konversi Najāshī ke dalam Islam, dan justru menekankan paradigma perlindungan timbal balik yang didasarkan pada rasa saling percaya dan tanggung jawab sipil. Dengan membingkai episode ini dalam lanskap historiografi keagamaan dan ketegangan politik di Ethiopia, studi ini menantang representasi nasionalis dan kolonial yang menghapus agensi Muslim. Temuan artikel ini menegaskan pentingnya menghidupkan kembali warisan koeksistensi lintas iman tersebut sebagai model kewargaan etis dalam masyarakat plural, yang menegaskan hak untuk hidup berdampingan melalui komitmen bersama terhadap keadilan, bukan melalui keseragaman doktrinal. Keywords: Abyssinia; Ethical pluralism; Ethiopia; Interfaith relations; Islamic political ethics

Reexamining The First Hijrah as A Foundation for Ethical Pluralism in Ethiopia Imam, Mohammad Fuyudun Ni'am; Imam Ghazali Said; Ahmad Nabilul Maram; Achmad Zainulloh Hamid
MUSLIM HERITAGE Vol 10 No 1 (2025): Muslim Heritage: Jurnal Dialog Islam dengan Realitas
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Kiai Ageng Muhammad Besari Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21154/muslimheritage.v10i1.11183

Abstract This article revisits the First Hijrah to Abyssinia and the Muslim community’s engagement with the Christian kingdom of Najāshī as a foundational narrative for ethical pluralism and shared political sovereignty within Islamic thought. In contrast to conventional historiography that marginalizes Islam’s role in Ethiopia’s state formation, this study foregrounds the early interfaith alliance between Muslim migrants and their Christian host, King Najāshī. Drawing on classical sources such as Ibn Hishām, al-Sarakhsī, and al-Shāfiʿī, the article reconstructs the legal and ethical discourse surrounding Muslim military involvement in Najāshī’s defense. It critiques traditional jurisprudential interpretations that condition Muslim solidarity on Najāshī’s conversion to Islam and instead emphasizes a paradigm of mutual protection founded on trust and civic responsibility. By contextualizing this episode within Ethiopia’s religious historiography and political tensions, the study challenges nationalist and colonial narratives that erase Muslim agency. The findings advocate for reviving this legacy of interfaith coexistence as a model for ethical citizenship in plural societies—affirming the right to live together through a shared commitment to justice rather than doctrinal uniformity. Abstrak Artikel ini meninjau kembali peristiwa Hijrah Pertama ke Habasyah dan keterlibatan komunitas Muslim dengan kerajaan Kristen Najāshī sebagai narasi dasar bagi pluralisme etis dan kedaulatan politik bersama dalam tradisi pemikiran Islam. Berbeda dengan historiografi konvensional yang meminggirkan peran Islam dalam pembentukan negara di Ethiopia, kajian ini menyoroti aliansi antaragama pada masa awal antara para migran Muslim dan tuan rumah Kristen mereka, Raja Najāshī. Dengan merujuk pada sumber-sumber klasik seperti Ibn Hishām, al-Sarakhsī, dan al-Shāfiʿī, artikel ini merekonstruksi wacana hukum dan etika mengenai keterlibatan militer Muslim dalam membela Najāshī. Tulisan ini mengkritisi pandangan fikih tradisional yang menggantungkan legitimasi solidaritas Muslim pada konversi Najāshī ke dalam Islam, dan justru menekankan paradigma perlindungan timbal balik yang didasarkan pada rasa saling percaya dan tanggung jawab sipil. Dengan membingkai episode ini dalam lanskap historiografi keagamaan dan ketegangan politik di Ethiopia, studi ini menantang representasi nasionalis dan kolonial yang menghapus agensi Muslim. Temuan artikel ini menegaskan pentingnya menghidupkan kembali warisan koeksistensi lintas iman tersebut sebagai model kewargaan etis dalam masyarakat plural, yang menegaskan hak untuk hidup berdampingan melalui komitmen bersama terhadap keadilan, bukan melalui keseragaman doktrinal. Keywords: Abyssinia; Ethical pluralism; Ethiopia; Interfaith relations; Islamic political ethics

Resiliensi Santri: Studi Internet Addiction pada Generasi Alpha Subahri, Bambang; Said, Imam Ghazali
Jurnal Psikologi Integratif Vol. 13 No. 1 (2025): Psikologi Integratif
Publisher : UIN Sunan Kalijaga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/jpsi.v13i1.3236

This research examines the academic resilience of Alpha generation students who experience internet addiction, with a focus on the impact of digital technology on their psychological development in the Islamic boarding school environment. In addition, this study also seeks to understand the mechanism of students’ resilience in fighting the challenges of internet addiction, to support their personality development and achievement in the digital era. This study uses a qualitative case study approach to explore factors such as social support, coping skills, religiosity, and Islamic boarding school values that offer solutions based on Islamic psychology to strengthen the mental resilience of students in the digital era. The conclusion of this study states that internet addiction among students has a significant impact on their ability to adapt to more discipline and limited access to technology in Islamic boarding school life. Dependence on the internet causes students to feel isolated, anxious, and frustrated which hinders their resilience in facing academic and social challenges in a new environment. However, Islamic Boarding Schools address this problem with character-building programs that emphasize discipline and responsibility and provide Islamic guidance and counselling services that help identify and overcome internet addiction, as well as alternative facilities such as sports. Arts are also offered to distract students from excessive internet use, support the development of interests and talents, and strengthen their academic resilience.Penelitian ini mengkaji resiliensi akademik santri generasi Alpha yang mengalami kecanduan internet, dengan fokus pada dampak teknologi digital terhadap perkembangan psikologis mereka di lingkungan pondok pesantren. Selain itu, penelitian ini juga berupaya memahami mekanisme resiliensi santri dalam menghadapi tantangan kecanduan internet, guna mendukung perkembangan kepribadian dan pencapaian prestasi mereka di era digital. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif studi kasus untuk mengeksplorasi faktor-faktor seperti dukungan sosial, keterampilan coping, religiusitas dan nilai kepesantrenan yang menawarkan solusi berbasis psikologi islam untuk memperkuat ketahanan mental. Kesimpulan dari penelitian ini menyatakan bahwa kecanduan internet di kalangan santri, menunjukkan dampak signifikan terhadap kemampuan mereka untuk beradaptasi dengan kehidupan pesantren yang lebih disiplin dan terbatas akses teknologi. Ketergantungan pada internet menyebabkan santri merasa terisolasi, cemas dan frustrasi yang menghambat resiliensi mereka dalam menghadapi tantangan akademik dan sosial di lingkungan yang baru. Namun demikian, Pondok Pesantren mengatasi masalah ini dengan program pembinaan karakter yang menekankan disiplin dan tanggung jawab, serta menyediakan layanan bimbingan dan konseling islam yang membantu mengidentifikasi serta mengatasi kecanduan internet, juga fasilitas alternatif seperti olahraga dan seni juga diberikan untuk mengalihkan perhatian santri dari penggunaan internet berlebihan, mendukung pengembangan minat dan bakat, serta memperkuat resiliensi akademik mereka.

DIFFERENTIATING THE HADITHS ON TABARRUK AT THE TOMB OF THE PROPHET AMONG SUNNIS IN THE BOOK OF MAFĀHIM AND AL-TABARRUK Prayogi, Ananda; Verawati, Sellyana; Said, Imam Ghazali; Bustomi, Achmad Wahid
Nabawi: Journal of Hadith Studies Vol 6, No 2 (2025): Nabawi: Journal of Hadith Studies
Publisher : LP2M Ma'had Aly Hasyim Asy'ari Pesantren Tebuireng

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55987/njhs.v6i2.293

Among Sunni Muslims—particularly between traditionalist and reformist circles—the practice of tabarruk at the Prophet’s tomb has remained a persistent source of controversy. The differing views, as seen between Nahdlatul Ulama and Wahhabi groups, reflect deeper tensions in understanding the legitimacy of such a practice. This issue is worth examining, as it highlights how variations in the interpretation of hadith shape religious perspectives within the Muslim community.This article aims to identify the differences in the use of hadith concerning tabarruk at the Prophet’s tomb by two prominent scholars: Sayyid Muḥammad ibn ʿAlawī al-Mālikī, representing the Sunni traditionalist perspective, and ʿAlī ibn Nāfiʿ al-ʿIlyānī, representing the Sunni reformist view. The study analyzes the hadiths each scholar employs as evidence, taking into account their authenticity, authority, interpretation, and the contextual factors underlying their differing positions.Using the methods of hadith criticism and ijmālī (holistic) understanding, this article reveals fundamental differences in their reasoning regarding tabarruk. The divergence lies not only in their choice of hadiths but also in how each relates the practice to societal behavior—whether deemed excessive or overly restrictive. Sayyid Muḥammad ibn ʿAlawī al-Mālikī argues that people are too quick to prohibit tabarruk, whereas ʿAlī ibn Nāfiʿ al-ʿIlyānī contends that the public tends to overindulge in it. In terms of validity, both hadiths used are authentic: the one cited by Sayyid Muḥammad is mauqūf al-sanad but marfūʿ al-ḥukm, while that cited by Shaykh ʿAlī ibn Nāfiʿ is marfūʿ. Both therefore carry equal argumentative strength.{Di kalangan Muslim Sunnī, khususnya antara kalangan tradisionalis dan reformis, praktik tabarruk dengan makam Nabi telah menjadi sumber kontroversi yang terus berlanjut. Perbedaan pandangan ini, seperti yang terlihat antara kelompok Nahdlatul Ulama dan Wahhabi, mencerminkan ketegangan dalam pemahaman terhadap praktik tersebut. Isu ini menjadi relevan untuk diteliti mengingat pentingnya memahami bagaimana perbedaan interpretasi hadis memengaruhi pandangan keagamaan di kalangan umat Islam. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi perbedaan penggunaan hadis tentang tabarruk dengan makam Nabi oleh dua tokoh besar, yaitu Sayyid Muḥammad ibn ’Alawī al-Mālikī yang mewakili perspektif Sunnī tradisionalis, dan ‘Ali ibn Nafi’ al-‘Ilyani yang mewakili Sunnī reformis. Penelitian ini menganalisis hadis-hadis yang mereka gunakan sebagai dalil, dengan mempertimbangkan aspek kesahihan, kehujahan, pemahaman mereka, serta faktor yang melatarbelakangi perbedaan ini. Dengan pendekatan kritik hadis dan pemahaman ijmālī, artikel ini mengungkapkan perbedaan mendasar dalam pendalilan kedua tokoh ini terhadap tabarruk dengan makam Nabi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa perbedaan ini tidak hanya terletak pada pemilihan hadis, tetapi juga pada cara keduanya menghubungkan praktik ini dengan respons terhadap perilaku masyarakat, yang dianggap berlebihan atau sebaliknya. Di satu sisi, Sayyid Muḥammad ibn ’Alawī al-Mālikī memandang masyarakat terlalu mudah mengharamkan tabarruk makam Nabi, sementara di sisi lain, ‘Ali ibn Nafi’ al-‘Ilyani menganggap masyarakat berlebihan dalam mempraktikkannya. Dari sisi validitas, kedua hadis yang digunakan adalah sahih, Hadis yang digunakan oleh Sayyid Muḥammad berstatus mauqūf al-sanad namun marfū‘ al-ḥukm, sedangkan hadis yang digunakan Syaikh ‘Alī ibn Nāfi’ berstatus marfū‘. Keduanya memiliki kekuatan argumentatif yang seimbang.}

Rethinking Javanese Sufism: From Ascetic Protest to Institutional Power Said, Imam Ghazali; Maram, Ahmad Nabilul; Muhdi, Muhdi
Teosofi: Jurnal Tasawuf dan Pemikiran Islam Vol. 15 No. 1 (2025): June
Publisher : Department of Aqidah and Islamic Philosophy, Faculty of Ushuluddin and Philosophy, Sunan Ampel State Islamic University Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15642/teosofi.2025.15.1.113-147

This article re-examines Javanese Sufism through the lenses of hierarchy, determinism, and free will, adding an explicit economic-political dimension often absent from earlier studies. Drawing on participant observations in three pesantren, semi-structured interviews, and textual analysis of classical and Javanese scholarship, the analysis showed how charismatic teachers and guides converted spiritual authority into material patronage networks, while disciples negotiated between Jabarī rhetoric and pragmatic agency. Two ideal types emerged: an ascetic current that framed free will as self-discipline and distance from power and a common, devotional current that sacralized the submission of the self through collective dhikr and pilgrimage economies. These two approaches can explain Sufism’s success in spreading Islam in Java and its current traction among economically marginal groups. By linking doctrinal debate with money flow, the study extends current scholarship on religion and social change and provides a framework for assessing governance and accountability in Sufi institutions. Sufi institutions are advised to adopt transparent budget disclosure and participatory decision-making so that charismatic authority is balanced by measurable good governance safeguards.

Teodemokrasi dalam Konsepsi Negara Islam: (Studi Komparasi Pemikiran Abu al-A’la Maududi dan Ayatullah Khomeini) Wafa Ilmi, Vika; Imam Ghazali Said; Zainal Fanani
Ta’wiluna: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur'an, Tafsir dan Pemikiran Islam Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): Ta’wiluna: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur’an, Tafsir dan Pemikiran Islam
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian, Penerbitan dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat (LP3M) IAIFA Kediri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58401/takwiluna.v6i1.1967

This research examines the thoughts of Abu al-A'la al-Maududi and Ayatollah Khomeini on theodemocracy in the Islamic state through a comparative study. Using a qualitative approach and literature research method, this study analyzes their primary works, particularly al-Hukumah al-Islamiyah, along with relevant secondary sources. The findings show that despite coming from different madhhab backgrounds - Sunni and Shia - both figures share fundamental views on the unity of Islam and state, as well as criticism of the secular Western democratic system. However, significant differences exist in their interpretation of theodemocracy, especially regarding state leadership. Maududi developed al-Hakimiyah al-Ilahiyah emphasizing collective sovereignty of the ummah, while Khomeini's Wilayah al-Faqih places ulama as the highest authority. These differences reflect in their proposed state structures: Maududi advocated classical trias politica, while Khomeini developed a system with Faqih as supreme supervisor. This research reveals that successful implementation of Islamic state concepts depends not only on ideological strength but also on compatibility with local socio-cultural and political contexts, as evidenced in Pakistan and Iran's experiences.

Doubts on the Hadith of Al-Thaqalayn in Sunni and Shia Perspective Rizaka, Maghza; Pratama, Ferdy; Said, Imam Ghazali
Jurnal Ilmiah Al-Mu'ashirah: Media Kajian Al-Qur'an dan Al-Hadits Multi Perspektif Vol. 21 No. 2 (2024)
Publisher : South East Asia Regional Intellectual Forum of Qoran Hadith (SEARFIQH)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22373/jim.v21i2.24745

The Hadith of al-Thaqalayn is one of the most significant hadiths in Islamic literature, particularly within Sunni and Shia traditions. This hadith states that the Prophet Muhammad (SAW) left behind two important things: the Qur'an and the Ahlul Bayt. This study examines various versions of the Hadith of al-Thaqalayn to determine its authenticity, interpretation, and implications for leadership in Islam. By comparing primary sources such as Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim and Uṣūl al-Kāfī, along with secondary literature, this research employs content analysis to identify textual variations, address doubts, and assess scholarly criticism of the Hadith of al-Thaqalayn. The findings reveal that despite differences in interpretation, both Sunni and Shia traditions emphasize the importance of adhering to the Qur'an and the Sunnah as the primary guides. The study also highlights the complexity of assessing the reliability of hadiths, demonstrating that even though some chains of transmission may be considered weak, the core message of adhering to the Qur'an and the teachings of the Prophet Muhammad remains vital. Additionally, the analysis discusses theological debates regarding the role of the Ahlul Bayt and provides a more comprehensive understanding of the Hadith of al-Thaqalayn within the context of Islamic scholarly tradition.

Title

Found 26 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 26 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 26 Documents
Search